LAKERS vs CELTICS: Race to the next championship
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 19, 20, 21 ... 30, 31, 32  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
joey25
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 03 Nov 2015
Posts: 129

PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2017 11:50 am    Post subject:

Gotta respect the Celtics. They've done a great job with their rebuilding phase post big-3 era unlike the Lakers. They're well ahead of the Lakers in this race.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ocho
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 24 May 2005
Posts: 53796

PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2017 5:33 pm    Post subject:

Cavs look out of sorts. Draymond just left the court with what may be an injury. You guys seem mighty confident.
_________________
14-5-3-12
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
saetarubia
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 6208

PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2017 5:43 pm    Post subject:

ocho wrote:
Cavs look out of sorts. Draymond just left the court with what may be an injury. You guys seem mighty confident.


If GSW beat Spurs, they aren't gonna lose to Celtics. If they have issues, Spurs will get out of the west anyway. Celtics don't have the team to win 4 games against Spurs/GSW.
_________________
Showtime 2.0
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
gumby
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 2500
Location: Inland Empire

PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:08 am    Post subject:

laker4life wrote:
Laker_Town wrote:
Boston winning.

We're still at the kiddie table while Boston has not o my improved, but is about to get another top pick.


We simply have a long way to go at this point compared to the Celtics.

They made incredible moves while we struggled with our FO.

Hopefully, the new kids on the block will make a change.


Well, to be honest. Boston has a lot of experience at sucking. This our first true major dive in how long?

Bye.
_________________
"This trophy removes the most odious sentence in the English Language. It can never be said again that 'the Lakers have never beaten the Celtics.'" -Dr. Jerry Buss (1985) R.I.P., 33 x M.V.O.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
giordan0
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 05 Jan 2016
Posts: 1016

PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2017 6:10 am    Post subject:

Their set for the next 5-6 years with the youth and high lottery picks in their team (gee thanks Billy King). As much as I'd hate for them to win title 18, they have their foot in the door.

Give Ainge credit, he's been able to turn them around in under two years.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Ziggy
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 12712

PostPosted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 10:50 am    Post subject:

I'm kind of tired of people comparing our FO with theirs. We DID attempt to retool with the CP3 trade. It would've kept us relevant and the competitive momentum would've moved us forward without having to go through this rebuild.

CP3 is highly respected among the players and surely would've drawn talent to the Lakers. Dwight would've been our version of Deandre, Kobe would've been able to play at peak form for longer (atleast offensively). That trade veto was the death of this franchise as we knew it. No CP3, Pau fell into depression, LO traded and hit the crack pipe, Dwight walks, Kobe tears achilles, Nash punks us. That was it. We had nothing left. We're starting from the bottom again like an expansion team. This is what decades of forward momentum looks like when it hits a brick wall.

Boston knew their time with the Big 3 was done. Ray Allen walked, KG was no longer an elite defensive anchor, which was what gave them their identity. It was an obvious time to move on. Enter this new billionaire owner setting Jim Buss-like expectations such as winning a championship within 5 years. It was a perfect storm for Boston, but it was a lucky opportunity that fell on their lap. It was clear they had to move on, but it was simply a matter of how much can they get. They got lucky, we didn't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
pjiddy
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Dec 2005
Posts: 29061

PostPosted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 10:54 am    Post subject:

giordan0 wrote:
Their set for the next 5-6 years with the youth and high lottery picks in their team (gee thanks Billy King). As much as I'd hate for them to win title 18, they have their foot in the door.

Give Ainge credit, he's been able to turn them around in under two years.


He was also able to get away with trading Pierce and (and to a lesser extent) KG. Their entire rebuild is a credit to this. By contrast, the Lakers never could've nor would have traded Kobe.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ringfinger
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 29418

PostPosted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 11:36 am    Post subject:

pjiddy wrote:
giordan0 wrote:
Their set for the next 5-6 years with the youth and high lottery picks in their team (gee thanks Billy King). As much as I'd hate for them to win title 18, they have their foot in the door.

Give Ainge credit, he's been able to turn them around in under two years.


He was also able to get away with trading Pierce and (and to a lesser extent) KG. Their entire rebuild is a credit to this. By contrast, the Lakers never could've nor would have traded Kobe.


Yup. They ripped off the band-aid and plowed ahead. This FO has a tendency to look to the past too much IMO.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
tox
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Nov 2015
Posts: 17876

PostPosted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 9:15 pm    Post subject:

ringfinger wrote:
pjiddy wrote:
giordan0 wrote:
Their set for the next 5-6 years with the youth and high lottery picks in their team (gee thanks Billy King). As much as I'd hate for them to win title 18, they have their foot in the door.

Give Ainge credit, he's been able to turn them around in under two years.


He was also able to get away with trading Pierce and (and to a lesser extent) KG. Their entire rebuild is a credit to this. By contrast, the Lakers never could've nor would have traded Kobe.


Yup. They ripped off the band-aid and plowed ahead. This FO has a tendency to look to the past too much IMO.


I agree with the FO but I don't think that's the point pjiddy was making. Kobe means something different to LA than what KG/ Pierce meant to Boston. Yeah, it was bittersweet losing Pierce and KG, especially Pierce. But it's not really comparable to Kobe & LA. I don't think Ainge, in Kupchak's spot, would've traded Kobe in, say, 2011 or 2012 either. LA would have have him hanged (or at least run out of town) when Kobe had his #Vino season.

Kobe was such an all time great (and inspired so much devotion from fans in LA) that the Lakers couldn't feasibly have traded him like the C's traded Pierce and KG. It's an apples-to-oranges comparison.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
panamaniac
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 28 May 2011
Posts: 11239
Location: PTY

PostPosted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 9:23 pm    Post subject:

tox wrote:
ringfinger wrote:
pjiddy wrote:
giordan0 wrote:
Their set for the next 5-6 years with the youth and high lottery picks in their team (gee thanks Billy King). As much as I'd hate for them to win title 18, they have their foot in the door.

Give Ainge credit, he's been able to turn them around in under two years.


He was also able to get away with trading Pierce and (and to a lesser extent) KG. Their entire rebuild is a credit to this. By contrast, the Lakers never could've nor would have traded Kobe.


Yup. They ripped off the band-aid and plowed ahead. This FO has a tendency to look to the past too much IMO.


I agree with the FO but I don't think that's the point pjiddy was making. Kobe means something different to LA than what KG/ Pierce meant to Boston. Yeah, it was bittersweet losing Pierce and KG, especially Pierce. But it's not really comparable to Kobe & LA. I don't think Ainge, in Kupchak's spot, would've traded Kobe in, say, 2011 or 2012 either. LA would have have him hanged (or at least run out of town) when Kobe had his #Vino season.

Kobe was such an all time great (and inspired so much devotion from fans in LA) that the Lakers couldn't feasibly have traded him like the C's traded Pierce and KG. It's an apples-to-oranges comparison.


Both you and Pjiddy stated it well. with that said, here's to Boston not winning a championship in the foreseeable future.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
The Logo
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 25 Jul 2013
Posts: 9577
Location: Salem, OR

PostPosted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 10:20 pm    Post subject:

Trading Kobe would've been akin to amnestying Kobe so we could appease Dwight to resigning here. Yeah, we could've done it if we really wanted to, but Mitch and Jim would most likely be found in a dead alley with their bodies being completely eviscerated.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Batguano
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 19 Mar 2015
Posts: 2255

PostPosted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 10:57 pm    Post subject:

If Ainge had a player like Kobe on the Celtics he wouldn't have traded him.

KG and Pierce are not Kobe.

Like Draymond said to Pierce this season, “Chasing that farewell tour, they don’t love you like that. You can’t get no farewell tour. They don’t love you like that … You thought you was Kobe.”
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
MickMgl
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 07 Jan 2013
Posts: 1987

PostPosted: Sun Apr 02, 2017 2:12 am    Post subject:

AFireInside619 wrote:

Yes, Boston has some nice draft picks coming up, but it's not like we've been without high draft picks either.


Big difference between being one of the league's best teams and accumulating great draft picks through smart management, like the Lakers of the late 70s and early 80s, and the current Celtics... vs being one of the league's biggest losers and having some of the high draft picks you earned (from losing) only because the league didn't allow you to trade ALL your draft picks each and every year.

Not the same thing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
MickMgl
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 07 Jan 2013
Posts: 1987

PostPosted: Sun Apr 02, 2017 2:18 am    Post subject: Re: The Road.....

omzzzzz wrote:
The Celtics path back to real contention:

Sign Gordon Hayward
Trade the Nets 2017 + Smart + Crowder for Jimmy Butler



The Lakers path back to contention:

Keep their 1st round pick & draft Lonzo
Trade Russell, Randle, and 2019 1st rd pick for Paul George
Sign Russell Westbrook in summer of 2018


Drafting Lonzo would be a huge step forward... which would be completely undermined by trading Russell and signing Westbrook.

Russell is probably playing out of position. Keep him and play him at off-guard next to Ball. Do not buy high on Westbrook. He will never be this good again. I don't hate him, but he's a terrible fit.

Do make Randle available, but that package for George is way too steep.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Wino
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 07 Jun 2002
Posts: 9674
Location: San Diego

PostPosted: Sun Apr 02, 2017 10:49 pm    Post subject: Re: The Road.....

MickMgl wrote:
omzzzzz wrote:
The Celtics path back to real contention:

Sign Gordon Hayward
Trade the Nets 2017 + Smart + Crowder for Jimmy Butler



The Lakers path back to contention:

Keep their 1st round pick & draft Lonzo
Trade Russell, Randle, and 2019 1st rd pick for Paul George
Sign Russell Westbrook in summer of 2018


Drafting Lonzo would be a huge step forward... which would be completely undermined by trading Russell and signing Westbrook.

Russell is probably playing out of position. Keep him and play him at off-guard next to Ball. Do not buy high on Westbrook. He will never be this good again. I don't hate him, but he's a terrible fit.

Do make Randle available, but that package for George is way too steep.


Yep, draft Lonzo, move DLO to SG but let him play some PG when needed. Keep Clarkson and let him rotate with Lonzo and DLO. Sign PG13 as a FA and let him rotate with Ingram and Randle.

Keep your eye out for second FA and consider trading, lower first round pick along with either Randle or Clarkson for that improved body, if it exists. Maybe this would be a center, maybe a PF who can play strong defense, or even a defensive guard.
_________________
Never argue with stupid people! They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!! - Twain
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144462
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Mon Apr 03, 2017 10:16 am    Post subject:

The Logo wrote:
Trading Kobe would've been akin to amnestying Kobe so we could appease Dwight to resigning here. Yeah, we could've done it if we really wanted to, but Mitch and Jim would most likely be found in a dead alley with their bodies being completely eviscerated.


We couldn't have done it unless Kobe wanted to. His no trade clause said differently.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
32
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 04 Nov 2009
Posts: 73063

PostPosted: Tue Apr 11, 2017 11:24 am    Post subject:

If Boston wins tomorrow they will be the number one seed in the east.
_________________
Nobody in the NBA can touch the Laker brand, which, like the uniform color, is pure gold.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Tue Apr 11, 2017 11:37 am    Post subject:

32 wrote:
If Boston wins tomorrow they will be the number one seed in the east.


Who cares.

Buck Foston.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
tox
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Nov 2015
Posts: 17876

PostPosted: Tue Apr 11, 2017 11:38 am    Post subject:

32 wrote:
If Boston wins tomorrow they will be the number one seed in the east.
Sub-.500 record against opposing EC playoff teams
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
danzag
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 28 Apr 2013
Posts: 22313
Location: Brazil

PostPosted: Tue Apr 11, 2017 1:47 pm    Post subject:

32 wrote:
If Boston wins tomorrow they will be the number one seed in the east.


They still have absolutely no shot at the title.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
32
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 04 Nov 2009
Posts: 73063

PostPosted: Tue Apr 11, 2017 2:26 pm    Post subject:

danzag wrote:
32 wrote:
If Boston wins tomorrow they will be the number one seed in the east.


They still have absolutely no shot at the title.


Probably not this year but they are a hell of alot closer than we are.
_________________
Nobody in the NBA can touch the Laker brand, which, like the uniform color, is pure gold.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Villain6Activated
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 22 Dec 2011
Posts: 6697

PostPosted: Tue Apr 11, 2017 2:30 pm    Post subject:

32 wrote:
danzag wrote:
32 wrote:
If Boston wins tomorrow they will be the number one seed in the east.


They still have absolutely no shot at the title.


Probably not this year but they are a hell of alot closer than we are.


I don't think so, it just seems like they are ahead of us because they are the first seed now. But in reality, if they were to build a contending team 5 years from now, none of the current roster except maybe JB would be a part of it.

The Nets are going to be the 7-12 seed in the east next year so there only chance of drafting a franchise altering player is this draft.
_________________
“Life is too short. You have to keep it moving.” - Kobe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kwase
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Posts: 3069

PostPosted: Tue Apr 11, 2017 4:24 pm    Post subject:

We are the 3rd worst team in the league, and they have a better record than the World Champs. It's hard to believe we were once in the same position TBH. This thread is painful.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
BirdMagicLegend
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 345
Location: Boston, MA

PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2017 5:03 am    Post subject:

Come on Laker fans. I know you are biased here but there is no way the Celtics and Lakers are in the same position because neither team will win the championship. That is like saying every team except Warriors, Spurs and Cavs is in the same position because they have little to no shot to win the championship. It's ridiculous.

I think the Celtics are doing a good job of contending now (one piece away) and building for the future with high draft picks.
_________________
"Larry, you only told me one lie. You said there will be another Larry Bird. Larry, there will never, ever be another Larry Bird." — Magic Johnson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
nash
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Oct 2001
Posts: 8194

PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2017 5:15 am    Post subject:

Ziggy wrote:
I'm kind of tired of people comparing our FO with theirs. We DID attempt to retool with the CP3 trade. It would've kept us relevant and the competitive momentum would've moved us forward without having to go through this rebuild.

CP3 is highly respected among the players and surely would've drawn talent to the Lakers. Dwight would've been our version of Deandre, Kobe would've been able to play at peak form for longer (atleast offensively). That trade veto was the death of this franchise as we knew it. No CP3, Pau fell into depression, LO traded and hit the crack pipe, Dwight walks, Kobe tears achilles, Nash punks us. That was it. We had nothing left. We're starting from the bottom again like an expansion team. This is what decades of forward momentum looks like when it hits a brick wall.

Boston knew their time with the Big 3 was done. Ray Allen walked, KG was no longer an elite defensive anchor, which was what gave them their identity. It was an obvious time to move on. Enter this new billionaire owner setting Jim Buss-like expectations such as winning a championship within 5 years. It was a perfect storm for Boston, but it was a lucky opportunity that fell on their lap. It was clear they had to move on, but it was simply a matter of how much can they get. They got lucky, we didn't.


Yes and no

They surely did a better job capitalizing on the departure of washed up HOF and found a small gem on free agency that had the desire to be a Laker, but just like us they couldn't find a franchise player in the draft, their best player is a way too small and don't have a positive impact on defense. The all star they landed is not one to lead a team to a championship. They did a better job than us for sure, but not a great job, just very good
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 19, 20, 21 ... 30, 31, 32  Next
Page 20 of 32
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB