Suns Lakers

 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> Trade and Free Agency Discussion Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
vicman
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 25 Jun 2005
Posts: 2379
Location: Arcadia

PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 8:52 am    Post subject: Suns Lakers

Suns don't want to pay Bledsoe and they are far apart on contract talks ship nash he can retire a sun as well as lin and sacre and Clarkson if we have to to the suns for Bledsoe maxed out. We could really use him and him and randle would make a nice young building block for the future at the same time put in a bid for boozer.

randle
boozer
davis
hill make a decent front court

Bledsoe kobe make a great backcourt all we would need is to find a way to get a sf somewhere that team gives us something to work with if we have to keep sacre and Clarkson keep them and send the rockets first instead
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Reply with quote
Reflexx
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 25 Jun 2005
Posts: 11163

PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 9:06 am    Post subject:

That will be great until Bledsoe gets injured and all we have to back him up is Marshall playing 48 minutes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
RMurphy_22
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 4193

PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:51 am    Post subject:

Is it possible that we can move Lin/Filler to PHX for a close to max Bledsoe?
_________________
Back to Back Yeah, Yeah...and you know that!
- Magic
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Hector the Pup
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 25 Jul 2002
Posts: 35946
Location: L.A.

PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 9:51 am    Post subject:

Possible, but not smart
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
vicman
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 25 Jun 2005
Posts: 2379
Location: Arcadia

PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 3:42 pm    Post subject:

Possible and very smart what would not be smart is if we included Randle unless we got Len and one of the Morris bothers back but Bledsoe is a great pickup as long as he doesn't cost us Randle.randle Bledsoe is something a max player would be willing to team up with
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Reply with quote
LALdynasty!
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 5037
Location: Torrance

PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 3:54 pm    Post subject:

http://www.lakersnation.com/lakers-rumors-eric-bledsoe-headed-to-los-angeles-in-blockbuster-trade/2014/07/19/

They better not trade Randle for him.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
vicman
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 25 Jun 2005
Posts: 2379
Location: Arcadia

PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 6:02 pm    Post subject:

I agree but they better trade for Bledsoe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Reply with quote
AirShooter
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 12 Jul 2014
Posts: 456

PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 9:07 pm    Post subject:

RMurphy_22 wrote:
Is it possible that we can move Lin/Filler to PHX for a close to max Bledsoe?

I doubt Sarver would take Lin. Sarver is a bit notorious for being a tightwad, like constantly selling his draft picks for money, or trading away higher cost players for cheaper ones or picks. There's no way he would pay Lin's extra salary that extends beyond the cap hit. Only rich franchise that don't care as much about money, like the Lakers, would. Sarver chooses money over winning, constantly selling his draft picks for cash. He worries more about profit and cost rather than putting a winning team together.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
DLaker
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 1536

PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 9:26 pm    Post subject:

Don't understand why the lakers will want to do this. We
could have outright offered Bledsoe the money, now we will lose Randle (7th pick), Hill and Houston's 1st also. Rotflmao. How one-sided is that trade. Has Bledsoe been an allstar before that it will cost 2 first rounders plus a very serviceable big man. That sun announcer should have never twitted a bogus rumor like this, it only makes him look bad. He should have processed the info and analyze that this is bogus. Does he think we want to go with this lineup.

Bledsoe, Nash, Lin
Kobe, X, Clarkson
Swaggy, Wesley
Boozer, Kelly
Davis, Sacre

How did this make our club better. When 6 bigs and Lin at point is much more promising going to next season.

Sorry for the vent
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
HAWAIIGUY27
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 2338
Location: Los Angeles, CA

PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 12:02 am    Post subject:

Nash + Hill + HOU 1st for Bledsoe + Len. Come on Mitch, make it happen! (JK, I realize that there's no chance in hell PHO takes this deal.)

Bledsoe/Lin/Clarkson
Bryant/Henry
Johnson/Young
Randle/Boozer/Kelly
Davis/Len/Sacre
_________________
In Rob I trust.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
dmorans1
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 11 Sep 2012
Posts: 11669

PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 1:03 am    Post subject:

Posted this pipe dream scenario in the FA Thread:

Trade Hill for a S&T Emeka at a 1 year 3 mil contract
Sign Young for 5 mil
We then have close to 3 mil in cap space, use it on someone (Marion?)
Trade Nash and HOU pick for Bledsoe at close to 14 mil starting salary
Sign Kelly, Wes, X, Davis, and Clarkson
Sign someone for the room exception (Sessions?)

Bledsoe/Lin/Sessions?
Kobe/X/Clarkson
Marion?/Swaggy/Wes
Randle/Boozer/Kelly
Emeka/Davis/Sacre

This is really a juggernaut of a team. We are 3 deep in every position.

Heck I created this team in 2k without Clarkson, Randle I had to improvise and used Carl Landry with Randle's attributes, rating, and style copied from a downloaded draft class. This team ranked 3rd in the League. That's with CHI having Pau, Cleveland having LeBron, and all the other moves. If Mitch can pull this off, WOW.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ribeye
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 10 Nov 2001
Posts: 12612

PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 6:02 am    Post subject:

RMurphy_22 wrote:
Is it possible that we can move Lin/Filler to PHX for a close to max Bledsoe?


So the Lakers receive a number one pick to take Lin off Houston's hands but Phoenix would give Bledsoe to receive him? If the Lakers pulled that off Mitch, et al, would be genius (or maybe Phoenix would be fools).
_________________
"A metronome keeps time by using a Ringo"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
unleasHell
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Apr 2001
Posts: 11591
Location: Stay Thirsty my Friends

PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 9:55 am    Post subject:

Only if the Suns take Nash back and give us our next years FR pick back...
_________________
“Always remember... Rumors are carried by haters, spread by fools, and accepted by idiots.”
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
The Shadow King
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 02 Apr 2011
Posts: 4363
Location: Dallas, Texas

PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 10:24 am    Post subject:

As long as it doesn't include Kobe or Randle, I'm fine with it.
_________________
Lakers, today. Lakers, tomorrow. Lakers, forever.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger Reply with quote
Cup-of-noodles
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 07 Jul 2010
Posts: 1696

PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2014 3:36 am    Post subject:

I don't like Sessions...how did he get into this roster??
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KobeDunk
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 26849

PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2014 7:02 am    Post subject:

No way we trade Randle! The kid is going to be a star, you could see it in his game but more importantly in his eyes! If Phx want to deal us Bledsoe they could have Nash back. But why would they do this? They own our pick so they would want us to do bad so they get the best possible lottery selection (above 5). Why would they give us Bledsoe and make the Lakers a better team?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lakurluv
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 17 May 2010
Posts: 2529

PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2014 7:14 am    Post subject:

I honestly think the Lakers are going to consider moving Hill, simply because of how much they paid him. Rightly so, I believe he earned his pay for dealing with the Likes of Mike Dantoni and Mike Brown. Hill could have been an even better player on this team, but that's behind us now and so are those horrible coaches.

Packaging Hill, Nash and the Houston Pick for Bledsoe would possibly be considered the best move of the off-season for this team. If this could be done, I think Lin would have to be thrown in IDK Clarkson should be considered.

Hill and Davis are redundant. They are technically the same player with about the same amount of skill set and will probably total out. So we get Davis the same player as Hill but Cheaper.

Since Monroe would be out of the conversation, we should look to add Turner at the 3 spot and then we're looking at a really versatile team.

Bledsoe/Clarkson
Kobe/Young/Henry
Turner/Johnson
Boozer/Randle/Kelly
Davis/Sacre

Now there's one more person we should add to this mix since Monroe is not in the picture. I believe we can get an equal quality player at a more affordable price on a 1 year possibly 2 year deal in Andray Blatche. Add him to that lineup and now we're talking possible future, youth, flexibility and diversity on a team that could make the playoffs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> Trade and Free Agency Discussion All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB