Better starting front line?

uberzev · Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:19 pm Post subject: Better starting front line?

Sorry I'm just pissed right now and starting dumb threads makes me feel better.
_________________
Lakers Gonna Lake

sodapoppenski · Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:21 pm Post subject:

Mihm/Kwame/Artest

Or better yet, Mihm/Odom/Artest, having traded Kwame & Miami's 1st.

fansincemagic · Franchise Player Joined: 23 Jun 2005 Posts: 11051

my question is, how are you getting that 2nd option? Artest/Foster for Mihm/Odom? Anyway, talent wise the 2nd frontline is better. That frontline has a good shot at taking apart ANY frontline in the NBA defensively. They aren't all 3 All-D team guys, but as a unit they'd be tough. Add Kobe's perimeter game and you have a deadly combination. Problem is we know it won't happen, but you bring up an interesting question.

Crazy Like Ron Artest · Star Player Joined: 17 Dec 2005 Posts: 4421

This indeed is a dumb thread.

But I give my vote to Ron Ron and the other two.

Charles · Star Player Joined: 22 Sep 2004 Posts: 4525

Foster would cushion any blow we would lose in the rebounding department, and Lamar will never have the consistent defensive and offensive impact Artest has on the court as long as he has his puppy mentality. Cook is a nonfactor and Mihm is too foul prone to ever be a legitimate starter. We may not have a shotblocker but man defense and rebounding is much improved.

NY_LakerFan · Star Player Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Posts: 1297

I guess being a mod gives you the right to waste server space. But if this was posted by any of us regular fans ...

lock and load