Jameer Nelson has been released by the Nuggets. Should have a number of suitors.
Better then Ennis and he brings that savvy veteran influence, I hope we waive Ennis and sign Jameer... Ennis has been a disappointment, at least Nelson will be a positive influence on the young guys.
Jameer Nelson has been released by the Nuggets. Should have a number of suitors.
Better then Ennis and he brings that savvy veteran influence, I hope we waive Ennis and sign Jameer... Ennis has been a disappointment, at least Nelson will be a positive influence on the young guys.
Who cares he's going to end up with a contender anyways.
With the unfortunate injury to Lin, Is it possible Brooklyn takes on Clarkson? There gonna need another guard scorer.
Lakers get: Harris and Booker
Nets get: Randle, Clarkson and two 2nd round picks
Why for Lakers?
We get a pure shooter in Harris and we free up cap space for the summer, since both Harris and Booker are expiring.
Why for Nets?
They need a power forward and Randle provides them with one. Clarkson replaces the injured Lin. He had success doing that before, didnt he? They also get some 2nd round picks to help even things out.
Joined: 16 Jun 2005 Posts: 40345 Location: Dirty South
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2017 3:48 am Post subject:
scoobs wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
With the unfortunate injury to Lin, Is it possible Brooklyn takes on Clarkson? There gonna need another guard scorer.
Lakers get: Harris and Booker
Nets get: Randle, Clarkson and two 2nd round picks
Why for Lakers?
We get a pure shooter in Harris and we free up cap space for the summer, since both Harris and Booker are expiring.
Why for Nets?
They need a power forward and Randle provides them with one. Clarkson replaces the injured Lin. He had success doing that before, didnt he? They also get some 2nd round picks to help even things out.
I understand what your thinking, and if I was unbias, I could accept the logic....but why would we have to toss in picks? Not sure I could send Randle to the Nets....I mean if they are good in a couple years, and DLo and Julius are a big part of their success....that may be too much to handle.
With the unfortunate injury to Lin, Is it possible Brooklyn takes on Clarkson? There gonna need another guard scorer.
Lakers get: Harris and Booker
Nets get: Randle, Clarkson and two 2nd round picks
Why for Lakers?
We get a pure shooter in Harris and we free up cap space for the summer, since both Harris and Booker are expiring.
Why for Nets?
They need a power forward and Randle provides them with one. Clarkson replaces the injured Lin. He had success doing that before, didnt he? They also get some 2nd round picks to help even things out.
That's a good way of achieving the two max plan, though the poor Nets are being turned into the 2016-17 Lakers. I'd only send one second round pick, though, and it wouldn't be Chicago's 2019 2nd.
If Chicago wants to dump Portis, I wonder if they would send Nwaba with him?
Lakers get:
Portis
Nwaba
Bulls get:
Clarkson
The Bulls would have the cap space to take on Clarkson, and would provide them a needed scoring guard....especially until Lavine is healthy.
The Lakers would shed Clarksons salary, and get a young defensive wing in Nwaba. We have no need for Portis....could simply waive him.
I was actually wondering if the Portis fight would make them more open to taking Julius Randle, depending on how they want to handle Portis long-term. _________________ Austin Reaves
Tweeter: @sarah_dotbiz
I heard Dlo is a bust. Can we trade him for Jc? Of course Nets need to include a few future 1sts too. _________________ From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
With the unfortunate injury to Lin, Is it possible Brooklyn takes on Clarkson? There gonna need another guard scorer.
Lakers get: Harris and Booker
Nets get: Randle, Clarkson and two 2nd round picks
Why for Lakers?
We get a pure shooter in Harris and we free up cap space for the summer, since both Harris and Booker are expiring.
Why for Nets?
They need a power forward and Randle provides them with one. Clarkson replaces the injured Lin. He had success doing that before, didnt he? They also get some 2nd round picks to help even things out.
I understand what your thinking, and if I was unbias, I could accept the logic....but why would we have to toss in picks? Not sure I could send Randle to the Nets....I mean if they are good in a couple years, and DLo and Julius are a big part of their success....that may be too much to handle.
I obviously rather not give up the picks, but Im just trying to be as realistic and unbiased as possible. We could really use Harris's shooting and Booker is decent. Like i said, they are both expiring contracts, so we make out on this deal all the way around. We improve this season because Harris fits a need and lets face it, shooters are a great commodity and very hard to get these days. We also set our selves up for next season, since both player acquired are expiring. I would gladly give up th picks if we could improve while at the same time dumping Clarkson.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
