2017 Lakers Draft Discussion Thread ** DRAFT DAY** (2: Ball, 27: Kuzma, 30: Hart and 42: Bryant )
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 773, 774, 775 ... 1279, 1280, 1281  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Who you got after Fultz?
Lonzo Ball
75%
 75%  [ 315 ]
Josh Jackson
15%
 15%  [ 64 ]
Jayson Tatum
1%
 1%  [ 8 ]
De'Aaron Fox
4%
 4%  [ 20 ]
Malik Monk
1%
 1%  [ 5 ]
Jonathan Isaac
0%
 0%  [ 4 ]
Total Votes : 416

Author Message
epak
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 34147

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2017 2:43 am    Post subject:

Seems to have some shake here
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
nash
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Oct 2001
Posts: 8194

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2017 3:09 am    Post subject:

ChickenStu wrote:
Hero Ball wrote:
I am confident Lonzo will be the pick because we need a court general and 3 point shooting.

As of now, we only have DLo who is better off playing the 2 and Ennis.


I do think that Lonzo will be the pick.

I'm just worried that he has a large range of potential outcomes, downside included.


That can be said about any prospect.

I don't know if Ball is going to be the best player to select at #2 but at least I'm sure he is someone I actually enjoy watching.

We didn't win anything in the 90's bur that team was funny to watch something I can't really say about our current core. Julius and JC lack of IQ make me nervous, so does Dlo's careless turnovers and lack of aggression.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epak
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 34147

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2017 3:21 am    Post subject:

How would you rank Towns, Simmons and Fultz all coming out of college?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KeepItRealOrElse
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 11 Oct 2012
Posts: 32767

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2017 3:38 am    Post subject:

epak wrote:
How would you rank Towns, Simmons and Fultz all coming out of college?


Just like that probably. Although Givony has Fultz and Ball over Simmons.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ChickenStu
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 25 Apr 2015
Posts: 31783
Location: Anaheim, CA

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2017 3:45 am    Post subject:

nash wrote:
ChickenStu wrote:
Hero Ball wrote:
I am confident Lonzo will be the pick because we need a court general and 3 point shooting.

As of now, we only have DLo who is better off playing the 2 and Ennis.


I do think that Lonzo will be the pick.

I'm just worried that he has a large range of potential outcomes, downside included.


That can be said about any prospect.

I don't know if Ball is going to be the best player to select at #2 but at least I'm sure he is someone I actually enjoy watching.

We didn't win anything in the 90's bur that team was funny to watch something I can't really say about our current core. Julius and JC lack of IQ make me nervous, so does Dlo's careless turnovers and lack of aggression.


I'll be more direct: I think that Lonzo's range of outcomes is more wide than the prospects being talked about (in his range) in this draft. He's just such an odd player. Will a low usage rate player be able to affect the game in the NBA similar to how he did in college? Will that funky shot (which I acknowledge flies through the air with a nice rotation) translate to the NBA, or will defenders get up on him on his left shoulder and force him to go right and by them?

I think he has both a lower floor and a lower ceiling that Jackson. Obviously, this is just opinion, and it's not fact. There's certainly a scenario where I could see Jackson not being a perimeter threat in the NBA and that would make him just a nice activity/role player, and a scenario where I could see Lonzo's form not being a hindrance to being a solid 3-point shooter and great passer.

One more thing I'll add is that I think Bolden is a lottery talent, the more I watch tape on him. Had he put up the stats he did from last season in Europe, but for UCLA in a second theoretical season there instead of in Europe, I think the kid is being talked about as a lottery pick. As long as you interview the guy and don't come away alarmed as to why he just didn't do that well at UCLA, to me, what he showed on tape last season should far supercede what transpired at UCLA. I already stated my belief that a lot of things can happen to young men at such a young age, from one year to the next. And there is absolutely no disputing the fact that the competition in the ABA is far better than what the Pac-12 has to offer.

I'm not even guaranteeing that Bolden ends up a really good NBA player. But what I am saying is that there's more of a chance that he does than the vast majority of players that are being mocked ahead of him. And he certainly has far more upside than virtually all of those guys. I mean, Ivan Rabb or Bolden...are you kidding me?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
HOF Rookie
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 09 Jun 2015
Posts: 1717

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2017 3:52 am    Post subject:

ChickenStu wrote:
I swear, if I read this thread long enough, I'm going to think everyone in discussion for #2 isn't good LOL.

As of now, I still have Jackson over Ball.


I'm a big fan of Jackson, and though his shooting is not ideal for this team, everything else about him fits us perfectly.

The fear I think is people think we may be passing up on a brilliant player in the makings Lonzo.

I don't know what the right answer is, but suspect we will draft Ball in just about every instance.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
DangeRuss
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 10 Feb 2016
Posts: 1418

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2017 4:03 am    Post subject:

epak wrote:
How would you rank Towns, Simmons and Fultz all coming out of college?


I think towns didn't get much hype until way later into the process. Most mocks I seen back then had okafor going number 1 until around late may and early June, but the talent was undeniable.

Simmons was always hyped and he'd been projected as the number 1 pick since he was in high school.

Fultz has been the consensus number 1 in this class for a while now, but I personally don't think he's the top prospect in this class, id rank him about even with dangelo Russell as an incoming prospect.

Overall coming out I'd say Simmons then towns then fultz.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
M2K
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 20 Feb 2011
Posts: 2432

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2017 4:36 am    Post subject:

Andre2K wrote:
Watching Lonzo, Simmons, Embiid and our next year's pick run laps around the league would give me nightmares, I think I'd sleep better at night watching them trying to sort out their potential spacing issues with Jackson or Fox. The front office shouldn't overthink this, draft Lonzo.

Top NCAA Freshmen Total Points Added (TPA) Scores


NBA defenders will shutdown Lonzo's game because they'll stay in his hip pocket forcing him to play to his greatest weakness... dribble penetration.
_________________
A three headed monster... Jeannie, Pelinka, and Ham... another terrible season.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
M2K
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 20 Feb 2011
Posts: 2432

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2017 4:38 am    Post subject:

Mike@LG wrote:
We never really see Lonzo play PnR, change directions on the first defender, get to a specific spot, then, change direction on the help defender and burn the guy to the cup.

Instead, he settles to allow their defensive switch, and then settles again with a 30' step back J.


This is reason #1 on why the Lakers shouldn't waste a #2 overall pick on Lonzo Ball.
_________________
A three headed monster... Jeannie, Pelinka, and Ham... another terrible season.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epak
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 34147

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2017 4:54 am    Post subject:

M2K wrote:
Mike@LG wrote:
We never really see Lonzo play PnR, change directions on the first defender, get to a specific spot, then, change direction on the help defender and burn the guy to the cup.

Instead, he settles to allow their defensive switch, and then settles again with a 30' step back J.


This is reason #1 on why the Lakers shouldn't waste a #2 overall pick on Lonzo Ball.


Is settling for a high percentage 3 such a bad thing?


Last edited by epak on Mon May 29, 2017 5:43 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Megaton
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 18 Feb 2015
Posts: 25624

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2017 5:06 am    Post subject:

M2K wrote:
Mike@LG wrote:
We never really see Lonzo play PnR, change directions on the first defender, get to a specific spot, then, change direction on the help defender and burn the guy to the cup.

Instead, he settles to allow their defensive switch, and then settles again with a 30' step back J.


This is reason #1 on why the Lakers shouldn't waste a #2 overall pick on Lonzo Ball.


He's considered one of if not the best player in the draft so not exactly a waste.
_________________
Darvin Scam: https://media.tenor.com/images/3c15249955860a4b16b59e8ae035fb75/tenor.gif
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Raijin
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 08 Feb 2009
Posts: 6576

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2017 5:19 am    Post subject:

LongTimeLurk wrote:
KeepItRealOrElse wrote:
Mike@LG wrote:
Quote:

Klay, Monk, G.Harris, D. Green, Derozen, Bazemore, Bradley, J. Richardson, Shump, Reddick, Cj Miles, Hield, Wes Mathews, KCP, Belleneli, Lavine at same age(not close)


None of these guys are great playmakers. They too, have rudimentary ball-handling when attacking the hoop. Most of these guys are 3 and D.


Nick Young, Dipo(at same age), Beverly, Solomon Hill, Fournier(debatable maybe now, but at same age), Beal(at same age), Luwawu/Stauskas

That's 23 starting or projected starting SGs. So by definition/numbers he has an above (or way abv) average handle for a SG his age
There are different interpretations of what a classifies a handle in a position
Honestly, the same part of a handle that you laud for Nick Young - you condemn Lonzo for. Young has also been mostly a step back ball handling move, into a jump shot, type ball handler (especially after what, year 2 in his career), and Nick wasn't even doing that as a Freshman in college.

Despite Lonzo not often pulling out a variety of moves - there were a handful of times that he did... And none of the listed guys above, did that once at the same age. Even Lonzo's main crossover is still an above avg move for a freshman SG. He just didn't drive a lot, but I don't think he drove a below average amount for a freshman SG - and factor in Lonzo collapsing the defense driving in transition.


What I keep wondering or worrying about is having a back court of Lonzo and Russell and neither one be even close to elite at being able to break down a defender and attack the rim. How many truly effective offenses lack at least one attacking guard quality shooter or not?

2 average athletes at the 1 and the 2 doesn't seem like a winning formula on the defensive side either. Outside of Clarkson this team sorely lacks players with explosiveness
_________________
"It was tough," Kobe Bryant said. "But when it got really tough for me, I just checked myself in."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
adkindo
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 40345
Location: Dirty South

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2017 5:20 am    Post subject:

AC Green's V-Card wrote:
adkindo wrote:
AC Green's V-Card wrote:
adkindo wrote:
dcarter4kobe wrote:
adkindo wrote:
dcarter4kobe wrote:
LongTimeLurk wrote:
dcarter4kobe wrote:
Cant get over the fact that both options for the 2nd draft pick will struggle mightily creating their own offense (Jackson and Ball).

If DSJ checks out in interviews, he has some serious attitude questions he needs to address, I would be in favor of a 2 for 5+10 trade with the Kings. Would then look to move 10 for a pick in the 14-17 range if we can get a 2018 1st.

Something like

DSJ (or Monk, Fox)
J.Patton, D.Mitchell, Kennard,Anunoby, Ike
2018 1st
for
Lonzo Ball



I have been a Jackson lean over Ball from the jump but you cant ignore Jackson's lack of consistent j, questions of how he will score in the NBA, discipline on defense, age, frame. Both Ball and Jackson are seriously flawed players who both do a lot of great things to help their team win.


will never understand this....it is math...we know he shot 37% from 3 over the season, and well over 40% once he altered his release...that is as consistent as any player in the draft.

Look at his FT shooting. Shooting off the dribble.


fine, but his jumpshot is as consistent as the %'s say it is....I get people that want to doubt that will translate to the NBA line, but that is just speculation. I do not or never have bought into the FT line as a predictor theory.....and if anyone does buy that theory, they have to also question Fultz and Balls ability to shoot the 3 in the NBA.


The formula isn't just FT%, though it plays a large role (and ~10% difference is nothing to sneeze at). It also heavily relies on three-point attempts. Jackson shot 3.3 3PT attempts Per40. Fultz/Ball shot 5.7/6.1 respectively. That is nearly twice the amount. Do you still not fundamentally understand why the models project them as better shooters? If you disagree, that's fine. But at least know what the models are based on.


we were not discussing a model, we were simply speaking about the correlation between free throw % indicating long term 3 point %....if you ( or dcarter) are speaking about a specific metric or model, I was not....but thanks for chiming in as always desperate to show everyone how much smarter you are than others.


No need for the personal pot shot, adkindo. You're better than that.


your comment speaks to me as if I am an imbecile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Andre2K
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 12199

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2017 5:48 am    Post subject:

M2K wrote:
Andre2K wrote:
Watching Lonzo, Simmons, Embiid and our next year's pick run laps around the league would give me nightmares, I think I'd sleep better at night watching them trying to sort out their potential spacing issues with Jackson or Fox. The front office shouldn't overthink this, draft Lonzo.

Top NCAA Freshmen Total Points Added (TPA) Scores


NBA defenders will shutdown Lonzo's game because they'll stay in his hip pocket forcing him to play to his greatest weakness... dribble penetration.


Okay, what data or example do you have to back up this claim?
_________________
My Dream Starting 5 next Season

Pg Lonzo
Sg Kawhi
Sf Ingram
Pf Lebron
C Dedmon

Bench: Caruso, Hart, Bullock, Kuzma, McGee etc
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KeepItRealOrElse
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 11 Oct 2012
Posts: 32767

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2017 5:55 am    Post subject:

Raijin wrote:
LongTimeLurk wrote:
KeepItRealOrElse wrote:
Mike@LG wrote:
Quote:

Klay, Monk, G.Harris, D. Green, Derozen, Bazemore, Bradley, J. Richardson, Shump, Reddick, Cj Miles, Hield, Wes Mathews, KCP, Belleneli, Lavine at same age(not close)


None of these guys are great playmakers. They too, have rudimentary ball-handling when attacking the hoop. Most of these guys are 3 and D.


Nick Young, Dipo(at same age), Beverly, Solomon Hill, Fournier(debatable maybe now, but at same age), Beal(at same age), Luwawu/Stauskas

That's 23 starting or projected starting SGs. So by definition/numbers he has an above (or way abv) average handle for a SG his age
There are different interpretations of what a classifies a handle in a position
Honestly, the same part of a handle that you laud for Nick Young - you condemn Lonzo for. Young has also been mostly a step back ball handling move, into a jump shot, type ball handler (especially after what, year 2 in his career), and Nick wasn't even doing that as a Freshman in college.

Despite Lonzo not often pulling out a variety of moves - there were a handful of times that he did... And none of the listed guys above, did that once at the same age. Even Lonzo's main crossover is still an above avg move for a freshman SG. He just didn't drive a lot, but I don't think he drove a below average amount for a freshman SG - and factor in Lonzo collapsing the defense driving in transition.


What I keep wondering or worrying about is having a back court of Lonzo and Russell and neither one be even close to elite at being able to break down a defender and attack the rim. How many truly effective offenses lack at least one attacking guard quality shooter or not?

2 average athletes at the 1 and the 2 doesn't seem like a winning formula on the defensive side either. Outside of Clarkson this team sorely lacks players with explosiveness


I wouldn't call Lonzo an average athlete , I'd say solid. He has a chance to be a good 2 position defender down the line, and a better chance to be at least a solid SG defender - no reason why he can't be, JJ reddick was a solid defender for most of his Clippers stint

But yea it'd still be good to have players who can impose their will defensively - Ingram has to grow into his body to hopefully do that for us - and guard the other teams best wing who's 6'5 and taller.

DLo and Lonzo have a chance to be 100x better than Portlands backcourt defensively
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
CRoost
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Posts: 4790

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2017 6:10 am    Post subject:

M2K wrote:
Andre2K wrote:
Watching Lonzo, Simmons, Embiid and our next year's pick run laps around the league would give me nightmares, I think I'd sleep better at night watching them trying to sort out their potential spacing issues with Jackson or Fox. The front office shouldn't overthink this, draft Lonzo.

Top NCAA Freshmen Total Points Added (TPA) Scores


NBA defenders will shutdown Lonzo's game because they'll stay in his hip pocket forcing him to play to his greatest weakness... dribble penetration.


By the time those defenders stay in his pocket, Lonzo has already someone open like oops there it is.


Last edited by CRoost on Mon May 29, 2017 6:13 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Hero Ball
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 May 2015
Posts: 4403

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2017 6:12 am    Post subject:

Andre2K wrote:
M2K wrote:
Andre2K wrote:
Watching Lonzo, Simmons, Embiid and our next year's pick run laps around the league would give me nightmares, I think I'd sleep better at night watching them trying to sort out their potential spacing issues with Jackson or Fox. The front office shouldn't overthink this, draft Lonzo.

Top NCAA Freshmen Total Points Added (TPA) Scores


NBA defenders will shutdown Lonzo's game because they'll stay in his hip pocket forcing him to play to his greatest weakness... dribble penetration.


Okay, what data or example do you have to back up this claim?


His greatest weakness is he looks like Robert Davi which also means he is Hollywood ready.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
adkindo
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 40345
Location: Dirty South

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2017 6:26 am    Post subject:

Hero Ball wrote:
Andre2K wrote:
M2K wrote:
Andre2K wrote:
Watching Lonzo, Simmons, Embiid and our next year's pick run laps around the league would give me nightmares, I think I'd sleep better at night watching them trying to sort out their potential spacing issues with Jackson or Fox. The front office shouldn't overthink this, draft Lonzo.

Top NCAA Freshmen Total Points Added (TPA) Scores


NBA defenders will shutdown Lonzo's game because they'll stay in his hip pocket forcing him to play to his greatest weakness... dribble penetration.


Okay, what data or example do you have to back up this claim?


His greatest weakness is he looks like Robert Davi which also means he is Hollywood ready.


damn, I actually see the resemblance
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
adkindo
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 40345
Location: Dirty South

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2017 6:27 am    Post subject:

CRoost wrote:
M2K wrote:
Andre2K wrote:
Watching Lonzo, Simmons, Embiid and our next year's pick run laps around the league would give me nightmares, I think I'd sleep better at night watching them trying to sort out their potential spacing issues with Jackson or Fox. The front office shouldn't overthink this, draft Lonzo.

Top NCAA Freshmen Total Points Added (TPA) Scores


NBA defenders will shutdown Lonzo's game because they'll stay in his hip pocket forcing him to play to his greatest weakness... dribble penetration.


By the time those defenders stay in his pocket, Lonzo has already someone open like oops there it is.


which was best. Whoomp, There it is (Tag Team) or Whoot There it is (95 South)?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Andre2K
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 12199

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2017 6:31 am    Post subject:

Hero Ball wrote:
Andre2K wrote:
M2K wrote:
Andre2K wrote:
Watching Lonzo, Simmons, Embiid and our next year's pick run laps around the league would give me nightmares, I think I'd sleep better at night watching them trying to sort out their potential spacing issues with Jackson or Fox. The front office shouldn't overthink this, draft Lonzo.

Top NCAA Freshmen Total Points Added (TPA) Scores


NBA defenders will shutdown Lonzo's game because they'll stay in his hip pocket forcing him to play to his greatest weakness... dribble penetration.


Okay, what data or example do you have to back up this claim?


His greatest weakness is he looks like Robert Davi which also means he is Hollywood ready.


Hmm...I think you're up to something there
_________________
My Dream Starting 5 next Season

Pg Lonzo
Sg Kawhi
Sf Ingram
Pf Lebron
C Dedmon

Bench: Caruso, Hart, Bullock, Kuzma, McGee etc
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
THE GOODS
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 11 Aug 2002
Posts: 1367

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2017 6:47 am    Post subject:

Any takes on D.J. Wilson as a possible candidate at #28? Mike? Jorker?

I see a lot posters wanting a stretch 4. I know he lacks physicality, but he's got good range, seems to move well enough on the perimeter to close out on shooters and he's got the wingspan 7-3 to bother shots in the paint. His rebound rate is terrible, but we've already got big guys who can do that. Assuming we take Ball at #2. do you think he can fit well with our team?

I'm still on the Bell bandwagon but I was intrigued by Wilson's game, just wanted to hear some thoughts on him as a player.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
PayasoLoco
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 07 Jul 2001
Posts: 16663

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2017 6:52 am    Post subject:

fiendishoc wrote:
This was my first impression of Tatum (vs Jackson) and I don't think I've ever gotten over it:











Maybe try something else, Jayson?


Tatum seems like a stiff
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
CRoost
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Posts: 4790

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2017 6:54 am    Post subject:

ChickenStu wrote:
nash wrote:
ChickenStu wrote:
Hero Ball wrote:
I am confident Lonzo will be the pick because we need a court general and 3 point shooting.

As of now, we only have DLo who is better off playing the 2 and Ennis.


I do think that Lonzo will be the pick.

I'm just worried that he has a large range of potential outcomes, downside included.


That can be said about any prospect.

I don't know if Ball is going to be the best player to select at #2 but at least I'm sure he is someone I actually enjoy watching.

We didn't win anything in the 90's bur that team was funny to watch something I can't really say about our current core. Julius and JC lack of IQ make me nervous, so does Dlo's careless turnovers and lack of aggression.


I'll be more direct: I think that Lonzo's range of outcomes is more wide than the prospects being talked about (in his range) in this draft. He's just such an odd player. Will a low usage rate player be able to affect the game in the NBA similar to how he did in college? Will that funky shot (which I acknowledge flies through the air with a nice rotation) translate to the NBA, or will defenders get up on him on his left shoulder and force him to go right and by them?

I think he has both a lower floor and a lower ceiling that Jackson. Obviously, this is just opinion, and it's not fact. There's certainly a scenario where I could see Jackson not being a perimeter threat in the NBA and that would make him just a nice activity/role player, and a scenario where I could see Lonzo's form not being a hindrance to being a solid 3-point shooter and great passer.

One more thing I'll add is that I think Bolden is a lottery talent, the more I watch tape on him. Had he put up the stats he did from last season in Europe, but for UCLA in a second theoretical season there instead of in Europe, I think the kid is being talked about as a lottery pick. As long as you interview the guy and don't come away alarmed as to why he just didn't do that well at UCLA, to me, what he showed on tape last season should far supercede what transpired at UCLA. I already stated my belief that a lot of things can happen to young men at such a young age, from one year to the next. And there is absolutely no disputing the fact that the competition in the ABA is far better than what the Pac-12 has to offer.

I'm not even guaranteeing that Bolden ends up a really good NBA player. But what I am saying is that there's more of a chance that he does than the vast majority of players that are being mocked ahead of him. And he certainly has far more upside than virtually all of those guys. I mean, Ivan Rabb or Bolden...are you kidding me?


YES on Lonzo.

PASS on Bolden.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Hero Ball
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 May 2015
Posts: 4403

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2017 7:43 am    Post subject:

I'd hate to say this but I think Bam gets taken in the lottery. No way he drops to 28.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KeepItRealOrElse
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 11 Oct 2012
Posts: 32767

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2017 7:57 am    Post subject:

Hero Ball wrote:
I'd hate to say this but I think Bam gets taken in the lottery. No way he drops to 28.


Most drafts I have like 2 prospects that I would really want in the late first.. This year I have 8. Draft is crazy deep. We'll be good
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 773, 774, 775 ... 1279, 1280, 1281  Next
Page 774 of 1281
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB