1. Jim Buss (3 coaches since Phil, etc., roster construction).
2. Scott (he's the coach).
3. Probably less so with players.
Jimbo is the singular and undeniable reason that things are the way they are.
I'm not getting into that, but my guesses were of what the public perception would be. And to his credit, Jim Buss has put the rebuild on his shoulders by saying he was giving himself 3 years to get it done. But 3 coaches and the current roster would be his handiwork. _________________ From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Boozer will be the scapegoat, because think about it...
He'll get a ton of minutes... When he sucks... all of us will collectively say, "Why don't they just flipping play Randle more, it's better than Boozer tonight".
Nash will get hurt too quickly to be a scapegoat, but he might also have a dynamic of starting over a player, we'd prefer to watch on TV.
Boozer will be the scapegoat, because think about it...
He'll get a ton of minutes... When he sucks... all of us will collectively say, "Why don't they just flipping play Randle more, it's better than Boozer tonight".
Nash will get hurt too quickly to be a scapegoat, but he might also have a dynamic of starting over a player, we'd prefer to watch on TV.
i think they will have short lease on boozer because of randle
Joined: 02 May 2005 Posts: 90307 Location: Formerly Known As 24
Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2014 1:28 pm Post subject:
L.A.M.B wrote:
24 wrote:
Jim99187 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
OP, um, you can always change the title. The fact that you haven't?
i did ...but i guess 24 changed it
i requested him to delete the thread too but he hasnt....thats why u see all kids running wild...
well 24, if you want LG to turn into insidehoops, go for it
The first rule of LG is not to take yourself too seriously. I learned this while selling strawberries and watching 999 throw urine bags...
if you think this forum doesn't take itself too seriously then i don't think you've been on the internet
Actually we don't. But we do take hostile, juvenile troublemakers who have vastly overestimated views of their opinions, contributions, and behavior patterns a bit more seriously than other things. Especially when they turn their sights on baiting the mods. Forewarned is forearmed my friend. _________________ “We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.” ― Elie Wiesel
OP, um, you can always change the title. The fact that you haven't?
i did ...but i guess 24 changed it
i requested him to delete the thread too but he hasnt....thats why u see all kids running wild...
well 24, if you want LG to turn into insidehoops, go for it
The first rule of LG is not to take yourself too seriously. I learned this while selling strawberries and watching 999 throw urine bags...
if you think this forum doesn't take itself too seriously then i don't think you've been on the internet
Actually we don't. But we do take hostile, juvenile troublemakers who have vastly overestimated views of their opinions, contributions, and behavior patterns a bit more seriously than other things. Especially when they turn their sights on baiting the mods. Forewarned is forearmed my friend.
Spacegoat? We don't have any Draenei on our team I don't think...
Brother....! _________________ “Power resides only where men believe it resides...A shadow on the wall, yet shadows can kill. And ofttimes a very small man can cast a very large shadow.” - GRRM
OP, um, you can always change the title. The fact that you haven't?
i did ...but i guess 24 changed it
i requested him to delete the thread too but he hasnt....thats why u see all kids running wild...
well 24, if you want LG to turn into insidehoops, go for it
The first rule of LG is not to take yourself too seriously. I learned this while selling strawberries and watching 999 throw urine bags...
I was seriously ok with that...but what my expecations out of u as a big brother/mod is that you come in and lay the law....saying its enough & get on track...
atleast thats what my expectations were...maybe they were wrong
anyways...this thread is stuck now in mockery and people who want to discuss the topic i put out..
Joined: 02 May 2005 Posts: 90307 Location: Formerly Known As 24
Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2014 1:52 pm Post subject:
Jim99187 wrote:
24 wrote:
Jim99187 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
OP, um, you can always change the title. The fact that you haven't?
i did ...but i guess 24 changed it
i requested him to delete the thread too but he hasnt....thats why u see all kids running wild...
well 24, if you want LG to turn into insidehoops, go for it
The first rule of LG is not to take yourself too seriously. I learned this while selling strawberries and watching 999 throw urine bags...
I was seriously ok with that...but what my expecations out of u as a big brother/mod is that you come in and lay the law....saying its enough & get on track...
atleast thats what my expectations were...maybe they were wrong
anyways...this thread is stuck now in mockery and people who want to discuss the topic i put out..
Fair enough. My opinion is that the levity is nice, especially since the topic is pretty lightweight and divisive (who is going to catch the hate of the fans this year?) in and of itself (but not out of bounds). Were you expecting a deep and fascinating discussion of why each fan thinks more fans hate this guy or that guy? With some over/under stats, and maybe some advanced metrics? Or were you really just hoping for a serious consideration of whom to hate on this year?
I don't get why you're so miffed, other than, like I said, taking it and/or yourself too seriously. _________________ “We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.” ― Elie Wiesel
OP, um, you can always change the title. The fact that you haven't?
i did ...but i guess 24 changed it
i requested him to delete the thread too but he hasnt....thats why u see all kids running wild...
well 24, if you want LG to turn into insidehoops, go for it
The first rule of LG is not to take yourself too seriously. I learned this while selling strawberries and watching 999 throw urine bags...
I was seriously ok with that...but what my expecations out of u as a big brother/mod is that you come in and lay the law....saying its enough & get on track...
atleast thats what my expectations were...maybe they were wrong
anyways...this thread is stuck now in mockery and people who want to discuss the topic i put out..
Fair enough. My opinion is that the levity is nice, especially since the topic is pretty lightweight and divisive (who is going to catch the hate of the fans this year?) in and of itself (but not out of bounds). Were you expecting a deep and fascinating discussion of why each fan thinks more fans hate this guy or that guy? With some over/under stats, and maybe some advanced metrics? Or were you really just hoping for a serious consideration of whom to hate on this year?
I don't get why you're so miffed, other than, like I said, taking it and/or yourself too seriously.
OP, um, you can always change the title. The fact that you haven't?
i did ...but i guess 24 changed it
i requested him to delete the thread too but he hasnt....thats why u see all kids running wild...
well 24, if you want LG to turn into insidehoops, go for it
The first rule of LG is not to take yourself too seriously. I learned this while selling strawberries and watching 999 throw urine bags...
I was seriously ok with that...but what my expecations out of u as a big brother/mod is that you come in and lay the law....saying its enough & get on track...
atleast thats what my expectations were...maybe they were wrong
anyways...this thread is stuck now in mockery and people who want to discuss the topic i put out..
Fair enough. My opinion is that the levity is nice, especially since the topic is pretty lightweight and divisive (who is going to catch the hate of the fans this year?) in and of itself (but not out of bounds). Were you expecting a deep and fascinating discussion of why each fan thinks more fans hate this guy or that guy? With some over/under stats, and maybe some advanced metrics? Or were you really just hoping for a serious consideration of whom to hate on this year?
I don't get why you're so miffed, other than, like I said, taking it and/or yourself too seriously.
Joined: 02 May 2005 Posts: 90307 Location: Formerly Known As 24
Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2014 2:09 pm Post subject:
_________________ “We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.” ― Elie Wiesel
It depends. Ultimately it comes down to the players and the coaches working together.
So if players are performing very well but not getting the minutes they deserve its on Scott. If players are inconsistent to no end that they can't compotently be given a consistent role that's on the player.
I think it's going to be Boozer. Anytime he plays like crap it will be "why isn't Randle in the game!" at which point the ire will be redirected at Byron.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
.
