|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
DancingBarry
Editor-in-Chief
Joined: 07 Sep 2001
Posts: 40203
Location: O.C.
|
 Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| epak wrote: | Nash 16 / Lin 32 / Clarkson 0
Kobe 32 / Henry 16
Johnson 19 / Young 25 / Randle 4
Boozer 20 / Randle 16 / Kelly 12
Hill 20 / Davis 22 / Boozer 6 / Sacre 0 |
Looks like you're on the same page as the Lakers with Randle seeing some SF time. Their depth chart looks like:
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=ined1h&s=8#.U9g99fldWno
Here's what they have them penciled in at:
Lin, Nash, Clarkson
Kobe, Henry
Swaggy, Johnson, Randle
Boozer, Kelly, Davis, Randle
Hill, Sacre |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LakerLanny
Retired Number
Joined: 24 Oct 2001
Posts: 47581
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DancingBarry wrote: | | epak wrote: | Nash 16 / Lin 32 / Clarkson 0
Kobe 32 / Henry 16
Johnson 19 / Young 25 / Randle 4
Boozer 20 / Randle 16 / Kelly 12
Hill 20 / Davis 22 / Boozer 6 / Sacre 0 |
Looks like you're on the same page as the Lakers with Randle seeing some SF time. Their depth chart looks like:
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=ined1h&s=8#.U9g99fldWno
Here's what they have them penciled in at:
Lin, Nash, Clarkson
Kobe, Henry
Swaggy, Johnson, Randle
Boozer, Kelly, Davis, Randle
Hill, Sacre |
I would be surprised if they started Young just because of the defensive matchups.
I think Johnson is more likely to start at SF with Kobe and probably Nash starting in the backcourt.
Starters: Hill 30, Boozer 28, Johnson 14, Kobe 32, Nash 16
Bench: Davis 18 , Randle 20, Henry 14, Kelly 8, Young 28, Lin 32
Deep Bench: Clarkson, Sacre
_________________
Love, Laker Lanny |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chrisca91
Star Player
Joined: 06 Jan 2013
Posts: 3461
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Starters:
Lin 33 MPG - 14.8 ppg 5.3 AST 3.3 RB
Kobe 34 MPG - 25.3 PPG 4.7 AST 4.3 REB
Johnson - 20 MPG 8 PTS 4 REB 2 AST
Boozer - 25 MPG 13 PPG 8 REB
Hill - 22 MPG 11 PPG 9.1 REB |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
44TheLogo
Star Player
Joined: 21 Feb 2009
Posts: 6364
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DancingBarry wrote: | | epak wrote: | Nash 16 / Lin 32 / Clarkson 0
Kobe 32 / Henry 16
Johnson 19 / Young 25 / Randle 4
Boozer 20 / Randle 16 / Kelly 12
Hill 20 / Davis 22 / Boozer 6 / Sacre 0 |
Looks like you're on the same page as the Lakers with Randle seeing some SF time. Their depth chart looks like:
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=ined1h&s=8#.U9g99fldWno
Here's what they have them penciled in at:
Lin, Nash, Clarkson
Kobe, Henry
Swaggy, Johnson, Randle
Boozer, Kelly, Davis, Randle
Hill, Sacre |
I know that's what it says on the board but I think we're missing some kind of nuance with the way they've written things because there's no way Randle is behind Kelly and Davis at the 4. I think they've color coded the board as well, with red text suggesting Henry and Johnson can play both 2 and 3, and the green text suggesting Clarkson can play 1 and 2. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
King Randle
Star Player
Joined: 21 Jul 2014
Posts: 7313
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The reason Kelly is the odd man out is because Scott said you have to play defense if you're going to play for him. Kelly can't push anyone out of the paint that weighs more than 80 lbs. Boozer, Randle, Hill and Davis is sufficient to split 96 minutes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
greenfrog
Retired Number
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 36081
Location: 502 Bad Gateway
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 7:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| King Randle wrote: | | The reason Kelly is the odd man out is because Scott said you have to play defense if you're going to play for him. Kelly can't push anyone out of the paint that weighs more than 80 lbs. Boozer, Randle, Hill and Davis is sufficient to split 96 minutes. |
You do realize that nobody can play defense on this team? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pmacla
Star Player
Joined: 31 Aug 2012
Posts: 7849
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 7:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| King Randle wrote: | | The reason Kelly is the odd man out is because Scott said you have to play defense if you're going to play for him. Kelly can't push anyone out of the paint that weighs more than 80 lbs. Boozer, Randle, Hill and Davis is sufficient to split 96 minutes. |
Defense is about effort and wanting to play defense, Kelly always gives effort and will be suprised when he is asked to play defense how well he will do, he even stepped up last year to try to guard LeBron I think he is a great team player and will do whatever it takes to win and help the team |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
greenfrog
Retired Number
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 36081
Location: 502 Bad Gateway
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 7:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| LakerLanny wrote: | | DancingBarry wrote: | | epak wrote: | Nash 16 / Lin 32 / Clarkson 0
Kobe 32 / Henry 16
Johnson 19 / Young 25 / Randle 4
Boozer 20 / Randle 16 / Kelly 12
Hill 20 / Davis 22 / Boozer 6 / Sacre 0 |
Looks like you're on the same page as the Lakers with Randle seeing some SF time. Their depth chart looks like:
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=ined1h&s=8#.U9g99fldWno
Here's what they have them penciled in at:
Lin, Nash, Clarkson
Kobe, Henry
Swaggy, Johnson, Randle
Boozer, Kelly, Davis, Randle
Hill, Sacre |
I would be surprised if they started Young just because of the defensive matchups.
I think Johnson is more likely to start at SF with Kobe and probably Nash starting in the backcourt.
Starters: Hill 30, Boozer 28, Johnson 14, Kobe 32, Nash 16
Bench: Davis 18 , Randle 20, Henry 14, Kelly 8, Young 28, Lin 32
Deep Bench: Clarkson, Sacre |
My prediction is that Wes will eventually fall out favor and Randle with take all his minutes at the 3. I'm encouraged to see that at least they value Kelly more than Ed Freakin' Davis. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
greenfrog
Retired Number
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 36081
Location: 502 Bad Gateway
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| 44TheLogo wrote: | | DancingBarry wrote: | | epak wrote: | Nash 16 / Lin 32 / Clarkson 0
Kobe 32 / Henry 16
Johnson 19 / Young 25 / Randle 4
Boozer 20 / Randle 16 / Kelly 12
Hill 20 / Davis 22 / Boozer 6 / Sacre 0 |
Looks like you're on the same page as the Lakers with Randle seeing some SF time. Their depth chart looks like:
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=ined1h&s=8#.U9g99fldWno
Here's what they have them penciled in at:
Lin, Nash, Clarkson
Kobe, Henry
Swaggy, Johnson, Randle
Boozer, Kelly, Davis, Randle
Hill, Sacre |
I know that's what it says on the board but I think we're missing some kind of nuance with the way they've written things because there's no way Randle is behind Kelly and Davis at the 4. I think they've color coded the board as well, with red text suggesting Henry and Johnson can play both 2 and 3, and the green text suggesting Clarkson can play 1 and 2. |
The whole summer league looked like an audition for Randle at the 3 so that's not surprising. My guess on the color coding is that Henry and Johnson are battling for the same minutes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
King Randle
Star Player
Joined: 21 Jul 2014
Posts: 7313
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 7:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Davis, Hill, Johnson, Henry are above average defenders. Lin, Randle, Clarkson, young, Kobe and Boozer should all be able to rotate and cover areas with a defensive scheme. I'm looking forward to this season. Much more than the last 2 years |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LakerLanny
Retired Number
Joined: 24 Oct 2001
Posts: 47581
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| King Randle wrote: | | Davis, Hill, Johnson, Henry are above average defenders. Lin, Randle, Clarkson, young, Kobe and Boozer should all be able to rotate and cover areas with a defensive scheme. I'm looking forward to this season. Much more than the last 2 years |
That is what I am hoping for...some type of defensive coaching, effort and cohesion.
Without that, you have no chance and I am back to the Tank Thread.
_________________
Love, Laker Lanny |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
