OFFICIAL BOOZER THREAD!!
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18 ... 24, 25, 26  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
paymonM
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 08 Jul 2003
Posts: 4396

PostPosted: Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:41 am    Post subject:

Lakers are not starting a 19 year old. Will never happen.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144461
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:00 am    Post subject:

K0BEE 2.0 wrote:
Boozer would need to lose a lot of weight and work on his foot-speed to play the SF.... that article seems like a typo..... he has a clear-cut PF body now if it was Kelly playing the 3 spot I would understand cause he has nice footspeed and can keep up with other SF's.


Or Boozer could take the opposing SFs down low and abuse them. Positions in the NBA have changed, the fans are the last to notice. It is about matchups, and some will favor Boozer at SF and some won't. When they don't, you use a different lineup.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Voices
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 07 Jul 2006
Posts: 8287
Location: Oxnard, Ca.

PostPosted: Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:46 am    Post subject:

Positions in the NBA are no longer stereotypical, in you can as a coach get a good matchup by playing players out their normal positions you do it. The need to have a coach that counters matchup is more important than ever, hopefully B will b a good in game coach.
_________________
.....
.....
ALTHOUGH HE STANDS 6 FEET 2 INCHES, JIM BUSS ATTENDED JOCKEY SCHOOL WHEN HE WAS 20.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Lakerfan 4 Life
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Apr 2001
Posts: 16096

PostPosted: Sat Jul 26, 2014 11:22 am    Post subject:

JeezyXVII wrote:
guys, your all wrong, Boozers gonna play @ the 3

Quote:
Boozer is penciled in as the Lakers' starting small forward, although he has played power forward throughout his 12-year NBA career.


http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/234430/Lakers-Pencil-In-Carlos-Boozer-As-Starting-Small-Forward

im really glad pencils have erasers. I wonder which genius labeled him a 3 after hes played the 4/5 his whole career.

Is this Jim Buss' doing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jackobe
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 17 May 2011
Posts: 4466

PostPosted: Sat Jul 26, 2014 11:25 am    Post subject:

Lakerfan 4 Life wrote:
JeezyXVII wrote:
guys, your all wrong, Boozers gonna play @ the 3

Quote:
Boozer is penciled in as the Lakers' starting small forward, although he has played power forward throughout his 12-year NBA career.


http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/234430/Lakers-Pencil-In-Carlos-Boozer-As-Starting-Small-Forward

im really glad pencils have erasers. I wonder which genius labeled him a 3 after hes played the 4/5 his whole career.

Is this Jim Buss' doing?


ya i saw that on real gm also. what a stupid report....

we don't even have a coach yet, how are we gonna pencil in anything.

HC is gonna decides who plays where....

and there is no way in hell Boozer gonna play 3. Even playing Randle there is a reach....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakersNewEra
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 16 Apr 2014
Posts: 1526
Location: Vancouver BC

PostPosted: Sat Jul 26, 2014 11:31 am    Post subject:

venturalakersfan wrote:
K0BEE 2.0 wrote:
Boozer would need to lose a lot of weight and work on his foot-speed to play the SF.... that article seems like a typo..... he has a clear-cut PF body now if it was Kelly playing the 3 spot I would understand cause he has nice footspeed and can keep up with other SF's.


Or Boozer could take the opposing SFs down low and abuse them. Positions in the NBA have changed, the fans are the last to notice. It is about matchups, and some will favor Boozer at SF and some won't. When they don't, you use a different lineup.


Sure thing the positions have changed but they have gotten smaller. Yesterdays tweeners or SF's are today's PF's. Players who would have been PF's before are centers now.
It is because of the bigger emphasis on speed and spacing.

LMAO at the idea of Boozer playing SF, sorry, it's just very funny to me. He can get away with playing center nowadays but not SF haha.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Sat Jul 26, 2014 12:09 pm    Post subject:

That has to be a typo no, Boozer playing SF??? Even Randle playing that position full time is a slight stretch, but Boozer there is a joke. No foot speed to stay on the perimeter and all you need is one pump fake and he's either jumping into you or you blow by him.

Please tell me this is a typo.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Treble Clef
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 20 Nov 2012
Posts: 23899

PostPosted: Sat Jul 26, 2014 12:32 pm    Post subject:

venturalakersfan wrote:
K0BEE 2.0 wrote:
Boozer would need to lose a lot of weight and work on his foot-speed to play the SF.... that article seems like a typo..... he has a clear-cut PF body now if it was Kelly playing the 3 spot I would understand cause he has nice footspeed and can keep up with other SF's.


Or Boozer could take the opposing SFs down low and abuse them. Positions in the NBA have changed, the fans are the last to notice. It is about matchups, and some will favor Boozer at SF and some won't. When they don't, you use a different lineup.


I haven't watched him too much lately but is he still capable of that? From recent memory, his inside scoring seems non existent and he's more of a jump shooter.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ChefLinda
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 24158
Location: Boston

PostPosted: Sat Jul 26, 2014 12:37 pm    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
That has to be a typo no, Boozer playing SF??? Even Randle playing that position full time is a slight stretch, but Boozer there is a joke. No foot speed to stay on the perimeter and all you need is one pump fake and he's either jumping into you or you blow by him.

Please tell me this is a typo.


It's from the LAT article. Honestly, I would just ignore it. The coaches will decide who starts after training camp, not some LAT reporter in July.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Sat Jul 26, 2014 12:39 pm    Post subject:

Treble Clef wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
K0BEE 2.0 wrote:
Boozer would need to lose a lot of weight and work on his foot-speed to play the SF.... that article seems like a typo..... he has a clear-cut PF body now if it was Kelly playing the 3 spot I would understand cause he has nice footspeed and can keep up with other SF's.


Or Boozer could take the opposing SFs down low and abuse them. Positions in the NBA have changed, the fans are the last to notice. It is about matchups, and some will favor Boozer at SF and some won't. When they don't, you use a different lineup.


I haven't watched him too much lately but is he still capable of that? From recent memory, his inside scoring seems non existent and he's more of a jump shooter.


From the recent games I've seen he's more of a jump shooter.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Kirby Brian
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 31 May 2005
Posts: 7920
Location: Chattanooga

PostPosted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 12:22 pm    Post subject: Boozer to be our new starting SF

my body is ready

Quote:
The Lakers have Carlos Boozer "penciled in" as their starting small forward, according to beat writer Mike Bresnahan.
It's unsettling to imagine Boozer trying to defend small forwards on a nightly basis. The 32-year-old said that he "absolutely" views himself as a starter, and he's comfortable playing PF or C, so he should carve out a solid role one way or another. His scoring and rebounding make him a tolerable gamble in the late rounds.
Source: L.A. Times Jul 27 - 4:11 PM
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Rivershow
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 09 Dec 2011
Posts: 6731

PostPosted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 12:25 pm    Post subject:

Why? Like Seriously, why? If they wanted to go with this horrible experiment wouldn't it make more sense for Randle to be the SF since he might actually have the speed to guard sf's?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
silkwilkes
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 15 Jul 2002
Posts: 6938
Location: searching for the mojo of Dr. Buss

PostPosted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 12:27 pm    Post subject:

notice the qualifier "penciled"... it means they will test it in preseason and go from there lol.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jackobe
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 17 May 2011
Posts: 4466

PostPosted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 12:30 pm    Post subject:

stop with that stupid report.

they reported even before we hired Byron.

It's up to the coach who plays at SF.

Byron isn't that stupid.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ibitegirls
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 29 Dec 2011
Posts: 4204

PostPosted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 12:31 pm    Post subject:

umm. hasn't this already been talked about in the official boozer thread?

wasn't this published before byron scott was hired? sounds a bit early to pencil someone into a position before even seeing what type of shape their in, or how the chemistry will work out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Sccit
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 06 May 2008
Posts: 886

PostPosted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 12:31 pm    Post subject:

I assume he'll play sf on offense while randle guards opposing small forwards... Which could actually work out, we'd control the glass every game.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Troublesome626
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 13 Nov 2012
Posts: 2469

PostPosted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 12:33 pm    Post subject:

That's why they make theses http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2f/Pink_Pearl_eraser.jpg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Vin
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 03 Jan 2013
Posts: 6005
Location: France

PostPosted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 12:34 pm    Post subject:

Obviously the writer meant Power foward. Nothing to see here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Golden_Emperor_24K
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Nov 2008
Posts: 3480

PostPosted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 12:34 pm    Post subject:

Boozer at Center, Randle at PF, boozer gets what he wants...Randle fans get what they want. Hill fits better with the 2nd unit I think. He and Ed Davis can rotate b/w 2nd string center or pf.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
mettaElbow
Sixth Man
Sixth Man


Joined: 11 Jul 2014
Posts: 59

PostPosted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 12:39 pm    Post subject:

would love to see boozer guarding the likes of lbj , kd and melo at sf, gonna be a sight
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ChefLinda
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 24158
Location: Boston

PostPosted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 12:48 pm    Post subject: Re: Boozer to be our new starting SF

KobeMania wrote:
Yay!

Quote:
The Lakers have Carlos Boozer "penciled in" as their starting small forward, according to beat writer Mike Bresnahan.
It's unsettling to imagine Boozer trying to defend small forwards on a nightly basis. The 32-year-old said that he "absolutely" views himself as a starter, and he's comfortable playing PF or C, so he should carve out a solid role one way or another. His scoring and rebounding make him a tolerable gamble in the late rounds.
Source: L.A. Times Jul 27 - 4:11 PM


You've been here long enough to know this belonged in the existing Boozer thread -- especially since it was already posted there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Golden_Emperor_24K
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Nov 2008
Posts: 3480

PostPosted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 12:50 pm    Post subject:

mettaElbow wrote:
would love to see boozer guarding the likes of lbj , kd and melo at sf, gonna be a sight


Wesley Johnson and x-henry will hold down the SF position. we just need Wesley to knock some open shots and play defense. Not asking too much of him. Hope he puts in the work this summer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
governator
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 25076

PostPosted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 1:14 pm    Post subject:

Boozer will start at PF and Hill will start at C
Randle and Davis will back them up but play good minutes (25 mins)
Sacre and Kelly will be the third stringers
Back court probably Kobe starting with Lin and SwaggyP
SG/SF will be blurred at times, likewise with SF/PF... we have the personal to do small ball or half court post up game

B.Scott better have a solid plan. We have to make the playoffs, can't have The LAKERS missing back to back year
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
fansincemagic
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 11051

PostPosted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 1:30 pm    Post subject:

governator wrote:
Boozer will start at PF and Hill will start at C
Randle and Davis will back them up but play good minutes (25 mins)
Sacre and Kelly will be the third stringers
Back court probably Kobe starting with Lin and SwaggyP
SG/SF will be blurred at times, likewise with SF/PF... we have the personal to do small ball or half court post up game

B.Scott better have a solid plan. We have to make the playoffs, can't have The LAKERS missing back to back year


Overall this is about right. If you consider Kobe's minutes get dialed back to 30-32, that doesn't leave a lot for Young at SG so he will get around 8-10 SF minutes ideally.

The key to Scott's success could be how he deals with those blurred lines you speak of. This team needs a wing defender to help Kobe, and Wes is really the best option so he may wrestle the bulk of the minutes from Henry at SF. Scott is going to be put in situations where Henry starts to get hot or the opposing team puts a slow SF out there and he's tempted to play Kelly, or Davis is having a great game and he may chose to keep Hill on the bench. I feel good about having a seasoned coach out there. With the Nets and Hornets he did have some quantity as opposed to quality so he knows what he's getting into.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
pio2u
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 26 Dec 2012
Posts: 54570

PostPosted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 4:10 pm    Post subject:

I think Coach Scott knows that Boozer will play a big role in our success (or lack of) this season for obvious reasons.
Boozer had a good season last year offensively but his defense is not up to par.
None-the-less if he does as good or better than last year he will have done his part.
Plus we got him & Lin at bargain-basement prices.

Win-Lin situation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18 ... 24, 25, 26  Next
Page 17 of 26
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB