| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
4stargeneralbulldog
Starting Rotation
Joined: 26 Aug 2012
Posts: 739
|
 Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2016 6:42 am Post subject: 4chan and /pol/ are launching Operation Google |
|
|
| Quote: | “Stinking Googles should be killed”: why 4chan is using a search engine as a racist slur
Users of the anonymous forum are targeting Google after the company introduced a programme for censoring abusive language.
“You were born a Google, and you are going to die a Google.”
Despite the lack of obscenity and profanity in this sentence, you have probably realised it was intended to be offensive. It is just one of hundreds of similar messages posted by the users of 4chan’s Pol board – an anonymous forum where people go to be politically incorrect. But they haven’t suddenly seen the error of their ways about using the n-word to demean their fellow human beings – instead they are trying to make the word “Google” itself become a racist slur. In an undertaking known as “Operation Google”, some 4chan users are resisting Google’s latest artificial intelligence program, Conversation AI, by swapping smears for the names of Google products. Conversation AI aims to spot and flag offensive language online, with the eventual possibility that it could automatically delete abusive comments. The famously outspoken forum 4chan, and the similar website 8chan, didn’t like this, and began their campaign which sees them refer to “Jews” as “Skypes”, Muslims as “Skittles”, and black people as “Googles”.
If it weren’t for the utterly abhorrent racism – which includes users conflating Google’s chat tool “Hangouts” with pictures of lynched African-Americans – it would be a genius idea. The group aims to force Google to censor its own name, making its AI redundant. Yet some have acknowledged this might not ultimately work – as the AI will be able to use contextual clues to filter out when “Google” is used positively or pejoratively – and their ultimate aim is now simply to make “Google” a racist slur as revenge.
If you're posting anything on social media, just casually replace n****rs/blacks with googles. Act as if it's already a thing,” wrote one anonymous user. “Ignore the company, just focus on the word. Casually is the important word here – don't force it. In a month or two, Google will find themselves running a company which is effectively called ‘n****r’. And their entire brand is built on that name, so they can't just change it.”
There is no doubt that Conversation AI is questionable to anyone who values free speech. Although most people desire a nicer internet, it is hard to agree that this should be achieved by blocking out large swathes of people, and putting the power to do so in the hands of one company. Additionally, algorithms can’t yet accurately detect sarcasm and humour, so false-positives are highly likely when a bot tries to identify whether something is offensive. Indeed, Wired journalist Andy Greenberg tested Conversation AI out and discovered it gave “I (bleep) you not” 98 out of 100 on its personal attack scale.
Yet these 4chan users have made it impossible to agree with their fight against Google by combining it with their racism. Google scores the word “moron” 99 out of 100 on its offensiveness scale. Had protestors decided to replace this – or possibly even more offensive words like “(bleep)” or “(bleep)” – with “Google”, pretty much everyone would be on board.
Some 4chan users are aware of this – and indeed it is important not to consider the site a unanimous entity. “You're just making yourselves look like idiots and ruining any legitimate effort to actually do this properly,” wrote one user, while some discussed their concerns that “normies” – ie. normal people – would never join in. Other 4chan users are against Operation Google as they see it as self-censorship, or simply just stupid.But anyone who disregards these efforts as the work of morons (or should that be Bings?) clearly does not understand the power of 4chan. The site brought down Microsoft’s AI Tay in a single day, brought the Unicode swastika (卐) to the top of Google’s trends list in 2008, hacked Sarah Palin’s email account, and leaked a large number of celebrity nudes in 2014. If the Ten Commandments were rewritten for the modern age and Moses took to Mount Sinai to wave two 16GB Tablets in the air, then the number one rule would be short and sweet: Thou shalt not mess with 4chan.
It is unclear yet how Google will respond to the attack, and whether this will ultimately affect the AI. Yet despite what ten years of Disney conditioning taught us as children, the world isn’t split into goodies and baddies. While 4chan’s methods are deplorable, their aim of questioning whether one company should have the power to censor the internet is not.
Google also hit headlines this week for its new “YouTube Heroes” program, a system that sees YouTube users rewarded with points when they flag offensive videos. It’s not hard to see how this kind of crowdsourced censorship is undesirable, particularly again as the chance for things to be incorrectly flagged is huge. A few weeks ago, popular YouTubers also hit back at censorship that saw them lose their advertising money from the site, leading #YouTubeIsOverParty to trend on Twitter. Perhaps ultimately, 4chan didn't need to go on a campaign to damage Google's name. It might already have been doing a good enough job of that itself. |
http://www.newstatesman.com/science-tech/internet/2016/09/stinking-googles-should-be-killed-why-4chan-using-search-engine-racist |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Reflexx
Franchise Player
Joined: 25 Jun 2005
Posts: 11163
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2016 8:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
...or they could just not use Google products.
What a bunch of Yahoos. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ringfinger
Retired Number
Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 29418
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2016 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It won't work unless it reaches semi-mass adoption.
But it is clever. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Huey Lewis & The News
Star Player
Joined: 18 Dec 2015
Posts: 5234
Location: So what's the uh...topic of discussion?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aeneas Hunter
Retired Number
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 31763
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2016 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Reflexx wrote: | ...or they could just not use Google products.
What a bunch of Yahoos. |
Well played, sir. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
audioaxes
Franchise Player
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 12573
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2016 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Google is too popular of a word for another meaning of the word to ever dominate it
and Im sure google's army of phd engineers will be able to adda simple exception condition to their censorship system to prevent "google" from ever getting flagged |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gatekeeper
Star Player
Joined: 11 Jan 2012
Posts: 5103
Location: Southland Native
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LakerFan87
Franchise Player
Joined: 25 May 2008
Posts: 18984
Location: The High Desert
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2016 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
#GoogleLivesMatter
_________________
...in my opinion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ringfinger
Retired Number
Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 29418
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2016 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| audioaxes wrote: | Google is too popular of a word for another meaning of the word to ever dominate it
and Im sure google's army of phd engineers will be able to adda simple exception condition to their censorship system to prevent "google" from ever getting flagged |
Yup. Plus, Google is well beyond keyword baaed algorithms now and much more dependent on context. It's much harder, if not impossible to game the algorithm anymore. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
