|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Jim99187
Franchise Player
Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 22138
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| KeepItRealOrElse wrote: | | ch3cky0selff00 wrote: | | diando wrote: | | Rivershow wrote: | | Has anyone thought yet that the FO might not be interested in Marion? He is 36 and we have wesley johnson and xavier henry who could both take his spot. |
Wes Johnson is a subpar player to me. He's athletic but bricks too many times. He's not an off-the-dribble threat and fails to finish with contact around the rim too. Think he'd need to bulk up and work on his handles to be a better player. |
So.. what you're saying is its impossible for a player his age to improve on any of those things?.
at such a cheap price.. if you hold onto him for 2 to 3 years and give him consistent playing time and he turns into half of the player he was projected to be when he was drafted - you've got yourself a real nice player on the cheap.
|
not when youre naturally horrible at those things. i think at best offensively he's a Sefilosha, for the rest of his career.
on the other hand , with X, all you have to do is get him to buy into a role (defense) ; much easier to do than improve your offensive skill. X buys in and he's a 2way player ; 2way players are crucial - especially when you dont have offensive juggernauts in your lineup, Kobe is our only guaranteed Offense in the starting lineup. sure a guy like Lin will contribute, but Kobe and Lin is no dynamic duo offensively. i dont think we can afford any offensive duds in that starting 5.
OKC w/ Durant and Westbrook could even come out of the west while having 2 offensive duds in their lineup.
Durant, Westbrook, Ibaka > Kobe, Lin, Boozer ; so uh, i dont think we can afford offensive duds like Wes |
my only concern with X is can he stay healthy and play 75-80 games.
he is a good kid with no drama so he will buy into what coach is preaching |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KeepItRealOrElse
Retired Number
Joined: 11 Oct 2012
Posts: 32767
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jim99187 wrote: | | KeepItRealOrElse wrote: | | ch3cky0selff00 wrote: | | diando wrote: | | Rivershow wrote: | | Has anyone thought yet that the FO might not be interested in Marion? He is 36 and we have wesley johnson and xavier henry who could both take his spot. |
Wes Johnson is a subpar player to me. He's athletic but bricks too many times. He's not an off-the-dribble threat and fails to finish with contact around the rim too. Think he'd need to bulk up and work on his handles to be a better player. |
So.. what you're saying is its impossible for a player his age to improve on any of those things?.
at such a cheap price.. if you hold onto him for 2 to 3 years and give him consistent playing time and he turns into half of the player he was projected to be when he was drafted - you've got yourself a real nice player on the cheap.
|
not when youre naturally horrible at those things. i think at best offensively he's a Sefilosha, for the rest of his career.
on the other hand , with X, all you have to do is get him to buy into a role (defense) ; much easier to do than improve your offensive skill. X buys in and he's a 2way player ; 2way players are crucial - especially when you dont have offensive juggernauts in your lineup, Kobe is our only guaranteed Offense in the starting lineup. sure a guy like Lin will contribute, but Kobe and Lin is no dynamic duo offensively. i dont think we can afford any offensive duds in that starting 5.
OKC w/ Durant and Westbrook could even come out of the west while having 2 offensive duds in their lineup.
Durant, Westbrook, Ibaka > Kobe, Lin, Boozer ; so uh, i dont think we can afford offensive duds like Wes |
my only concern with X is can he stay healthy and play 75-80 games.
he is a good kid with no drama so he will buy into what coach is preaching |
yes, indeed. ( and i meant to say KD/Westbrook/Ibaka COULDN'T* do it with 2 offensive duds. and so, why should we have any type of success with 2 offensive duds in the lineup) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dreamshake
Franchise Player
Joined: 05 May 2006
Posts: 13711
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 6:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| LakersInFour wrote: | | Secretary of Defense wrote: | Anyone here think we might trade for Klay? I think the stars are lining up for a splashy trade that takes the league by surprise just like in 2008, and Klay is the most likely target.
2015's free agents aren't actually all that great. There are a lot more of them from what I understand than there were this year, so by sheer numbers, the class will be deeper, but there are no transcendent superstars to sign. (And please, don't say Love is a superstar.)
However, the restricted free agents like Thompson and Leonard are very good and could yet prove they are worth max money.
Maybe that is why Hill's contract was structured like it was?
I could easily see a package of Hill, Nash (if he can still play), both our HOU picks, and the protected part of our 2015 pick (#1-#5) being out there for someone. |
I'd love to see Klay in a Lakers uniform, and I think it's inevitable at some point in his career. Sooner the better, although since I think it's something he wants I'd hold off to see if we can land him at a discount. |
I don't see any discount happening on him. GS won't even give him up for Love and he wants the max. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jim99187
Franchise Player
Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 22138
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Dreamshake wrote: | | LakersInFour wrote: | | Secretary of Defense wrote: | Anyone here think we might trade for Klay? I think the stars are lining up for a splashy trade that takes the league by surprise just like in 2008, and Klay is the most likely target.
2015's free agents aren't actually all that great. There are a lot more of them from what I understand than there were this year, so by sheer numbers, the class will be deeper, but there are no transcendent superstars to sign. (And please, don't say Love is a superstar.)
However, the restricted free agents like Thompson and Leonard are very good and could yet prove they are worth max money.
Maybe that is why Hill's contract was structured like it was?
I could easily see a package of Hill, Nash (if he can still play), both our HOU picks, and the protected part of our 2015 pick (#1-#5) being out there for someone. |
I'd love to see Klay in a Lakers uniform, and I think it's inevitable at some point in his career. Sooner the better, although since I think it's something he wants I'd hold off to see if we can land him at a discount. |
I don't see any discount happening on him. GS won't even give him up for Love and he wants the max. |
would be interesting to see how GSW reacts to this. you have curry who is getting paid 11mil and Klay will be getting paid 15/16
+ they have contracts of bogut, lee, Iggy & Steph
i think the lakers should sign him for max and see.
if we come out with Gasol/DJ + Klay, I will be happy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fastbreak32
Star Player
Joined: 11 Oct 2011
Posts: 4746
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 8:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Jim99187 wrote: | | Dreamshake wrote: | | LakersInFour wrote: | | Secretary of Defense wrote: | Anyone here think we might trade for Klay? I think the stars are lining up for a splashy trade that takes the league by surprise just like in 2008, and Klay is the most likely target.
2015's free agents aren't actually all that great. There are a lot more of them from what I understand than there were this year, so by sheer numbers, the class will be deeper, but there are no transcendent superstars to sign. (And please, don't say Love is a superstar.)
However, the restricted free agents like Thompson and Leonard are very good and could yet prove they are worth max money.
Maybe that is why Hill's contract was structured like it was?
I could easily see a package of Hill, Nash (if he can still play), both our HOU picks, and the protected part of our 2015 pick (#1-#5) being out there for someone. |
I'd love to see Klay in a Lakers uniform, and I think it's inevitable at some point in his career. Sooner the better, although since I think it's something he wants I'd hold off to see if we can land him at a discount. |
I don't see any discount happening on him. GS won't even give him up for Love and he wants the max. |
would be interesting to see how GSW reacts to this. you have curry who is getting paid 11mil and Klay will be getting paid 15/16
+ they have contracts of bogut, lee, Iggy & Steph
i think the lakers should sign him for max and see.
if we come out with Gasol/DJ + Klay, I will be happy. |
Klay is a nice player, but do you think he's ready to make that next leap in his game to warrant a max contract? I hope so, but I don't know.
_________________
LeBron, AD, & _________. Stay tuned.
"...there was a time when the Israelites were wandering in the desert and all of a sudden, bread came down from heaven,” Pelinka said. “That’s kind of what today feels like for us to have KCP join.” |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Fastbreak32 wrote: | | Jim99187 wrote: | | Dreamshake wrote: | | LakersInFour wrote: | | Secretary of Defense wrote: | Anyone here think we might trade for Klay? I think the stars are lining up for a splashy trade that takes the league by surprise just like in 2008, and Klay is the most likely target.
2015's free agents aren't actually all that great. There are a lot more of them from what I understand than there were this year, so by sheer numbers, the class will be deeper, but there are no transcendent superstars to sign. (And please, don't say Love is a superstar.)
However, the restricted free agents like Thompson and Leonard are very good and could yet prove they are worth max money.
Maybe that is why Hill's contract was structured like it was?
I could easily see a package of Hill, Nash (if he can still play), both our HOU picks, and the protected part of our 2015 pick (#1-#5) being out there for someone. |
I'd love to see Klay in a Lakers uniform, and I think it's inevitable at some point in his career. Sooner the better, although since I think it's something he wants I'd hold off to see if we can land him at a discount. |
I don't see any discount happening on him. GS won't even give him up for Love and he wants the max. |
would be interesting to see how GSW reacts to this. you have curry who is getting paid 11mil and Klay will be getting paid 15/16
+ they have contracts of bogut, lee, Iggy & Steph
i think the lakers should sign him for max and see.
if we come out with Gasol/DJ + Klay, I will be happy. |
Klay is a nice player, but do you think he's ready to make that next leap in his game to warrant a max contract? I hope so, but I don't know. |
Max for Klay? Nope. Doesn't mean some team may not over pay him ala Parsons/Hayward, but not worth a max in my book.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
USCandLakers
Franchise Player
Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 19955
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 8:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| yinoma2001 wrote: | | Fastbreak32 wrote: | | Jim99187 wrote: | | Dreamshake wrote: | | LakersInFour wrote: | | Secretary of Defense wrote: | Anyone here think we might trade for Klay? I think the stars are lining up for a splashy trade that takes the league by surprise just like in 2008, and Klay is the most likely target.
2015's free agents aren't actually all that great. There are a lot more of them from what I understand than there were this year, so by sheer numbers, the class will be deeper, but there are no transcendent superstars to sign. (And please, don't say Love is a superstar.)
However, the restricted free agents like Thompson and Leonard are very good and could yet prove they are worth max money.
Maybe that is why Hill's contract was structured like it was?
I could easily see a package of Hill, Nash (if he can still play), both our HOU picks, and the protected part of our 2015 pick (#1-#5) being out there for someone. |
I'd love to see Klay in a Lakers uniform, and I think it's inevitable at some point in his career. Sooner the better, although since I think it's something he wants I'd hold off to see if we can land him at a discount. |
I don't see any discount happening on him. GS won't even give him up for Love and he wants the max. |
would be interesting to see how GSW reacts to this. you have curry who is getting paid 11mil and Klay will be getting paid 15/16
+ they have contracts of bogut, lee, Iggy & Steph
i think the lakers should sign him for max and see.
if we come out with Gasol/DJ + Klay, I will be happy. |
Klay is a nice player, but do you think he's ready to make that next leap in his game to warrant a max contract? I hope so, but I don't know. |
Max for Klay? Nope. Doesn't mean some team may not over pay him ala Parsons/Hayward, but not worth a max in my book. |
He'll be worth his max in 2016 when the cap is projected to skyrocket.
_________________
A banana is killed every time a terrible thread or post is made.  Save the bananas. Stop creating terrible posts! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
22
Franchise Player
Joined: 05 Apr 2013
Posts: 17063
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| USCandLakers wrote: | | yinoma2001 wrote: | | Fastbreak32 wrote: | | Jim99187 wrote: | | Dreamshake wrote: | | LakersInFour wrote: | | Secretary of Defense wrote: | Anyone here think we might trade for Klay? I think the stars are lining up for a splashy trade that takes the league by surprise just like in 2008, and Klay is the most likely target.
2015's free agents aren't actually all that great. There are a lot more of them from what I understand than there were this year, so by sheer numbers, the class will be deeper, but there are no transcendent superstars to sign. (And please, don't say Love is a superstar.)
However, the restricted free agents like Thompson and Leonard are very good and could yet prove they are worth max money.
Maybe that is why Hill's contract was structured like it was?
I could easily see a package of Hill, Nash (if he can still play), both our HOU picks, and the protected part of our 2015 pick (#1-#5) being out there for someone. |
I'd love to see Klay in a Lakers uniform, and I think it's inevitable at some point in his career. Sooner the better, although since I think it's something he wants I'd hold off to see if we can land him at a discount. |
I don't see any discount happening on him. GS won't even give him up for Love and he wants the max. |
would be interesting to see how GSW reacts to this. you have curry who is getting paid 11mil and Klay will be getting paid 15/16
+ they have contracts of bogut, lee, Iggy & Steph
i think the lakers should sign him for max and see.
if we come out with Gasol/DJ + Klay, I will be happy. |
Klay is a nice player, but do you think he's ready to make that next leap in his game to warrant a max contract? I hope so, but I don't know. |
Max for Klay? Nope. Doesn't mean some team may not over pay him ala Parsons/Hayward, but not worth a max in my book. |
He'll be worth his max in 2016 when the cap is projected to skyrocket. |
Agreed. And we'd be one step closer to my ultimate super pipe roster as well. Muhahahah! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| USCandLakers wrote: | | yinoma2001 wrote: | | Fastbreak32 wrote: | | Jim99187 wrote: | | Dreamshake wrote: | | LakersInFour wrote: | | Secretary of Defense wrote: | Anyone here think we might trade for Klay? I think the stars are lining up for a splashy trade that takes the league by surprise just like in 2008, and Klay is the most likely target.
2015's free agents aren't actually all that great. There are a lot more of them from what I understand than there were this year, so by sheer numbers, the class will be deeper, but there are no transcendent superstars to sign. (And please, don't say Love is a superstar.)
However, the restricted free agents like Thompson and Leonard are very good and could yet prove they are worth max money.
Maybe that is why Hill's contract was structured like it was?
I could easily see a package of Hill, Nash (if he can still play), both our HOU picks, and the protected part of our 2015 pick (#1-#5) being out there for someone. |
I'd love to see Klay in a Lakers uniform, and I think it's inevitable at some point in his career. Sooner the better, although since I think it's something he wants I'd hold off to see if we can land him at a discount. |
I don't see any discount happening on him. GS won't even give him up for Love and he wants the max. |
would be interesting to see how GSW reacts to this. you have curry who is getting paid 11mil and Klay will be getting paid 15/16
+ they have contracts of bogut, lee, Iggy & Steph
i think the lakers should sign him for max and see.
if we come out with Gasol/DJ + Klay, I will be happy. |
Klay is a nice player, but do you think he's ready to make that next leap in his game to warrant a max contract? I hope so, but I don't know. |
Max for Klay? Nope. Doesn't mean some team may not over pay him ala Parsons/Hayward, but not worth a max in my book. |
He'll be worth his max in 2016 when the cap is projected to skyrocket. |
Well, it's speculation about how large the salary cap will get in 2016. Sure a new TV deal may change things. If this is the rationale, why didn't we sign a few of the free agents this summer, even RFAs, under the similar understanding that $16m in 2016 won't be the same as $16m in 2014 (cap hit wise)?
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
USCandLakers
Franchise Player
Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 19955
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| yinoma2001 wrote: |
Well, it's speculation about how large the salary cap will get in 2016. Sure a new TV deal may change things. If this is the rationale, why didn't we sign a few of the free agents this summer, even RFAs, under the similar understanding that $16m in 2016 won't be the same as $16m in 2014 (cap hit wise)? |
Because of the "plan". Or the new plan. Or whatever.
I don't know.
_________________
A banana is killed every time a terrible thread or post is made. Save the bananas. Stop creating terrible posts! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| USCandLakers wrote: | | yinoma2001 wrote: |
Well, it's speculation about how large the salary cap will get in 2016. Sure a new TV deal may change things. If this is the rationale, why didn't we sign a few of the free agents this summer, even RFAs, under the similar understanding that $16m in 2016 won't be the same as $16m in 2014 (cap hit wise)? |
Because of the "plan". Or the new plan. Or whatever.
I don't know. |
The rationale was advanced with Young, with people saying Young's $4-5m contract would seem tiny in 2016. So it's not like it wasn't a consideration.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
USCandLakers
Franchise Player
Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 19955
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| yinoma2001 wrote: | | USCandLakers wrote: | | yinoma2001 wrote: |
Well, it's speculation about how large the salary cap will get in 2016. Sure a new TV deal may change things. If this is the rationale, why didn't we sign a few of the free agents this summer, even RFAs, under the similar understanding that $16m in 2016 won't be the same as $16m in 2014 (cap hit wise)? |
Because of the "plan". Or the new plan. Or whatever.
I don't know. |
The rationale was advanced with Young, with people saying Young's $4-5m contract would seem tiny in 2016. So it's not like it wasn't a consideration. |
They've been making a lot of head scratching moves.
_________________
A banana is killed every time a terrible thread or post is made. Save the bananas. Stop creating terrible posts! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RI Laker
Star Player
Joined: 27 Jun 2005
Posts: 7148
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I think you may see some players wait until 2017 to cash in. The players will not ratify the current CBA. The new CBA should be good for both the players and the Lakers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
waterman40
Star Player
Joined: 17 Jun 2003
Posts: 6284
Location: Central Coast
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I think another shoe is going to drop, we will wait and see who is available at teh trade deadline. Hill and Nash together are like almost $20 million in salary that can be dumped. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The_Dynasty24
Star Player
Joined: 12 Jun 2013
Posts: 2840
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 10:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| waterman40 wrote: | | I think another shoe is going to drop, we will wait and see who is available at teh trade deadline. Hill and Nash together are like almost $20 million in salary that can be dumped. |
Yeah, the only problem is we would need to attach assets to them to get anything valuable back. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kenji
Starting Rotation
Joined: 04 Jul 2014
Posts: 113
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 11:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The_Dynasty24 wrote: | | waterman40 wrote: | | I think another shoe is going to drop, we will wait and see who is available at teh trade deadline. Hill and Nash together are like almost $20 million in salary that can be dumped. |
Yeah, the only problem is we would need to attach assets to them to get anything valuable back. |
And both of them will be gone next year (I can't imagine why we would keep Hill at that price, unless we have no chance of landing anyone in free agency) just in time for several bigs to become FA's, like Marc Gasol and DeAndre Jordan.
No one is going to take them now, and even if we could talk someone into taking them, I can't imagine we'd get anything we actually need in return. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bard207
Star Player
Joined: 08 Jan 2013
Posts: 7713
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
I went through and looked for Players on ending contracts and TPE situations greater than $6 million.
Situations currently unresolved such as Monroe, Bledsoe and Love were not included.
Teams such as Philadelphia and perhaps Utah might have available Cap Space greater than $6 million.
__________
Boston
$12.9 million -- Rondo
$8.6 million -- Marcus Thornton
$6.9 million -- Brando Bass
Toronto
$7 million -- Amir Johnson
$6.3 million -- Landry Fields
$6 million -- Chuck Hayes
Brooklyn
$12 million -- Garnett
Mew York
$11.5 million -- Bargnani
$23.4 million -- Stoudemire
Philadelphia
$6.6 million -- Jason Richardson
Atlanta
$9.5 million -- Paul Millsap
Charlotte
Miami
Orlando
Washington
Chicago
Cleveland
$9.7 million -- Varejao
Detroit
Indiana
Milwaukee
____________
Dallas
$14.8 million -- Tyson Chandler
Memphis
$15.8 million -- Marc Gasol
$7.7 million -- Prince
New Orleans
$8.4 million -- Asik
San Antonio
$12.5 million -- Parker
$10.4 million -- Duncan
$7. million -- Ginobili
Houston
$8.4 million -- TPE (Lin trade)
Denver
Minnesota
OKlahoma City
$9.7 million -- Perkins
Portland
$16 million -- Aldridge
Utah
Golden State
Clippers
$11.4 million -- Jordan
Phoenix
$7.5 million - Dragic (Player Option)
Sacramento
$19 million -- Rudy Gay
| waterman40 wrote: | | I think another shoe is going to drop, we will wait and see who is available at teh trade deadline. Hill and Nash together are like almost $20 million in salary that can be dumped. |
Is there something special - unique about a salary dump using Hill and/or Nash that is superior to what some other teams can offer? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jim99187
Franchise Player
Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 22138
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 12:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA 2m
Free agent guard Mo Williams is nearing an agreement with Minnesota, league sources tell Yahoo Sports. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jackobe
Star Player
Joined: 17 May 2011
Posts: 4466
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 12:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jim99187 wrote: | | Quote: | Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA 2m
Free agent guard Mo Williams is nearing an agreement with Minnesota, league sources tell Yahoo Sports. |
|
LOL say what?????????
Twolves sure love PGs.
Got Rubio, Lavine, and Mo.
If Mo didn't go for playing time or winning situation,
that means he probably got paid. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jim99187
Franchise Player
Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 22138
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jackobe wrote: | | Jim99187 wrote: | | Quote: | Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA 2m
Free agent guard Mo Williams is nearing an agreement with Minnesota, league sources tell Yahoo Sports. |
|
LOL say what?????????
Twolves sure love PGs.
Got Rubio, Lavine, and Mo.
If Mo didn't go for playing time or winning situation,
that means he probably got paid. |
u forgot JJ barea? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jackobe
Star Player
Joined: 17 May 2011
Posts: 4466
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jim99187 wrote: | | Jackobe wrote: | | Jim99187 wrote: | | Quote: | Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA 2m
Free agent guard Mo Williams is nearing an agreement with Minnesota, league sources tell Yahoo Sports. |
|
LOL say what?????????
Twolves sure love PGs.
Got Rubio, Lavine, and Mo.
If Mo didn't go for playing time or winning situation,
that means he probably got paid. |
u forgot JJ barea? |
ya, and I'm sure Twolves forgot their had JJ Barea as well, that's probably why they signed Mo.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jim99187
Franchise Player
Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 22138
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 12:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jackobe wrote: | | Jim99187 wrote: | | Jackobe wrote: | | Jim99187 wrote: | | Quote: | Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA 2m
Free agent guard Mo Williams is nearing an agreement with Minnesota, league sources tell Yahoo Sports. |
|
LOL say what?????????
Twolves sure love PGs.
Got Rubio, Lavine, and Mo.
If Mo didn't go for playing time or winning situation,
that means he probably got paid. |
u forgot JJ barea? |
ya, and I'm sure Twolves forgot their had JJ Barea as well, that's probably why they signed Mo. |
haha good 1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
eagles nut
Star Player
Joined: 06 Jul 2001
Posts: 6240
Location: Baltimore, MD
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wesley Johnson officially signed.
Also, Shelly Sterling won a clean-sweep against Donald and it's essentially an appeal-proof ruling so the sale of the Clippers will go through. So forget your Chris Paul fantasies. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ronnyjeremy
Star Player
Joined: 06 Aug 2012
Posts: 1182
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | CBS Los Angeles @CBSLA
#BREAKING: Judge rules Shelly Sterling can sell Los Angeles #Clippers to Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer for $2B. Go to http://cbsla.com . |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
epak
Retired Number
Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 34147
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 1:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ronnyjeremy wrote: | | Quote: | CBS Los Angeles @CBSLA
#BREAKING: Judge rules Shelly Sterling can sell Los Angeles #Clippers to Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer for $2B. Go to http://cbsla.com . |
|
Sad day in America.
Sterling deserves to own the company he bought. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
