OFFICIAL JULIUS RANDLE THREAD!!
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 1296, 1297, 1298 ... 1421, 1422, 1423  Next

 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Fortysixn2
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 22 Jun 2016
Posts: 1517

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2018 7:15 am    Post subject:

J.C. Smith wrote:
Dr. Funkbot wrote:
Kuzma is a better defender as a rookie than Jules was as a rookie. Therefore when Kuz has been in the league for 3 years I anticipate he will be a better defender than Randle at 3 years. The much better offense that Kuz gives you is icing on the cake.


That's a bit of a leap. He may very well improve his D to be better than Randle's, and I like the signs from Kuzma recently. But he spent three years in college, to Randle's one. He's less than eight months younger than Randle.

They are completely different players. Randle is a bruiser who can create offense a bit better than Kuzma at the moment, where Kuzma is a much better off ball player who can drain threes and has a nice inside out game. Randle's body will always make him better able to battle in the post, and capable of delivering harder screens. He'll likely never be the shooter than Kuzma already is though. Randle is a 4/5 where Kuzma is a 3/4 (mostly 4). They can certainly play together. The bench that was terrorizing teams in the early season was Kuzma/Randle.

It's also quite debatable to say that Randle will never be the offensive player that Kuzma will be. The Lakers are actually better offensively when Randle is on the court.

Here's an actual comparison of the two with the areas where they are better than the counterpart bolded.

Kuzma:
ORating (On Court): 101.9
ORating (Off Court): 99.8
ORating Differential: +2.1
DRating (On Court): 105.6
DRating (Off Court): 103.1
DRating Differential (Lower is Better): +2.5
Net Rating: -0.5
Points: 16.8
FG%: 46%
3P%: 37.5%
FT%: 73.8%
Rebounds: 6.4
Assists: 1.9
Steals: 0.6
Blocks: 0.4
Turnovers: 1.9
Minutes: 31.4
Points/36: 19.2
Rebounds/36: 7.3
Assists/36:2.2
Steals/36: 0.7
Blocks/36: 0.5
Turnovers/36: 2.2

Randle:
ORating (On Court): 102.9
ORating (Off Court): 99.6
ORating Differential: +3.3
DRating (On Court): 104.8
DRating (Off Court): 104.5
DRating Differential (Lower is Better): +0.3
Net Rating: +2.9

Points: 13.2
FG%: 54.3%
3P%: 25%
FT%: 68.6%
Rebounds: 7.2
Assists: 2
Steals: 0.5
Blocks: 0.7
Turnovers: 2.4
Minutes: 23 minutes
Points/36: 20.7
Rebounds/36: 11.2
Assists/36: 3.1

Steals/36: 0.7
Blocks/36: 1.1
Turnovers/36: 3.7

That is not to say that I don't love Kuzma's game. I do. But the main reason his numbers are better than Randle's is because he has more than 8 more minutes per game. I do think Kuzma is going to improve, he has the desire to do so and he's already very good for a rookie. But it's also fair to assume that Randle will continue improving as well. They are both good prospects and still years away from their primes. More importantly, they can play together and their games compliment one another. Randle needs a shooter opposite of him, and his rebounding and ability to defend down low cover two of the weaker areas of Kuzma's game.

Fortysixn2 wrote:
his terrible shooting and no hustle (go back and watch him on D and in transition) wasnít part of the problem lol.


He had 8 rebounds, a steal, and a block in 22 minutes.


I dig kuzmas offensive game, but defensively heís pretty bad...Iím not surprised about the numbers. Kumza does play better with Lonzo though because he can shoot and the goal is to build around Lonzo, but no arguing that Kuzma is probably = to Julius right now.

As far as his 8 rebounds a steal and a block in 22 minutes, did you watch the game? He was miserable. 2/7 and one of those two makes and one of his 8 rebounds was a lucky putback on his own miss that was 5 feet off and luckily bounced to him. He had at least 2 defensive sequences where he loafed or just stood there and watched someone score....not saying every game heís like that, but he was really really really garbage in this game.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
RI Laker
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 27 Jun 2005
Posts: 3160

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2018 7:22 am    Post subject:

Cuban hates us and is going to try to stick it to us. He will offer JR low 20's. I hope the FO has a plan. The two worst things for us are to lose him for nothing and overpay him.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ringfinger
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 20731

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2018 7:24 am    Post subject:

tox wrote:
ringfinger wrote:
What was the point of tanking if we arenít going to retain the fruits of our tanking labor unless the player becomes a unicorn?

I guess Iím still trying to understand who would be better than Randle for us?

I'm not saying I advocate dumping Randle, but arguably the point of tanking is exactly what you said: to find a "unicorn" (or more generally, find stars). Tanking just gives you a ton of opportunities to do that -- it doesn't mean you are beholden to the "failed experiments" (so to speak).

What you never want to do is strap yourself to mediocre players on big contracts. Kent Bazemore, Allen Crabbe, etc. But of course, you need to factor individual growth. Oladipo is the prime example on that front (but to be fair he's also a bit of an outlier).

Whether you keep Randle should be dependent on whether he's worth eating up X% of the cap, where X depends on his contract. At $8M you probably do it. That's a steal. At $18M you probably don't do it, because that's exactly a Bazemore type of contract -- even if he's better than the likes of the players I mentioned above, he's probably still not worth 18% of the cap.

But maybe if you think he'll keep improving you do it. $18M might also make sense if you've gotten two maxes besides him and you keep him via Bird rights.

But yeah, holding onto players just because they are the fruits of tanking is just not the right approach.


Ok. I wasn't suggesting that you hold on to every one of your draft picks indefinitely just because you tanked. What I'm suggesting is, and where I disagree with you on the goal of tanking for picks, is that sometimes you find a #2 option in the draft. Sometimes, it's a #3 option, or a #4 option. I mean, should GSW have dumped Klay for cap space since he is not a unicorn and that is the point of the draft? I don't think so.

Where I do agree with you, is that you have to consider the value in terms of their cap space hit. We just don't know that yet though for Randle and in spite of that, we're seeing a number of posts (and rumors) suggesting we trade Randle for cap space.

To me, there is a clear role for Randle on this team as a #3 or #4 option. So IMO, we should be looking to KEEP Randle, with the caveat that it depends on the cost of doing so.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Fortysixn2
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 22 Jun 2016
Posts: 1517

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2018 8:10 am    Post subject:

ringfinger wrote:
tox wrote:
ringfinger wrote:
What was the point of tanking if we arenít going to retain the fruits of our tanking labor unless the player becomes a unicorn?

I guess Iím still trying to understand who would be better than Randle for us?

I'm not saying I advocate dumping Randle, but arguably the point of tanking is exactly what you said: to find a "unicorn" (or more generally, find stars). Tanking just gives you a ton of opportunities to do that -- it doesn't mean you are beholden to the "failed experiments" (so to speak).

What you never want to do is strap yourself to mediocre players on big contracts. Kent Bazemore, Allen Crabbe, etc. But of course, you need to factor individual growth. Oladipo is the prime example on that front (but to be fair he's also a bit of an outlier).

Whether you keep Randle should be dependent on whether he's worth eating up X% of the cap, where X depends on his contract. At $8M you probably do it. That's a steal. At $18M you probably don't do it, because that's exactly a Bazemore type of contract -- even if he's better than the likes of the players I mentioned above, he's probably still not worth 18% of the cap.

But maybe if you think he'll keep improving you do it. $18M might also make sense if you've gotten two maxes besides him and you keep him via Bird rights.

But yeah, holding onto players just because they are the fruits of tanking is just not the right approach.


Ok. I wasn't suggesting that you hold on to every one of your draft picks indefinitely just because you tanked. What I'm suggesting is, and where I disagree with you on the goal of tanking for picks, is that sometimes you find a #2 option in the draft. Sometimes, it's a #3 option, or a #4 option. I mean, should GSW have dumped Klay for cap space since he is not a unicorn and that is the point of the draft? I don't think so.

Where I do agree with you, is that you have to consider the value in terms of their cap space hit. We just don't know that yet though for Randle and in spite of that, we're seeing a number of posts (and rumors) suggesting we trade Randle for cap space.

To me, there is a clear role for Randle on this team as a #3 or #4 option. So IMO, we should be looking to KEEP Randle, with the caveat that it depends on the cost of doing so.


I think the real issue is if heís willing to accept an appropriate role and the money for that role. For a backup 4 or 5, heís an average player...3 years 30 million playing 20 minutes a game and the occasional spot start is where he fits in the NBA. Thing is, Kuzma is the future and Nance is better than him IMO. So can he hang 20 minutes at center every game? Not against big centers. Is he willing to make $10m a year and be a role player? Doesnít seem like it.

The thing with Randle, just like JC...they have been on a bad team their entire career and been spoiled with minutes and lack of real talent to compete with them on the roster. They both think they are NBA starters who should be playing at least 30 minutes a game. I think both of them are going to be in for a shock if they leave.

Nick Young is better than JC, he went to a talented team...playing 15 minutes a game and has 11 games this year where he played less than 10 minutes.

Kenneth Faried puts up around the same per/36 numbers as Julius...Julius Shoots the ball more and turns the ball over more and commits more fouls, faried blocks more shots, other than that very close. He is averaging 15 minutes a game and has been out of the rotation for a dozen games this year on a team that is .500. Thatís about where Julius would be on a average team.

I think JC is overpayed and should just be moved for an expiring contract. With Julius, if he can accept his roll...15-20 minutes a game off the bench at 8-10 million a year, then thatís cool...if he thinks heís better than that he will be in for a rude awakening when he finds himself on a roster with more talent.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerSD
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 10 Nov 2016
Posts: 4996

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2018 8:52 am    Post subject:

https://twitter.com/lakersoutsiders/status/953517270961029121
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 125847
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2018 8:56 am    Post subject:

Dr. Funkbot wrote:
I value D a lot. Kuzma is a better defender as a rookie than Jules was as a rookie. Therefore when Kuz has been in the league for 3 years I anticipate he will be a better defender than Randle at 3 years. The much better offense that Kuz gives you is icing on the cake.

Randle has given us a half a season of good D and he is back sliding now.

Besides, if you value D and Bball smarts, Nance is the one you want to hang onto over Randle. Nance never pouts and always gives it 100% when he is on the floor.

Don't lump me in with any sort of Ball, BI, Nance, Hart haters. I love all of those guys. I just don't care too much for our resident lug heads, JC and JR.

And If they remain on the team and play consistently hard on both ends of the floor I will happily root for JR and JC.


Kuzma and Randle are the same age and at the same position in the NBA. Comparing a 19 yo Randle with a 22 yo Kuzma is lazy, disingenuous and ridiculous. I too want to see them both stay and have been a big supporter of them playing together. The numbers speak for themselves. All I have asked from Kuzma is more effort defensively even if it takes away offense. Randle has already learned that.
_________________
LG NBA Playoff pool first round:

1. pjiddy 32
2. blackmamba08 30
2. rebirth 30
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Ziggy
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 10069

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2018 8:59 am    Post subject:

RI Laker wrote:
Cuban hates us and is going to try to stick it to us. He will offer JR low 20's. I hope the FO has a plan. The two worst things for us are to lose him for nothing and overpay him.


Mavs are reported to be one of the teams interested in Cousins. I could see them making Randle a backup plan.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 89704
Location: I have hate filled eyes.

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2018 9:16 am    Post subject:

RI Laker wrote:
Cuban hates us and is going to try to stick it to us. He will offer JR low 20's. I hope the FO has a plan. The two worst things for us are to lose him for nothing and overpay him.


That's an overpay for Jules. Does he want to populate his team with overpaid guys like Barnes, Wes Matthews, and a 20m+/year Jules?
_________________
Plan A: PG13/LBJ/re-sign Jules/Brook (room ex.)
Plan B: PG13/re-sign Jules/punt rest of cap to 2019
Plan C: re-sign Jules/do not extend mediocre players to long term deals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Gimme_the_rock
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 13 Apr 2001
Posts: 11240
Location: Looking outta the window, watching the asphalt grow ...

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2018 9:24 am    Post subject:

RI Laker wrote:
Cuban hates us and is going to try to stick it to us. He will offer JR low 20's. I hope the FO has a plan. The two worst things for us are to lose him for nothing and overpay him.


I've thought the same thing.

Cuban once traded for Christian Laettner to keep him from coming to the Lakers in a deal. Mavs had little to no need for Laettner, weren't in championship contention but still made the move to spite LA and then coach Don Nelson bragged about it.
_________________
Maginka doing work
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Cutheon
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 10 Jul 2009
Posts: 7451
Location: Bay Area

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2018 11:19 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
RI Laker wrote:
Cuban hates us and is going to try to stick it to us. He will offer JR low 20's. I hope the FO has a plan. The two worst things for us are to lose him for nothing and overpay him.


That's an overpay for Jules. Does he want to populate his team with overpaid guys like Barnes, Wes Matthews, and a 20m+/year Jules?


That would be awesome. I love Jules, but if his time on the Lakers is best-remembered as inducing Cuban to cut off his nose just to spite his face...that's a #7 pick well-spent in my opinion. Plus it would give Jules and his family some financial security, which is always a good thing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
trablos
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 10 May 2017
Posts: 1268

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2018 12:08 pm    Post subject:

Fortysixn2 wrote:
ringfinger wrote:
tox wrote:
ringfinger wrote:
What was the point of tanking if we arenít going to retain the fruits of our tanking labor unless the player becomes a unicorn?

I guess Iím still trying to understand who would be better than Randle for us?

I'm not saying I advocate dumping Randle, but arguably the point of tanking is exactly what you said: to find a "unicorn" (or more generally, find stars). Tanking just gives you a ton of opportunities to do that -- it doesn't mean you are beholden to the "failed experiments" (so to speak).

What you never want to do is strap yourself to mediocre players on big contracts. Kent Bazemore, Allen Crabbe, etc. But of course, you need to factor individual growth. Oladipo is the prime example on that front (but to be fair he's also a bit of an outlier).

Whether you keep Randle should be dependent on whether he's worth eating up X% of the cap, where X depends on his contract. At $8M you probably do it. That's a steal. At $18M you probably don't do it, because that's exactly a Bazemore type of contract -- even if he's better than the likes of the players I mentioned above, he's probably still not worth 18% of the cap.

But maybe if you think he'll keep improving you do it. $18M might also make sense if you've gotten two maxes besides him and you keep him via Bird rights.

But yeah, holding onto players just because they are the fruits of tanking is just not the right approach.


Ok. I wasn't suggesting that you hold on to every one of your draft picks indefinitely just because you tanked. What I'm suggesting is, and where I disagree with you on the goal of tanking for picks, is that sometimes you find a #2 option in the draft. Sometimes, it's a #3 option, or a #4 option. I mean, should GSW have dumped Klay for cap space since he is not a unicorn and that is the point of the draft? I don't think so.

Where I do agree with you, is that you have to consider the value in terms of their cap space hit. We just don't know that yet though for Randle and in spite of that, we're seeing a number of posts (and rumors) suggesting we trade Randle for cap space.

To me, there is a clear role for Randle on this team as a #3 or #4 option. So IMO, we should be looking to KEEP Randle, with the caveat that it depends on the cost of doing so.


I think the real issue is if heís willing to accept an appropriate role and the money for that role. For a backup 4 or 5, heís an average player...3 years 30 million playing 20 minutes a game and the occasional spot start is where he fits in the NBA. Thing is, Kuzma is the future and Nance is better than him IMO. So can he hang 20 minutes at center every game? Not against big centers. Is he willing to make $10m a year and be a role player? Doesnít seem like it.

The thing with Randle, just like JC...they have been on a bad team their entire career and been spoiled with minutes and lack of real talent to compete with them on the roster. They both think they are NBA starters who should be playing at least 30 minutes a game. I think both of them are going to be in for a shock if they leave.

Nick Young is better than JC, he went to a talented team...playing 15 minutes a game and has 11 games this year where he played less than 10 minutes.

Kenneth Faried puts up around the same per/36 numbers as Julius...Julius Shoots the ball more and turns the ball over more and commits more fouls, faried blocks more shots, other than that very close. He is averaging 15 minutes a game and has been out of the rotation for a dozen games this year on a team that is .500. Thatís about where Julius would be on a average team.

I think JC is overpayed and should just be moved for an expiring contract. With Julius, if he can accept his roll...15-20 minutes a game off the bench at 8-10 million a year, then thatís cool...if he thinks heís better than that he will be in for a rude awakening when he finds himself on a roster with more talent.

Spot on post...can't really disagree with anything. It all boils down to what kind of value you place on his game and perceived potential.

But just to give Randle the benefit of the doubt, he's clearly not the offensive player Kuzma is, but we don't really need him to be. As long as he understands his role on the team and is willing to play within his capacity, and could be retained for a decent figure, I would be glad to keep him and add PG moving forward.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Inspector Gadget
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Posts: 16428
Location: L.A.

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2018 12:25 pm    Post subject:

LakerSD wrote:
https://twitter.com/lakersoutsiders/status/953517270961029121


Sounds like they are playing game of chicken with the Mavericks... those sort of things can put pressure on a team like Dallas to do a trade... we all know that isnít gonna happen.. Iím pretty sure they are trying to make sure the Mavs add valuable assets in a Randle trade.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
tox
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Nov 2015
Posts: 13124

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2018 1:25 pm    Post subject:

ringfinger wrote:
tox wrote:
ringfinger wrote:
What was the point of tanking if we arenít going to retain the fruits of our tanking labor unless the player becomes a unicorn?

I guess Iím still trying to understand who would be better than Randle for us?

I'm not saying I advocate dumping Randle, but arguably the point of tanking is exactly what you said: to find a "unicorn" (or more generally, find stars). Tanking just gives you a ton of opportunities to do that -- it doesn't mean you are beholden to the "failed experiments" (so to speak).

What you never want to do is strap yourself to mediocre players on big contracts. Kent Bazemore, Allen Crabbe, etc. But of course, you need to factor individual growth. Oladipo is the prime example on that front (but to be fair he's also a bit of an outlier).

Whether you keep Randle should be dependent on whether he's worth eating up X% of the cap, where X depends on his contract. At $8M you probably do it. That's a steal. At $18M you probably don't do it, because that's exactly a Bazemore type of contract -- even if he's better than the likes of the players I mentioned above, he's probably still not worth 18% of the cap.

But maybe if you think he'll keep improving you do it. $18M might also make sense if you've gotten two maxes besides him and you keep him via Bird rights.

But yeah, holding onto players just because they are the fruits of tanking is just not the right approach.


Ok. I wasn't suggesting that you hold on to every one of your draft picks indefinitely just because you tanked. What I'm suggesting is, and where I disagree with you on the goal of tanking for picks, is that sometimes you find a #2 option in the draft. Sometimes, it's a #3 option, or a #4 option. I mean, should GSW have dumped Klay for cap space since he is not a unicorn and that is the point of the draft? I don't think so.

Where I do agree with you, is that you have to consider the value in terms of their cap space hit. We just don't know that yet though for Randle and in spite of that, we're seeing a number of posts (and rumors) suggesting we trade Randle for cap space.

To me, there is a clear role for Randle on this team as a #3 or #4 option. So IMO, we should be looking to KEEP Randle, with the caveat that it depends on the cost of doing so.

I agree with you overall. A good NBA franchise avoids overpaying for talent. I think we both agree you shouldn't dump Randle for the sake of dumping him unless you get a good return... otherwise why? We can just renounce our rights to clear his cap hold.

My point was mostly what you said later, it depends on how much it costs to keep Randle.
_________________
https://j.gifs.com/Rnqnbk.gif
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Dr. Funkbot
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Sep 2001
Posts: 7736
Location: Eagle Rock

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2018 1:55 pm    Post subject:

venturalakersfan wrote:
Dr. Funkbot wrote:
I value D a lot. Kuzma is a better defender as a rookie than Jules was as a rookie. Therefore when Kuz has been in the league for 3 years I anticipate he will be a better defender than Randle at 3 years. The much better offense that Kuz gives you is icing on the cake.

Randle has given us a half a season of good D and he is back sliding now.

Besides, if you value D and Bball smarts, Nance is the one you want to hang onto over Randle. Nance never pouts and always gives it 100% when he is on the floor.

Don't lump me in with any sort of Ball, BI, Nance, Hart haters. I love all of those guys. I just don't care too much for our resident lug heads, JC and JR.

And If they remain on the team and play consistently hard on both ends of the floor I will happily root for JR and JC.


Kuzma and Randle are the same age and at the same position in the NBA. Comparing a 19 yo Randle with a 22 yo Kuzma is lazy, disingenuous and ridiculous. I too want to see them both stay and have been a big supporter of them playing together. The numbers speak for themselves. All I have asked from Kuzma is more effort defensively even if it takes away offense. Randle has already learned that.


Randle played all of 17 minutes as a 19 year old in the NBA. So he came in as a 20 year old playing horrible defense after having a year to spend with the NBA club while he was rehabing. So who is being disingenuous here? And last time I checked Kuz is 22 currently and Randle is 23, they are not the same age.

Yes Kuz came in older, but he is still played better D as rookie than Randle did in his second NBA season and I still believe that Kuz will end up being a superior defender because he does not take plays off like Randle has been known to do.
_________________
R.I.P. Doc Buss

"I think we often overlook the best way for a team like these Lakers to obtain star level players is to turn their current players into stars, rather than looking for outside help."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
MJST
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 14986

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2018 2:46 pm    Post subject:

I doubt Kuz will ever be capable of defending all 5 positions like Julius can.
_________________
How NBA 2K18 failed the All-Time Lakers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxMBYm3wwxk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 125847
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2018 2:49 pm    Post subject:

Dr. Funkbot wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
Dr. Funkbot wrote:
I value D a lot. Kuzma is a better defender as a rookie than Jules was as a rookie. Therefore when Kuz has been in the league for 3 years I anticipate he will be a better defender than Randle at 3 years. The much better offense that Kuz gives you is icing on the cake.

Randle has given us a half a season of good D and he is back sliding now.

Besides, if you value D and Bball smarts, Nance is the one you want to hang onto over Randle. Nance never pouts and always gives it 100% when he is on the floor.

Don't lump me in with any sort of Ball, BI, Nance, Hart haters. I love all of those guys. I just don't care too much for our resident lug heads, JC and JR.

And If they remain on the team and play consistently hard on both ends of the floor I will happily root for JR and JC.


Kuzma and Randle are the same age and at the same position in the NBA. Comparing a 19 yo Randle with a 22 yo Kuzma is lazy, disingenuous and ridiculous. I too want to see them both stay and have been a big supporter of them playing together. The numbers speak for themselves. All I have asked from Kuzma is more effort defensively even if it takes away offense. Randle has already learned that.


Randle played all of 17 minutes as a 19 year old in the NBA. So he came in as a 20 year old playing horrible defense after having a year to spend with the NBA club while he was rehabing. So who is being disingenuous here? And last time I checked Kuz is 22 currently and Randle is 23, they are not the same age.

Yes Kuz came in older, but he is still played better D as rookie than Randle did in his second NBA season and I still believe that Kuz will end up being a superior defender because he does not take plays off like Randle has been known to do.


Yes he does, his inconsistent defensive effort is what Luke comments on. I know you cannot be unbiased, so continue to think what you want.
_________________
LG NBA Playoff pool first round:

1. pjiddy 32
2. blackmamba08 30
2. rebirth 30
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Dr. Laker
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 12 Apr 2002
Posts: 11515

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2018 3:26 pm    Post subject:

MJST wrote:
I doubt Kuz will ever be capable of defending all 5 positions like Julius can.


I doubt Julius is capable of defending all 5 positions. He has a difficult enough time defending the 4.
_________________
Suck it, whiners. I have TWC!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KeepItRealOrElse
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 11 Oct 2012
Posts: 28352

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2018 3:32 pm    Post subject:

Randle was 21 his true rookie year , Kuz 22. Same difference
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Dr. Funkbot
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Sep 2001
Posts: 7736
Location: Eagle Rock

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2018 3:37 pm    Post subject:

venturalakersfan wrote:
Dr. Funkbot wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
Dr. Funkbot wrote:
I value D a lot. Kuzma is a better defender as a rookie than Jules was as a rookie. Therefore when Kuz has been in the league for 3 years I anticipate he will be a better defender than Randle at 3 years. The much better offense that Kuz gives you is icing on the cake.

Randle has given us a half a season of good D and he is back sliding now.

Besides, if you value D and Bball smarts, Nance is the one you want to hang onto over Randle. Nance never pouts and always gives it 100% when he is on the floor.

Don't lump me in with any sort of Ball, BI, Nance, Hart haters. I love all of those guys. I just don't care too much for our resident lug heads, JC and JR.

And If they remain on the team and play consistently hard on both ends of the floor I will happily root for JR and JC.


Kuzma and Randle are the same age and at the same position in the NBA. Comparing a 19 yo Randle with a 22 yo Kuzma is lazy, disingenuous and ridiculous. I too want to see them both stay and have been a big supporter of them playing together. The numbers speak for themselves. All I have asked from Kuzma is more effort defensively even if it takes away offense. Randle has already learned that.


Randle played all of 17 minutes as a 19 year old in the NBA. So he came in as a 20 year old playing horrible defense after having a year to spend with the NBA club while he was rehabing. So who is being disingenuous here? And last time I checked Kuz is 22 currently and Randle is 23, they are not the same age.

Yes Kuz came in older, but he is still played better D as rookie than Randle did in his second NBA season and I still believe that Kuz will end up being a superior defender because he does not take plays off like Randle has been known to do.


Yes he does, his inconsistent defensive effort is what Luke comments on. I know you cannot be unbiased, so continue to think what you want.


Thank you VLF! You do the same and lets hope Kuz and Randle both continue to improve and get us back where we belong- the playoffs.
_________________
R.I.P. Doc Buss

"I think we often overlook the best way for a team like these Lakers to obtain star level players is to turn their current players into stars, rather than looking for outside help."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 89704
Location: I have hate filled eyes.

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2018 6:10 pm    Post subject:

Keep.
Him.
_________________
Plan A: PG13/LBJ/re-sign Jules/Brook (room ex.)
Plan B: PG13/re-sign Jules/punt rest of cap to 2019
Plan C: re-sign Jules/do not extend mediocre players to long term deals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
hydrohead
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 14 Jul 2003
Posts: 1152
Location: Lost Angeles

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2018 6:14 pm    Post subject:

LakerSD wrote:
https://twitter.com/lakersoutsiders/status/953517270961029121

couple this with the dallasbasketball.com story or even on its own: looks like the Lakers are fishing for better offers. no way they are going to commit to Ju with big fish out there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Aike
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 17 May 2017
Posts: 116

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2018 6:47 pm    Post subject:

Inspector Gadget wrote:
LakerSD wrote:
https://twitter.com/lakersoutsiders/status/953517270961029121


Sounds like they are playing game of chicken with the Mavericks... those sort of things can put pressure on a team like Dallas to do a trade... we all know that isnít gonna happen.. Iím pretty sure they are trying to make sure the Mavs add valuable assets in a Randle trade.


Lakers are also going ahead and getting in the "we will match so don't bother offering" stabs. If they don't trade him, they hope no one offers in free agency. Lakers would love to have him back on a cheap contract.

I still say the number where the Lakers don't match is $18 per, and I'm not sure anyone will offer that. But he's a lot closer to that kind of offer than he was a month ago.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 125847
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2018 7:27 pm    Post subject:

Dr. Funkbot wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
Dr. Funkbot wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
Dr. Funkbot wrote:
I value D a lot. Kuzma is a better defender as a rookie than Jules was as a rookie. Therefore when Kuz has been in the league for 3 years I anticipate he will be a better defender than Randle at 3 years. The much better offense that Kuz gives you is icing on the cake.

Randle has given us a half a season of good D and he is back sliding now.

Besides, if you value D and Bball smarts, Nance is the one you want to hang onto over Randle. Nance never pouts and always gives it 100% when he is on the floor.

Don't lump me in with any sort of Ball, BI, Nance, Hart haters. I love all of those guys. I just don't care too much for our resident lug heads, JC and JR.

And If they remain on the team and play consistently hard on both ends of the floor I will happily root for JR and JC.


Kuzma and Randle are the same age and at the same position in the NBA. Comparing a 19 yo Randle with a 22 yo Kuzma is lazy, disingenuous and ridiculous. I too want to see them both stay and have been a big supporter of them playing together. The numbers speak for themselves. All I have asked from Kuzma is more effort defensively even if it takes away offense. Randle has already learned that.


Randle played all of 17 minutes as a 19 year old in the NBA. So he came in as a 20 year old playing horrible defense after having a year to spend with the NBA club while he was rehabing. So who is being disingenuous here? And last time I checked Kuz is 22 currently and Randle is 23, they are not the same age.

Yes Kuz came in older, but he is still played better D as rookie than Randle did in his second NBA season and I still believe that Kuz will end up being a superior defender because he does not take plays off like Randle has been known to do.


Yes he does, his inconsistent defensive effort is what Luke comments on. I know you cannot be unbiased, so continue to think what you want.


Thank you VLF! You do the same and lets hope Kuz and Randle both continue to improve and get us back where we belong- the playoffs.


I know that is what we would both love to see
_________________
LG NBA Playoff pool first round:

1. pjiddy 32
2. blackmamba08 30
2. rebirth 30
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
32
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 04 Nov 2009
Posts: 55537

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2018 8:11 pm    Post subject:

I don't understand how he could only get 1 rebound.
_________________
Nobody in the NBA can touch the Laker brand, which, like the uniform color, is pure gold.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epak
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 19068

PostPosted: Wed Jan 17, 2018 8:49 pm    Post subject:

32 wrote:
I don't understand how he could only get 1 rebound.


I missed the game. How did that happen?
_________________
Summer: Paul + Boogie
Draft any combo of: Anfernee Simons, Shake Milton, Melvin Frazier
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 1296, 1297, 1298 ... 1421, 1422, 1423  Next
Page 1297 of 1423
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2010 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB