| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
sogood.
Star Player
Joined: 17 Oct 2015
Posts: 1821
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Russell- 18ppg/5rbs/6asts
Clarkson- 17ppg/4.5rbs/3asts
Randle- 13ppg/11rbs/2asts
Ingram- 12ppg/4rbs/1.5asts
Nance- 8ppg/6rbs/1asts
Zubac- 4pts/3rbs/1blks (limited minutes) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Logo
Star Player
Joined: 25 Jul 2013
Posts: 9577
Location: Salem, OR
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 2:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Russell: 17/3/5, 1.5 steals on 45/38/77 shooting
Clarkson: 19/4/3, 1.3 steals on 45/36/81 shooting
Randle: 14/10/3 on 47/30/75 shooting
Ingram: 10/4/2, .8 steals on 43/35/73 shooting
Nance Jr: 8/6/2 1 steal, .8 blocks on 47/33/70 shooting
Black: 4/5 .5 blocks on 51/55 shooting
Zubac: 4/3 on 53/77 shooting
Brown: 5 PPG on 42/33/86 shooting |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MJST
Retired Number
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 26309
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I actually think Clarkson will break 20 ppg this season. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JJin77
Starting Rotation
Joined: 25 May 2016
Posts: 499
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Lakers95 wrote: | Russell: 16 PPG, 4 RPG, 6 APG
Ingram: 13 PPG, 5 RPG, 2 APG
Randle: 12 PPG, 11 RPG, 2 APG
Clarkson: 17 PPG, 3 RPG, 3 APG
Nance: 8 PPG, 5 RPG, 2 APG |
its prob. closest one to a reality.
i have russell at 17 pts and clarkson at 18. but at least one of them wont get enough touches to get there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
defense
Retired Number
Joined: 12 Jan 2010
Posts: 39445
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 4:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| How are those predictions looking going into all star break... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HOF Rookie
Star Player
Joined: 09 Jun 2015
Posts: 1717
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 5:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
True Ingram projections are way out of whack. I don't know if some people expected him to get more minutes to average 14 a game but to me, it's obvious his body isn't there for 35 minutes a game for 82. I figured he'd be in single digits scoring. I see him progressing so that's all I care about.
I overshot my projection on russell, I thought he would be shooting better than he is. I thought he would hit 19 a game. I also thought Randle would be averaging a double double, a low one but he's a couple rebounds shy of it.
I had no expectations from zubac. I figured Larry would average 5/4. His value isn't in his stats.
I thought clarkson would be averaging a few more points than where ha at. Not really impressed with what I've seen from him so far |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Wildchild027
Star Player
Joined: 17 Jul 2002
Posts: 3846
Location: A-T-L-A-N-T-A
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 7:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| defense wrote: | | How are those predictions looking going into all star break... |
Absolutely horrible. Ingram has been one of the worse rookies, and he is leading all rookies in minutes. Russell has a sight increase in scoring, but is shooting a slightly worse percentage. The only guy that has played better in my opinion is Randle. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tox
Franchise Player
Joined: 16 Nov 2015
Posts: 17876
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| defense wrote: | | How are those predictions looking going into all star break... |
At least I abstained from predicting Ingram.
My biggest miss was Clarkson, lol. Guess I was too much of a homer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dcarter4kobe
Franchise Player
Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Posts: 17668
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| dcarter4kobe wrote: | Russell 16/4/5 in 34MPG
JC 18/4/4 in 34MPG
Randle 14/11 in 30MPG
Ingram 12/5 in 28 MPG |
Welp. Was off on Ingram a lot. Thought I was predicting 10/4.
_________________
"He's a Zen master, so he can speak to you, and he doesn't need a microphone; you can hear him in your head, 'Ron, don't shoot, don't shoot.' Whatever, pow, three. I love the Zen, though." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Thugnomoe
Franchise Player
Joined: 19 Jul 2005
Posts: 14660
Location: unfortunately not Los Angeles anymore
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
should look at PER..
probably closer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
