The Lakers gave up 36 points in the third quarter!

 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Supa
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 08 Dec 2004
Posts: 2210

PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:12 pm    Post subject: The Lakers gave up 36 points in the third quarter!

And only scored 19 points. Supposedly, according to some, Kobe shot the Lakers out of the game in this quarter.

Tell me what happened in the second quarter when the Lakers only scored 18 points supposedly playing within the offense. That quarter they gave up a more respectable 22 points.

Are you telling me that Kobe's play is the reason the Lakers gave up 36 points in that third quarter? Is that really it? The guys didn't appreciate Kobe taking the majority of the the shots, so they decided to leave Manu wide open? Wasn't Manu Lamar's guy? So what? Is the main culprit Lamar?

I highly doubt that's the case. If it is, those players with that mentality need to be traded ASAP. It is just a fantasy created by fans upset that we got worked by a better team. Face it, we couldn't stop the Spurs in that third quarter. Their inside out game is too good, and they were nailing their outside shots.


Last edited by Supa on Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:20 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
JerryWest_44
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 22 May 2004
Posts: 25319

PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:14 pm    Post subject:

If there was one area that killed us tonite it was perimeter defense. The second problem was PG penetration.

Finley 21 pts
Gino 21 pts
Parker 21 pts

Nice defense Smush, Kobe, Sasha ...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
drzucchini
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 28 Sep 2002
Posts: 16327

PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:14 pm    Post subject:

1. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=supposedly

2. Their inside game wasn't dominant enough to warrant a double team on Duncan. Brown was playing adequate defense on him. Odom messed up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Supa
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 08 Dec 2004
Posts: 2210

PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:19 pm    Post subject:

drzucchini wrote:
1. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=supposedly

2. Their inside game wasn't dominant enough to warrant a double team on Duncan. Brown was playing adequate defense on him. Odom messed up.

Thanks. I'll edit ASAP. It's great we have guys like this one who correct our spelling mistakes!

Perhaps maybe Jackson should have called a timeout and adjusted? What's the point of watching all those three's drained with the same defensive strategy?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
cirehawk
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 08 Jun 2005
Posts: 5525

PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:26 pm    Post subject:

JerryWest_44 wrote:
If there was one area that killed us tonite it was perimeter defense. The second problem was PG penetration.

Finley 21 pts
Gino 21 pts
Parker 21 pts

Nice defense Smush, Kobe, Sasha ...


Ok, not to seem like a Kobe apologist. But let's see. The guy is suffering from a bad sinus infection the last 3 games. He's still playing over 40 minutes in those games. He's still averaging around 40 in those 3 games. He's shooting over 50 percent in those games. But I guess he's a slackard since he wasn't shutting those 3 guys down.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
cirehawk
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 08 Jun 2005
Posts: 5525

PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:27 pm    Post subject:

But I agree about Smush
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
drzucchini
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 28 Sep 2002
Posts: 16327

PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:29 pm    Post subject:

JerryWest_44 wrote:
Nice defense Smush, Kobe, Sasha ...


Try Odom.

Surprise!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
aiel
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 16 May 2001
Posts: 1211

PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:41 pm    Post subject:

Can't fully blame odom. WHen a team gets beat off the dribble, it sucks the defense in creating open perimeter shot. odom's not fast enough to recover to the open man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Supa
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 08 Dec 2004
Posts: 2210

PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:43 pm    Post subject:

Odom probably could have challenged Ginobili a little better. It was almost embarrassing to watch him shoot all those wide open 3 pointers we nobody near him. But, you also gotta consider that the Spurs system creates those wide open shots.

If you stay at home on their perimeter guys, either Duncan will get going, or Parker will start killing you on drives. If you double on Duncan or try to clog the lane to stop Parker, it'll leave some of their shooters open. There's a reason they've won a couple championships in the last few yeras.

Parker was killing us a couple years ago in the playoffs. I believe they adjusted by clogging the lane, leaving some of their shooters open. Parker was contained, the shooters couldn't make shots, and the Lakers went on to win four games in a row.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
osj
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 21 Jul 2003
Posts: 2819
Location: Singapore

PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:45 pm    Post subject:

the spuds have the best halfcourt offense in the league
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Laker_Dynasty
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 21 May 2001
Posts: 11831
Location: West LA

PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:19 am    Post subject:

I was there. Kobe didn't shoot the team out of the game in the 3rd quarter. When the lead built up to 9 from wide open jumpers from 20 ft and beyond and they were knocking down every one of them, the team should've made adjustments to that and stayed home on the shooters.

Of course, there's always a risk of opening more things up for Tim Duncan, the problem is that the Spurs were completely on fire and had SO much time to shoot. There were a few instances where everybody on the team was guilty of sagging back from their man a little too much. It's almost as if they had this mentality that they could recover so easily. End result was the Spurs pushing the lead to 18 at one point.

All-in-all, the team didn't necessarily come out "flat" in the 3rd, but they still don't know how to come out with a sense of urgency in the 3rd. It's been their M.O. the entire year. At halftime, I was really concerned about it because despite having a 2 point lead, I saw that the Spurs were still missing some wide-open, uncontested jumpers (still shooting above 50%) and had a feeling it would haunt the Lakers in the 2nd half. Sure enough, that's what happened.
_________________
Just chill and watch the new Dynasty evolve...

Time for the Lakers to create a whole new legacy! We want 10 more trophies boys!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB