View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
KeepItRealOrElse Retired Number
Joined: 11 Oct 2012 Posts: 32767
|
Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dao wrote: | Randle has been put on notice by the front office. First there was that Ding article that was released right before the Russell trade.
http://lakers.247sports.com/Bolt/Report-Lakers-have-concerns-about-Russell-Randle--53241388
Quote: | There is still a lot to like about both Russell and Randle as well, but there are also ongoing questions about how well they take criticism, according to team sources. Lakers head coach Luke Walton entered the season asking Russell to be less of a know-it-all and more of a leader for the group, while he hoped Randle would emulate Draymond Green in using every perceived slight as motivation.
Though both players improved their games, neither advanced as far as Walton had hoped. Russell was inconsistent with his professionalism, and Randle often lost messages given to him if they were delivered harshly." |
And then the FO let the Pacers choose between taking Clarkson or Randle. That's a clear sign that they are ready to give up on Randle just like they gave up on Russell.
The workouts are nice and all, but Randle's physique is the LEAST of his problems as a player. He needs to get into the film room and learn the mental aspects of the game. It's clear from this Ding article that he hasn't responded well to constructive criticism about these aspects of the game.
Now the front office has basically written him off. They tried to dump him to Indiana, but the Pacers see the same problems that the Lakers see, so they don't want him. Then the Lakers draft a stretch 4 in Kuzma, which makes Randle even more expendable. The writing is on the wall for Randle. Luckily for him, his trade value is too low for the Lakers to get a great return via trade, and he has a chance to salvage his career as a Laker this year. Let's see how he responds. |
What did the Ding farticle say? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
justsomelakerfan Franchise Player
Joined: 16 Jul 2016 Posts: 10939
|
Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 8:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It messes me up a little that if the players don't connect with Luke they could be gone, but Luke is just as unproven as the young guys. _________________ Austin Reaves
Tweeter: @sarah_dotbiz |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dao Star Player
Joined: 02 Jan 2013 Posts: 5572
|
Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 8:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KeepItRealOrElse wrote: | dao wrote: | Randle has been put on notice by the front office. First there was that Ding article that was released right before the Russell trade.
http://lakers.247sports.com/Bolt/Report-Lakers-have-concerns-about-Russell-Randle--53241388
Quote: | There is still a lot to like about both Russell and Randle as well, but there are also ongoing questions about how well they take criticism, according to team sources. Lakers head coach Luke Walton entered the season asking Russell to be less of a know-it-all and more of a leader for the group, while he hoped Randle would emulate Draymond Green in using every perceived slight as motivation.
Though both players improved their games, neither advanced as far as Walton had hoped. Russell was inconsistent with his professionalism, and Randle often lost messages given to him if they were delivered harshly." |
And then the FO let the Pacers choose between taking Clarkson or Randle. That's a clear sign that they are ready to give up on Randle just like they gave up on Russell.
The workouts are nice and all, but Randle's physique is the LEAST of his problems as a player. He needs to get into the film room and learn the mental aspects of the game. It's clear from this Ding article that he hasn't responded well to constructive criticism about these aspects of the game.
Now the front office has basically written him off. They tried to dump him to Indiana, but the Pacers see the same problems that the Lakers see, so they don't want him. Then the Lakers draft a stretch 4 in Kuzma, which makes Randle even more expendable. The writing is on the wall for Randle. Luckily for him, his trade value is too low for the Lakers to get a great return via trade, and he has a chance to salvage his career as a Laker this year. Let's see how he responds. |
What did the Ding farticle say? | it's in the quote above, bolded. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
E_Wulf420 Star Player
Joined: 06 Jan 2014 Posts: 1091 Location: Oregon
|
Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Now that Randle is lighter I'm sure we will see a more faster, quicker, explosive Julius. Hopefully he improves is jumpshot, if he does I see 16/8/3 _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
greenfrog Retired Number
Joined: 02 Jan 2011 Posts: 36081 Location: 502 Bad Gateway
|
Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 8:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dao wrote: | KeepItRealOrElse wrote: | dao wrote: | Randle has been put on notice by the front office. First there was that Ding article that was released right before the Russell trade.
http://lakers.247sports.com/Bolt/Report-Lakers-have-concerns-about-Russell-Randle--53241388
Quote: | There is still a lot to like about both Russell and Randle as well, but there are also ongoing questions about how well they take criticism, according to team sources. Lakers head coach Luke Walton entered the season asking Russell to be less of a know-it-all and more of a leader for the group, while he hoped Randle would emulate Draymond Green in using every perceived slight as motivation.
Though both players improved their games, neither advanced as far as Walton had hoped. Russell was inconsistent with his professionalism, and Randle often lost messages given to him if they were delivered harshly." |
And then the FO let the Pacers choose between taking Clarkson or Randle. That's a clear sign that they are ready to give up on Randle just like they gave up on Russell.
The workouts are nice and all, but Randle's physique is the LEAST of his problems as a player. He needs to get into the film room and learn the mental aspects of the game. It's clear from this Ding article that he hasn't responded well to constructive criticism about these aspects of the game.
Now the front office has basically written him off. They tried to dump him to Indiana, but the Pacers see the same problems that the Lakers see, so they don't want him. Then the Lakers draft a stretch 4 in Kuzma, which makes Randle even more expendable. The writing is on the wall for Randle. Luckily for him, his trade value is too low for the Lakers to get a great return via trade, and he has a chance to salvage his career as a Laker this year. Let's see how he responds. |
What did the Ding farticle say? | it's in the quote above, bolded. |
He just wanted to say farticle. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KeepItRealOrElse Retired Number
Joined: 11 Oct 2012 Posts: 32767
|
Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hahaha oops. but yea, farticle had to be said |
|
Back to top |
|
|
.4 Starting Rotation
Joined: 08 Feb 2008 Posts: 702
|
Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KeepItRealOrElse wrote: | hahaha oops. but yea, farticle had to be said |
_________________ My face reading 90% of the posts on LG: |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Truck Turner Star Player
Joined: 28 Apr 2011 Posts: 3937
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 12:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
dao wrote: | Randle has been put on notice by the front office. First there was that Ding article that was released right before the Russell trade.
http://lakers.247sports.com/Bolt/Report-Lakers-have-concerns-about-Russell-Randle--53241388
Quote: | There is still a lot to like about both Russell and Randle as well, but there are also ongoing questions about how well they take criticism, according to team sources. Lakers head coach Luke Walton entered the season asking Russell to be less of a know-it-all and more of a leader for the group, while he hoped Randle would emulate Draymond Green in using every perceived slight as motivation.
Though both players improved their games, neither advanced as far as Walton had hoped. Russell was inconsistent with his professionalism, and Randle often lost messages given to him if they were delivered harshly." |
And then the FO let the Pacers choose between taking Clarkson or Randle. That's a clear sign that they are ready to give up on Randle just like they gave up on Russell.
The new trainer and instagram pics are nice and all, but Randle's physique is the LEAST of his problems as a player. He needs to get into the film room and learn the mental aspects of the game. He needs to learn the basics of being a good team defender. He needs to learn to be active off the ball on offense. He needs to play with a high motor and high IQ off the ball on both ends of the court. It's clear from this Ding article that he hasn't responded well to constructive criticism about these aspects of the game.
Now the front office has basically written him off. They tried to dump him to Indiana, but the Pacers see the same problems that the Lakers see, so they don't want him. Then the Lakers draft a stretch 4 in Kuzma, which makes Randle even more expendable. The writing is on the wall for Randle. Luckily for him, his trade value is too low for the Lakers to get a great return via trade, and he has a chance to salvage his career as a Laker this year. Let's see how he responds. |
I've said before that I don't buy the Ding article, simply because both Julius and Luke Walton have said the exact opposite. Julius has said repeatedly that he wants Luke and his teammates to get on him if he's making mistakes. Luke said he really got on Julius during a practice and called him the following night, then Julius had a triple double the next game.
Even when Byron Scott was the coach and criticizing Randle he responded well.
The main critique we know the front office has had of him is being in shape. His cardio just hasn't been up to par and going by Julius and his trainers comments much of it had to do with diet (something a lot of rookies struggle with, even Kobe). Better cardio is going to lead to him being more consistent. It wasn't a coincidence that Julius typically played poorly on back to backs. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nash Star Player
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 Posts: 8194
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 3:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
justsomelakerfan wrote: | It messes me up a little that if the players don't connect with Luke they could be gone, but Luke is just as unproven as the young guys. |
Those players aren't delivering so I have no problem.
Young players taking too many possessions off, with a poor effort on defense and primadona attitude don't belong to a winning program and our results are compatible with that. Man up, adapt or go out.
Luke was able to win in Golden State with a great team, good or bad coach you know he can run good players.
By the way, Julius was another player demoted under Scott and Clarkson stats are regressing for two straight seasons, but he at least plays hard every game.
Last edited by nash on Sun Jun 25, 2017 5:33 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bum2 Starting Rotation
Joined: 31 Aug 2005 Posts: 809
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 3:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
justsomelakerfan wrote: | It messes me up a little that if the players don't connect with Luke they could be gone, but Luke is just as unproven as the young guys. |
It's the way it has always been. Coach gets to act like the king until absolutely proven otherwise. Players must do as told until proven to be great and then nobody will care how they act.
Any deviation from this and you are considered a maverick or uncoachable. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pidge Starting Rotation
Joined: 11 Oct 2012 Posts: 440
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 3:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
With Lopez I think Randle's even more important to us, in terms of boards, second chance points and just providing a scoring option for Ball to find near the basket. If his physical condition means he will improve his transition defence later in games, great. _________________ "I got Wheaties!" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Vin Star Player
Joined: 03 Jan 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: France
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 5:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pidge wrote: | With Lopez I think Randle's even more important to us, in terms of boards, second chance points and just providing a scoring option for Ball to find near the basket. If his physical condition means he will improve his transition defence later in games, great. |
Excited to see what Randle can do with that space that provides playing alongside a stretch 5. Hopefully he's still here next season. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
thegreatest Star Player
Joined: 02 Sep 2002 Posts: 9911
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 8:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Truck Turner wrote: | dao wrote: | Randle has been put on notice by the front office. First there was that Ding article that was released right before the Russell trade.
http://lakers.247sports.com/Bolt/Report-Lakers-have-concerns-about-Russell-Randle--53241388
Quote: | There is still a lot to like about both Russell and Randle as well, but there are also ongoing questions about how well they take criticism, according to team sources. Lakers head coach Luke Walton entered the season asking Russell to be less of a know-it-all and more of a leader for the group, while he hoped Randle would emulate Draymond Green in using every perceived slight as motivation.
Though both players improved their games, neither advanced as far as Walton had hoped. Russell was inconsistent with his professionalism, and Randle often lost messages given to him if they were delivered harshly." |
And then the FO let the Pacers choose between taking Clarkson or Randle. That's a clear sign that they are ready to give up on Randle just like they gave up on Russell.
The new trainer and instagram pics are nice and all, but Randle's physique is the LEAST of his problems as a player. He needs to get into the film room and learn the mental aspects of the game. He needs to learn the basics of being a good team defender. He needs to learn to be active off the ball on offense. He needs to play with a high motor and high IQ off the ball on both ends of the court. It's clear from this Ding article that he hasn't responded well to constructive criticism about these aspects of the game.
Now the front office has basically written him off. They tried to dump him to Indiana, but the Pacers see the same problems that the Lakers see, so they don't want him. Then the Lakers draft a stretch 4 in Kuzma, which makes Randle even more expendable. The writing is on the wall for Randle. Luckily for him, his trade value is too low for the Lakers to get a great return via trade, and he has a chance to salvage his career as a Laker this year. Let's see how he responds. |
I've said before that I don't buy the Ding article, simply because both Julius and Luke Walton have said the exact opposite. Julius has said repeatedly that he wants Luke and his teammates to get on him if he's making mistakes. Luke said he really got on Julius during a practice and called him the following night, then Julius had a triple double the next game.
Even when Byron Scott was the coach and criticizing Randle he responded well.
The main critique we know the front office has had of him is being in shape. His cardio just hasn't been up to par and going by Julius and his trainers comments much of it had to do with diet (something a lot of rookies struggle with, even Kobe). Better cardio is going to lead to him being more consistent. It wasn't a coincidence that Julius typically played poorly on back to backs. |
Yeah, I remember Luke talking about how he was hard on Julius and Julius responded the next game. So, I don't know much about that article, but the only report of when Luke was tough on Julius, Luke said he responded. But hopefully it won't take that next season. _________________ "Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
- Michael Jordan |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JohnWick Starting Rotation
Joined: 21 Jun 2017 Posts: 251
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 9:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not sure how we can keep Randle and go after TWO max free agents.
What's Randle's cap hold going to be and will we need to renounce his rights to sign 2 max guys? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Roon Star Player
Joined: 29 Sep 2012 Posts: 1816
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 12:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dao wrote: | Randle has been put on notice by the front office. First there was that Ding article that was released right before the Russell trade.
http://lakers.247sports.com/Bolt/Report-Lakers-have-concerns-about-Russell-Randle--53241388
Quote: | There is still a lot to like about both Russell and Randle as well, but there are also ongoing questions about how well they take criticism, according to team sources. Lakers head coach Luke Walton entered the season asking Russell to be less of a know-it-all and more of a leader for the group, while he hoped Randle would emulate Draymond Green in using every perceived slight as motivation.
Though both players improved their games, neither advanced as far as Walton had hoped. Russell was inconsistent with his professionalism, and Randle often lost messages given to him if they were delivered harshly." |
And then the FO let the Pacers choose between taking Clarkson or Randle. That's a clear sign that they are ready to give up on Randle just like they gave up on Russell.
The new trainer and instagram pics are nice and all, but Randle's physique is the LEAST of his problems as a player. He needs to get into the film room and learn the mental aspects of the game. He needs to learn the basics of being a good team defender. He needs to learn to be active off the ball on offense. He needs to play with a high motor and high IQ off the ball on both ends of the court. It's clear from this Ding article that he hasn't responded well to constructive criticism about these aspects of the game.
Now the front office has basically written him off. They tried to dump him to Indiana, but the Pacers see the same problems that the Lakers see, so they don't want him. Then the Lakers draft a stretch 4 in Kuzma, which makes Randle even more expendable. The writing is on the wall for Randle. Luckily for him, his trade value is too low for the Lakers to get a great return via trade, and he has a chance to salvage his career as a Laker this year. Let's see how he responds. |
Have you been to school? There's a reason people go for years. It takes time to learn how to do things well.
I don't know about you, but I know a lot more about basketball now then when I was 21.
And lol about the bolded. Dump him. Dump him. They offered to trade him for Paul George. Trading for Paul George isn't dumping. Your whole premise is wrong.
Also acting like Kuzma won't have to learn all of things at a nba level either.
JR has his faults but you're making things up. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Shaber Star Player
Joined: 12 Mar 2006 Posts: 3732 Location: The other side
|
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
E_Wulf420 wrote: | Now that Randle is lighter I'm sure we will see a more faster, quicker, explosive Julius. Hopefully he improves is jumpshot, if he does I see 16/8/3 |
That is all nice and well.
But if he will not improve his D, he can take his 16/8 in Indiana.
I find it utterly unfair that Russell was (after the trade) singled out for the lack of D while Clarkson and Randle where much worse. _________________ .
Lakers depth chart
PG Johnson / Goodrich
SG Bryant / West / Scott
SF Baylor / Worthy / Cooper
PF Mikkelsen / Hairston / McAdoo / Gasol
C Chamberlain / Abdul-Jabbar / O'Neal / Mikan |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chronicle Retired Number
Joined: 21 Jul 2012 Posts: 31935 Location: Manhattan
|
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Shaber wrote: | I find it utterly unfair that Russell was (after the trade) singled out for the lack of D while Clarkson and Randle where much worse. |
Singled out? That's pretty much the only thing magic didn't complain about in regards to russell... _________________ Kobe |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Truck Turner Star Player
Joined: 28 Apr 2011 Posts: 3937
|
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, nobody has really gone in on Russell for his defense, or his play overall. The issue with Russell was mostly about his lack of leadership, perceived lack of work ethic, and immaturity.
All the complaints about Defense fall on Randle and Clarkson. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
av3773 Star Player
Joined: 11 Dec 2011 Posts: 3751
|
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Randles going to go at some point if we are going after 2 max guys....I hope plays well enough so at the trade dead line someone would be willing to eat Dengs contract to get him....if the FO can move off Deng and still keep BI and Ball and a number of their good young pieces, Nance, Zubac, (hart who I expect to be good) etc. The FO will have done a really good job in one year |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yinoma2001 Retired Number
Joined: 19 Jun 2010 Posts: 119487
|
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
JohnWick wrote: | I'm not sure how we can keep Randle and go after TWO max free agents.
What's Randle's cap hold going to be and will we need to renounce his rights to sign 2 max guys? |
12.5m. If the 2 max goal is still alive, both he and JC are likely casualties too. _________________ From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rogers49 Star Player
Joined: 02 Jul 2015 Posts: 1182
|
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
JohnWick wrote: | I'm not sure how we can keep Randle and go after TWO max free agents.
What's Randle's cap hold going to be and will we need to renounce his rights to sign 2 max guys? |
Yes, so better trade him now.
Hopefully unloading Deng as a result. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yinoma2001 Retired Number
Joined: 19 Jun 2010 Posts: 119487
|
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
rogers49 wrote: | JohnWick wrote: | I'm not sure how we can keep Randle and go after TWO max free agents.
What's Randle's cap hold going to be and will we need to renounce his rights to sign 2 max guys? |
Yes, so better trade him now.
Hopefully unloading Deng as a result. |
I hate that the team would give up on Jules to chase the 2 max deal. But if they are hell bent on it, the reality is that the team cannot keep him and pay 2 max deals. _________________ From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Four Decade Bandwagon Star Player
Joined: 18 Jul 2014 Posts: 8156
|
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am more of the mindset that I prefer Randle having a "break out" year and that his 16/8 (or better) and overall play makes it a difficult decision between a long term plan of his max contract of approx $20 M or a short term retirement package for $35M+.
Third year. Improved fitness and understanding of what he needs to work on. A system and PG that will get him the ball as he cuts or open jumpshots instead of having to create for himself.
I must have much more confidence in what Randle can produce then most of you. IMO a long term part of the puzzle instead of dumped for a "possibility" of 2 max contracts and all the implications they bring, good and bad! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yinoma2001 Retired Number
Joined: 19 Jun 2010 Posts: 119487
|
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Four Decade Bandwagon wrote: | I am more of the mindset that I prefer Randle having a "break out" year and that his 16/8 (or better) and overall play makes it a difficult decision between a long term plan of his max contract of approx $20 M or a short term retirement package for $35M+.
Third year. Improved fitness and understanding of what he needs to work on. A system and PG that will get him the ball as he cuts or open jumpshots instead of having to create for himself.
I must have much more confidence in what Randle can produce then most of you. IMO a long term part of the puzzle instead of dumped for a "possibility" of 2 max contracts and all the implications they bring, good and bad! |
It's a ticking time bomb. I prefer to keep Jules and see what happens, but the team may decide to trade him (already dangled for PG13) lest they get a Nerlens Noel return (poor) b/c he's a RFA coming up. _________________ From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Car54 Franchise Player
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 14424
|
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
yinoma2001 wrote: | JohnWick wrote: | I'm not sure how we can keep Randle and go after TWO max free agents.
What's Randle's cap hold going to be and will we need to renounce his rights to sign 2 max guys? |
12.5m. If the 2 max goal is still alive, both he and JC are likely casualties too. |
I hate that their hell bent on building a super team. They could have stayed patient and just signed PG in the summer and added him to Randle Russell Clarkson Ball and Ingram. That team has more potential than Lebron PG and scrubs _________________ Coach Vogel, Kidd, Hollins
Max slot : Kawhi |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|