OFFICIAL BYRON SCOTT THREAD.....BREAKING NEWS...BYRON OFFICIALLY FIRED (Page 690)!!!
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 692, 693, 694  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
fiendishoc
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 8488
Location: The (real) short corner

PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 8:05 am    Post subject:

CabinCreek44 wrote:
Maybe we could lose a game, or play a bad quarter, or allow a 10-0 run, during an actual regular season game, before we begin the P&M about Byron Scott?

The best players on this team are geezing, the rest of the "talent" is spotty at best, we're already loaded with the injured and infirm, and Byron is a stiff because we're losing games that don't even count?

As Tyrion Lannister said, it's going to be a long season.


Imagine if Byron said the first option this season was for Kobe to jack a three every single time down the floor, and the team does it and proceeds to lose by 30-40 in two preseason games - and then afterwards he says that the team's problem is that they didn't play hard enough, and was missing key rebounders. Would you still say wait until the regular season to start waving red flags?

Well, this "long 2" offense is yielding about the same efficiency that you would see from that approach. Of course its time to start feeling some concern.

Edit: Just want to add the disclaimer that they haven't yet worked on offense all that much. Still, the comments coming out of Byron's mouth are very disturbing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lukewaltonsdad
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 09 Jul 2014
Posts: 2983

PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 8:47 am    Post subject:

24 wrote:
lukewaltonsdad wrote:
MJST wrote:
"if he could go" isn't happening.

Scott said Lin'd likely be starting and Nash coming off the bench.


Lin likely won't play...Nash is listed as a probable starter according to Pincus. Even if Lin does play, and Nash says he's healthy, I'd still think Scott would favor Nash. Either way, it's all moot; Nash will hurt himself and force Scott's hand...the disappointing thing to me in all of this is Nash should have already been benched...


I agree with playing Nash significantly in the pre season. Best to see what he can do now.


I usually agree with your analysis, but in this particular case, I simply do not. We already know what Nash could do; Scott has seen Jon in practice and the first quarter of the Denver game. He's also seen Nash last year when he was analyzing games for Time Warner. If he needs to assess him anymore than that, then he could Steve could come off the bench. Scott should put it to rest officially and declare Steve a non factor because that's what he is essentially; but as of yesterday, Scott stated 'he had no idea,' what he was going to do. This has become a distraction that we don't need now or during the season. Nevertheless, it will be settled when Nash inevitably carries another bag or tweaks something else; Scott will have to do figure a solution.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
DimesnD
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 14 Feb 2009
Posts: 944

PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 9:17 am    Post subject:

B. Scott was not my first choice. But because the ownership believes in clinging on the "heralded" past at all costs to dictate their future, Scott was a natural choice. The message is old and hopefully it reaches a few ears but make no mistake, "where's the beef?" ain't that funny in today's age.

Does Scott really think Sacre and Hill being at the high post would yield the same success as it would with a young kenyon Martin? I see alot of time wasting when they have to wait for the PG to shed his man and come get the ball.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LA_Lakers_Rule
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 23 Aug 2004
Posts: 19482
Location: The X-Files

PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 11:35 am    Post subject:

DimesnD wrote:
B. Scott was not my first choice. But because the ownership believes in clinging on the "heralded" past at all costs to dictate their future, Scott was a natural choice. The message is old and hopefully it reaches a few ears but make no mistake, "where's the beef?" ain't that funny in today's age.

Does Scott really think Sacre and Hill being at the high post would yield the same success as it would with a young kenyon Martin? I see alot of time wasting when they have to wait for the PG to shed his man and come get the ball.


It's a matter of having to deal with what you've got....
_________________
Rule = win titles

Good judgment comes from experience and a lot of that comes from bad judgment. - Will Rogers ...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
SGV-Laker fan
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 May 2013
Posts: 8842

PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 12:30 pm    Post subject:

DimesnD wrote:
B. Scott was not my first choice. But because the ownership believes in clinging on the "heralded" past at all costs to dictate their future, Scott was a natural choice. The message is old and hopefully it reaches a few ears but make no mistake, "where's the beef?" ain't that funny in today's age.

Does Scott really think Sacre and Hill being at the high post would yield the same success as it would with a young kenyon Martin? I see alot of time wasting when they have to wait for the PG to shed his man and come get the ball.


exactly, this Laker ownership is still trying to sell public the glorious past. get over it, Lakers is a laughing stock nowadays in the league. past glory means sh*t in today's FAs' eyes. this season gonna be even more horrendous than previous year. at least when MDA was here while we losing games we at least put some ton of points to entertain fans. now this squad just going to lose game while scoring in the 80's.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
MJST
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 26085

PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 12:34 pm    Post subject:

DimesnD wrote:
B. Scott was not my first choice. But because the ownership believes in clinging on the "heralded" past at all costs to dictate their future, Scott was a natural choice. The message is old and hopefully it reaches a few ears but make no mistake, "where's the beef?" ain't that funny in today's age.

Does Scott really think Sacre and Hill being at the high post would yield the same success as it would with a young kenyon Martin? I see alot of time wasting when they have to wait for the PG to shed his man and come get the ball.


How many Sacre Hill lineups do you see Scott running?

Sounds like you're creating an overestimated assumption on what Scott plans to do.



Why Scott is here is to set the precedent of what's expected of those that wear Purple and Gold. A precedent that was completely gone during Mike D'antoni's tenure and his greatest reason for why we lost games were because "they(the other team) are just better."

Scott isn't accepting that and doesn't play that. He's instilling a mentality that no matter what roster they have they are going to prepare and carry themselves like they are going after a championship and should play with that kind of intensity every single night.

However that works out depending on the roster is irrelevant, what matters is instilling that kind of attitude and nature within the organization and coaching staff that's been missing over the past few years.

It was a needed instillation. Particularly moving forward into the future to set that precedent that this isn't the place to come, get your stats in a 27 win year and everything is good. When you're here you're here to work hard.

That's a very big reason why Beasley is not here right now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
DSF_27
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 310

PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 12:59 pm    Post subject:

If Byron hadnt been a Laker in the 80s he wouldnt have even been considered.

Thats a pretty dumb reason for choosing a coach. Id rather have a real teacher of the game than someone with a nostalgia factor.

I honestly think he doesnt have a clue as to why the Lakers are shooting such few threes. I think he was asked after the first game by the media why they shot so few and and he was probably clueless that it even happened. But he obviously cant say that so his defense was to say it was a "good" thing. Then the trend continued and now people think its because of his coaching "philosophy".

His coaching philosophy is to not get fired.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
cheesysapien
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 15 Oct 2014
Posts: 357

PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 1:43 pm    Post subject:

MJST wrote:
Not much to take away from the games. The starters seem to be getting the offense down for the most part except for the fact they've had 3 different starting lineups in the first 4 games.

The bench is the entire 3rd string + Randle and Davis and Randle and Davis have been the best players of it. So... everything has pretty much been to be expected.


We really won't know what to take away from anything till Wayne Ellington isn't our only three point shooter and X, Kelly, Lin, Nash and eventually Young are back.

24 wrote:

They should have Boozer doing the screen setting and then rolling to his shooting spots, with other guys reading Lin and cutting or spotting up. Kobe can move in and out of the post area wile allowing Lin room to penetrate.


Agree 100%. Too bad we've only seen one game of Lin with the starting lineup. I hope that the starting lineup in full gets a chance to play at least one week of pre-season to get some things flowing a bit.


Yes I hope so too. It will be fun to watch Lin running the point for the first unit and see how far we could go
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
CabinCreek44
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 16 Apr 2001
Posts: 3855

PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 1:45 pm    Post subject:

fiendishoc wrote:
CabinCreek44 wrote:
Maybe we could lose a game, or play a bad quarter, or allow a 10-0 run, during an actual regular season game, before we begin the P&M about Byron Scott?

The best players on this team are geezing, the rest of the "talent" is spotty at best, we're already loaded with the injured and infirm, and Byron is a stiff because we're losing games that don't even count?

As Tyrion Lannister said, it's going to be a long season.


Imagine if Byron said the first option this season was for Kobe to jack a three every single time down the floor, and the team does it and proceeds to lose by 30-40 in two preseason games - and then afterwards he says that the team's problem is that they didn't play hard enough, and was missing key rebounders. Would you still say wait until the regular season to start waving red flags?

Well, this "long 2" offense is yielding about the same efficiency that you would see from that approach. Of course its time to start feeling some concern.

Edit: Just want to add the disclaimer that they haven't yet worked on offense all that much. Still, the comments coming out of Byron's mouth are very disturbing.


The preseason means absolutely nothing. It means less than nothing. It's too long, and the players (especially the veterans) and coaches just do the best they can to get thru in one piece these glorified scrimmages/league marketing opportunities.

That said I am wildly concerned with what we'll be watching this season. Frankly, I think the only hope we have is Kobe. But if he can't be Kobe, this team is not going to be very good. Regardless of what offense Byron Scott is trying to run, or anything else he tries to do.

This team is talent deficient. And if we aren't any good, that's going to be the reason why.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
MJST
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 26085

PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 2:59 pm    Post subject:

Let's not forget before we put stock into how that bench performed. We've been so shorthanded we've actually ran a lineup Jeremy Tyler, Wayne Ellington, Wes Johnson, Carlos Boozer, and Robert Sacre at some point if even for a moment.

No team in the NBA is gonna struggle against that, if they do they have severe worries.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ringfinger
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 29418

PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 3:27 pm    Post subject:

MJST wrote:
Let's not forget before we put stock into how that bench performed against Utah's bench that we were so shorthanded we ran a lineup Jeremy Tyler, Wayne Ellington, Wes Johnson, Carlos Boozer, and Robert Sacre at one point.

No team in the NBA is gonna struggle against that, if they do they have severe worries.


Who's saying anything about struggle? Many of those players are rotation players and one of them is a starter.

I'm not even asking for struggle. I'm asking for don't manhandle in every possible human way. LOL
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Yumyumcha
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 751

PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 6:04 pm    Post subject:

Heck, if we didn't give MDA the benefit of the doubt with all the injuries he had last season, why should we let Scott off....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
fiendishoc
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 8488
Location: The (real) short corner

PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 6:25 pm    Post subject:

MJST wrote:
DimesnD wrote:
B. Scott was not my first choice. But because the ownership believes in clinging on the "heralded" past at all costs to dictate their future, Scott was a natural choice. The message is old and hopefully it reaches a few ears but make no mistake, "where's the beef?" ain't that funny in today's age.

Does Scott really think Sacre and Hill being at the high post would yield the same success as it would with a young kenyon Martin? I see alot of time wasting when they have to wait for the PG to shed his man and come get the ball.


How many Sacre Hill lineups do you see Scott running?

Sounds like you're creating an overestimated assumption on what Scott plans to do.



Why Scott is here is to set the precedent of what's expected of those that wear Purple and Gold. A precedent that was completely gone during Mike D'antoni's tenure and his greatest reason for why we lost games were because "they(the other team) are just better."

Scott isn't accepting that and doesn't play that. He's instilling a mentality that no matter what roster they have they are going to prepare and carry themselves like they are going after a championship and should play with that kind of intensity every single night.

However that works out depending on the roster is irrelevant, what matters is instilling that kind of attitude and nature within the organization and coaching staff that's been missing over the past few years.

It was a needed instillation. Particularly moving forward into the future to set that precedent that this isn't the place to come, get your stats in a 27 win year and everything is good. When you're here you're here to work hard.

That's a very big reason why Beasley is not here right now.


So it's acceptable to go down by 30-40 in preseason games and then blame it on injuries? When D'antoni gets blown out due to injuries, its because he doesn't "know what its like to represent this jersey".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lukewaltonsdad
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 09 Jul 2014
Posts: 2983

PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 6:31 pm    Post subject:

We should have hired George Karl.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Tyrion Lannister
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 20 May 2014
Posts: 4567
Location: Westeros

PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 6:34 pm    Post subject:

Just going to wait and see about this team.

Its only pre season, but the trends about this team are not encouraging.

Kobe looks great.

Nash needs to go away and never comeback. He is done.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lakersken80
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Aug 2009
Posts: 38751

PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 6:34 pm    Post subject:

wolfpaclaker wrote:
Dave20 wrote:
Byron is still stuck in the 80's, Kareem. Magic, and Worthy aren't walking through that door(playing anyways).

Yes, but what coach would take the amazing lineup of Price, 20 ppg decline version of Kobe, Wesley, Hill and Boozer to great heights?

This is one of the most untalented teams I've seen in Laker land in a long time. Not so much in depth, but at the top. Even in the just after Shaq trade days, we had prime Kobe, Lamar and Caron. After that we got Kobe, Lamar, Mihm (at the time Mihm was good post player) and some decent shooters.

The Lakers right now are a hot mess roster wise. 4 PF's in Hill, Davis, Boozer, Randle and no real C. We're playing guys who should be at PF, at C. And it's not like the guys at PF have speed that can use as an advantage. At SF we have a no body. At PG, it's been Price/Nash.

Come on guys, so far in PS, this team has looked bad sets wise, but they're also plain bad. At the top (top 3 players) this is easily the worst team on paper we've had in a long time


The lineup on paper definitely won't get people excited....Coach Scott adds an element of credibility since he knows what it takes to win, at least as a player. I think with the lack of major free agent acquisitions having Coach Scott definitely made things much easier than having MDA back, considering a lot of fans were calling for his head. The problem with this team is lack of size, our veterans like Kobe and Nash who are fighting age, and players like Randle who are young and inexperienced that you cannot just shoulder the burden of the franchise so early in their careers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
DimesnD
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 14 Feb 2009
Posts: 944

PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 6:59 pm    Post subject:

MJST wrote:


How many Sacre Hill lineups do you see Scott running?

Sounds like you're creating an overestimated assumption on what Scott plans to do.



If the question is how many lineup have I seen Sacre and Hill play TOGETHER? I can't say I have but how is that relevant to my original post? If what you are insunating is true then it follows that both Hill and Sacre would be at the high post at the same time. There would be no logic to that. What has happened is when EITHER one is in, the center position goes to the high post. Not their strength.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kobe_luver
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 08 Feb 2008
Posts: 11644
Location: LA

PostPosted: Sun Oct 19, 2014 1:33 pm    Post subject:

Great idea having a hard practice today before our game later. Not only will the guys have no legs again but now Kelly's right hamstring is sore when he was ready to return from the left one!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
MJST
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 26085

PostPosted: Sun Oct 19, 2014 1:37 pm    Post subject:

fiendishoc wrote:
MJST wrote:
DimesnD wrote:
B. Scott was not my first choice. But because the ownership believes in clinging on the "heralded" past at all costs to dictate their future, Scott was a natural choice. The message is old and hopefully it reaches a few ears but make no mistake, "where's the beef?" ain't that funny in today's age.

Does Scott really think Sacre and Hill being at the high post would yield the same success as it would with a young kenyon Martin? I see alot of time wasting when they have to wait for the PG to shed his man and come get the ball.


How many Sacre Hill lineups do you see Scott running?

Sounds like you're creating an overestimated assumption on what Scott plans to do.



Why Scott is here is to set the precedent of what's expected of those that wear Purple and Gold. A precedent that was completely gone during Mike D'antoni's tenure and his greatest reason for why we lost games were because "they(the other team) are just better."

Scott isn't accepting that and doesn't play that. He's instilling a mentality that no matter what roster they have they are going to prepare and carry themselves like they are going after a championship and should play with that kind of intensity every single night.

However that works out depending on the roster is irrelevant, what matters is instilling that kind of attitude and nature within the organization and coaching staff that's been missing over the past few years.

It was a needed instillation. Particularly moving forward into the future to set that precedent that this isn't the place to come, get your stats in a 27 win year and everything is good. When you're here you're here to work hard.

That's a very big reason why Beasley is not here right now.


So it's acceptable to go down by 30-40 in preseason games and then blame it on injuries? When D'antoni gets blown out due to injuries, its because he doesn't "know what its like to represent this jersey".


Doesn't make the fans that bashed D'antoni for that correct either.

It's really down to the personnel and the fact you can only do with what you've got.

Fans complaining about us not taking threes when due to personnel and injuries we have one maybe 2 three point shooters on the team.

To shoot more threes would mean forcing Price and Kobe to jack up threes for the sake of them which would be stupid and something people would hate our last coach for doing.

We can't bash D'antoni for 'playing people out of position and away from their strengths' and then bash Byron for not forcing this team to take more threes when we have one at most three point shooter in our starting and bench lineups.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
greenfrog
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 36081
Location: 502 Bad Gateway

PostPosted: Sun Oct 19, 2014 1:41 pm    Post subject:

lukewaltonsdad wrote:
We should have hired George Karl.


yeah his ego wouldn't clash with kobe's at all... there simply no good choices.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
BobbyB
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 05 Feb 2013
Posts: 2489

PostPosted: Sun Oct 19, 2014 2:27 pm    Post subject:

We just don't have the players to compete on a night to night basis. I was a huge dantoni supporter and believe he got to much of the blame for the how the team performed but as I stated earlier the team is just not good.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
K2
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 25 Dec 2011
Posts: 23529

PostPosted: Sun Oct 19, 2014 3:33 pm    Post subject:

Mike Brown - Master cleanser of all things triangle
Mike D'Antoni - Showtime 2.0
Byron 'Antom Scott - Showtime 1.0 guy inherits some Showtime 2.0 guys and works them like he got worked in the 80s
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144432
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Sun Oct 19, 2014 3:36 pm    Post subject:

Maybe the players aren't very talented, but don't the deserve modern offensive and defensive systems? One of the best shots to take today is the corner 3, and we have shot 0. And with the sets we have seen so far, we won't take many. My only hope is that things will grow from what ee have seen.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
MJST
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 26085

PostPosted: Sun Oct 19, 2014 4:52 pm    Post subject:

K2 wrote:
Mike Brown - Master cleanser of all things triangle
Mike D'Antoni - Showtime 2.0
Byron 'Antom Scott - Showtime 1.0 guy inherits some Showtime 2.0 guys and works them like he got worked in the 80s


Mike Brown ran triangle,4 out 1 in as well as early Spurs 'twin towers' sets.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Hard_Butter
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 02 Jan 2012
Posts: 12223
Location: The Two One Three

PostPosted: Sun Oct 19, 2014 6:54 pm    Post subject:

Where's Ed Davis, Byron?

Why you no likey Randle?
_________________
The butter's hard and the eggs are chillin' in the dark.

Kiss my Converse.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 692, 693, 694  Next
Page 4 of 694
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB