ESPN Projects Lakers to Have Fewest Wins in NBA
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 6, 7, 8 ... 14, 15, 16  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
PRLakeShow
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 07 Oct 2016
Posts: 10460

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 6:30 am    Post subject:

venturalakersfan wrote:
IceInMyVeins wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
Treble Clef wrote:
Worthy42 wrote:
lol, if there are people who still don't think ESPN has agenda to use the Lakers as click bait, they've been living in a cave.


This thread is made every year and the Lakers always win fewer games than ESPN predicts. I don't think the Lakers have exceeded expectations since 2008.

The bar is set low for them to do it this season, but I thought that the last few years as well.


I think the difference is that toward the end of the season we do not put out lineups to lose games this season.


According to you, we weren't tanking last season...


They were once they sat vets for no reason.


So you changed your mind since then? After all the discussions you had with people? That's fine I guess. We all have the right to change our minds.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
TooMuchMajicBuss
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 17 Sep 2008
Posts: 21079
Location: In a white room, with black curtains near the station

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:12 am    Post subject:

I'm still sticking with my original prediction of 37 wins. We just beat an 8th seed team at home because we had a better coach and players willing to listen, make adjustments, and play hard, effective defense when it counted most. When you see Nick Young, in crunch time, diving and hitting the hardwood for the loose ball right alongside DLO because Clarkson got a key deflection, you know something's going right.

Luke did a great job coaching this team out of the gates, not just adjustments but with player rotations as well. We see an offense now that can regularly get into the second and third options. I'll bet ESPN didn't factor that in at all. It's a nice start, and I'm sure most 'analysts' were surprised at the result, especially after the offensive butt spanking Houston put on us in the first half.

I don't think the Lakers lack talent, just experience. We're still likely to lose a lot of games before that changes, once the adrenaline wears off and teams start scouting us, but by March and April I think the Lakers could be a surprisingly dangerous match up for playoff-bound teams looking for a better seed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
dcarter4kobe
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Posts: 17677

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:26 am    Post subject:

IceInMyVeins wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
IceInMyVeins wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
Treble Clef wrote:
Worthy42 wrote:
lol, if there are people who still don't think ESPN has agenda to use the Lakers as click bait, they've been living in a cave.


This thread is made every year and the Lakers always win fewer games than ESPN predicts. I don't think the Lakers have exceeded expectations since 2008.

The bar is set low for them to do it this season, but I thought that the last few years as well.


I think the difference is that toward the end of the season we do not put out lineups to lose games this season.


According to you, we weren't tanking last season...


They were once they sat vets for no reason.


So you changed your mind since then? After all the discussions you had with people? That's fine I guess. We all have the right to change our minds.


Even if someone considers sitting Lou/Bass for Black and more PT for DLO/JC tanking, we only did it for the last 7 games and our 2nd spot in the lottery was already basically locked up. Only difference is instead of 17 wins we might of had 18 wins.
_________________
"He's a Zen master, so he can speak to you, and he doesn't need a microphone; you can hear him in your head, 'Ron, don't shoot, don't shoot.' Whatever, pow, three. I love the Zen, though."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
4stargeneralbulldog
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 26 Aug 2012
Posts: 739

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 8:00 am    Post subject:

As a wise man once said, "They don't think it be like it is, but it do."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lakersboy
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Posts: 8518
Location: Left coast

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 10:43 am    Post subject:

IceInMyVeins wrote:
Sad that I'm not surprised. Not because it's ESPN but because we actually suck.
Game 1 is over.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
P.K.
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 10 Jul 2003
Posts: 29726

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 10:56 am    Post subject:

Some of you need to temper your expectations a lot..
this was 1 game, early in the season, against a D'antoni team which are never known for playing D (hell, Houston played very little defense BEFORE MDA was hired)

I thought ESPN's estimate was about 6 games low, but that doesn't change the facts...
realistically, we're still going to lose a lot more games than we win this year.
_________________
LBJ + AD = More rings
Never argue with a fool - listeners can't tell you apart
Wilt's unstoppable fadeaway: www.youtube.com/watch?v=8O9MgNfcGJA
NPZ's Magic Johnson mix: www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8Qbo0WqvOI
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
bandiger
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 12555

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 11:01 am    Post subject:

P.K. wrote:
Some of you need to temper your expectations a lot..
this was 1 game, early in the season, against a D'antoni team which are never known for playing D (hell, Houston played very little defense BEFORE MDA was hired)

I thought ESPN's estimate was about 6 games low, but that doesn't change the facts...
realistically, we're still going to lose a lot more games than we win this year.


This next stretch of games are kinda brutal. Should be interesting to watch.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
andree
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 05 May 2014
Posts: 519

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 11:12 am    Post subject:

Gentlemen, it's only a game! Let's wait and see!
If I am correct 3 years ago Philly won the first game against LeBron's Miami. And they finished with the worst record.
Look at the bright side. If we finish at the bottom and received the 1st or 2nd pick, we can put it in a package with Clarckson and Randle and go after A.Davis or Cousins.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
P.K.
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 10 Jul 2003
Posts: 29726

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 11:52 am    Post subject:

bandiger wrote:
P.K. wrote:
Some of you need to temper your expectations a lot..
this was 1 game, early in the season, against a D'antoni team which are never known for playing D (hell, Houston played very little defense BEFORE MDA was hired)

I thought ESPN's estimate was about 6 games low, but that doesn't change the facts...
realistically, we're still going to lose a lot more games than we win this year.


This next stretch of games are kinda brutal. Should be interesting to watch.

I'm liking what I'm seeing so far - this is the most interesting the Lakers have been in 4 years now.

They are going to be a lot more competitive this year, meaning even losses will be closer instead of blowouts, but it's still a rebuild and they are still very inexperienced.
It'll be 2-3 years until they're serious playoff caliber
_________________
LBJ + AD = More rings
Never argue with a fool - listeners can't tell you apart
Wilt's unstoppable fadeaway: www.youtube.com/watch?v=8O9MgNfcGJA
NPZ's Magic Johnson mix: www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8Qbo0WqvOI
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Omar Little
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 90306
Location: Formerly Known As 24

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 11:53 am    Post subject:

P.K. wrote:
Some of you need to temper your expectations a lot..
this was 1 game, early in the season, against a D'antoni team which are never known for playing D (hell, Houston played very little defense BEFORE MDA was hired)

I thought ESPN's estimate was about 6 games low, but that doesn't change the facts...
realistically, we're still going to lose a lot more games than we win this year.


Do you have any gray poop on?
_________________
“We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.” ― Elie Wiesel
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakersRGolden
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 13 Jan 2002
Posts: 7924
Location: Lake Forest

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 11:55 am    Post subject:

23 more to go...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Omar Little
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 90306
Location: Formerly Known As 24

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 11:57 am    Post subject:

dcarter4kobe wrote:
IceInMyVeins wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
IceInMyVeins wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
Treble Clef wrote:
Worthy42 wrote:
lol, if there are people who still don't think ESPN has agenda to use the Lakers as click bait, they've been living in a cave.


This thread is made every year and the Lakers always win fewer games than ESPN predicts. I don't think the Lakers have exceeded expectations since 2008.

The bar is set low for them to do it this season, but I thought that the last few years as well.


I think the difference is that toward the end of the season we do not put out lineups to lose games this season.


According to you, we weren't tanking last season...


They were once they sat vets for no reason.


So you changed your mind since then? After all the discussions you had with people? That's fine I guess. We all have the right to change our minds.


Even if someone considers sitting Lou/Bass for Black and more PT for DLO/JC tanking, we only did it for the last 7 games and our 2nd spot in the lottery was already basically locked up. Only difference is instead of 17 wins we might of had 18 wins.


We were tanking by rolling Byron out there.
_________________
“We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.” ― Elie Wiesel
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
splashmtn
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 30 Aug 2016
Posts: 3961

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 12:02 pm    Post subject:

TooMuchMajicBuss wrote:
I'm still sticking with my original prediction of 37 wins. We just beat an 8th seed team at home because we had a better coach and players willing to listen, make adjustments, and play hard, effective defense when it counted most. When you see Nick Young, in crunch time, diving and hitting the hardwood for the loose ball right alongside DLO because Clarkson got a key deflection, you know something's going right.

Luke did a great job coaching this team out of the gates, not just adjustments but with player rotations as well. We see an offense now that can regularly get into the second and third options. I'll bet ESPN didn't factor that in at all. It's a nice start, and I'm sure most 'analysts' were surprised at the result, especially after the offensive butt spanking Houston put on us in the first half.

I don't think the Lakers lack talent, just experience. We're still likely to lose a lot of games before that changes, once the adrenaline wears off and teams start scouting us, but by March and April I think the Lakers could be a surprisingly dangerous match up for playoff-bound teams looking for a better seed.


well after last nights game as much as i loved that win for our lakers. I have to admit, it may be time to downgrade the new dwight howardless rockets. They have no interior defense whatsoever. And its true harden isnt just the best ball handler and passer on the team by a little, it's by a lot. Which is a huge issue with that teams bench. Think about it, who are the rockets beating if they continue to play just like what we saw last night? All offense no defense at all even though they have a few wing guys who can lock up in ariza, brewer, and e.gordon. If you ask me they need to run more plays for ryan anderson to get loose to be that 2nd star so E.gordon can be the 3rd guy from a scoring perspective. Then they could be that 8th to 7th seed again.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Omar Little
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 90306
Location: Formerly Known As 24

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 12:13 pm    Post subject:

splashmtn wrote:
TooMuchMajicBuss wrote:
I'm still sticking with my original prediction of 37 wins. We just beat an 8th seed team at home because we had a better coach and players willing to listen, make adjustments, and play hard, effective defense when it counted most. When you see Nick Young, in crunch time, diving and hitting the hardwood for the loose ball right alongside DLO because Clarkson got a key deflection, you know something's going right.

Luke did a great job coaching this team out of the gates, not just adjustments but with player rotations as well. We see an offense now that can regularly get into the second and third options. I'll bet ESPN didn't factor that in at all. It's a nice start, and I'm sure most 'analysts' were surprised at the result, especially after the offensive butt spanking Houston put on us in the first half.

I don't think the Lakers lack talent, just experience. We're still likely to lose a lot of games before that changes, once the adrenaline wears off and teams start scouting us, but by March and April I think the Lakers could be a surprisingly dangerous match up for playoff-bound teams looking for a better seed.


well after last nights game as much as i loved that win for our lakers. I have to admit, it may be time to downgrade the new dwight howardless rockets. They have no interior defense whatsoever. And its true harden isnt just the best ball handler and passer on the team by a little, it's by a lot. Which is a huge issue with that teams bench. Think about it, who are the rockets beating if they continue to play just like what we saw last night? All offense no defense at all even though they have a few wing guys who can lock up in ariza, brewer, and e.gordon. If you ask me they need to run more plays for ryan anderson to get loose to be that 2nd star so E.gordon can be the 3rd guy from a scoring perspective. Then they could be that 8th to 7th seed again.


Yah, they sort of built a cartoon of an MDA team by getting all shooters, no defenders.
_________________
“We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.” ― Elie Wiesel
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Lakersprime
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 15 Aug 2014
Posts: 322

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 12:35 pm    Post subject:

Cochese wrote:
I'm shocked. ESPN is usually fair to the Lakers...

How are we worse than the Nets?


Because Nets have J Lin.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
TooMuchMajicBuss
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 17 Sep 2008
Posts: 21079
Location: In a white room, with black curtains near the station

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 1:34 pm    Post subject:

splashmtn wrote:
TooMuchMajicBuss wrote:
I'm still sticking with my original prediction of 37 wins. We just beat an 8th seed team at home because we had a better coach and players willing to listen, make adjustments, and play hard, effective defense when it counted most. When you see Nick Young, in crunch time, diving and hitting the hardwood for the loose ball right alongside DLO because Clarkson got a key deflection, you know something's going right.

Luke did a great job coaching this team out of the gates, not just adjustments but with player rotations as well. We see an offense now that can regularly get into the second and third options. I'll bet ESPN didn't factor that in at all. It's a nice start, and I'm sure most 'analysts' were surprised at the result, especially after the offensive butt spanking Houston put on us in the first half.

I don't think the Lakers lack talent, just experience. We're still likely to lose a lot of games before that changes, once the adrenaline wears off and teams start scouting us, but by March and April I think the Lakers could be a surprisingly dangerous match up for playoff-bound teams looking for a better seed.


well after last nights game as much as i loved that win for our lakers. I have to admit, it may be time to downgrade the new dwight howardless rockets. They have no interior defense whatsoever. And its true harden isnt just the best ball handler and passer on the team by a little, it's by a lot. Which is a huge issue with that teams bench. Think about it, who are the rockets beating if they continue to play just like what we saw last night? All offense no defense at all even though they have a few wing guys who can lock up in ariza, brewer, and e.gordon. If you ask me they need to run more plays for ryan anderson to get loose to be that 2nd star so E.gordon can be the 3rd guy from a scoring perspective. Then they could be that 8th to 7th seed again.


It's possible Houston is cellar bound. I can see them getting spanked more often than not, and I'm no fan of Harden or that team. Nonetheless, they took it to the Lakers early, and I like the way the Lakers responded in the second half. I think the Lakers are going to be awfully inconsistent for a while. I disagree, however, with the idea some posters are putting forward that we just don't have talent on this team. I do think there's enough talent on this team to come together and play some pretty good bb before the season is over.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144466
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 1:36 pm    Post subject:

bandiger wrote:
P.K. wrote:
Some of you need to temper your expectations a lot..
this was 1 game, early in the season, against a D'antoni team which are never known for playing D (hell, Houston played very little defense BEFORE MDA was hired)

I thought ESPN's estimate was about 6 games low, but that doesn't change the facts...
realistically, we're still going to lose a lot more games than we win this year.


This next stretch of games are kinda brutal. Should be interesting to watch.


The next month is brutal, that is why a win last night was so nice.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Baron Von Humongous
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 02 Jul 2015
Posts: 32979

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 2:33 pm    Post subject:

Lakersprime wrote:
Cochese wrote:
I'm shocked. ESPN is usually fair to the Lakers...

How are we worse than the Nets?


Because Nets have J Lin.

And not much more with Brook Lopez being turned into a jumpshooter in Atkinson's offense. Lin is going to get an opportunity to put up crazy numbers in that system - the Nets have shooters who can get hot, but no real creators besides him (unless we count Scola).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Treble Clef
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 20 Nov 2012
Posts: 23912

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 2:52 pm    Post subject:

P.K. wrote:
Some of you need to temper your expectations a lot..
this was 1 game, early in the season, against a D'antoni team which are never known for playing D (hell, Houston played very little defense BEFORE MDA was hired)

I thought ESPN's estimate was about 6 games low, but that doesn't change the facts...
realistically, we're still going to lose a lot more games than we win this year.


Every year this happens. In 2014, it was the opening night win over the Clippers. In 2015, I remember there being a preseason game where everyone was making shots. In 2016, I remember a game where someone threw a punch and Roy Hibbert got in his face and everyone talked about how unified and fun the team was going to be.

It is going to take a little while to know what to really expect from this season. So far it looks like younger teams are going to be much better matchups. The Lakers starters looked very comfortable against the shaky defenses of Phoenix and Houston. Against the other teams, not so much.

A road game at Utah would usually be a good measure of what the team is made of but I think they're catching a break this time since the Jazz have a ton of injuries.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Inverse
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 27 Jun 2014
Posts: 2069

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 3:05 pm    Post subject:

Lakers are a +8.5 for tomorrows game and the jazz have no Gordon Hayward. The league is straight sleeping on the lakers right now! I wish i was in vegas id put 200 minimum on that. Might even take them on the money line
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lakersboy
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Posts: 8518
Location: Left coast

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 6:12 pm    Post subject:

I remember Phil being new in 1999 and telling people not to over estimate his team. He said they would probably win 5 of the first 10 but the Lakers won 8-10. This team has to gel, and as bad as they looked at times against a good offensive team, their defense eventually came through. I believe 15-20 games into the season, if healthy, this team will look different and much better as more guys figure out their role and learn to depend on each other.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Vancouver Fan
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 17 Apr 2006
Posts: 17740

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 6:17 pm    Post subject:

Inverse wrote:
Lakers are a +8.5 for tomorrows game and the jazz have no Gordon Hayward. The league is straight sleeping on the lakers right now! I wish i was in vegas id put 200 minimum on that. Might even take them on the money line
I like the way you think.
_________________
Music is my medicine
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Halflife
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 15 Aug 2015
Posts: 16740

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:19 pm    Post subject:

We have guys that can score. A lot of outlets. We won't be out of many games. Play solid d to end qts and all of 4th and we should be between 40-47 wins
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
PRLakeShow
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 07 Oct 2016
Posts: 10460

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:20 pm    Post subject:

We're gonna shock the world. #1 seed here we come.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
AFireInside619
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 11 Dec 2015
Posts: 11447

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 9:35 pm    Post subject:

IceInMyVeins wrote:
We're gonna shock the world. #1 seed here we come.


But wait... In the Mitch & Jim thread you said we could possibly lose the next 20 games...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 6, 7, 8 ... 14, 15, 16  Next
Page 7 of 16
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB