OFFICIAL LONZO BALL THREAD
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 753, 754, 755 ... 1218, 1219, 1220  Next

 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
LakersNewEra
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 16 Apr 2014
Posts: 1449
Location: Vancouver BC

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:08 pm    Post subject:

mookielala wrote:
Lavar and his other kids have nothing to do with the Lakers. What a headache.


Thats what you think!! LaVar disagrees.

https://youtu.be/NhTyu99hjV8

LaVar working on getting us LaMelo! Seriously LaMelo is going to be special and LaVar wants him to play for us. Is that seriously something we should say no to?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
GoldenThroat
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 36646

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:15 pm    Post subject:

LakersNewEra wrote:
mookielala wrote:
Lavar and his other kids have nothing to do with the Lakers. What a headache.


Thats what you think!! LaVar disagrees.

https://youtu.be/NhTyu99hjV8

LaVar working on getting us LaMelo! Seriously LaMelo is going to be special and LaVar wants him to play for us. Is that seriously something we should say no to?


You gotta tone it down about 5 notches, man.
_________________
Sign up for The Athletic through this link to get 40% off your first year's subscription: LINK
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
mookielala
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 29 Jul 2012
Posts: 2604

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:16 pm    Post subject:

LakersNewEra wrote:
mookielala wrote:
Lavar and his other kids have nothing to do with the Lakers. What a headache.


Thats what you think!! LaVar disagrees.

https://youtu.be/NhTyu99hjV8

LaVar working on getting us LaMelo! Seriously LaMelo is going to be special and LaVar wants him to play for us. Is that seriously something we should say no to?


Honestly, at this point, I wish we didn't have any Balls on the team. It's a reality show circus. Definitely not looking forward to another.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Baron Von Humongous
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 02 Jul 2015
Posts: 16433

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:21 pm    Post subject:

Since this is the LaMelo thread now, how about a comparison with Trae Young? Like a bigger Trae Young?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Joe Pesci
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 15 Oct 2017
Posts: 2018

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:29 pm    Post subject:

If La Melo Ball and his family want him here so bad that they enter the 2020 draft truly prepared to ONLY play for the Lakers, prepared to forego two years after refusing to play for a team, other than the Lakers, that drafts you, prepared to become an unprecedented rookie free agent in 2022 that’ll sign for whatever the Lakers can afford, I’m all for it.

He’s a blue-chipper, whatever that means, and he’ll be served up to the Lakers on a platter for probably pennies all because he just really, really wants to play on the Lakers.

Sounds like loyalty and Laker love to me. What’s the problem again?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
SocalDevin
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 May 2016
Posts: 4440
Location: Long Beach

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:38 pm    Post subject:

You guys had me spend a good 15 minutes watchin Kid Melo with this he's better than Lonzo talk lol... I don't think so.. maybe later.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
GoldenThroat
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 36646

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:51 pm    Post subject:

Here are all of the 5-man lineups that Lonzo's been in that've played at least 10 minutes together, and their Net Rating:

Different PF Options

Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Randle + Lopez...................+32.7 (12 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Lopez......................-2.8 (217 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Lopez.......................-9.7 (155 minutes)

Different C Options

Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Randle..................+28.6 (52 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Lopez.......................-9.7 (155 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Bogut.....................-11.5 (11 minutes)

Overall

Lonzo + Clarkson + Blue + Kuzma + Randle................+40.2 (10 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Randle + Lopez....................+32.7 (12 minutes)
Lonzo + Clarkson + Brewer + Kuzma + Randle............+31.6 (13 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Randle..................+28.6 (52 minutes)
Lonzo + Brewer + Ingram + Nance + Lopez................+22.3 (24 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Clarkson + Ingram + Randle................+18.0 (24 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Hart + Kuzma + Randle........................+0.2 (18 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Lopez......................-2.8 (217 minutes)
Lonzo + Brewer + Ingram + Kuzma + Lopez..................-8.9 (10 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Lopez.......................-9.7 (155 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Bogut.....................-11.5 (11 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Randle....................-19.8 (10 minutes)
Lonzo + Deng + Ingram + Nance + Lopez....................-26.8 (13 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Clarkson + Kuzma + Randle..................-28.6 (16 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Nance.....................-93.8 (12 minutes)
_________________
Sign up for The Athletic through this link to get 40% off your first year's subscription: LINK
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
AY2043
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Posts: 9773

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:56 pm    Post subject:

LakersNewEra wrote:
Here is a breakdown of LaMelo's shooting mechanics.

https://youtu.be/dJFrTRRztg8

He is an absolute shooting phenom! Comparisons to Curry are very much unavoidable and on point. As you can see, there is either very little thats wrong with his shooting or in a lot of cases a lot of things he does with his feet and his hips actually make it possible for him to generate that power and shoot from deep. His range is already ridiculous and bear in mind he will get stronger.
I especially liked the point that LaMelo is laser focused on the rim even before the final dribble, his hand eye coordination.

All in all, LaMelo will be amazing and yes IMO he is already better than Lonzo, especially for the NBA.
He just needs to learn the game, needs to learn to play in a system etc. That will come. But the individual talent is there and it looks amazing.

Lonzo on the other hand doesnt have that kind of ceiling IMO. I dont think its even close but Lonzo can become a good player in his own right if he improves his shooting.

I can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic or not....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
AY2043
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Posts: 9773

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:57 pm    Post subject:

GoldenThroat wrote:
Here are all of the 5-man lineups that Lonzo's been in that've played at least 10 minutes together, and their Net Rating:

Different PF Options

Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Randle + Lopez...................+32.7 (12 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Lopez......................-2.8 (217 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Lopez.......................-9.7 (155 minutes)

Different C Options

Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Randle..................+28.6 (52 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Lopez.......................-9.7 (155 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Bogut.....................-11.5 (11 minutes)

Overall

Lonzo + Clarkson + Blue + Kuzma + Randle................+40.2 (10 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Randle + Lopez....................+32.7 (12 minutes)
Lonzo + Clarkson + Brewer + Kuzma + Randle............+31.6 (13 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Randle..................+28.6 (52 minutes)
Lonzo + Brewer + Ingram + Nance + Lopez................+22.3 (24 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Clarkson + Ingram + Randle................+18.0 (24 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Hart + Kuzma + Randle........................+0.2 (18 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Lopez......................-2.8 (217 minutes)
Lonzo + Brewer + Ingram + Kuzma + Lopez..................-8.9 (10 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Lopez.......................-9.7 (155 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Bogut.....................-11.5 (11 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Randle....................-19.8 (10 minutes)
Lonzo + Deng + Ingram + Nance + Lopez....................-26.8 (13 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Clarkson + Kuzma + Randle..................-28.6 (16 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Nance.....................-93.8 (12 minutes)

So basically start Kuzma.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
mookielala
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 29 Jul 2012
Posts: 2604

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:01 pm    Post subject:

AY2043 wrote:
GoldenThroat wrote:
Here are all of the 5-man lineups that Lonzo's been in that've played at least 10 minutes together, and their Net Rating:

Different PF Options

Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Randle + Lopez...................+32.7 (12 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Lopez......................-2.8 (217 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Lopez.......................-9.7 (155 minutes)

Different C Options

Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Randle..................+28.6 (52 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Lopez.......................-9.7 (155 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Bogut.....................-11.5 (11 minutes)

Overall

Lonzo + Clarkson + Blue + Kuzma + Randle................+40.2 (10 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Randle + Lopez....................+32.7 (12 minutes)
Lonzo + Clarkson + Brewer + Kuzma + Randle............+31.6 (13 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Randle..................+28.6 (52 minutes)
Lonzo + Brewer + Ingram + Nance + Lopez................+22.3 (24 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Clarkson + Ingram + Randle................+18.0 (24 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Hart + Kuzma + Randle........................+0.2 (18 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Lopez......................-2.8 (217 minutes)
Lonzo + Brewer + Ingram + Kuzma + Lopez..................-8.9 (10 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Lopez.......................-9.7 (155 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Bogut.....................-11.5 (11 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Randle....................-19.8 (10 minutes)
Lonzo + Deng + Ingram + Nance + Lopez....................-26.8 (13 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Clarkson + Kuzma + Randle..................-28.6 (16 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Nance.....................-93.8 (12 minutes)

So basically start Kuzma.


I think JR is the standout in this stat line.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
SocalDevin
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 May 2016
Posts: 4440
Location: Long Beach

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:03 pm    Post subject:

Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Randle..................+28.6 (52 minutes)

Proof that the majority of LG has it right.. I believe the consensus is most of us would like that to be our starting line up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakersNewEra
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 16 Apr 2014
Posts: 1449
Location: Vancouver BC

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:07 pm    Post subject:

Joe Pesci wrote:
If La Melo Ball and his family want him here so bad that they enter the 2020 draft truly prepared to ONLY play for the Lakers, prepared to forego two years after refusing to play for a team, other than the Lakers, that drafts you, prepared to become an unprecedented rookie free agent in 2022 that’ll sign for whatever the Lakers can afford, I’m all for it.

He’s a blue-chipper, whatever that means, and he’ll be served up to the Lakers on a platter for probably pennies all because he just really, really wants to play on the Lakers.

Sounds like loyalty and Laker love to me. What’s the problem again?



Its not Lakers love. I think Lavar makes it about himself in the end and this would be no exception. Can you imagine for example if LaMelo and Lonzo are Lakers best players? Imagine the kind of control LaVar would have and he would know it.
Honestly a guy like LaVar at that point he would be asking for an ownership stake. Im not kidding.

So all in all as good as Melo will be and he is by far the most skilled 15 year old that I have ever seen, things hes capable of doing at 15 shouldnt be normal even for NBA players...but yeah as good as he is there will be other superstars in the league.
If Lavar would have that kind of control and that much of a pull...then he would be a problem.
I dont think even the front office role would suffice. He would want a percentage of ownership IMO.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
mookielala
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 29 Jul 2012
Posts: 2604

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:10 pm    Post subject:

mookielala wrote:
AY2043 wrote:
GoldenThroat wrote:
Here are all of the 5-man lineups that Lonzo's been in that've played at least 10 minutes together, and their Net Rating:

Different PF Options

Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Randle + Lopez...................+32.7 (12 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Lopez......................-2.8 (217 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Lopez.......................-9.7 (155 minutes)

Different C Options

Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Randle..................+28.6 (52 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Lopez.......................-9.7 (155 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Bogut.....................-11.5 (11 minutes)

Overall

Lonzo + Clarkson + Blue + Kuzma + Randle................+40.2 (10 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Randle + Lopez....................+32.7 (12 minutes)
Lonzo + Clarkson + Brewer + Kuzma + Randle............+31.6 (13 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Randle..................+28.6 (52 minutes)
Lonzo + Brewer + Ingram + Nance + Lopez................+22.3 (24 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Clarkson + Ingram + Randle................+18.0 (24 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Hart + Kuzma + Randle........................+0.2 (18 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Lopez......................-2.8 (217 minutes)
Lonzo + Brewer + Ingram + Kuzma + Lopez..................-8.9 (10 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Lopez.......................-9.7 (155 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Bogut.....................-11.5 (11 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Randle....................-19.8 (10 minutes)
Lonzo + Deng + Ingram + Nance + Lopez....................-26.8 (13 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Clarkson + Kuzma + Randle..................-28.6 (16 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Nance.....................-93.8 (12 minutes)

So basically start Kuzma.


I think JR is the standout in this stat line.


Thinking further, it could be also be that these JR lineups played against more second team players. Still, he seems to be more dependably effective this year than Lopez.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
AY2043
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Posts: 9773

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:12 pm    Post subject:

mookielala wrote:
AY2043 wrote:
GoldenThroat wrote:
Here are all of the 5-man lineups that Lonzo's been in that've played at least 10 minutes together, and their Net Rating:

Different PF Options

Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Randle + Lopez...................+32.7 (12 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Lopez......................-2.8 (217 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Lopez.......................-9.7 (155 minutes)

Different C Options

Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Randle..................+28.6 (52 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Lopez.......................-9.7 (155 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Bogut.....................-11.5 (11 minutes)

Overall

Lonzo + Clarkson + Blue + Kuzma + Randle................+40.2 (10 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Randle + Lopez....................+32.7 (12 minutes)
Lonzo + Clarkson + Brewer + Kuzma + Randle............+31.6 (13 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Randle..................+28.6 (52 minutes)
Lonzo + Brewer + Ingram + Nance + Lopez................+22.3 (24 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Clarkson + Ingram + Randle................+18.0 (24 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Hart + Kuzma + Randle........................+0.2 (18 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Lopez......................-2.8 (217 minutes)
Lonzo + Brewer + Ingram + Kuzma + Lopez..................-8.9 (10 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Lopez.......................-9.7 (155 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Bogut.....................-11.5 (11 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Randle....................-19.8 (10 minutes)
Lonzo + Deng + Ingram + Nance + Lopez....................-26.8 (13 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Clarkson + Kuzma + Randle..................-28.6 (16 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Nance.....................-93.8 (12 minutes)

So basically start Kuzma.


I think JR is the standout in this stat line.

You’re right, misread that.

So basically, start Kuzma and Randle haha
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epak
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 23318

PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:01 am    Post subject:

Starting Kuz with Julius would be something to see.
But I'm waiting for Alex to come back up in the middle of the season and play next to Lonzo.
_________________
👊 Los Angeles Lakers 👊
One more trade to get rid of the old regime's players!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Daphanabe
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Nov 2007
Posts: 2145

PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:04 am    Post subject:

SocalDevin wrote:
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Randle..................+28.6 (52 minutes)

Proof that the majority of LG has it right.. I believe the consensus is most of us would like that to be our starting line up.


Yeah, pretty much. Why our coaching staff can’t see what’s pretty obvious from the actual games is beyond me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerMindLA
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 Dec 2008
Posts: 2550

PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:19 am    Post subject:

The only way the other two Ball brothers play in the NBA is if a team is drafting them for the publicity that comes with them.

Neither of them will be NBA players based on skill and talent level.

Even Lonzo's value was inflated by the media hype - which likely played a role in the Lakers drafting him.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
GoldenThroat
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 36646

PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:32 am    Post subject:

mookielala wrote:
Thinking further, it could be also be that these JR lineups played against more second team players. Still, he seems to be more dependably effective this year than Lopez.


In some cases, yes, but Randle's the Center that closes games for us rather than Lopez. He's played against plenty of starters, but it's usually at the end of games rather than the beginning. That one lineup that's played 52 minutes and has a +28.6 Net Rtg is the starting lineup with him in place of Lopez and Kuzma (who was a starter until recently) in place of Nance.
_________________
Sign up for The Athletic through this link to get 40% off your first year's subscription: LINK
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Joe Pesci
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 15 Oct 2017
Posts: 2018

PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 1:00 am    Post subject:

LakersNewEra wrote:
Joe Pesci wrote:
If La Melo Ball and his family want him here so bad that they enter the 2020 draft truly prepared to ONLY play for the Lakers, prepared to forego two years after refusing to play for a team, other than the Lakers, that drafts you, prepared to become an unprecedented rookie free agent in 2022 that’ll sign for whatever the Lakers can afford, I’m all for it.

He’s a blue-chipper, whatever that means, and he’ll be served up to the Lakers on a platter for probably pennies all because he just really, really wants to play on the Lakers.

Sounds like loyalty and Laker love to me. What’s the problem again?



Its not Lakers love. I think Lavar makes it about himself in the end and this would be no exception. Can you imagine for example if LaMelo and Lonzo are Lakers best players? Imagine the kind of control LaVar would have and he would know it.
Honestly a guy like LaVar at that point he would be asking for an ownership stake. Im not kidding.

So all in all as good as Melo will be and he is by far the most skilled 15 year old that I have ever seen, things hes capable of doing at 15 shouldnt be normal even for NBA players...but yeah as good as he is there will be other superstars in the league.
If Lavar would have that kind of control and that much of a pull...then he would be a problem.
I dont think even the front office role would suffice. He would want a percentage of ownership IMO.

That’s all well and good, but are you really saying that if Melo Ball is gift wrapped for you at some paltry one million/yr deal, you wouldn’t sign him?

I hear everything you’re saying, but is the fear of Daddy enough to pass on golden opportunity?

I say you’d be a damn fool to not sign the kid for peanuts if he waits for you for two years in order to sign with you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Joe Pesci
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 15 Oct 2017
Posts: 2018

PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 1:08 am    Post subject:

GoldenThroat wrote:
Here are all of the 5-man lineups that Lonzo's been in that've played at least 10 minutes together, and their Net Rating:

Different PF Options

Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Randle + Lopez...................+32.7 (12 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Lopez......................-2.8 (217 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Lopez.......................-9.7 (155 minutes)

Different C Options

Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Randle..................+28.6 (52 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Lopez.......................-9.7 (155 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Bogut.....................-11.5 (11 minutes)

Overall

Lonzo + Clarkson + Blue + Kuzma + Randle................+40.2 (10 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Randle + Lopez....................+32.7 (12 minutes)
Lonzo + Clarkson + Brewer + Kuzma + Randle............+31.6 (13 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Randle..................+28.6 (52 minutes)
Lonzo + Brewer + Ingram + Nance + Lopez................+22.3 (24 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Clarkson + Ingram + Randle................+18.0 (24 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Hart + Kuzma + Randle........................+0.2 (18 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Lopez......................-2.8 (217 minutes)
Lonzo + Brewer + Ingram + Kuzma + Lopez..................-8.9 (10 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Lopez.......................-9.7 (155 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Bogut.....................-11.5 (11 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Nance + Randle....................-19.8 (10 minutes)
Lonzo + Deng + Ingram + Nance + Lopez....................-26.8 (13 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Clarkson + Kuzma + Randle..................-28.6 (16 minutes)
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Nance.....................-93.8 (12 minutes)

Good, good stuff.

Start Clarkson until he’s traded (Ingram off bench).
After Clarkson trade, start Ingram again.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
trablos
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 10 May 2017
Posts: 1735

PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 1:27 am    Post subject:

Looks like Vander needs some more playing time...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
J.C. Smith
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 10707

PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 1:33 am    Post subject:

LakerMindLA wrote:
The only way the other two Ball brothers play in the NBA is if a team is drafting them for the publicity that comes with them.

Neither of them will be NBA players based on skill and talent level.


I hope the Celtics should make your their head scout.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Aeneas Hunter
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 21007

PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 3:30 am    Post subject:

GoldenThroat wrote:
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Nance.....................-93.8 (12 minutes)


Yikes. I wish we could have those 12 minutes back.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
deal
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 17 Aug 2008
Posts: 10954
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 5:56 am    Post subject:

I've got buyers remorse with Lonzo, we could have done better.

With regards to the other Ball kids, a I would wait to see who is on the
market when the time comes. No need for the Lakers to continue to
be a weak team just to temporarily satisfy the LA based fan and
risk being a crappy team. The FO has to evaluate all available talent,
no matter where they are from, when the time comes.
_________________
The move
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Bol
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 3098

PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 6:54 am    Post subject:

SocalDevin wrote:
Lonzo + KCP + Ingram + Kuzma + Randle..................+28.6 (52 minutes)

Proof that the majority of LG has it right.. I believe the consensus is most of us would like that to be our starting line up.




I had thought starting Randle at center might be a bad idea because he'd get worn out playing too much time against bigger players, but now I figure it's worth a shot. They'll get worn out trying to run with him, too. And Slowpez is a hindrance to Lonzo and the team's transition game.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 753, 754, 755 ... 1218, 1219, 1220  Next
Page 754 of 1220
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB