Official Jordan Clarkson Thread
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 648, 649, 650 ... 683, 684, 685  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> General Basketball Discussion Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
adkindo
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 40345
Location: Dirty South

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:08 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
PayasoLoco wrote:
Girls are this guys motivation

“I mean my pops, my family, that’s always No. 1,” Clarkson said. “But second probably the girls and stuff. Females. Know what I mean? I love women.”


I'm sure Magic is happy with the latter.


honestly, if there is one guy that should understand, it is probably Magic.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Bard207
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 08 Jan 2013
Posts: 7713

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:09 am    Post subject:

Joe Pesci wrote:
Bard207 wrote:
Joe Pesci wrote:
Should the Lakers wait until the summer, after securing the free agents, to dump Clarkson for space or trade him as soon as any reasonable deal becomes available?

The risks: Trade him now and the team may suffer from missing his offense. Also, if you trade him now, you could be dumping him for nothing if no free agents come. Trade him in the offseason and you run the risk of getting hosed after the entire league knows you absolutely MUST trade him. For example, a team could insist on including a guy like Nance with Clarkson into their space.

What say you?



It won't be so much the rest of the league being anti Lakers that could force a high cost to dump Clarkson, it is that there just aren't going to be many places to dump unwanted salary and the cost will be high for any team that wants to do so.

NBA Contracts Summary

Cap holds for 2018 free agents and 2018 draft picks aren't included in those team salary numbers. Salaries for players with team or player options are included.

Interesting. So, it’s safe to assume, you’d trade him ASAP?



If the two Max plan is what they really plan to do, they should have moved him this past summer. At this point in time, I think there will already be some type of cost involved to move him and the cost is more likely to go up than go down as summer 2018 gets closer.


Across the Internet, you will see fans of other teams pondering how their players in the middle can be moved for expiring salary or less returning salary.


1. Superstars & stars who are outperforming their contracts are highly valued.

2. Players on bargain contracts and those doing well on rookie scale contracts are valued.


Clarkson doesn't belong in either of those two categories and is a fully paid journeyman.


Last edited by Bard207 on Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:10 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:10 am    Post subject:

adkindo wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
PayasoLoco wrote:
Girls are this guys motivation

“I mean my pops, my family, that’s always No. 1,” Clarkson said. “But second probably the girls and stuff. Females. Know what I mean? I love women.”


I'm sure Magic is happy with the latter.


honestly, if there is one guy that should understand, it is probably Magic.


I think that's my point?
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
adkindo
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 40345
Location: Dirty South

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:11 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
adkindo wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
PayasoLoco wrote:
Girls are this guys motivation

“I mean my pops, my family, that’s always No. 1,” Clarkson said. “But second probably the girls and stuff. Females. Know what I mean? I love women.”


I'm sure Magic is happy with the latter.


honestly, if there is one guy that should understand, it is probably Magic.


I think that's my point?


my bad, I miss read it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Joe Pesci
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 15 Oct 2017
Posts: 3885

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 9:08 am    Post subject:

Bard207 wrote:
Joe Pesci wrote:
Bard207 wrote:
Joe Pesci wrote:
Should the Lakers wait until the summer, after securing the free agents, to dump Clarkson for space or trade him as soon as any reasonable deal becomes available?

The risks: Trade him now and the team may suffer from missing his offense. Also, if you trade him now, you could be dumping him for nothing if no free agents come. Trade him in the offseason and you run the risk of getting hosed after the entire league knows you absolutely MUST trade him. For example, a team could insist on including a guy like Nance with Clarkson into their space.

What say you?



It won't be so much the rest of the league being anti Lakers that could force a high cost to dump Clarkson, it is that there just aren't going to be many places to dump unwanted salary and the cost will be high for any team that wants to do so.

NBA Contracts Summary

Cap holds for 2018 free agents and 2018 draft picks aren't included in those team salary numbers. Salaries for players with team or player options are included.

Interesting. So, it’s safe to assume, you’d trade him ASAP?



If the two Max plan is what they really plan to do, they should have moved him this past summer. At this point in time, I think there will already be some type of cost involved to move him and the cost is more likely to go up than go down as summer 2018 gets closer.


Across the Internet, you will see fans of other teams pondering how their players in the middle can be moved for expiring salary or less returning salary.


1. Superstars & stars who are outperforming their contracts are highly valued.

2. Players on bargain contracts and those doing well on rookie scale contracts are valued.


Clarkson doesn't belong in either of those two categories and is a fully paid journeyman.

Hardcore isht right here. I couldn’t agree more.

Although his numbers are awe-inspiring, I admit, and he is a very gifted and efficient scorer, he doesn’t work with Ball.

On paper, the offensive Clarkson and the unselfish, defensive Ball should be a match, but Clarkson is and always has been too dominant — it’s the primary reason he excelled as a rookie on an awful team.

I’d only keep him until the summer unless I know with absolute certainty that there were several teams (3-4) who were enamored with him enough to absorb him ... but that is all fantasy according to Bard, because realistically there wont be enough teams with the actual space+need to absorb him this summer.

So, all this begs the questions:

- Why the hell are they waiting?
- His value will never get any higher, right?
- Am I giving them too much credit to assume that they know they can trade him whenever they please?
- Because if they aren’t previed to this knowledge, that would mean that they are inept, and can they be that stupid?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 9:13 am    Post subject:

Quote:
So, all this begs the questions:

- Why the hell are they waiting?
- His value will never get any higher, right?
- Am I giving them too much credit to assume that they know they can trade him whenever they please?
- Because if they aren’t previed to this knowledge, that would mean that they are inept, and can they be that stupid?


I don't think the Lakers feel they have a sufficient replacement if he's traded for essentially a salary dump. Hart isn't ready, and who is playing backup PG?
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
socalsp3
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 07 Jul 2016
Posts: 3502

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 9:24 am    Post subject:

Is he still here?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Joe Pesci
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 15 Oct 2017
Posts: 3885

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 9:28 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
Quote:
So, all this begs the questions:

- Why the hell are they waiting?
- His value will never get any higher, right?
- Am I giving them too much credit to assume that they know they can trade him whenever they please?
- Because if they aren’t previed to this knowledge, that would mean that they are inept, and can they be that stupid?


I don't think the Lakers feel they have a sufficient replacement if he's traded for essentially a salary dump. Hart isn't ready, and who is playing backup PG?

So you think they’re not trading him because the team will suffer.

Interesting. Although I 100% percent understand and agree upon the importance of winning, I think holding onto him, considering the context, would be an EXTREMELY shortsighted decision. Again, strongly considering the context and everything Mr. Bard posted above.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LuciusAllen
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 5787

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 9:34 am    Post subject:

Joe Pesci wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
Quote:
So, all this begs the questions:

- Why the hell are they waiting?
- His value will never get any higher, right?
- Am I giving them too much credit to assume that they know they can trade him whenever they please?
- Because if they aren’t previed to this knowledge, that would mean that they are inept, and can they be that stupid?


I don't think the Lakers feel they have a sufficient replacement if he's traded for essentially a salary dump. Hart isn't ready, and who is playing backup PG?

So you think they’re not trading him because the team will suffer.

Interesting. Although I 100% percent understand and agree upon the importance of winning, I think holding onto him, considering the context, would be an EXTREMELY shortsighted decision. Again, strongly considering the context and everything Mr. Bard posted above.

I'm sure that if the Lakers could use JC to dump Deng's contract, they would do so without any hesitation. Beyond that, I think they want to be thoughtful about how they shed his contract, because he does have some value in this league (maybe not Deng-dump value, but something)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Joe Pesci
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 15 Oct 2017
Posts: 3885

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 9:49 am    Post subject:

LuciusAllen wrote:
Joe Pesci wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
Quote:
So, all this begs the questions:

- Why the hell are they waiting?
- His value will never get any higher, right?
- Am I giving them too much credit to assume that they know they can trade him whenever they please?
- Because if they aren’t previed to this knowledge, that would mean that they are inept, and can they be that stupid?


I don't think the Lakers feel they have a sufficient replacement if he's traded for essentially a salary dump. Hart isn't ready, and who is playing backup PG?

So you think they’re not trading him because the team will suffer.

Interesting. Although I 100% percent understand and agree upon the importance of winning, I think holding onto him, considering the context, would be an EXTREMELY shortsighted decision. Again, strongly considering the context and everything Mr. Bard posted above.

I'm sure that if the Lakers could use JC to dump Deng's contract, they would do so without any hesitation. Beyond that, I think they want to be thoughtful about how they shed his contract, because he does have some value in this league (maybe not Deng-dump value, but something)

I’m sorry, but this sounds like rhetoric. I mean, what does it even mean?

Read Bard’s post. Not to sweat the dude, but all the necessary thoughtfulness is there.

Try not to respond to people actually giving answers and being thoughtful with, “I think the Lakers will be thoughtful because Clarkson has value”.

Tell me what kind of value he has. Otherwise you’re spewing rhetoric and being Captain Obvious.

I suppose I agree with you, but there really isn’t much to agree with because there isn’t very much being said.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
levon
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 11 Oct 2016
Posts: 10602

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 9:52 am    Post subject:

adkindo wrote:
my bad, I miss read it.

this was not lost on me
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
adkindo
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 40345
Location: Dirty South

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 9:56 am    Post subject:

levon wrote:
adkindo wrote:
my bad, I miss read it.

this was not lost on me


my poor spelling of misread?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Kjj10697X
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 02 Dec 2012
Posts: 375

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 11:51 am    Post subject:

Joe Pesci wrote:
Should the Lakers wait until the summer, after securing the free agents, to dump Clarkson for space or trade him as soon as any reasonable deal becomes available?

The risks: Trade him now and the team may suffer from missing his offense. Also, if you trade him now, you could be dumping him for nothing if no free agents come. Trade him in the offseason and you run the risk of getting hosed after the entire league knows you absolutely MUST trade him. For example, a team could insist on including a guy like Nance with Clarkson into their space.

What say you?


If we have commitments from 2 max players, we can stretch Deng, not pickup JR, and stretch JC.

Case closed. Nothing else to discuss.

Is it wasteful? Yes ...... but so is trading away young guys now just in case we can get 2 max players this summer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
2019
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 03 Dec 2014
Posts: 10804

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 11:54 am    Post subject:

Joe Pesci wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
Quote:
So, all this begs the questions:

- Why the hell are they waiting?
- His value will never get any higher, right?
- Am I giving them too much credit to assume that they know they can trade him whenever they please?
- Because if they aren’t previed to this knowledge, that would mean that they are inept, and can they be that stupid?


I don't think the Lakers feel they have a sufficient replacement if he's traded for essentially a salary dump. Hart isn't ready, and who is playing backup PG?

So you think they’re not trading him because the team will suffer.

Interesting. Although I 100% percent understand and agree upon the importance of winning, I think holding onto him, considering the context, would be an EXTREMELY shortsighted decision. Again, strongly considering the context and everything Mr. Bard posted above.


He's easily moveable but right now he's playing at a level that is helping us win games. No need to do it right now..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Joe Pesci
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 15 Oct 2017
Posts: 3885

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 12:08 pm    Post subject:

Kjj10697X wrote:
Joe Pesci wrote:
Should the Lakers wait until the summer, after securing the free agents, to dump Clarkson for space or trade him as soon as any reasonable deal becomes available?

The risks: Trade him now and the team may suffer from missing his offense. Also, if you trade him now, you could be dumping him for nothing if no free agents come. Trade him in the offseason and you run the risk of getting hosed after the entire league knows you absolutely MUST trade him. For example, a team could insist on including a guy like Nance with Clarkson into their space.

What say you?


If we have commitments from 2 max players, we can stretch Deng, not pickup JR, and stretch JC.

Case closed. Nothing else to discuss.

Is it wasteful? Yes ...... but so is trading away young guys now just in case we can get 2 max players this summer.

Very good to know.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Joe Pesci
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 15 Oct 2017
Posts: 3885

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 12:10 pm    Post subject:

2019 wrote:
Joe Pesci wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
Quote:
So, all this begs the questions:

- Why the hell are they waiting?
- His value will never get any higher, right?
- Am I giving them too much credit to assume that they know they can trade him whenever they please?
- Because if they aren’t previed to this knowledge, that would mean that they are inept, and can they be that stupid?


I don't think the Lakers feel they have a sufficient replacement if he's traded for essentially a salary dump. Hart isn't ready, and who is playing backup PG?

So you think they’re not trading him because the team will suffer.

Interesting. Although I 100% percent understand and agree upon the importance of winning, I think holding onto him, considering the context, would be an EXTREMELY shortsighted decision. Again, strongly considering the context and everything Mr. Bard posted above.


He's easily moveable but right now he's playing at a level that is helping us win games. No need to do it right now..

Easily, huh? If isn’t what K suggested above, stretching him, then im not nearly as confident as you are that he can “easily” be moved.

But hey, hope I’m wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LuciusAllen
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 5787

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 12:23 pm    Post subject:

Joe Pesci wrote:
LuciusAllen wrote:
Joe Pesci wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
Quote:
So, all this begs the questions:

- Why the hell are they waiting?
- His value will never get any higher, right?
- Am I giving them too much credit to assume that they know they can trade him whenever they please?
- Because if they aren’t previed to this knowledge, that would mean that they are inept, and can they be that stupid?


I don't think the Lakers feel they have a sufficient replacement if he's traded for essentially a salary dump. Hart isn't ready, and who is playing backup PG?

So you think they’re not trading him because the team will suffer.

Interesting. Although I 100% percent understand and agree upon the importance of winning, I think holding onto him, considering the context, would be an EXTREMELY shortsighted decision. Again, strongly considering the context and everything Mr. Bard posted above.

I'm sure that if the Lakers could use JC to dump Deng's contract, they would do so without any hesitation. Beyond that, I think they want to be thoughtful about how they shed his contract, because he does have some value in this league (maybe not Deng-dump value, but something)

I’m sorry, but this sounds like rhetoric. I mean, what does it even mean?

Read Bard’s post. Not to sweat the dude, but all the necessary thoughtfulness is there.

Try not to respond to people actually giving answers and being thoughtful with, “I think the Lakers will be thoughtful because Clarkson has value”.

Tell me what kind of value he has. Otherwise you’re spewing rhetoric and being Captain Obvious.

I suppose I agree with you, but there really isn’t much to agree with because there isn’t very much being said.

Sorry, didn't think you would get stuck on a throwaway line like that. Anyway:

http://bkref.com/tiny/08qsJ

A small player comparison among players I pulled out of my wherever. Reggie Jackson, Alan Crabbe, and a younger JR Smith (when he was even better than he is now).

Now, it's not like any of these are brothers from a different mother. Some are pure shooters, while Reggie plays the point. None are especially good on D, all are decent on offense, but none are shooting as well as JC is this year.

All of them have bigger contracts than JC.

I realize that "value" is completely subjective, and I also understand that no teams are going to help the Lakers shed their remaining big contracts. But if three other NBA teams were willing to spend more for players who are essentially less productive (maybe not Reggie, but he's pretty comparable), then it stands to reason that there are NBA GMs out there who see that JC is performing at a relative bargain. And GMs earn their keep on trying to obtain value. So trading a draft pick or an expiring for a (relatively) value contract is going to be appealing to somebody.

Again, I don't believe he has enough value to entice a team to take Deng too. But I think he has enough that a GM can justify taking him on without completely screwing the Lakers in the process.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 7:15 pm    Post subject:

Games like tonight show why I don’t think we will trade JC in season. He brings scoring off the bench at the guard spot. Lonzo and KCP aren’t consistent enough scoring wise.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
tox
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Nov 2015
Posts: 17876

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:03 pm    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
Games like tonight show why I don’t think we will trade JC in season. He brings scoring off the bench at the guard spot. Lonzo and KCP aren’t consistent enough scoring wise.

He's been so good. And while his shooting might regress a bit, he's taking much smarter shots so I don't think he's going to regress too much. But we should trade him now while his value is high. The 2 max plan requires another sacrifice.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
32
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 04 Nov 2009
Posts: 73062

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:21 pm    Post subject:

Great showcase game.
_________________
Nobody in the NBA can touch the Laker brand, which, like the uniform color, is pure gold.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
danzag
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 28 Apr 2013
Posts: 22313
Location: Brazil

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:22 pm    Post subject:

PORN STAR CONTROL
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
BigBallerBrand
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Dec 2008
Posts: 5790
Location: LA

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:22 pm    Post subject:

JC is playing so well that we might be able to get away with attaching him to Deng's contract along with a future first and second for some expiring trash in return
_________________
Billions Billions Billions
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144461
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:22 pm    Post subject:

tox wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
Games like tonight show why I don’t think we will trade JC in season. He brings scoring off the bench at the guard spot. Lonzo and KCP aren’t consistent enough scoring wise.

He's been so good. And while his shooting might regress a bit, he's taking much smarter shots so I don't think he's going to regress too much. But we should trade him now while his value is high. The 2 max plan requires another sacrifice.


How about sacrificing a max?
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
The Juggernaut
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Aug 2017
Posts: 4572

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:24 pm    Post subject:

I wouldn't trade JC yet. If we do get ready to be the worst team in the league and unwatchable games. FO needs to stay patient until the deadline before trying to move JC.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Lakesh0wtime
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 28 Mar 2016
Posts: 5351

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:26 pm    Post subject:

Finally. Luke let's him finish a fame
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> General Basketball Discussion All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 648, 649, 650 ... 683, 684, 685  Next
Page 649 of 685
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB