Team's RPM Numbers
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
tox
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Nov 2015
Posts: 17880

PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 6:00 pm    Post subject:

GoldenThroat wrote:
Looks like RPM is having a hard time moving on from the Russell trade.
Eh that -2.08 DRPM ain't looking too pretty either
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
JustWinBaby
Rookie
Rookie


Joined: 23 Oct 2017
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 7:22 pm    Post subject:

Looks like when Nance returns from injury, our lineup should be according to WIN :

Lopez/Randle
Nance/???? (more Kuzma?)
Kuzma/Ingram
KCP/(Hart/Blue)
Ball/Clarkson





Wins

Center
Lopez: 1.27
Randle: 0.87
Bogut: 0.13

Forward
Nance: 0.73
Kuzma: 0.5
Ingram: 0.24
Brewer: 0.03

Shooting Guard
KCP: 0.55
Hart: 0.11

Point Guard
Ball: 0.46
Clarkson: 0.32
Ennis: 0.06
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
GoldenThroat
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 37474

PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 7:58 pm    Post subject:

tox wrote:
GoldenThroat wrote:
Looks like RPM is having a hard time moving on from the Russell trade.
Eh that -2.08 DRPM ain't looking too pretty either


It's a joke based on a comment in the Ingram thread, where some dude implied that I'm hard on Ingram because I'm upset about the Russell trade.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
levon
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 11 Oct 2016
Posts: 10654

PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 11:23 pm    Post subject:

Lopez with a god-mode prior, tbh.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Lucky_Shot
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 10 Jan 2016
Posts: 5160

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:12 pm    Post subject:

Thanks for compiling all this info, I've been waiting for espn to update their rpm ranks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Luminous8
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 Apr 2017
Posts: 2192

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:23 pm    Post subject:

GoldenThroat wrote:
Looks like RPM is having a hard time moving on from the Russell trade.


Sounds like maybe you are since you keep bringing it up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
DShotMaker1824
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 16 Feb 2012
Posts: 8769

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:13 pm    Post subject:

GoldenThroat wrote:
Looks like RPM is having a hard time moving on from the Russell trade.


_________________

"Through the legs to the left, through the legs to the right, we don't run them Laker plays, we just Kobe fadeaway..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Luminous8
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 Apr 2017
Posts: 2192

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 10:04 pm    Post subject:

GoldenThroat wrote:
tox wrote:
GoldenThroat wrote:
Looks like RPM is having a hard time moving on from the Russell trade.
Eh that -2.08 DRPM ain't looking too pretty either


It's a joke based on a comment in the Ingram thread, where some dude implied that I'm hard on Ingram because I'm upset about the Russell trade.


My bad.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
tox
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Nov 2015
Posts: 17880

PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2017 12:43 am    Post subject:

GoldenThroat wrote:
tox wrote:
GoldenThroat wrote:
Looks like RPM is having a hard time moving on from the Russell trade.
Eh that -2.08 DRPM ain't looking too pretty either


It's a joke based on a comment in the Ingram thread, where some dude implied that I'm hard on Ingram because I'm upset about the Russell trade.

Ah lol. I was expecting Russell to have numbers comparable to last year (where he was positive for much of the year, until we started tanking) after seeing your post
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
tox
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Nov 2015
Posts: 17880

PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2017 12:43 am    Post subject:

levon wrote:
Lopez with a god-mode prior, tbh.

I thought so too.
Then I realized his RPM last year was lower.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Lucky_Shot
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 10 Jan 2016
Posts: 5160

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 10:34 am    Post subject:

Wow what a difference a few games make for a players RPM. To have a huge change in such a short time makes me wonder how reliable rpm is this early in the season. (Rank by position)

Lopez 1.59(7)
Nance .55(25)
Julius -.03(35)
Bogut -.17(33)
Clarkson -.46 (29)
Pope -.77(28)
--------------------- -Dlo -1.38(53)
Kuzma -1.45(74)
CB -1.99(77)
BI -2.10(79)
Ball -2.55(77)

Bigs are favored more by drpm so bigs natural have higher RPMs thats why have the ranking for their positions also
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
The Juggernaut
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Aug 2017
Posts: 4572

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 12:06 pm    Post subject:

I see what the RPM says but I don't buy it completely for Kuzma and Ingram. For Ingram other than that 3 game road trip stretch where he sucked, he's been very good. He's been making the correct plays majority of the time, playing within himself, and playing solid D. The RPM numbers show me that he hasn't been one of our better players which the eye test disagrees with. Same with Kuzma.

These numbers are good to mix in with actual watching of the film. I think Kuzma and Ingram have both been better this season on the whole than what the RPM numbers say.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Aeneas Hunter
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 31763

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 12:37 pm    Post subject:

Lucky_Shot wrote:
Wow what a difference a few games make for a players RPM. To have a huge change in such a short time makes me wonder how reliable rpm is this early in the season. (Rank by position)


That’s true of all stats this early in the season. RPM isn’t some talismanic stat that tells us who is good and who is bad. It just tells us how productive someone has been up to this point.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
greenfrog
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 36081
Location: 502 Bad Gateway

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 12:42 pm    Post subject:

The Juggernaut wrote:
I see what the RPM says but I don't buy it completely for Kuzma and Ingram. For Ingram other than that 3 game road trip stretch where he sucked, he's been very good. He's been making the correct plays majority of the time, playing within himself, and playing solid D. The RPM numbers show me that he hasn't been one of our better players which the eye test disagrees with. Same with Kuzma.

These numbers are good to mix in with actual watching of the film. I think Kuzma and Ingram have both been better this season on the whole than what the RPM numbers say.


Few 3's, made FT's, rebounds, and assists, plus turnovers. That's why Ingram is so low.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
The Juggernaut
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Aug 2017
Posts: 4572

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 12:55 pm    Post subject:

greenfrog wrote:
The Juggernaut wrote:
I see what the RPM says but I don't buy it completely for Kuzma and Ingram. For Ingram other than that 3 game road trip stretch where he sucked, he's been very good. He's been making the correct plays majority of the time, playing within himself, and playing solid D. The RPM numbers show me that he hasn't been one of our better players which the eye test disagrees with. Same with Kuzma.

These numbers are good to mix in with actual watching of the film. I think Kuzma and Ingram have both been better this season on the whole than what the RPM numbers say.


Few 3's, made FT's, rebounds, and assists, plus turnovers. That's why Ingram is so low.


I get why his RPM is low but I see a lot of people using that as a way to brush off Ingram as a bad player when that's not the case. Minus that 3 game stretch, he's been very good this season and is progressing nicely.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Aeneas Hunter
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 31763

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 12:58 pm    Post subject:

The Juggernaut wrote:
greenfrog wrote:
The Juggernaut wrote:
I see what the RPM says but I don't buy it completely for Kuzma and Ingram. For Ingram other than that 3 game road trip stretch where he sucked, he's been very good. He's been making the correct plays majority of the time, playing within himself, and playing solid D. The RPM numbers show me that he hasn't been one of our better players which the eye test disagrees with. Same with Kuzma.

These numbers are good to mix in with actual watching of the film. I think Kuzma and Ingram have both been better this season on the whole than what the RPM numbers say.


Few 3's, made FT's, rebounds, and assists, plus turnovers. That's why Ingram is so low.


I get why his RPM is low but I see a lot of people using that as a way to brush off Ingram as a bad player when that's not the case. Minus that 3 game stretch, he's been very good this season and is progressing nicely.


There’s an old saying about people who use stats like a drunk uses a lamp post: for support, not illumination. We’re all guilty of that at times.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
The Juggernaut
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Aug 2017
Posts: 4572

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 1:03 pm    Post subject:

Aeneas Hunter wrote:
The Juggernaut wrote:
greenfrog wrote:
The Juggernaut wrote:
I see what the RPM says but I don't buy it completely for Kuzma and Ingram. For Ingram other than that 3 game road trip stretch where he sucked, he's been very good. He's been making the correct plays majority of the time, playing within himself, and playing solid D. The RPM numbers show me that he hasn't been one of our better players which the eye test disagrees with. Same with Kuzma.

These numbers are good to mix in with actual watching of the film. I think Kuzma and Ingram have both been better this season on the whole than what the RPM numbers say.


Few 3's, made FT's, rebounds, and assists, plus turnovers. That's why Ingram is so low.


I get why his RPM is low but I see a lot of people using that as a way to brush off Ingram as a bad player when that's not the case. Minus that 3 game stretch, he's been very good this season and is progressing nicely.


There’s an old saying about people who use stats like a drunk uses a lamp post: for support, not illumination. We’re all guilty of that at times.


That's good one. Very true.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
tox
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Nov 2015
Posts: 17880

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 1:10 pm    Post subject:

Lucky_Shot wrote:
Wow what a difference a few games make for a players RPM. To have a huge change in such a short time makes me wonder how reliable rpm is this early in the season. (Rank by position)

Lopez 1.59(7)
Nance .55(25)
Julius -.03(35)
Bogut -.17(33)
Clarkson -.46 (29)
Pope -.77(28)
--------------------- -Dlo -1.38(53)
Kuzma -1.45(74)
CB -1.99(77)
BI -2.10(79)
Ball -2.55(77)

Bigs are favored more by drpm so bigs natural have higher RPMs thats why have the ranking for their positions also

fwiw bigs are favored by drpm but I think the opposite is true, to a smaller extent, for guards (favored in orpm).
It is still true that RPM overall favors bigs though.

Also these fluctuations are why you should ignore RPM until at least January... just not enough games.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Baron Von Humongous
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 02 Jul 2015
Posts: 32979

PostPosted: Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:16 am    Post subject:

Update near the end of December:

Name: RPM (Pos. Rank)

PGs (out of 93)
Lonzo -0.44 (35) - 8th in DRPM
Clarkson -0.90 (45)
Ennis -1.55 (57)
--------------------- Dlo -1.90 (67)
--------------------- Mudiay -5.52 (93)

SGs (out of 100)
KCP 0.01 (22)
Hart -1.36 (42)
Caruso -2.14 (79)

SFs (out of 88)
Brewer -1.19 (48)
Deng -1.31 (51)
Ingram -2.05 (74)

PFs (out of 96)
LNJ 0.97 (23) - 11th DRPM
Randle 0.42 (31)
Kuzma -2.09 (85) - 16th ORPM, last in DRPM

Centers (out of 73)
Lopez 0.48 (20)
Bogut -0.19 (31)
Zu -1.12 (53)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
defense
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Jan 2010
Posts: 39544

PostPosted: Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:44 am    Post subject:

Baron Von Humongous wrote:
Update near the end of December:

Name: RPM (Pos. Rank)

PGs (out of 93)
Lonzo -0.44 (35) - 8th in DRPM
Clarkson -0.90 (45)
Ennis -1.55 (57)
--------------------- Dlo -1.90 (67)
--------------------- Mudiay -5.52 (93)

SGs (out of 100)
KCP 0.01 (22)
Hart -1.36 (42)
Caruso -2.14 (79)

SFs (out of 88)
Brewer -1.19 (48)
Deng -1.31 (51)
Ingram -2.05 (74)

PFs (out of 96)
LNJ 0.97 (23) - 11th DRPM
Randle 0.42 (31)
Kuzma -2.09 (85) - 16th ORPM, last in DRPM

Centers (out of 73)
Lopez 0.48 (20)
Bogut -0.19 (31)
Zu -1.12 (53)


The players we hate the most are the highest.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
tox
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Nov 2015
Posts: 17880

PostPosted: Wed Dec 27, 2017 1:07 pm    Post subject:

defense wrote:
Baron Von Humongous wrote:
Update near the end of December:

Name: RPM (Pos. Rank)

PGs (out of 93)
Lonzo -0.44 (35) - 8th in DRPM
Clarkson -0.90 (45)
Ennis -1.55 (57)
--------------------- Dlo -1.90 (67)
--------------------- Mudiay -5.52 (93)

SGs (out of 100)
KCP 0.01 (22)
Hart -1.36 (42)
Caruso -2.14 (79)

SFs (out of 88)
Brewer -1.19 (48)
Deng -1.31 (51)
Ingram -2.05 (74)

PFs (out of 96)
LNJ 0.97 (23) - 11th DRPM
Randle 0.42 (31)
Kuzma -2.09 (85) - 16th ORPM, last in DRPM

Centers (out of 73)
Lopez 0.48 (20)
Bogut -0.19 (31)
Zu -1.12 (53)


The players we hate the most are the highest.

KCP I get because as much as people hate him, he's a far more dynamic scorer and even shooter than the likes of Hart and Caruso. Lopez is a no brainer with his prior.

Brewer is puzzling at first glance. #59 out of 88 in ORPM? In this case, I think his ORPM gets a boost from Ingram's ISO tendencies, and the fact that we don't have any other 3s. The Lakers score only 0.4 points per 100 possession fewer (well within error) with Brewer off the court vs. on it, so I guess ORPM deduced that Brewer isn't the reason our offense is so mediocre. Of course in reality, Brewer is awful. He just doesn't ball stop a la Ingram and keeps his usage fairly low so the lineup data is somewhat deceiving.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
activeverb
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 37470

PostPosted: Wed Dec 27, 2017 1:19 pm    Post subject:

textbook wrote:
So lopez should be playing 38 min a game.



Up though November, I thought Lopez was the team mvp, primarily for his impact on the defensive end. But his play really fell apart.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
tox
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Nov 2015
Posts: 17880

PostPosted: Wed Dec 27, 2017 1:22 pm    Post subject:

activeverb wrote:
textbook wrote:
So lopez should be playing 38 min a game.



Up though November, I thought Lopez was the team mvp, primarily for his impact on the defensive end. But his play really fell apart.

Yeah his RPM is dropping like an anchor. +2.77 a month and a half ago. +0.48 now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
adkindo
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 40345
Location: Dirty South

PostPosted: Wed Dec 27, 2017 1:32 pm    Post subject:

Nance, Lopez, Randle, KCP only players with positive RPM. All < +1.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
adkindo
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 40345
Location: Dirty South

PostPosted: Wed Dec 27, 2017 1:40 pm    Post subject:

Only players on roster with a positive ORPM is Clarkson (29th PG) and Kuzma (16th PF).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB