The JULIUS RANDLE Thread
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 1337, 1338, 1339 ... 1534, 1535, 1536  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> General Basketball Discussion Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:37 pm    Post subject:

LS, what's your valuation of what you think Jules gets on the FA market?
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Cutheon
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 10 Jul 2009
Posts: 12161
Location: Bay Area

PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:43 pm    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
LS, what's your valuation of what you think Jules gets on the FA market?


I'm not LS, but I'm just gonna slide right in to say: I want the Lakers to resign him at 12-14; I am okay with 15-16; I do not expect any team to offer a contract above that; if they do, I think the cap is 18m; my dark horse candidate is the Rockets, in the belief that if there is one person in this league that can turn Julius into a shooter overnight, and thereby unlock his fill potential, it's Mike D'antoni.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerSanity
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 33474
Location: Long Beach, California

PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:58 pm    Post subject:

Cutheon wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
LS, what's your valuation of what you think Jules gets on the FA market?


I'm not LS, but I'm just gonna slide right in to say: I want the Lakers to resign him at 12-14; I am okay with 15-16; I do not expect any team to offer a contract above that; if they do, I think the cap is 18m; my dark horse candidate is the Rockets, in the belief that if there is one person in this league that can turn Julius into a shooter overnight, and thereby unlock his fill potential, it's Mike D'antoni.


I'm not as educated as some are re: who has cap space and who doesn't. However, my understanding is that the teams with real cap space this summer will be limited to us, Dallas, Chicago, Indiana and Brooklyn.

Assuming those four other teams are the only teams who could make Randle a real offer, you can eliminate Indiana (Turner and Sabonis) and Chicago (Portis and Markenan) right off the bat. They have their own young players and don't need a 24 year old who is still not an entirely sure thing. Brooklyn could make a play, but I don't think they have serious money or would pay serious money (anything above $16-$18 million a year).

I could see Dallas going after Randle pretty easily. Dallas is really the only true contender IMO. However, they (and the league) may not value Randle as we do. I think Randle is underrated. This summer, here is the list of front court FAs (ranked in order according to Hoopshype): Cousins, Jordan, Capela (RFA), Gordon (RFA), Parker (RFA), Randle (RFA), Mirotic (RFA), Favors, Anthony, Kanter, B. Lopez and Nurkic.

I don't think Dallas goes for Jordan again, but wouldn't be surprised if they make Cousins a big offer. Capela sticks with the Rockets UNLESS Lebron goes there. Magic match for Gordon - no way they let him go no matter the price (the Magic can't afford to let their young guys go). Parker is a wild card and Nurkic I think may actually get paid. I don't think Milwaukee wants to pay Parker a lot given his injury history and could seriously see Dallas step in with an offer for him. Strategically, for both Houston and us, it might make sense to give Capela and/or Randle some quick offers just to put both teams on the clock while we wait for our free agent options to play out. Bottom line is that I could equally see Dallas making offers for Cousins, Parker, Capela and Randle. Who they actually make an offer to is anyone's guess.

Therefore, to answer the question, it really depends on what Dallas does. I could see Dallas making Randle an offer in the $18-$20 million range (just outside of what we likely want to pay him). In that case, I think Randle is likely gone (unless he somehow finishes the year even better than he's already been paid and we just have to keep him). However, if Dallas doesn't do it, I think we offer him something between $12-$14 million. Even then, possible that Randle doesn't take it, pulls a Noel and takes the qualifying offer to see what's out there next summer.

Bottom line is that I don't think he is getting a max deal or one above $20 million. Also, all of this could go out the window if we pull a Deng trade freeing up more space. In that situation, we may not mind paying Randle a little extra while still being able to maintain two max spaces for 2018 and/or 2019.
_________________
LakersGround's Terms of Service

Twitter: @DeleteThisPost
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2018 2:03 pm    Post subject:

The McDermott move was curious for Dallas. Why trade for a RFA that they will have to renounce if they're not going after someone like Jules?
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Cutheon
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 10 Jul 2009
Posts: 12161
Location: Bay Area

PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2018 2:16 pm    Post subject:

I'm pretty sure the Rockets would have the room; still, had them as my dark horse for a reason.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
pio2u
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 26 Dec 2012
Posts: 54571

PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2018 7:23 pm    Post subject:

Assessing Julius Randle’s long-term value

Quote:
Los Angeles Lakers forward Julius Randle is approaching a crucial juncture in his career. He is entering restricted free agency this summer, and the Lakers have to decide how much they want him, though their decision will likely also be dependent on their luck attracting max free agents.


https://www.fanragsports.com/lakers/assessing-julius-randles-long-term-value/amp/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerFan1972
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Apr 2005
Posts: 3257

PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2018 7:45 pm    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
The McDermott move was curious for Dallas. Why trade for a RFA that they will have to renounce if they're not going after someone like Jules?


Looks like they turned Devin Harris' expiring contract into a 2nd rounder. They are in full tank mode, so collecting assets/picks where they can. Makes me doubt Dallas would really throw a big contract at JR. Going to be an interesting summer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Laker's Fan
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 27 Jun 2002
Posts: 12850

PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2018 8:35 pm    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
The McDermott move was curious for Dallas. Why trade for a RFA that they will have to renounce if they're not going after someone like Jules?


I think Dallas can keep McBucket's cap hold and still offer Randle a salary starting around $14M, but it would force them to renounce everybody else.

I don't see the Randle fit in Dallas myself. Carlisle's schemes call for spacing and they allow for one spot that can't shoot which is reserved for a rim protecting big. Barnes is their crunch time PF.
_________________
Austin Reaves keeps his game tight, like Kobe Bryant on game night.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerSD
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 10 Nov 2016
Posts: 23778

PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2018 8:35 pm    Post subject:

LakerFan1972 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
The McDermott move was curious for Dallas. Why trade for a RFA that they will have to renounce if they're not going after someone like Jules?


Looks like they turned Devin Harris' expiring contract into a 2nd rounder. They are in full tank mode, so collecting assets/picks where they can. Makes me doubt Dallas would really throw a big contract at JR. Going to be an interesting summer.


Imo this is just tanking for this year’s draft. They could still make a run at JR.

Barnes
DSJ
Lottery pick
Randle

Pretty decent 4 to build around if they choose to go that route. I still think they make a substantial offer to Randle...just not sure if they overpay like they did with Barnes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jesusdelonla
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 24 Jan 2018
Posts: 15430

PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2018 9:22 pm    Post subject:

Laker's Fan wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
The McDermott move was curious for Dallas. Why trade for a RFA that they will have to renounce if they're not going after someone like Jules?


I think Dallas can keep McBucket's cap hold and still offer Randle a salary starting around $14M, but it would force them to renounce everybody else.

I don't see the Randle fit in Dallas myself. Carlisle's schemes call for spacing and they allow for one spot that can't shoot which is reserved for a rim protecting big. Barnes is their crunch time PF.


their top 3 pick will cost them 6/7m as well
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
repandpresent
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 552

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2018 12:48 am    Post subject:

Since the trade deadline, he's been trying to attack double teams more often. He's a bully out there but when he does that, and it has been a lot lately, the flow of the game is affected.

The few weeks leading up to the deadline he was playing great.

I want to see less of him trying to score on double teams and more of pre trade deadline hustle.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
dcarter4kobe
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Posts: 17674

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2018 1:25 am    Post subject:

Will be interesting to see what kind of market it is for Randle & other free agents. I would be pretty happy with a 4y/56M deal.
_________________
"He's a Zen master, so he can speak to you, and he doesn't need a microphone; you can hear him in your head, 'Ron, don't shoot, don't shoot.' Whatever, pow, three. I love the Zen, though."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
pio2u
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 26 Dec 2012
Posts: 54571

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2018 3:07 am    Post subject:

I love Julius' hustle and passion but his BBIQ is average at best. His decision-making is, at times, frustrating. He tries to do too much or he tries to do things that he's not good at.
He, too often, does not realize his limitations and does not consistently play to his strengths.

I like his playmaking ability on the break but he frequently tries to create plays in transition that just aren't there and usually picks up an offensive foul by doing so.
He also needs to be a more willing passer once he's doubled under the rim instead of forcing up a shot. His lack of length makes this situation even more problematic.
Lastly, his perimeter shot is still unreliable; he is shooting 23% from behind the arc which is not exactly what teams are looking for these days.

Julius could be a very good playmaking power forward because he has the tools and skills.
He possesses speed, power, passing ability, great rebounding and interior scoring but he has a lot of work to do in order to improve his glaring weaknesses.

I would love for the Lakers to retain his services but at a slight hometown discount.
I hope that he can be persuaded to stay here and potentially play with two super-stars who could help him hone his skills and perhaps also be part of something special.
We will just have to wait until summer where his market value will ultimately be determined.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Car54
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 10 Aug 2005
Posts: 14424

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:19 am    Post subject:

Laker's Fan wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
The McDermott move was curious for Dallas. Why trade for a RFA that they will have to renounce if they're not going after someone like Jules?


I think Dallas can keep McBucket's cap hold and still offer Randle a salary starting around $14M, but it would force them to renounce everybody else.

I don't see the Randle fit in Dallas myself. Carlisle's schemes call for spacing and they allow for one spot that can't shoot which is reserved for a rim protecting big. Barnes is their crunch time PF.


Actually Randle can start at Center and he would fit perfectly next to Barnes. You don't need to have shot blocking when you have bigs that can switch on guards.
_________________
Coach Vogel, Kidd, Hollins
Max slot : Kawhi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ingle
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 17 Mar 2017
Posts: 960

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2018 6:23 am    Post subject:

pio2u wrote:
I love Julius' hustle and passion but his BBIQ is average at best. His decision-making is, at times, frustrating. He tries to do too much or he tries to do things that he's not good at.
He, too often, does not realize his limitations and does not consistently play to his strengths.

I like his playmaking ability on the break but he frequently tries to create plays in transition that just aren't there and usually picks up an offensive foul by doing so.
He also needs to be a more willing passer once he's doubled under the rim instead of forcing up a shot. His lack of length makes this situation even more problematic.
Lastly, his perimeter shot is still unreliable; he is shooting 23% from behind the arc which is not exactly what teams are looking for these days.

Julius could be a very good playmaking power forward because he has the tools and skills.
He possesses speed, power, passing ability, great rebounding and interior scoring but he has a lot of work to do in order to improve his glaring weaknesses.

I would love for the Lakers to retain his services but at a slight hometown discount.
I hope that he can be persuaded to stay here and potentially play with two super-stars who could help him hone his skills and perhaps also be part of something special.
We will just have to wait until summer where his market value will ultimately be determined.


I agree with everything here, I love Julius as a wrecking ball at 20 minutes a game, more if the opposing frontline is white guys with slow foot speed that he can abuse at will.

Giving him starter minutes and money would get me very nervous.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2018 6:56 am    Post subject:

Car54 wrote:
Laker's Fan wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
The McDermott move was curious for Dallas. Why trade for a RFA that they will have to renounce if they're not going after someone like Jules?


I think Dallas can keep McBucket's cap hold and still offer Randle a salary starting around $14M, but it would force them to renounce everybody else.

I don't see the Randle fit in Dallas myself. Carlisle's schemes call for spacing and they allow for one spot that can't shoot which is reserved for a rim protecting big. Barnes is their crunch time PF.


Actually Randle can start at Center and he would fit perfectly next to Barnes. You don't need to have shot blocking when you have bigs that can switch on guards.


Seems to me Dallas/Carlisle love their big centers. Last year was the first time recently they went without a "traditional" starting center, as they had to find a place to play Dirk with Barnes.

2015: Zaza
2014: Chandler
2013: Dalembert

Etc.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2018 6:57 am    Post subject:

LakerSD wrote:
LakerFan1972 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
The McDermott move was curious for Dallas. Why trade for a RFA that they will have to renounce if they're not going after someone like Jules?


Looks like they turned Devin Harris' expiring contract into a 2nd rounder. They are in full tank mode, so collecting assets/picks where they can. Makes me doubt Dallas would really throw a big contract at JR. Going to be an interesting summer.


Imo this is just tanking for this year’s draft. They could still make a run at JR.

Barnes
DSJ
Lottery pick
Randle

Pretty decent 4 to build around if they choose to go that route. I still think they make a substantial offer to Randle...just not sure if they overpay like they did with Barnes.


If I'm Dallas, I'd rather tank one more season, and have, you got it, 2 max slots for 2019 after Dirk likely retires. Get a top 5 pick this year and next, and you have a really nice squad for the future.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerSD
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 10 Nov 2016
Posts: 23778

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2018 7:07 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
LakerSD wrote:
LakerFan1972 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
The McDermott move was curious for Dallas. Why trade for a RFA that they will have to renounce if they're not going after someone like Jules?


Looks like they turned Devin Harris' expiring contract into a 2nd rounder. They are in full tank mode, so collecting assets/picks where they can. Makes me doubt Dallas would really throw a big contract at JR. Going to be an interesting summer.


Imo this is just tanking for this year’s draft. They could still make a run at JR.

Barnes
DSJ
Lottery pick
Randle

Pretty decent 4 to build around if they choose to go that route. I still think they make a substantial offer to Randle...just not sure if they overpay like they did with Barnes.


If I'm Dallas, I'd rather tank one more season, and have, you got it, 2 max slots for 2019 after Dirk likely retires. Get a top 5 pick this year and next, and you have a really nice squad for the future.


That’s the better strategy for sure.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2018 7:14 am    Post subject:

LakerSD wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
LakerSD wrote:
LakerFan1972 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
The McDermott move was curious for Dallas. Why trade for a RFA that they will have to renounce if they're not going after someone like Jules?


Looks like they turned Devin Harris' expiring contract into a 2nd rounder. They are in full tank mode, so collecting assets/picks where they can. Makes me doubt Dallas would really throw a big contract at JR. Going to be an interesting summer.


Imo this is just tanking for this year’s draft. They could still make a run at JR.

Barnes
DSJ
Lottery pick
Randle

Pretty decent 4 to build around if they choose to go that route. I still think they make a substantial offer to Randle...just not sure if they overpay like they did with Barnes.


If I'm Dallas, I'd rather tank one more season, and have, you got it, 2 max slots for 2019 after Dirk likely retires. Get a top 5 pick this year and next, and you have a really nice squad for the future.


That’s the better strategy for sure.


Randle would win them a few more games, and you may be spending 16-18m of the cap space you could throw at the 2019 FA class.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Ziggy
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 12712

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2018 7:34 am    Post subject:

ingle wrote:
pio2u wrote:
I love Julius' hustle and passion but his BBIQ is average at best. His decision-making is, at times, frustrating. He tries to do too much or he tries to do things that he's not good at.
He, too often, does not realize his limitations and does not consistently play to his strengths.

I like his playmaking ability on the break but he frequently tries to create plays in transition that just aren't there and usually picks up an offensive foul by doing so.
He also needs to be a more willing passer once he's doubled under the rim instead of forcing up a shot. His lack of length makes this situation even more problematic.
Lastly, his perimeter shot is still unreliable; he is shooting 23% from behind the arc which is not exactly what teams are looking for these days.

Julius could be a very good playmaking power forward because he has the tools and skills.
He possesses speed, power, passing ability, great rebounding and interior scoring but he has a lot of work to do in order to improve his glaring weaknesses.

I would love for the Lakers to retain his services but at a slight hometown discount.
I hope that he can be persuaded to stay here and potentially play with two super-stars who could help him hone his skills and perhaps also be part of something special.
We will just have to wait until summer where his market value will ultimately be determined.


I agree with everything here, I love Julius as a wrecking ball at 20 minutes a game, more if the opposing frontline is white guys with slow foot speed that he can abuse at will.

Giving him starter minutes and money would get me very nervous.


Lamar Odom had the exact same issue with running over guys in the paint and collecting charge calls. He was able to learn to cut down on it drastically at an older age than Randle. As frustrating as it was/is to watch, LO taught me that it can be fixed.

Ultimately, I think Randle should play the same role as LO did on a championship team. Odom came off the bench and killed you with finesse and Randle can do the same with his physicality. LO finished games for us and so can JR.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Baron Von Humongous
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 02 Jul 2015
Posts: 32979

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2018 7:34 am    Post subject:

Julius may want to go home, making Dallas a threat. But Sacramento is going to have money and will make a stupid free agent offer to someone this summer, so don't be surprised if Vlade overpays to get Joerger his "young ZBo."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Baron Von Humongous
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 02 Jul 2015
Posts: 32979

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2018 7:36 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
LakerSD wrote:
LakerFan1972 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
The McDermott move was curious for Dallas. Why trade for a RFA that they will have to renounce if they're not going after someone like Jules?


Looks like they turned Devin Harris' expiring contract into a 2nd rounder. They are in full tank mode, so collecting assets/picks where they can. Makes me doubt Dallas would really throw a big contract at JR. Going to be an interesting summer.


Imo this is just tanking for this year’s draft. They could still make a run at JR.

Barnes
DSJ
Lottery pick
Randle

Pretty decent 4 to build around if they choose to go that route. I still think they make a substantial offer to Randle...just not sure if they overpay like they did with Barnes.


If I'm Dallas, I'd rather tank one more season, and have, you got it, 2 max slots for 2019 after Dirk likely retires. Get a top 5 pick this year and next, and you have a really nice squad for the future.

Or bring a Dallas kid back home to pair with DeAndre Ayton and DSJ.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
scooterp10
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 04 Oct 2016
Posts: 961

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2018 7:38 am    Post subject:

LakerSanity wrote:
Another thing to consider in evaluating Randle - he graduated high school the same year as Kuzma and Hart. Kuzma red-shirted his first year, but was in school for four years. Just something to think about in comparing the three.


If Randle was a rookie everyone would be singing his praises
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
defense
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Jan 2010
Posts: 39451

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2018 7:45 am    Post subject:

scooterp10 wrote:
LakerSanity wrote:
Another thing to consider in evaluating Randle - he graduated high school the same year as Kuzma and Hart. Kuzma red-shirted his first year, but was in school for four years. Just something to think about in comparing the three.


If Randle was a rookie everyone would be singing his praises


When you've seen a guy play for 3 seasons. Is not fair to say "if he was a rookie". There is data and evidence to make assumptions on. Every situation and player is unique, judge them as such.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
scooterp10
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 04 Oct 2016
Posts: 961

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2018 7:48 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
LakerSD wrote:
LakerFan1972 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
The McDermott move was curious for Dallas. Why trade for a RFA that they will have to renounce if they're not going after someone like Jules?


Looks like they turned Devin Harris' expiring contract into a 2nd rounder. They are in full tank mode, so collecting assets/picks where they can. Makes me doubt Dallas would really throw a big contract at JR. Going to be an interesting summer.


Imo this is just tanking for this year’s draft. They could still make a run at JR.

Barnes
DSJ
Lottery pick
Randle

Pretty decent 4 to build around if they choose to go that route. I still think they make a substantial offer to Randle...just not sure if they overpay like they did with Barnes.


If I'm Dallas, I'd rather tank one more season, and have, you got it, 2 max slots for 2019 after Dirk likely retires. Get a top 5 pick this year and next, and you have a really nice squad for the future.


That sounds like the Lakers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> General Basketball Discussion All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 1337, 1338, 1339 ... 1534, 1535, 1536  Next
Page 1338 of 1536
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB