2017-2018 Lakers lineup Rotation and Minutes Breakdown
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144432
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 9:35 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
greenfrog wrote:
So JC goes from leading the team in minutes per game (Luke ) down to 20? I dunno, that seems drastic.


Whose minutes are being taken away? Maybe Ennis. But i get the sense that he will get 11-12 mpg to back up the PG spot.


Ennis shouldn't be getting more than spot minutes unless we decide to tank again.


So since team Tank Guards was DLO/Lou/Swaggy/JC, do you not want to play JC too?


JC is a lot better than Ennis. We didn't seem to even want him, we signed him when everyone else turned us down.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epak
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 34147

PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:12 am    Post subject:

2017-18 Lineup by end of the year.

Forecast 1: Unfortunately, Russell Westbrook has an injury that causes him to miss 60% of the season. OKC is a .500 club with PG leading the team. As whispers of PG leaving for the Lakers in the off-season bubble up in Oklahoma, the Thunder decide to trade PG to the Lakers instead of losing him for nothing. And since they assume Kanter will opt in next year, and they are out of cap space, they decide to take on Jordan Clarkson since they can't sign a better FA. PG to L.A. for JC and Brewer.

Forecast 2: The Pelicans struggle with a lineup of AD and Cousins. Everyone on the team gets along, but every game is a grind. Advanced stats show that the team does slightly better when one of AD/Cousins is off the floor. The twin tower experiment fails in the current NBA and the Pelicans try to trade Cousins to the Lakers in a package centered on Brook Lopez. Surprisingly the Lakers balk on the deal.

Minutes breakdown (averages)
Ball (29) . Ennis (17)
KCP (31) . Hard|Blue (15)
PG (32) . Ingram (29)
Randle (29) . Nance (20)
Lopez (26) . Zubac (12)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:20 am    Post subject:

epak wrote:
2017-18 Lineup by end of the year.

Forecast 1: Unfortunately, Russell Westbrook has an injury that causes him to miss 60% of the season. OKC is a .500 club with PG leading the team. As whispers of PG leaving for the Lakers in the off-season bubble up in Oklahoma, the Thunder decide to trade PG to the Lakers instead of losing him for nothing. And since they assume Kanter will opt in next year, and they are out of cap space, they decide to take on Jordan Clarkson since they can't sign a better FA. PG to L.A. for JC and Brewer.

Forecast 2: The Pelicans struggle with a lineup of AD and Cousins. Everyone on the team gets along, but every game is a grind. Advanced stats show that the team does slightly better when one of AD/Cousins is off the floor. The twin tower experiment fails in the current NBA and the Pelicans try to trade Cousins to the Lakers in a package centered on Brook Lopez. Surprisingly the Lakers balk on the deal.

Minutes breakdown (averages)
Ball (29) . Ennis (17)
KCP (31) . Hard|Blue (15)
PG (32) . Ingram (29)
Randle (29) . Nance (20)
Lopez (26) . Zubac (12)


I've thought about that too. Would OKC take JC/Jules for PG13 for example? I know the Indy trade was a double benefit to them b/c they got out of Dipo's ugly deal AND they got PG13.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
pio2u
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 26 Dec 2012
Posts: 54519

PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 4:40 pm    Post subject:

I think most nights Luke will play 8-10 guys. However no matter how the minutes pan out we need consistency, better shooting and improvement defensively in all areas.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Chronicle
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Posts: 31930
Location: Manhattan

PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:16 pm    Post subject:

Brewer will probably get a bunch of minutes at the backup 3, at least for the first half of the season if not longer
_________________
Kobe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
2019
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 03 Dec 2014
Posts: 10786

PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:26 pm    Post subject:

epak wrote:
2017-18 Lineup by end of the year.

Forecast 1: Unfortunately, Russell Westbrook has an injury that causes him to miss 60% of the season. OKC is a .500 club with PG leading the team. As whispers of PG leaving for the Lakers in the off-season bubble up in Oklahoma, the Thunder decide to trade PG to the Lakers instead of losing him for nothing. And since they assume Kanter will opt in next year, and they are out of cap space, they decide to take on Jordan Clarkson since they can't sign a better FA. PG to L.A. for JC and Brewer.

Forecast 2: The Pelicans struggle with a lineup of AD and Cousins. Everyone on the team gets along, but every game is a grind. Advanced stats show that the team does slightly better when one of AD/Cousins is off the floor. The twin tower experiment fails in the current NBA and the Pelicans try to trade Cousins to the Lakers in a package centered on Brook Lopez. Surprisingly the Lakers balk on the deal.

Minutes breakdown (averages)
Ball (29) . Ennis (17)
KCP (31) . Hard|Blue (15)
PG (32) . Ingram (29)
Randle (29) . Nance (20)
Lopez (26) . Zubac (12)


No chance OKC would take that deal and no chance we would turn down Lopez for Cousins. Cousins is almost the perfect C for Lonzo... imagine him get looks like Zo was getting Zu all SL.

Lopez is going to be a great fit to but just pointing out that we would never turn down a trade for (arguably) the best C in the NBA.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
fontana3d
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 3794

PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2017 6:12 am    Post subject:

2019 wrote:
epak wrote:
2017-18 Lineup by end of the year.

Forecast 1: Unfortunately, Russell Westbrook has an injury that causes him to miss 60% of the season. OKC is a .500 club with PG leading the team. As whispers of PG leaving for the Lakers in the off-season bubble up in Oklahoma, the Thunder decide to trade PG to the Lakers instead of losing him for nothing. And since they assume Kanter will opt in next year, and they are out of cap space, they decide to take on Jordan Clarkson since they can't sign a better FA. PG to L.A. for JC and Brewer.

Forecast 2: The Pelicans struggle with a lineup of AD and Cousins. Everyone on the team gets along, but every game is a grind. Advanced stats show that the team does slightly better when one of AD/Cousins is off the floor. The twin tower experiment fails in the current NBA and the Pelicans try to trade Cousins to the Lakers in a package centered on Brook Lopez. Surprisingly the Lakers balk on the deal.

Minutes breakdown (averages)
Ball (29) . Ennis (17)
KCP (31) . Hard|Blue (15)
PG (32) . Ingram (29)
Randle (29) . Nance (20)
Lopez (26) . Zubac (12)


No chance OKC would take that deal and no chance we would turn down Lopez for Cousins. Cousins is almost the perfect C for Lonzo... imagine him get looks like Zo was getting Zu all SL.

Lopez is going to be a great fit to but just pointing out that we would never turn down a trade for (arguably) the best C in the NBA.


You mean the best nutcase loser in the league because that is what Cousins is. Plus we have to pay this moron if we wanted to re-sign him.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
fontana3d
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 3794

PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2017 6:16 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
epak wrote:
2017-18 Lineup by end of the year.

Forecast 1: Unfortunately, Russell Westbrook has an injury that causes him to miss 60% of the season. OKC is a .500 club with PG leading the team. As whispers of PG leaving for the Lakers in the off-season bubble up in Oklahoma, the Thunder decide to trade PG to the Lakers instead of losing him for nothing. And since they assume Kanter will opt in next year, and they are out of cap space, they decide to take on Jordan Clarkson since they can't sign a better FA. PG to L.A. for JC and Brewer.

Forecast 2: The Pelicans struggle with a lineup of AD and Cousins. Everyone on the team gets along, but every game is a grind. Advanced stats show that the team does slightly better when one of AD/Cousins is off the floor. The twin tower experiment fails in the current NBA and the Pelicans try to trade Cousins to the Lakers in a package centered on Brook Lopez. Surprisingly the Lakers balk on the deal.

Minutes breakdown (averages)
Ball (29) . Ennis (17)
KCP (31) . Hard|Blue (15)
PG (32) . Ingram (29)
Randle (29) . Nance (20)
Lopez (26) . Zubac (12)


I've thought about that too. Would OKC take JC/Jules for PG13 for example? I know the Indy trade was a double benefit to them b/c they got out of Dipo's ugly deal AND they got PG13.


Indy didn't take that deal what makes you think OKC will they would rather lose PG13 for nothing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2017 6:23 am    Post subject:

fontana3d wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
epak wrote:
2017-18 Lineup by end of the year.

Forecast 1: Unfortunately, Russell Westbrook has an injury that causes him to miss 60% of the season. OKC is a .500 club with PG leading the team. As whispers of PG leaving for the Lakers in the off-season bubble up in Oklahoma, the Thunder decide to trade PG to the Lakers instead of losing him for nothing. And since they assume Kanter will opt in next year, and they are out of cap space, they decide to take on Jordan Clarkson since they can't sign a better FA. PG to L.A. for JC and Brewer.

Forecast 2: The Pelicans struggle with a lineup of AD and Cousins. Everyone on the team gets along, but every game is a grind. Advanced stats show that the team does slightly better when one of AD/Cousins is off the floor. The twin tower experiment fails in the current NBA and the Pelicans try to trade Cousins to the Lakers in a package centered on Brook Lopez. Surprisingly the Lakers balk on the deal.

Minutes breakdown (averages)
Ball (29) . Ennis (17)
KCP (31) . Hard|Blue (15)
PG (32) . Ingram (29)
Randle (29) . Nance (20)
Lopez (26) . Zubac (12)


I've thought about that too. Would OKC take JC/Jules for PG13 for example? I know the Indy trade was a double benefit to them b/c they got out of Dipo's ugly deal AND they got PG13.


Indy didn't take that deal what makes you think OKC will they would rather lose PG13 for nothing.


That's why i noted that OKC got a double benefit (likely going to be getting off Dipo's deal). Just was thinking that maybe they wouldn't mind JC at a reasonable 12.5m/year deal if they know that PG13 is leaving, and especially for LA.

If the net trade is trading DIPO and his ugly deal for JC at half the price, not too bad of a transaction IMO.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
nash
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Oct 2001
Posts: 8194

PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2017 7:22 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
fontana3d wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
epak wrote:
2017-18 Lineup by end of the year.

Forecast 1: Unfortunately, Russell Westbrook has an injury that causes him to miss 60% of the season. OKC is a .500 club with PG leading the team. As whispers of PG leaving for the Lakers in the off-season bubble up in Oklahoma, the Thunder decide to trade PG to the Lakers instead of losing him for nothing. And since they assume Kanter will opt in next year, and they are out of cap space, they decide to take on Jordan Clarkson since they can't sign a better FA. PG to L.A. for JC and Brewer.

Forecast 2: The Pelicans struggle with a lineup of AD and Cousins. Everyone on the team gets along, but every game is a grind. Advanced stats show that the team does slightly better when one of AD/Cousins is off the floor. The twin tower experiment fails in the current NBA and the Pelicans try to trade Cousins to the Lakers in a package centered on Brook Lopez. Surprisingly the Lakers balk on the deal.

Minutes breakdown (averages)
Ball (29) . Ennis (17)
KCP (31) . Hard|Blue (15)
PG (32) . Ingram (29)
Randle (29) . Nance (20)
Lopez (26) . Zubac (12)


I've thought about that too. Would OKC take JC/Jules for PG13 for example? I know the Indy trade was a double benefit to them b/c they got out of Dipo's ugly deal AND they got PG13.


Indy didn't take that deal what makes you think OKC will they would rather lose PG13 for nothing.


That's why i noted that OKC got a double benefit (likely going to be getting off Dipo's deal). Just was thinking that maybe they wouldn't mind JC at a reasonable 12.5m/year deal if they know that PG13 is leaving, and especially for LA.

If the net trade is trading DIPO and his ugly deal for JC at half the price, not too bad of a transaction IMO.


It makes sense, Julius is also a good player that can help them. That would be a good deal for both teams.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2017 7:24 am    Post subject:

Quote:

It makes sense, Julius is also a good player that can help them. That would be a good deal for both teams.


The only downside is that it would be nearly a 30m/year future deal if Jules gets 18m/year. They got out of DIPO's bad deal, do they want to burn their cap space on these two? It depends obviously on how WB pans out. If he and PG13 are both bailing on OKC, they may elect for a totally clean cap sheet.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144432
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:17 am    Post subject:

2019 wrote:
epak wrote:
2017-18 Lineup by end of the year.

Forecast 1: Unfortunately, Russell Westbrook has an injury that causes him to miss 60% of the season. OKC is a .500 club with PG leading the team. As whispers of PG leaving for the Lakers in the off-season bubble up in Oklahoma, the Thunder decide to trade PG to the Lakers instead of losing him for nothing. And since they assume Kanter will opt in next year, and they are out of cap space, they decide to take on Jordan Clarkson since they can't sign a better FA. PG to L.A. for JC and Brewer.

Forecast 2: The Pelicans struggle with a lineup of AD and Cousins. Everyone on the team gets along, but every game is a grind. Advanced stats show that the team does slightly better when one of AD/Cousins is off the floor. The twin tower experiment fails in the current NBA and the Pelicans try to trade Cousins to the Lakers in a package centered on Brook Lopez. Surprisingly the Lakers balk on the deal.

Minutes breakdown (averages)
Ball (29) . Ennis (17)
KCP (31) . Hard|Blue (15)
PG (32) . Ingram (29)
Randle (29) . Nance (20)
Lopez (26) . Zubac (12)


No chance OKC would take that deal and no chance we would turn down Lopez for Cousins. Cousins is almost the perfect C for Lonzo... imagine him get looks like Zo was getting Zu all SL.

Lopez is going to be a great fit to but just pointing out that we would never turn down a trade for (arguably) the best C in the NBA.


Yes, Cousins could teach Lonzo how to drink in the locker room. That veteran leadership!
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144432
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:19 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
fontana3d wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
epak wrote:
2017-18 Lineup by end of the year.

Forecast 1: Unfortunately, Russell Westbrook has an injury that causes him to miss 60% of the season. OKC is a .500 club with PG leading the team. As whispers of PG leaving for the Lakers in the off-season bubble up in Oklahoma, the Thunder decide to trade PG to the Lakers instead of losing him for nothing. And since they assume Kanter will opt in next year, and they are out of cap space, they decide to take on Jordan Clarkson since they can't sign a better FA. PG to L.A. for JC and Brewer.

Forecast 2: The Pelicans struggle with a lineup of AD and Cousins. Everyone on the team gets along, but every game is a grind. Advanced stats show that the team does slightly better when one of AD/Cousins is off the floor. The twin tower experiment fails in the current NBA and the Pelicans try to trade Cousins to the Lakers in a package centered on Brook Lopez. Surprisingly the Lakers balk on the deal.

Minutes breakdown (averages)
Ball (29) . Ennis (17)
KCP (31) . Hard|Blue (15)
PG (32) . Ingram (29)
Randle (29) . Nance (20)
Lopez (26) . Zubac (12)


I've thought about that too. Would OKC take JC/Jules for PG13 for example? I know the Indy trade was a double benefit to them b/c they got out of Dipo's ugly deal AND they got PG13.


Indy didn't take that deal what makes you think OKC will they would rather lose PG13 for nothing.


That's why i noted that OKC got a double benefit (likely going to be getting off Dipo's deal). Just was thinking that maybe they wouldn't mind JC at a reasonable 12.5m/year deal if they know that PG13 is leaving, and especially for LA.

If the net trade is trading DIPO and his ugly deal for JC at half the price, not too bad of a transaction IMO.


Not if you want to win which OKC seems interested in.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epak
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 34147

PostPosted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:02 pm    Post subject:

2019 wrote:
epak wrote:
2017-18 Lineup by end of the year.

Forecast 1: Unfortunately, Russell Westbrook has an injury that causes him to miss 60% of the season. OKC is a .500 club with PG leading the team. As whispers of PG leaving for the Lakers in the off-season bubble up in Oklahoma, the Thunder decide to trade PG to the Lakers instead of losing him for nothing. And since they assume Kanter will opt in next year, and they are out of cap space, they decide to take on Jordan Clarkson since they can't sign a better FA. PG to L.A. for JC and Brewer.

Forecast 2: The Pelicans struggle with a lineup of AD and Cousins. Everyone on the team gets along, but every game is a grind. Advanced stats show that the team does slightly better when one of AD/Cousins is off the floor. The twin tower experiment fails in the current NBA and the Pelicans try to trade Cousins to the Lakers in a package centered on Brook Lopez. Surprisingly the Lakers balk on the deal.

Minutes breakdown (averages)
Ball (29) . Ennis (17)
KCP (31) . Hard|Blue (15)
PG (32) . Ingram (29)
Randle (29) . Nance (20)
Lopez (26) . Zubac (12)


No chance OKC would take that deal and no chance we would turn down Lopez for Cousins. Cousins is almost the perfect C for Lonzo... imagine him get looks like Zo was getting Zu all SL.

Lopez is going to be a great fit to but just pointing out that we would never turn down a trade for (arguably) the best C in the NBA.


We'll see.
I'm really interested to see how OKC plays this year. Hoping they suck.
I think we balk on cousins if the Lakers are keen on LeBron and PG right?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144432
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 8:42 am    Post subject:

fontana3d wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
epak wrote:
2017-18 Lineup by end of the year.

Forecast 1: Unfortunately, Russell Westbrook has an injury that causes him to miss 60% of the season. OKC is a .500 club with PG leading the team. As whispers of PG leaving for the Lakers in the off-season bubble up in Oklahoma, the Thunder decide to trade PG to the Lakers instead of losing him for nothing. And since they assume Kanter will opt in next year, and they are out of cap space, they decide to take on Jordan Clarkson since they can't sign a better FA. PG to L.A. for JC and Brewer.

Forecast 2: The Pelicans struggle with a lineup of AD and Cousins. Everyone on the team gets along, but every game is a grind. Advanced stats show that the team does slightly better when one of AD/Cousins is off the floor. The twin tower experiment fails in the current NBA and the Pelicans try to trade Cousins to the Lakers in a package centered on Brook Lopez. Surprisingly the Lakers balk on the deal.

Minutes breakdown (averages)
Ball (29) . Ennis (17)
KCP (31) . Hard|Blue (15)
PG (32) . Ingram (29)
Randle (29) . Nance (20)
Lopez (26) . Zubac (12)


I've thought about that too. Would OKC take JC/Jules for PG13 for example? I know the Indy trade was a double benefit to them b/c they got out of Dipo's ugly deal AND they got PG13.


Indy didn't take that deal what makes you think OKC will they would rather lose PG13 for nothing.


OKC would prefer that PG opts in or if not, re-signs there.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Lucky_Shot
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 10 Jan 2016
Posts: 5140

PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 5:44 pm    Post subject:

Update:

PG Ball/Ennis
SG Pope/Clarkson
SF Ingram/Kuzma
PF Nance/Randle
C Bogut/Lopez

30min: Ball Pope Ingram
24min: Randle Nance Bogut Lopez
18min: Kuzma Ennis Clarkson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
fontana3d
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 3794

PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 6:43 pm    Post subject:

Lucky_Shot wrote:
Update:

PG Ball/Ennis
SG Pope/Clarkson
SF Ingram/Kuzma
PF Nance/Randle
C Bogut/Lopez

30min: Ball Pope Ingram
24min: Randle Nance Bogut Lopez
18min: Kuzma Ennis Clarkson


I got it mostly right expect for PF and C. There is 21 million reasons why Lopez is not coming off the bench, and Randle is playing for a contract that would be ground for him asking for a trade if you make him come off the bench.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144432
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 6:58 pm    Post subject:

Lucky_Shot wrote:
Update:

PG Ball/Ennis
SG Pope/Clarkson
SF Ingram/Kuzma
PF Nance/Randle
C Bogut/Lopez

30min: Ball Pope Ingram
24min: Randle Nance Bogut Lopez
18min: Kuzma Ennis Clarkson


That won’t happen
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kobe_4_mvp
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 13 Apr 2008
Posts: 3798

PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 7:08 pm    Post subject:

Lucky_Shot wrote:
Update:

PG Ball/Ennis
SG Pope/Clarkson
SF Ingram/Kuzma
PF Nance/Randle
C Bogut/Lopez

30min: Ball Pope Ingram
24min: Randle Nance Bogut Lopez
18min: Kuzma Ennis Clarkson


are you tanking?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Lucky_Shot
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 10 Jan 2016
Posts: 5140

PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 7:13 pm    Post subject:

Post all-star game I think this will be our best defensive lineup and will work with Lonzo's transition game.

There could be better lineups, the data will tell us. I also think our best lineup will include Bogut.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epak
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 34147

PostPosted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 7:57 am    Post subject:

I'd like to see Nance at the center spot especially if he's gunning for the dpoy.
I hope Lopez and Bogut aren't too upset with their lack of minutes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144432
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 9:11 am    Post subject:

epak wrote:
I'd like to see Nance at the center spot especially if he's gunning for the dpoy.
I hope Lopez and Bogut aren't too upset with their lack of minutes.


Nance lacked the strength to play the center spot defensively last season, we will see if that has changed.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
oldlakerfan
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 2146
Location: Tega Cay, South Carolina

PostPosted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 9:24 am    Post subject:

Here is how I see it

PG: Ball/Clarkson
SG: KCP/Clarkson/BI
SF: BI/Kuz
PF: Randle/Nance/Kuz
C: Lopez/Randle or Nance/Zubac or Bogut

Inconsistent appearances: Brewer/Hart/Ennis

Warming the bench: Deng

Inactive Bryant, Deng, Hart of Ennis

Around 27-32 minutes: Randle, Ball, BI, Clarkson, KCP
15 to 20 Minutes: Kuzma, Nance
10 Minutes: Winner of Zubac and Bogut
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Luminous8
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 Apr 2017
Posts: 2192

PostPosted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 6:10 pm    Post subject:

https://scontent-dft4-3.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/22007988_1670859882926297_1488097701702756119_n.jpg?efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&oh=1680e821251d8abf022da6d9f92b38b0&oe=5A8884B3

Please tell me this doesn't mean anything?!?!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
3peat_pete
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 13 Mar 2009
Posts: 5464

PostPosted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 7:41 pm    Post subject:

Luminous8 wrote:
https://scontent-dft4-3.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/22007988_1670859882926297_1488097701702756119_n.jpg?efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&oh=1680e821251d8abf022da6d9f92b38b0&oe=5A8884B3

Please tell me this doesn't mean anything?!?!


haha

that guy in the middle thinks it's still the early 2000s. breh, you washed up. give it up already.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 3 of 5
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB