Joined: 02 May 2005 Posts: 90307 Location: Formerly Known As 24
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 6:43 pm Post subject:
fiendishoc wrote:
Quote:
On the other hand, west is not a rim defender, but has quick feet, hands, and great wingspan, as well as very good instincts and reads. So they run show and recover when his man sets the pick, with Hibbert lurking behind.
This perhaps explains why Byron wanted his bigs to play up, as it worked for him in New Orleans. Of course when you have both prime West and prime Tyson Chandler as your starting bigs, you have a lot more options.
Correct. And Hibbert back allows current West to play up, but tellingly, vogel doesn't play Hibbert up. Hill would benefit from playing back because he defends he rim better from back behind the play rather than chasing, and because it simplifies his reads with the action (not just the ballhandler) out front of him. It helps keep Davis near the rim as well, and the combination of both beig back is better than either. _________________ “We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.” ― Elie Wiesel
Would it be fair to say that Byron Scott is employing some sort of junk defense to hide the fact that he doesn't have a real center out there?
Or is what he has been trying to do from start of year, and simplified recently, not just being executed properly by the players?
e. g. This article on Byron Scott's coaching stint with New Orleans seems to indicate he used a junk defense there when injuries occurred on that team:
Ronnie should only be playin spot minute to disrupt the other teams offense.
Lin should be playing 32-36min a game so we can see if we want to keep him, and Clarkson should be getting tick at the backup 1 and 2 so he can develop.
Price isn't helping us win or develop a future
I dont think price disprups anything really, so i'd rather he just be treated as a deep bench pg who is too old to be developed, so he gets minutes only in garbage time and when there are injury or foul issues, and i'd still prioritize Clarkson even then.
There's a joke about the lakers offense in there somewhere...
Joined: 23 Jun 2005 Posts: 8488 Location: The (real) short corner
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 7:30 pm Post subject:
JLinfanJoe wrote:
Thanks for the comments above, everyone.
Would it be fair to say that Byron Scott is employing some sort of junk defense to hide the fact that he doesn't have a real center out there?
Or is what he has been trying to do from start of year, and simplified recently, not just being executed properly by the players?
e. g. This article on Byron Scott's coaching stint with New Orleans seems to indicate he used a junk defense there when injuries occurred on that team:
Yeah I've seen that article, and no I haven't seen anything of that sort this year. They put Wes on the best wing player so that Kobe can rest. They don't purposely allow the other team to take bad shots (long 2s), at least not before they switched to the more conservative scheme.
The only "junk" defense I noticed was Kobe's Hardenesque one man zone under the basket. The problem is that it doesn't work when the man he's guarding is not Tony Allen or someone else who can't shoot.
Joined: 23 Jun 2005 Posts: 8488 Location: The (real) short corner
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 9:15 pm Post subject:
DancingBarry wrote:
It does drive me nuts that the coaches we brought through here have continually scrapped things for their pet systems rather than building upon things that work or being flexible with their personnel. Brown for a long time didn't utilize Pau as a passer. D'Antoni wanted him as a three shooter. Scott now with Lin...
Ronnie should only be playin spot minute to disrupt the other teams offense.
Lin should be playing 32-36min a game so we can see if we want to keep him, and Clarkson should be getting tick at the backup 1 and 2 so he can develop.
Price isn't helping us win or develop a future
I dont think price disprups anything really, so i'd rather he just be treated as a deep bench pg who is too old to be developed, so he gets minutes only in garbage time and when there are injury or foul issues, and i'd still prioritize Clarkson even then.
You won't hear any arguments from me on that! 100% agree.
Anyone know if there an assistant coach working with Lin to improve his "point guard instincts" and "defensive rotations", or is he supposed to figure out everything all by himself?
(seems like Steve Nash could have been invaluable as a mentor and teacher to Lin now, but unfortunately he still hasn't rejoined the team, and also that Goran Dragic would not have become the Dragic everyone saw last year if he had stayed in Houston and continued to develop under Kevin McHale, especially within the rigid confines of Moreyball idealogy)
Joined: 02 May 2005 Posts: 90307 Location: Formerly Known As 24
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 9:33 am Post subject:
It is fair to criticize Lin's deficiencies, including consistency and point guard instincts. But when you deny him time with guys who he works well with, and seem to punish him for aggressively attacking and doing what he does well, and seem to want him to not play like a point guard, they do ring somewhat hollow.
I'm stuck between being disappointed with Lin and feeling like he is being set up to fail. _________________ “We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.” ― Elie Wiesel
Joined: 23 Jun 2005 Posts: 8488 Location: The (real) short corner
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 9:36 am Post subject:
JLinfanJoe wrote:
Anyone know if there an assistant coach working with Lin to improve his "point guard instincts" and "defensive rotations", or is he supposed to figure out everything all by himself?
(seems like Steve Nash could have been invaluable as a mentor and teacher to Lin now, but unfortunately he still hasn't rejoined the team, and also that Goran Dragic would not have become the Dragic everyone saw last year if he had stayed in Houston and continued to develop under Kevin McHale, especially within the rigid confines of Moreyball idealogy)
I don't think Lin has a huge problem in these areas. Not enough to be benched for anyways. He's certainly better in doing PG things than Price. Byron probably just wants to slow the pace down, even though it's not making the defense any better, and it's killing the offense.
To me, it is still a much, much, much better situation than the Houston Rockets, but I also feel organization hasn't really gotten behind him like he was their first round draft pick and try and put him in position to succeed (not just one game, extended period of time where he gets to play through his mistakes, even if Byron Scott does pull him temporarily because he is getting too aggressive and out of control at time).
e. g. not deploying Lin and Ed Davis together, either on first unit or second unit, but moving Davis to first unit and switching Lin to second unit at same time.
Joined: 23 Jun 2005 Posts: 8488 Location: The (real) short corner
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 9:51 am Post subject:
Now that we've covered defense, let's look at the offensive advanced stats. It doesn't look like too much has changed offensively for the better, even with Swaggy back for this entire stretch of games.
Offensive rating
When we last looked at them, the Lakers had an offensive rating of 104.4. Now 10 games later, that rating on the season has slid a bit to 103.8, falling to the 17th ranked offense in the league. It's not as big a fall as their improvement on defense over the ten game stretch, so the team overall should have gotten marginally better.
Their effective field goal percentage has improved slightly from 46.9% to 47.4%, likely due to taking more threes, although they are still the 6th worst in the league. Over the last ten games, they've taken 20.7 threes a game, making 34.8% of them, versus averaging 18.4 on the season at a 32.6% rate.
However, their true shooting percentage stayed mostly the same at 52%, sliding one spot to 7th worse in the league, as they're not getting the line as much. Their FT rate over the last ten games has been 27% versus 30.7% on the season. Even more worrying, their offensive rebound rate has gone way down from the start of the season. Over the last 10 games, their OREB% has been 22.5%, 6th worse in the league, versus the first 12 games where they were 4th best in the league at 29.1%. Maybe it's reversion to the mean, or maybe the bigs are just settling for hanging out too far from the basket.
Their turnover ratio remains strong though, as they are still 4th in the league in hanging on to the ball.
Long 2 point shooting
Last time I said that they could be average on offense as long as they kept up their hot shooting from long 2 point range, but I wouldn't count on it continuing. So let's take a look at the shooting stats. Unfortunately, the Lakers are taking the same proportion of their shots from between 16 ft and the 3pt line, at 24.8% of total shots, still the second most in the league.
They're now making 40.9% of those shots, down from 43.9%
Season FG% on long 2s ten games ago vs now:
Kobe 50.6% -> 47.1%
Hill 32% -> 36.7%
Boozer 31% -> 36.2%
Ellington 80% -> 52.9%
So while Hill and Boozer have improved their percentages, Kobe's gotten worse from this distance. Nick Young and Sacre are shooting over 40% from that distance, but the rest of the team is in the low 30s or below (Price at 23.8%).
However, the lack of offensive rebounds seems to be the bigger problem in terms of the drop in offensive efficiencies.
Last two games
As we all know, the major change in the last two games have been moving Price and Davis into the starting lineup. While the defensive efficiency has not changed much from the rest of the recent 10 game stretch, the offensive efficiency for these two games has nosedived to 95.1 points per 100 possessions. The offensive rebound percentage for these two games was a measly 20.8%, despite having the team's two best rebounders starting together. Possibly, it may be because teams are able to pack the paint even more now. Fast break points in these two games have halved from their season average to only 6 FBPs a game. Yes two games is not a real sample size but watching the team, it's not hard to draw the conclusion that if there's not another change to the starting lineup (preferably a guard who can shoot, hint hint), this trend will continue.
Stagnant offense:
Watching the team also gives you the impression that the sets are stagnant and dependent on isolations. This comes through in the passing stats. On the year, the Lakers have the 3rd fewest passes per game, are second to last in secondary assists, and second to last in points created by assists.
Another problem that eye test identifies is that the bigs generally suck at setting screens. The stats confirm this, as the Lakers are the worst team in terms of their Solid Screen % at 77.93%, which are the screens that either make contact with the defender or reroute them. They also have had the fewest percentage of open shots in the league, which is almost certainly due to both of the above two problems.
One observation on why I think the Houston Rockets and ClutchFans forum became so toxic for Lin fans:
To me, ClutchFans website has to be viewed as a de facto extension of Daryl Morey and Rockets front office.
There appears to be a good number of front office insiders or at least friends of front office who post on that forum (typically original 1999 members, I think), and I think they drink the same Kool-Aid front office does in terms of Moreyball idealogy and "solving" basketball using analytics. Harden also came across as jealous of Lin's entertaining and crowd pleasing game and didn't seem to want to share the limelight with him, and Rockets needed to appease him by making sure Lin isn't even given the opportunity to outshine Harden on court from time to time.
Passive Aggressive Jealousy?:
Lin also doesn't fit Moreyball "the earth is flat" idealogy (threes, shots at rim, free throws, no midrange), and in some sense, is a data point that disproves his religion and thus had to be destroyed. In addition to lack of pnr partner in Houston, Lin needs to represent a true triple threat driving to the basket (drive, SHOOT, or pass) in order to be effective. With Moreyball idealogy, opposing big just waited to block Lin at rim (never had to run out and contest an unexpected or deliberately conceded pull up jumper), and everyone else just waited to pick off pass out to three point line that they knew was coming. Lin was basically reduced to driving to hoop by hopping on one leg, and with one hand tied behind his back. No wonder he wasn't as effective as he could have been.
Les Alexander (owner of Rockets) apparently is the one who wanted Lin just to fill Toyota Center ( http://www.quora.com/What-is-Jeremy-Lins-revenue-potential-with-the-Houston-Rockets ) (he also said he wanted his teams to run forever), but seems like Daryl Morey and Kevin McHale never believed in him from the start. IIRC, Knicks original offer to Lin was 4 years / $24 million, that was original offer from Rockets, but later had to add the poison pill (3 year / $25 million / poison pill $15 million third year to make sure Knicks couldn't match without paying a large luxury tax: http://etane.net/jeremy-lin/rules-to-live-by/
The CF forum don't necessarily represent the whole Houston Rockets fan base, but in the eyes of many Lin fans, that's all they know (the cries of racism seem to me to come mainly from some Lin fans who live outside the U. S. and so their "prism" looking in on America (not just Lin) is different; few others seem to be trying to live vicariously through Lin for perceived insults they may have received on recreational basketball court as an Asian American baller, but that subset seems to actually have become more realistic as Lin has appeared to struggle on court at times with Lakers). LOL, at times, some Lin fans have actually become harsher on Lin (passive, etc.) than his true haters!
Also have to note that 60% of Houston never actually was able to watch Lin play, with their own eyes and on their own tv sets (just watch box scores and read false narratives after the fact), ever since he arrived two seasons ago, and all the way up to point he was traded to Lakers this summer (I think games were finally shown and ATT and DirectTV, in addition to CSN Houston, just after this current season started): http://www.khou.com/story/news/2014/07/22/11861564/
At this point, it's become the Hatfields and McCoys, or even a generational blood feud, where the last insult by other side has to be avenged, even if no one remembers what the original insult was.
I think there was no adult supervision by Clutch locking down threads or very quickly banning extremists on both sides (at least until the purges that took place there immediately after Lin trade), as has been done here, and I think that is part of reason why things are so toxic between Lin fans and that website.
Best thing Clutch could do, this me, is lock down the remaining Lin or Laker threads and don't let anyone start any thread like that (except he probably generates good revenue from the clicks an incendiary thread like that generates).
Last edited by JLinfanJoe on Fri Dec 12, 2014 11:17 am; edited 5 times in total
One observation on why I think the Houston Rockets and ClutchFans forum became so toxic for Lin fans:
To me, ClutchFans website has to be viewed as a de facto extension of Daryl Morey and Rockets front office.
There appears to be a good number of front office insiders or at least friends of front office who post on that forum (typically original 1999 members, I think), and I think they drink the same Kool-Aid front office does in terms of Moreyball idealogy and "solving" basketball using analytics. Harden also came across as jealous of Lin's entertaining and crowd pleasing game and didn't seem to want to share the limelight with him, and Rockets needed to appease him by making sure Lin isn't even given the opportunity to outshine Harden on court from time to time.
Lin also doesn't fit Moreyball "the earth is flat" idealogy (threes, shots at rim, free throws, no midrange), and in some sense, is a data point that disproves his religion and thus had to be destroyed. In addition to lack of pnr partner in Houston, Lin needs to represent a true triple threat driving to the basket (drive, SHOOT, or pass) in order to be effective. With Moreyball idealogy, opposing big just waited to block Lin at rim (never had to run out and contest and unexpected or deliberately conceded pull up jumper), and everyone else just waited for pass out to three point line that they knew was coming. Lin was basically reduced to driving to hoop by hopping one one leg, and with one hand tied behind his back. No wonder he wasn't as effective as he could have been.
Les Alexander (owner of Rockets) apparently is the one who wanted Lin just to fill Toyota Center ( http://www.quora.com/What-is-Jeremy-Lins-revenue-potential-with-the-Houston-Rockets ) (he also said he wanted his teams to run forever), but seems like Daryl Morey and Kevin McHale never believed in him from the start. IIRC, Knicks original offer to Lin was 4 years / $24 million, that was original offer from Rockets, but later had to add the poison pill (3 year / $25 million / poison pill $15 million third year to make sure Knicks couldn't match without paying a large luxury tax: http://etane.net/jeremy-lin/rules-to-live-by/
The CF forum don't necessarily represent the whole Houston Rockets fan base, but in the eyes of many Lin fans, that's all they know (the cries of racism seem to me to come mainly from some Lin fans who live outside the U. S. and so their "prism" looking in on America (not just Lin) is different; few others seem to be trying to live vicariously through Lin for perceived insults they may have received on recreational basketball court as an Asian American baller, but that subset seems to actually have become more realistic as Lin has appeared to struggle on court at times with Lakers). LOL, at times, some Lin fans have actually become harsher on Lin (passive, etc.) than his true haters!
Also have to note that 60% of Houston never actually was able to watch Lin play, with their own eyes and on their own tv sets (just watch box scores and read false narratives after the fact), ever since he arrived two seasons ago, and all the way up to point he was traded to Lakers this summer (I think games were finally shown and ATT and DirectTV, in addition to CSN Houston, just after this current season started): http://www.khou.com/story/news/2014/07/22/11861564/
At this point, it's become the Hatfields and McCoys, or even a generational blood feud, where the last insult by other side has to be avenged, even if no one remembers what the original insult was.
I think there was no adult supervision by Clutch locking down threads or very quickly banning extremists on both sides (at least until the purges that took place there immediately after Lin trade), as has been done here, and I think that is part of reason why things are so toxic between Lin fans and that website.
Best thing Clutch could do, this me, is lock down the remaining Lin or Laker threads and don't let anyone start any thread like that (except he probably generates good revenue from the clicks an incendiary thread like that generates).
Hey Jlinfanjoe,
You seem like an honest poster man, but you're getting a bit off topic here. There is an official Jeremy Lin thread where this post should be discussed.
I'm not trying to be a jerk, my apologies if that's what it sounds like. But this is one of the few threads that hasn't been polluted with Kobe arguments, Lin debates, and Jim Buss complaints. I just want to see it stay that way please. Thanks.
Joined: 23 Jun 2005 Posts: 8488 Location: The (real) short corner
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 10:46 am Post subject:
I don't want to see this thread turn into another JLin discussion, but I'll address some of your points:
1) Moreyball is definitely working this year.
2) I don't think there's any overarching conspiracy holding Lin down, but no, I'm not going discuss that with you here. Nor does it really matter what went down at CF.
3) I think Lin would fit well in a modern offense that emphasizes getting to the basket and 3s. You just need sets that magnify his strengths. (see San Antonio).
4) If you want to continue (outside of debating the merits of Moreyball, which I'm happy to do), please wait until the official JLin thread is open to do so.
Last edited by fiendishoc on Fri Dec 12, 2014 10:51 am; edited 1 time in total
...(outside of debating the merits of Moreyball, which I'm happy to do)....
To the extent that Moreyball is defined as concentrating on points per shot (i.e. points in the paint and threes), I'm not sure what there is to debate. Everyone is doing it because it obviously works. Morey is just pushing it further.
I am not trying to pick a fight here, and probably do deserve some of the criticism above for calling Moreyball an "earth is flat" Kool-Aid idealogy, but until they win a championship, to me, nothing is proven.
With the best center and best shooting guard in league, I would think alot of systems should work well.
Rockets haven't even gotten beyond first round last few years.
Joined: 23 Jun 2005 Posts: 8488 Location: The (real) short corner
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 11:21 am Post subject:
Inigo Montoya wrote:
fiendishoc wrote:
...(outside of debating the merits of Moreyball, which I'm happy to do)....
To the extent that Moreyball is defined as concentrating on points per shot (i.e. points in the paint and threes), I'm not sure what there is to debate. Everyone is doing it because it obviously works. Morey is just pushing it further.
True, I wasn't expecting too much resistance on this front tbh .
Joined: 23 Jun 2005 Posts: 8488 Location: The (real) short corner
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 11:26 am Post subject:
On the winning the championship thing- I mean Byron said it too, but he's wrong:
A good way to look at it is to compare A) The single preseason game that had everyone freaking out about dinosaur ball, the Lakers shot something like 45 long two point jumpers and got smashed, and B) The Spurs, during the ENTIRE Finals series, shooting 51 long twos combined,.
I did state above that I know nothing about team wide x and o, and that is why I started asking questions in this thread.
But from watching Lin play in that system for two years, seems to me that Lin doesn't "fit" that idealogy at all:
Dallas Mavericks game last December that Harden didn't play Lin had 5 turnovers and said he felt every pass was being deflected. Watching that game, to me, reason was that Mavericks knew that they didn't have to honor his pull up jump shot at all (center just waits to block him at the rim, and everyone else just plays him for the pass).
Lin also beat the Mavericks and Spurs on back to back nights at end of January when Harden didn't play, so IIRC represented more of an individual scoring threat than that early Mavericks game:
"Early on in the season I used to write about a player that some say is just a myth. A whisper heard in-between the hallowed walls of Toyota Center. But I’m here to confirm that he does in fact exist and his name is Confident Lin. Some compare him to world renown phenomenon Jeremy Lin but in reality these two people could not be more different. First name Confident, last name Lin.
When Confident Lin steps onto the court you can smell the swagger. The gravitational pull of Confident Lin’s swagger is what actually keeps us planted on this Earth. Next time you jump and don’t float into the stratosphere, thank Confident Lin.
Confident Lin drives to the basket when ever he damn well pleases. He drains tough shots and laughs in the face of your attempt to foil him. He plays alert (although clumsy) defense and he is exactly what every team would desire from a sixth man or spot starter. In yesterday’s game against the Spurs and their O.A.F.S., he was beginning to form but today gave Lin a chance to really strut his stuff."
Lin also contained Tony Parker very well on Christmas the game after that Dallas loss (Patrick Beverley had just fractured his hand), and Kevin McHale challenged Lin to step up his defense that game:
And he followed up that performance by doing this @ Grizzlies:
Last edited by JLinfanJoe on Fri Dec 12, 2014 12:53 pm; edited 24 times in total
...(outside of debating the merits of Moreyball, which I'm happy to do)....
To the extent that Moreyball is defined as concentrating on points per shot (i.e. points in the paint and threes), I'm not sure what there is to debate. Everyone is doing it because it obviously works. Morey is just pushing it further.
True, I wasn't expecting too much resistance on this front tbh .
I think you'll see some resistance if we start talking about Rio Grande Vipers ball (which is Moreyball taken to its theoretical extreme)
...(outside of debating the merits of Moreyball, which I'm happy to do)....
To the extent that Moreyball is defined as concentrating on points per shot (i.e. points in the paint and threes), I'm not sure what there is to debate. Everyone is doing it because it obviously works. Morey is just pushing it further.
True, I wasn't expecting too much resistance on this front tbh .
Ah, I left out points in transition. Those are nicely efficient too. And in the new Ronnie Price regime, we seem to have dropped to the bottom of the league in those. Gotta slow things down when playing Kobe a gazillion minutes per game, after all.
Joined: 23 Jun 2005 Posts: 8488 Location: The (real) short corner
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 11:46 am Post subject:
Teams do know that they have to stop their opponent from getting to the basket, so the "not honoring the pull up jump shot" is the logical counterpart strategy on defense, and you can expect to see a lot of tall guys camped under the basket. That's why if you can hit the short jumper around 50% (hopefully around 5-10 feet not 15-20 feet away), then you become an even bigger threat. That's probably why he was working on his floater so much over the summer (tho he probably should have learned the Harden ref mind control technique instead). But in no way invalidates the offensive philosophy.
...(outside of debating the merits of Moreyball, which I'm happy to do)....
To the extent that Moreyball is defined as concentrating on points per shot (i.e. points in the paint and threes), I'm not sure what there is to debate. Everyone is doing it because it obviously works. Morey is just pushing it further.
True, I wasn't expecting too much resistance on this front tbh .
I think you'll see some resistance if we start talking about Rio Grande Vipers ball (which is Moreyball taken to its theoretical extreme)
RGV style requires good 3 point shooters--and they were blowing everyone out of the water last year before NBA teams started poaching those players from the Vipers. It is an interesting question how well that would work in the NBA where teams actually play defense... but if you structure a team where 1-4 are decent 3pt shooters, a couple of them can slash, and you have a decent defensive center it might work very well.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum