Steve Nash Discussion: Done for season; Nash open letter to Laker fans, pg 29
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 18, 19, 20 ... 36, 37, 38  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Jim99187
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 22138

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2014 9:23 pm    Post subject:

LeBronte Jest wrote:
Jim99187 wrote:
LakerLand247 wrote:
Jim99187 wrote:
Hibbert for nash/sacre/1st houston +2nd

Or al horford for nash/sacre/1st houston + 2nd


please we need to stop including draft picks like they are hot cakes. We need to keep all of our draft picks especially in a rebuilding stage. Look how a couple of draft picks rejuvenate our roster ( with youth and talent in Randl/ clarkson)


having hibbert will set u up for next 5-8yrs and can contribute at a v high level.

having him will help Randle also.


Hibbert is almost 28, lol. You guys are insane.


so? he is not an athletic freak whose physical play won't last? next 5 yrs he should be very serviceable.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LeBronte Jest
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Nov 2010
Posts: 1236

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2014 10:01 pm    Post subject:

Jim99187 wrote:
LeBronte Jest wrote:
Jim99187 wrote:
LakerLand247 wrote:
Jim99187 wrote:
Hibbert for nash/sacre/1st houston +2nd

Or al horford for nash/sacre/1st houston + 2nd


please we need to stop including draft picks like they are hot cakes. We need to keep all of our draft picks especially in a rebuilding stage. Look how a couple of draft picks rejuvenate our roster ( with youth and talent in Randl/ clarkson)


having hibbert will set u up for next 5-8yrs and can contribute at a v high level.

having him will help Randle also.


Hibbert is almost 28, lol. You guys are insane.


so? he is not an athletic freak whose physical play won't last? next 5 yrs he should be very serviceable.


Thought it was 5-8 years?

I can't believe you guys want to waste max money on Roy freaking Hibbert. Feels like I'm taking crazy pills here, lol. John Henson will be better than Roy Hibbert, and he's only 23. Perfect to pair with Randle FOR THE NEXT DECADE, and he's dirt cheap right now. Kyle O'Quinn is another guy. Hell, I'd take Kevin Seraphin over Hibbert and his contract. All 3 of them should be somewhat available. Gobert? Dieng? Harder to get, but at least they'll be hitting their prime by the time we're contending again. Hibbert isn't putting this team over the top, so it's totally pointless to waste that kind of money on him (especially with Kobe still on the books). Stop getting stuck on these names. I feel like I'm drafting with bad fantasy basketball players. Let's go after Kevin Garnett too!!

We should be focusing on 3-4 years from now, not the next season or two. Hibbert is too old, and too expensive. Not to mention the fact that he's just not worth max money. He'll be 31 by the time we're even remotely good again. Get a few young guys and they'll be hitting their prime at the perfect time. It's basic math, ffs. You just don't waste max money on someone just for the sake of it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jim99187
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 22138

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2014 10:04 pm    Post subject:

LeBronte Jest wrote:
Jim99187 wrote:
LeBronte Jest wrote:
Jim99187 wrote:
LakerLand247 wrote:
Jim99187 wrote:
Hibbert for nash/sacre/1st houston +2nd

Or al horford for nash/sacre/1st houston + 2nd


please we need to stop including draft picks like they are hot cakes. We need to keep all of our draft picks especially in a rebuilding stage. Look how a couple of draft picks rejuvenate our roster ( with youth and talent in Randl/ clarkson)


having hibbert will set u up for next 5-8yrs and can contribute at a v high level.

having him will help Randle also.


Hibbert is almost 28, lol. You guys are insane.


so? he is not an athletic freak whose physical play won't last? next 5 yrs he should be very serviceable.


Thought it was 5-8 years?

I can't believe you guys want to waste max money on Roy freaking Hibbert. Feels like I'm taking crazy pills here, lol. John Henson will be better than Roy Hibbert, and he's only 23. Perfect to pair with Randle FOR THE NEXT DECADE, and he's dirt cheap right now. Kyle O'Quinn is another guy. Hell, I'd take Kevin Seraphin over Hibbert and his contract. All 3 of them should be somewhat available. Gobert? Dieng? Harder to get, but at least they'll be hitting their prime by the time we're contending again. Hibbert isn't putting this team over the top, so it's totally pointless to waste that kind of money on him (especially with Kobe still on the books). Stop getting stuck on these names. I feel like I'm drafting with bad fantasy basketball players. Let's go after Kevin Garnett too!!

We should be focusing on 3-4 years from now, not the next season or two. Hibbert is too old, and too expensive. Not to mention the fact that he's just not worth max money. He'll be 31 by the time we're even remotely good again. Get a few young guys and they'll be hitting their prime at the perfect time. It's basic math, ffs. You just don't waste max money on someone just for the sake of it.


i have been dying to get 3 of the 4 guys u mentioned:
Henson
Gobert
Dieng

i doubt we can get any...I would even give houston pick/2nd for Gobert actually
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LeBronte Jest
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Nov 2010
Posts: 1236

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2014 10:21 pm    Post subject:

Jim99187 wrote:
LeBronte Jest wrote:
Jim99187 wrote:
LeBronte Jest wrote:
Jim99187 wrote:
LakerLand247 wrote:
Jim99187 wrote:
Hibbert for nash/sacre/1st houston +2nd

Or al horford for nash/sacre/1st houston + 2nd


please we need to stop including draft picks like they are hot cakes. We need to keep all of our draft picks especially in a rebuilding stage. Look how a couple of draft picks rejuvenate our roster ( with youth and talent in Randl/ clarkson)


having hibbert will set u up for next 5-8yrs and can contribute at a v high level.

having him will help Randle also.


Hibbert is almost 28, lol. You guys are insane.


so? he is not an athletic freak whose physical play won't last? next 5 yrs he should be very serviceable.


Thought it was 5-8 years?

I can't believe you guys want to waste max money on Roy freaking Hibbert. Feels like I'm taking crazy pills here, lol. John Henson will be better than Roy Hibbert, and he's only 23. Perfect to pair with Randle FOR THE NEXT DECADE, and he's dirt cheap right now. Kyle O'Quinn is another guy. Hell, I'd take Kevin Seraphin over Hibbert and his contract. All 3 of them should be somewhat available. Gobert? Dieng? Harder to get, but at least they'll be hitting their prime by the time we're contending again. Hibbert isn't putting this team over the top, so it's totally pointless to waste that kind of money on him (especially with Kobe still on the books). Stop getting stuck on these names. I feel like I'm drafting with bad fantasy basketball players. Let's go after Kevin Garnett too!!

We should be focusing on 3-4 years from now, not the next season or two. Hibbert is too old, and too expensive. Not to mention the fact that he's just not worth max money. He'll be 31 by the time we're even remotely good again. Get a few young guys and they'll be hitting their prime at the perfect time. It's basic math, ffs. You just don't waste max money on someone just for the sake of it.


i have been dying to get 3 of the 4 guys u mentioned:
Henson
Gobert
Dieng

i doubt we can get any...I would even give houston pick/2nd for Gobert actually


See, now we're talkin! Henson would be the easiest to get. Kidd likes Sanders, so Henson should be available again. He was as of last April, and they have a few contracts that they'd love to get rid of (Mayo/Ersan). Both expire next season, and they're roughly HALF of what Hibbert makes.

Gobert would be slightly more difficult. I'm not sure how well he and Favors are going to work. I mentioned the Jazz being interested in Ryan Kelly awhile back. He fits better than Gobert does, but we'd probably have to throw in the HOU pick at the very least. I mentioned going after Gobert at the same time (earlier this summer), but then he went off during FIBA, so he's going to cost a bit more now.

Dieng would be the hardest to get. Probably unavailable, tbh.

Kyle O'Quinn might actually be the easiest out of all of them, and that dude is an absolute monster with minutes. He's only 24, and Orlando has Vuc/Frye/Gordon/Nicholson at the 4/5 already. He's just wasting away on their bench.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jim99187
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 22138

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2014 10:45 pm    Post subject:

LeBronte Jest wrote:
Jim99187 wrote:
LeBronte Jest wrote:
Jim99187 wrote:
LeBronte Jest wrote:
Jim99187 wrote:
LakerLand247 wrote:
Jim99187 wrote:
Hibbert for nash/sacre/1st houston +2nd

Or al horford for nash/sacre/1st houston + 2nd


please we need to stop including draft picks like they are hot cakes. We need to keep all of our draft picks especially in a rebuilding stage. Look how a couple of draft picks rejuvenate our roster ( with youth and talent in Randl/ clarkson)


having hibbert will set u up for next 5-8yrs and can contribute at a v high level.

having him will help Randle also.


Hibbert is almost 28, lol. You guys are insane.


so? he is not an athletic freak whose physical play won't last? next 5 yrs he should be very serviceable.


Thought it was 5-8 years?

I can't believe you guys want to waste max money on Roy freaking Hibbert. Feels like I'm taking crazy pills here, lol. John Henson will be better than Roy Hibbert, and he's only 23. Perfect to pair with Randle FOR THE NEXT DECADE, and he's dirt cheap right now. Kyle O'Quinn is another guy. Hell, I'd take Kevin Seraphin over Hibbert and his contract. All 3 of them should be somewhat available. Gobert? Dieng? Harder to get, but at least they'll be hitting their prime by the time we're contending again. Hibbert isn't putting this team over the top, so it's totally pointless to waste that kind of money on him (especially with Kobe still on the books). Stop getting stuck on these names. I feel like I'm drafting with bad fantasy basketball players. Let's go after Kevin Garnett too!!

We should be focusing on 3-4 years from now, not the next season or two. Hibbert is too old, and too expensive. Not to mention the fact that he's just not worth max money. He'll be 31 by the time we're even remotely good again. Get a few young guys and they'll be hitting their prime at the perfect time. It's basic math, ffs. You just don't waste max money on someone just for the sake of it.


i have been dying to get 3 of the 4 guys u mentioned:
Henson
Gobert
Dieng

i doubt we can get any...I would even give houston pick/2nd for Gobert actually


See, now we're talkin! Henson would be the easiest to get. Kidd likes Sanders, so Henson should be available again. He was as of last April, and they have a few contracts that they'd love to get rid of (Mayo/Ersan). Both expire next season, and they're roughly HALF of what Hibbert makes.

Gobert would be slightly more difficult. I'm not sure how well he and Favors are going to work. I mentioned the Jazz being interested in Ryan Kelly awhile back. He fits better than Gobert does, but we'd probably have to throw in the HOU pick at the very least. I mentioned going after Gobert at the same time (earlier this summer), but then he went off during FIBA, so he's going to cost a bit more now.

Dieng would be the hardest to get. Probably unavailable, tbh.

Kyle O'Quinn might actually be the easiest out of all of them, and that dude is an absolute monster with minutes. He's only 24, and Orlando has Vuc/Frye/Gordon/Nicholson at the 4/5 already. He's just wasting away on their bench.


Agreed. I love gobert. Lowe did a article on him which says his cieling maybe prime chsndler. I think its higher then that.

But henson/gobert and i m ok. The most getable is kevin seraphin as he signed the QO.

Dieng, i agree he is unavailable.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
cheesysapien
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 15 Oct 2014
Posts: 357

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2014 10:48 pm    Post subject:

Melissa Rohlin @melissarohlin · 42m 42 minutes ago
CP3 on Nash: " I remember the night before I played him the first time, I couldn't sleep because I wanted to play against him so bad."

Melissa Rohlin @melissarohlin · 43m 43 minutes ago
CP3 on Nash: "When I came into the NBA, he was the guy I was coming after."
_________________
"We have a lot of guys that have been kinda discarded ... Myself with the injury and the age. Jeremy ... a bunch of players who other teams really felt they had no use for. So we have that kind of attitude built into ourselves" -- Kobe Bryant
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LeBronte Jest
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Nov 2010
Posts: 1236

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2014 11:00 pm    Post subject:

Jim99187 wrote:


Agreed. I love gobert. Lowe did a article on him which says his cieling maybe prime chsndler. I think its higher then that.

But henson/gobert and i m ok. The most getable is kevin seraphin as he signed the QO.

Dieng, i agree he is unavailable.


Seraphin would actually be my last choice anyway. I like him, but I was using him as the worst case example of guys I'd be willing to take to avoid Hibbert's contract, lol.

It's not even that I dislike Hibbert that much, it's just that I don't think he's worth the max (especially when we don't have much cap space to play with). I'd rather put the puzzle together, and then drop in that last piece when we find a max player that's actually worth it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerLand247
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 Sep 2009
Posts: 4809

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2014 11:05 pm    Post subject:

Thanks Nash. Only a season too late. Enjoy your retirement and the $$$
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LaZonaImagery
Sixth Man
Sixth Man


Joined: 15 Jun 2013
Posts: 85

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2014 11:45 pm    Post subject:

Someone got paid for nuthin'
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Runway8
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Posts: 22852
Location: La Jolla, San Diego

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 12:10 am    Post subject:

LaZonaImagery wrote:
Someone got paid for nuthin'


A lot of NBA players get paid for nothing, or are not worth their contract. That's the nature of the business. These are guaranteed contracts. At least from an overall career perspective, HE DESERVES IT. Some guys don't get injured, don't miss any seasons but are worth half their career earnings. Someone like Boozer? LOL! What about Grant Hill cashing in on his max contract while giving Orlando NOTHING in return. Derek Rose and Kobe continued to cash checks as well being out these past few seasons. Nash just stands out and is an easy target cause it's his last year.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
USCandLakers
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 19955

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 12:54 am    Post subject:

Runway8 wrote:
LaZonaImagery wrote:
Someone got paid for nuthin'


A lot of NBA players get paid for nothing, or are not worth their contract. That's the nature of the business. These are guaranteed contracts. At least from an overall career perspective, HE DESERVES IT. Some guys don't get injured, don't miss any seasons but are worth half their career earnings. Someone like Boozer? LOL! What about Grant Hill cashing in on his max contract while giving Orlando NOTHING in return. Derek Rose and Kobe continued to cash checks as well being out these past few seasons. Nash just stands out and is an easy target cause it's his last year.


First of all, those situations are not even remotely comparable and I'm shocked you even brought them up. Kobe ran himself into the ground trying to get us into the playoffs, he deserved every penny he got. Derrick Rose sat out when he was healthy. And Nash will have played 65 games out of a possible 246 games and did absolutely nothing in those 65 games. We've gotten no value out of that contract.

Secondly, Nash stands out because he not only cost us 4 draft picks, but again, he's only played in 65/246 games. And he refused medical retirement last season for a futile comeback that he knew was going to cost us.

I don't think anyone really cares that Nash is in his last season.
_________________
A banana is killed every time a terrible thread or post is made. Save the bananas. Stop creating terrible posts!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Purp 32
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 12 Jul 2014
Posts: 2154
Location: Inglewood, CA

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 4:01 am    Post subject:

Runway8 wrote:
LaZonaImagery wrote:
Someone got paid for nuthin'


A lot of NBA players get paid for nothing, or are not worth their contract. That's the nature of the business. These are guaranteed contracts. At least from an overall career perspective, HE DESERVES IT. Some guys don't get injured, don't miss any seasons but are worth half their career earnings. Someone like Boozer? LOL! What about Grant Hill cashing in on his max contract while giving Orlando NOTHING in return. Derek Rose and Kobe continued to cash checks as well being out these past few seasons. Nash just stands out and is an easy target cause it's his last year.


Kobe won us championships and is a Lakers legend. Nash has been an utter disappointment his entire time here. Don't compare the two situations.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
cheetos82
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 1010

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 7:34 am    Post subject:

He isn't a game changer anymore and is definitely flawed but I'd take

Josh Smith for Nash + Ellington.

Mitch waves magic wand and gets a 1st rounder for taking on Josh Smith's contract.

I don't want a Deron or Rondo type, we have a quality PG in Lin, might as well upgrade other positions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 7:37 am    Post subject:

cheetos82 wrote:
He isn't a game changer anymore and is definitely flawed but I'd take

Josh Smith for Nash + Ellington.

Mitch waves magic wand and gets a 1st rounder for taking on Josh Smith's contract.

I don't want a Deron or Rondo type, we have a quality PG in Lin, might as well upgrade other positions.


No thanks. That means Jules or Smith, one has to play SF. Smith sucks at that and Jules isn't really a SF IMO.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
cheetos82
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 1010

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 7:42 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
cheetos82 wrote:
He isn't a game changer anymore and is definitely flawed but I'd take

Josh Smith for Nash + Ellington.

Mitch waves magic wand and gets a 1st rounder for taking on Josh Smith's contract.

I don't want a Deron or Rondo type, we have a quality PG in Lin, might as well upgrade other positions.


No thanks. That means Jules or Smith, one has to play SF. Smith sucks at that and Jules isn't really a SF IMO.


Well I mean nobody is going to give us a Prime Scotty Pippen for Nash at this point and the more I think about this, the more it makes sense for both sides. Pistons want to trade Smith in order to lock up Monroe. Lakers can definitely use his rim protection and defense. Smith and Davis in the lineup would definitely help out Randle on the defensive end. I'm high on Julius but he is a rookie after all and we shouldn't expect him to be at an all-star level this year.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 7:43 am    Post subject:

Quote:
@WojYahooNBA: Knicks could be changing course on picking up Shane Larkin 2015-'16 option, now leaning toward the cap space, sources say. Deadline Friday.


Nash to Knicks...give us Shane and other contracts.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 7:45 am    Post subject:

cheetos82 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
cheetos82 wrote:
He isn't a game changer anymore and is definitely flawed but I'd take

Josh Smith for Nash + Ellington.

Mitch waves magic wand and gets a 1st rounder for taking on Josh Smith's contract.

I don't want a Deron or Rondo type, we have a quality PG in Lin, might as well upgrade other positions.


No thanks. That means Jules or Smith, one has to play SF. Smith sucks at that and Jules isn't really a SF IMO.


Well I mean nobody is going to give us a Prime Scotty Pippen for Nash at this point and the more I think about this, the more it makes sense for both sides. Pistons want to trade Smith in order to lock up Monroe. Lakers can definitely use his rim protection and defense. Smith and Davis in the lineup would definitely help out Randle on the defensive end. I'm high on Julius but he is a rookie after all and we shouldn't expect him to be at an all-star level this year.


Smith is going to be a tough one to deal with as he gets older and his athleticism declines. I have liked him in the past but he's just going to be a hindrance to Randle growing on this team. He duplicates what Randle will be for us (of course Smith is better on defense). I just don't see the Lakers going in the Smoove direction.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jim99187
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 22138

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 8:04 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
Quote:
@WojYahooNBA: Knicks could be changing course on picking up Shane Larkin 2015-'16 option, now leaning toward the cap space, sources say. Deadline Friday.


Nash to Knicks...give us Shane and other contracts.


nash is too big of expiring for shane. maybe Sacre and a 2nd should do it
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 8:07 am    Post subject:

If we get a DPE can use on Shane iirc.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jim99187
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 22138

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 8:12 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
If we get a DPE can use on Shane iirc.


that means we can't use nash's contract at deadline. prefer to keep the contract till deadline and see if we can use it before using DPE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jim99187
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 22138

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 8:17 am    Post subject:

my gosh why do people want Josh Smith?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
dvdrdiscs
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 6274

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 8:52 am    Post subject:

First person to suggest we bring back Derek Fisher will be stoned.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
jodeke
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 67709
Location: In a world where admitting to not knowing something is considered a great way to learn.

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 11:23 am    Post subject:

dvdrdiscs wrote:
First person to suggest we bring back Derek Fisher will be stoned.

Bring Derek back LINK j/k
_________________
Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind.

America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Wino
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 07 Jun 2002
Posts: 9674
Location: San Diego

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 11:24 am    Post subject:

Yeah, I think we should bring back Derek Fisher or Smush!!
_________________
Never argue with stupid people! They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!! - Twain
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
AshesToAshes
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 20 Jun 2009
Posts: 4837

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 11:32 am    Post subject:

so can we trade him to the suns for isiah and someone?

can't he fail to meet the 10 games played and give them the medical kickback anyways?
_________________
KOBE!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 18, 19, 20 ... 36, 37, 38  Next
Page 19 of 38
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB