View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
scoobs Star Player
Joined: 19 Aug 2005 Posts: 4746
|
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2017 2:40 pm Post subject: Question: Can a team stretch a player that they traded for? |
|
|
I have seen several fans post trade proposals about this, but I am not sure its legal under the CBA. I thought you can only stretch a player that you signed yourself. I might be getting that rule mixed up with the amnesty provision. Can anyone answer this question? Maybe Larry Coon or somebody? Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fontana3d Star Player
Joined: 22 Mar 2013 Posts: 3794
|
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2017 2:43 pm Post subject: Re: Question: Can a team stretch a player that they traded for? |
|
|
scoobs wrote: | I have seen several fans post trade proposals about this, but I am not sure its legal under the CBA. I thought you can only stretch a player that you signed yourself. I might be getting that rule mixed up with the amnesty provision. Can anyone answer this question? Maybe Larry Coon or somebody? Thanks. |
I know the Clips did it before after take took on players from the Bucks that one time. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
venturalakersfan Retired Number
Joined: 14 Apr 2001 Posts: 144462 Location: The Gold Coast
|
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2017 2:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, you can waive a player that you traded for. You must be thinking of amnesty which would only apply for a player you signed. _________________ RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scoobs Star Player
Joined: 19 Aug 2005 Posts: 4746
|
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2017 2:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
venturalakersfan wrote: | Yes, you can waive a player that you traded for. You must be thinking of amnesty which would only apply for a player you signed. | I know that you could waive a player that you traded for. My question was, can you stretch a player that you traded for. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
venturalakersfan Retired Number
Joined: 14 Apr 2001 Posts: 144462 Location: The Gold Coast
|
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2017 3:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Stretching is waiving a player _________________ RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ToastedMuffins Starting Rotation
Joined: 14 Apr 2016 Posts: 589
|
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2017 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There's no limitation to stretching a player acquired through a trade.
The only limitation a team has as far as stretching salary is that the total combined "stretched" salary cannot amount to more than 15% of the overall salary cap for any season.
For instance, in theory the Lakers could have kept Mozgov and opted to stretch both him and Deng this upcoming off-season, however it would have amounted to almost exactly 15% of the salary cap and they would have been prevented from stretching any further salary going forward should they have needed to. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bard207 Star Player
Joined: 08 Jan 2013 Posts: 7713
|
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2017 4:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here is an example of Portland doing it last summer.
TRAIL BLAZERS TRADE CRABBE TO BROOKLYN FOR NICHOLSON (Posted: Jul 25, 2017)
Portland Trail Blazers Team Payroll
Andrew Nicholson
Waived under stretch provision on August 30, 2017.
Traded to POR on July 25, 2017.
2019-20 is player option.
Signed 4-yr/$26M deal on July 7, 2016.
The charges against team salary for the following seasons.
2017 - 18
$2,844,429
2018 - 19
$2,844,429
2019 - 20
$2,844,429
2020 - 21
$2,844,429
2021 - 22
$2,844,429
2022 -23
$2,844,429
2023 -24
$2,844,429
The setup on Basketball Reference didn't go far enough into the future, so I had add the 2023 - 24 season to make the numbers right.
Last edited by Bard207 on Sun Nov 26, 2017 4:23 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LAPauer Starting Rotation
Joined: 14 Jul 2016 Posts: 165
|
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2017 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmm, interesting. So could the Lakers potentially trade Deng and an asset for a less terrible contract, and then waive that player for a substantially lower cost each year? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
venturalakersfan Retired Number
Joined: 14 Apr 2001 Posts: 144462 Location: The Gold Coast
|
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2017 4:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They could but it would have to be a valuable asset _________________ RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dont_be_a_wuss Franchise Player
Joined: 29 Mar 2012 Posts: 21458
|
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2017 4:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Emplay's extend and stretch plan still seems the best. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laker's Fan Franchise Player
Joined: 27 Jun 2002 Posts: 12850
|
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2017 8:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
venturalakersfan wrote: | Stretching is waiving a player |
My understanding of it is that when you waive a player the payments are always stretched while the team has the option whether or not to stretch the cap hit. There is a deadline to include the 'current' year in the stretch.
Yes, you can stretch a salary you trade for in terms of cap hit. _________________ Austin Reaves keeps his game tight, like Kobe Bryant on game night. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Omar Little Moderator
Joined: 02 May 2005 Posts: 90306 Location: Formerly Known As 24
|
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2017 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Laker's Fan wrote: | venturalakersfan wrote: | Stretching is waiving a player |
My understanding of it is that when you waive a player the payments are always stretched while the team has the option whether or not to stretch the cap hit. There is a deadline to include the 'current' year in the stretch.
Yes, you can stretch a salary you trade for in terms of cap hit. |
Yup. I think the op was mistaking stretch for amnesty. _________________ “We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.” ― Elie Wiesel |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scoobs Star Player
Joined: 19 Aug 2005 Posts: 4746
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 1:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
LAPauer wrote: | Hmmm, interesting. So could the Lakers potentially trade Deng and an asset for a less terrible contract, and then waive that player for a substantially lower cost each year? | That is great news! It gives the Lakers a lot of different options in terms of what they do with Deng. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AshesToAshes Star Player
Joined: 20 Jun 2009 Posts: 4837
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 6:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
scoobs wrote: | LAPauer wrote: | Hmmm, interesting. So could the Lakers potentially trade Deng and an asset for a less terrible contract, and then waive that player for a substantially lower cost each year? | That is great news! It gives the Lakers a lot of different options in terms of what they do with Deng. |
But before you celebrate, imagine you're every other GM in the league and decide which asset we have is enough for you to TAKE DENG also; and temper the excitement/expectations.
You have a bad contract and then the Lakers ask you to trade for a worse one. What would it take to say yes? _________________ KOBE!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Aeneas Hunter Retired Number
Joined: 12 Jul 2005 Posts: 31763
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 8:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
AshesToAshes wrote: | scoobs wrote: | That is great news! It gives the Lakers a lot of different options in terms of what they do with Deng. |
But before you celebrate, imagine you're every other GM in the league and decide which asset we have is enough for you to TAKE DENG also; and temper the excitement/expectations.
You have a bad contract and then the Lakers ask you to trade for a worse one. What would it take to say yes? |
I think that the best case scenario is a deadline deal to some contender who thinks that Randall or Clarkson is the piece they need to make a run in the playoffs. It seems unlikely, but this sort of thing happens. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
venturalakersfan Retired Number
Joined: 14 Apr 2001 Posts: 144462 Location: The Gold Coast
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 9:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
AshesToAshes wrote: | scoobs wrote: | LAPauer wrote: | Hmmm, interesting. So could the Lakers potentially trade Deng and an asset for a less terrible contract, and then waive that player for a substantially lower cost each year? | That is great news! It gives the Lakers a lot of different options in terms of what they do with Deng. |
But before you celebrate, imagine you're every other GM in the league and decide which asset we have is enough for you to TAKE DENG also; and temper the excitement/expectations.
You have a bad contract and then the Lakers ask you to trade for a worse one. What would it take to say yes? |
That is the sticking point. The cost might exceed the benefit. _________________ RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ToastedMuffins Starting Rotation
Joined: 14 Apr 2016 Posts: 589
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
There seems to be 4 options for clearing most of Deng's salary off our cap for next season.
Option 1: Extend and Stretch
A plan proposed by Eric Pincus/emplay wherein the Lakers would offer Deng a 5-year extension at virtually the same amount of money he's currently owed thereby allowing them to stretch his salary over the span of 11 years instead of 5. The only snags with this plan are that Deng would likely want some additional compensation to play along and there's a chance the league might veto the extension viewing it as circumvention rather than exploiting a loophole.
Option 2: Buyout and Stretch
This plan would hinge upon Deng's impatience to play for another team and potentially earn another contract. Essentially Deng and the Lakers would agree upon a buyout whereby Deng would take a significant discount on the remaining salary owed to him on his contract under the understanding that he would be released and free to sign with another team where he may actually get to play. Following this the Lakers would stretch the remaining salary owed. Deron Williams recently agreed to a buyout reducing his salary owed by about $18 million for the chance to join another team so it isn't unprecedented.
Option 3: Trade and Stretch
Essentially the Lakers would trade Deng for a slightly less horrible contract using a marginal asset such as a 2nd round pick. The Lakers would then stretch that player for a smaller cap hit then Deng. Some examples of potential players would be Brandon Knight, Gorgui Dieng, Dwight Powell, Solomon Hill, Omer Asik, Timofey Mozgov, Jonas Valanciunas, Tristan Thompson, Miles Plumlee, Marvin Williams, Cody Zeller, Dion Waiters, or Ian Mahinmi.
Option 4: Just Stretch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lamar's Bud Star Player
Joined: 24 Jun 2005 Posts: 2232
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ToastedMuffins wrote: | There seems to be 4 options for clearing most of Deng's salary off our cap for next season.
Option 1: Extend and Stretch
A plan proposed by Eric Pincus/emplay wherein the Lakers would offer Deng a 5-year extension at virtually the same amount of money he's currently owed thereby allowing them to stretch his salary over the span of 11 years instead of 5. The only snags with this plan are that Deng would likely want some additional compensation to play along and there's a chance the league might veto the extension viewing it as circumvention rather than exploiting a loophole.
Option 2: Buyout and Stretch
This plan would hinge upon Deng's impatience to play for another team and potentially earn another contract. Essentially Deng and the Lakers would agree upon a buyout whereby Deng would take a significant discount on the remaining salary owed to him on his contract under the understanding that he would be released and free to sign with another team where he may actually get to play. Following this the Lakers would stretch the remaining salary owed. Deron Williams recently agreed to a buyout reducing his salary owed by about $18 million for the chance to join another team so it isn't unprecedented.
Option 3: Trade and Stretch
Essentially the Lakers would trade Deng for a slightly less horrible contract using a marginal asset such as a 2nd round pick. The Lakers would then stretch that player for a smaller cap hit then Deng. Some examples of potential players would be Brandon Knight, Gorgui Dieng, Dwight Powell, Solomon Hill, Omer Asik, Timofey Mozgov, Jonas Valanciunas, Tristan Thompson, Miles Plumlee, Marvin Williams, Cody Zeller, Dion Waiters, or Ian Mahinmi.
Option 4: Just Stretch |
If Rob and Magic did that.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ToastedMuffins Starting Rotation
Joined: 14 Apr 2016 Posts: 589
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lamar's Bud wrote: | ToastedMuffins wrote: | There seems to be 4 options for clearing most of Deng's salary off our cap for next season.
Option 1: Extend and Stretch
A plan proposed by Eric Pincus/emplay wherein the Lakers would offer Deng a 5-year extension at virtually the same amount of money he's currently owed thereby allowing them to stretch his salary over the span of 11 years instead of 5. The only snags with this plan are that Deng would likely want some additional compensation to play along and there's a chance the league might veto the extension viewing it as circumvention rather than exploiting a loophole.
Option 2: Buyout and Stretch
This plan would hinge upon Deng's impatience to play for another team and potentially earn another contract. Essentially Deng and the Lakers would agree upon a buyout whereby Deng would take a significant discount on the remaining salary owed to him on his contract under the understanding that he would be released and free to sign with another team where he may actually get to play. Following this the Lakers would stretch the remaining salary owed. Deron Williams recently agreed to a buyout reducing his salary owed by about $18 million for the chance to join another team so it isn't unprecedented.
Option 3: Trade and Stretch
Essentially the Lakers would trade Deng for a slightly less horrible contract using a marginal asset such as a 2nd round pick. The Lakers would then stretch that player for a smaller cap hit then Deng. Some examples of potential players would be Brandon Knight, Gorgui Dieng, Dwight Powell, Solomon Hill, Omer Asik, Timofey Mozgov, Jonas Valanciunas, Tristan Thompson, Miles Plumlee, Marvin Williams, Cody Zeller, Dion Waiters, or Ian Mahinmi.
Option 4: Just Stretch |
If Rob and Magic did that.... |
It would certainly be ironic, but he's owed less money over the same amount of years as Deng and has recently been benched in Brooklyn in favor of both Tyler Zeller and Jarrett Allen while the team has been playing better following this. If Brooklyn thinks Mozgov is washed up and that Deng could have something left in the tank, it's conceivable they could be interested in a straight swap. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|