Rumor: Lakers potentially eyeing Quincy Miller?; Update: Impresses in workout
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 13, 14, 15, 16  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Chronicle
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Posts: 31930
Location: Manhattan

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 11:22 am    Post subject:

Gimme_the_rock wrote:
Well it's too early to start preparing that.

But not to early to ask how you like it.

Lakers like Kelly a LOT.

I did too but he's starting to frustrate me.


Nah he'll be great again once he gets healthy. Farmar last year had the exact same injury at seemingly the exact same time.
_________________
Kobe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
fontana3d
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 3794

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 11:24 am    Post subject:

kentu_tiro wrote:
With Nick Young back, Ronnie Price has become expendable. Also makes Ellington expendable. Cut them both and then sign Quincy. Leave 1 roster spot for another "need" player.


Not so fast because Clarkson is not ready to get minutes yet abd X is not if game shape yet. You know would be easier to do in the first place is we some had gotten rid of Nash in the first place.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 11:25 am    Post subject:

I really liked what Kelly had to offer. I'm just curious why people want to trade him, particularly when all we get back is a TPE and a roster space.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
22
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 05 Apr 2013
Posts: 17063

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 11:28 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
I really liked what Kelly had to offer. I'm just curious why people want to trade him, particularly when all we get back is a TPE and a roster space.


Well the last part of your post is just an assumption.

But to address why some are advocating it, simply because he does have some value but he also has some injury prone concerns.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 11:29 am    Post subject:

22 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
I really liked what Kelly had to offer. I'm just curious why people want to trade him, particularly when all we get back is a TPE and a roster space.


Well the last part of your post is just an assumption.

But to address why some are advocating it, simply because he does have some value but he also has some injury prone concerns.


Of course it is, but unless you can show me where an injury prone player procured a TPE AND a 2nd rounder, I think my assumption may be historically correct.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Gimme_the_rock
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 13 Apr 2001
Posts: 11882
Location: Looking outta the window, watching the asphalt grow ...

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 11:32 am    Post subject:

I'm not saying to give up on the man ... but I have an eye on him suspecting he's injury prone.
_________________
We back.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jim99187
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 22138

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 11:35 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
22 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
I really liked what Kelly had to offer. I'm just curious why people want to trade him, particularly when all we get back is a TPE and a roster space.


Well the last part of your post is just an assumption.

But to address why some are advocating it, simply because he does have some value but he also has some injury prone concerns.


Of course it is, but unless you can show me where an injury prone player procured a TPE AND a 2nd rounder, I think my assumption may be historically correct.



every player is a different case. we are not dumping him. we are trading him. He brings value on the court.

he is not like thabeet who got traded for tpe and OKC had to give away a 2nd for him
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 11:38 am    Post subject:

Jim99187 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
22 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
I really liked what Kelly had to offer. I'm just curious why people want to trade him, particularly when all we get back is a TPE and a roster space.


Well the last part of your post is just an assumption.

But to address why some are advocating it, simply because he does have some value but he also has some injury prone concerns.


Of course it is, but unless you can show me where an injury prone player procured a TPE AND a 2nd rounder, I think my assumption may be historically correct.



every player is a different case. we are not dumping him. we are trading him. He brings value on the court.

he is not like thabeet who got traded for tpe and OKC had to give away a 2nd for him


I guess my (and others') question is why are we trading him if he has value as a player? I'd rather keep young (and cheap) players like him on the team. If it's to open up a roster space, plenty of other non-long term player candidates to choose from.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jim99187
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 22138

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 11:43 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
Jim99187 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
22 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
I really liked what Kelly had to offer. I'm just curious why people want to trade him, particularly when all we get back is a TPE and a roster space.


Well the last part of your post is just an assumption.

But to address why some are advocating it, simply because he does have some value but he also has some injury prone concerns.


Of course it is, but unless you can show me where an injury prone player procured a TPE AND a 2nd rounder, I think my assumption may be historically correct.



every player is a different case. we are not dumping him. we are trading him. He brings value on the court.

he is not like thabeet who got traded for tpe and OKC had to give away a 2nd for him


I guess my (and others') question is why are we trading him if he has value as a player? I'd rather keep young (and cheap) players like him on the team. If it's to open up a roster space, plenty of other non-long term player candidates to choose from.


cause if jimmy butler says he wants 14 and not 12 then I dont want to waste that opportunity because we have kelly on roster and no 2mil cap space remaining
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 11:45 am    Post subject:

If you want Butler,

1. you're going to have to offer the max. Chicago will keep him for offers below that. They have other contracts that are moveable (Taj, Pau, even McBuckets).

2. if Butler is the target, then the FO will make the offer first and the other FAs will be adjusted, not the other way around. Your scenario presupposes that Butler is the last move in free agency.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jim99187
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 22138

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 11:48 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
If you want Butler,

1. you're going to have to offer the max. Chicago will keep him for offers below that. They have other contracts that are moveable (Taj, Pau, even McBuckets).

2. if Butler is the target, then the FO will make the offer first and the other FAs will be adjusted, not the other way around. Your scenario presupposes that Butler is the last move in free agency.


when u wait that long and the world knows , u have to give a 2nd pick and not get it.

fyi: butler was an example.


Last edited by Jim99187 on Fri Nov 21, 2014 12:01 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 11:49 am    Post subject:

Jim99187 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
If you want Butler,

1. you're going to have to offer the max. Chicago will keep him for offers below that. They have other contracts that are moveable (Taj, Pau, even McBuckets).

2. if Butler is the target, then the FO will make the offer first and the other FAs will be adjusted, not the other way around. Your scenario presupposes that Butler is the last move in free agency.


when u wait that long and the world know u have to give a 2nd pick and not get it.

fyi: butler was an example.


I don't even understand what's going on here.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jim99187
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 22138

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 12:01 pm    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
Jim99187 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
If you want Butler,

1. you're going to have to offer the max. Chicago will keep him for offers below that. They have other contracts that are moveable (Taj, Pau, even McBuckets).

2. if Butler is the target, then the FO will make the offer first and the other FAs will be adjusted, not the other way around. Your scenario presupposes that Butler is the last move in free agency.


when u wait that long and the world know u have to give a 2nd pick and not get it.

fyi: butler was an example.


I don't even understand what's going on here.


Ok
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
22
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 05 Apr 2013
Posts: 17063

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 12:28 pm    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
Jim99187 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
If you want Butler,

1. you're going to have to offer the max. Chicago will keep him for offers below that. They have other contracts that are moveable (Taj, Pau, even McBuckets).

2. if Butler is the target, then the FO will make the offer first and the other FAs will be adjusted, not the other way around. Your scenario presupposes that Butler is the last move in free agency.


when u wait that long and the world know u have to give a 2nd pick and not get it.

fyi: butler was an example.


I don't even understand what's going on here.


that's because you convoluted the hell out of something that was incredibly simple.

It's just differing opinions.

Kelly has some value to trade and thereby some value to keep as well.

But he can't both be worth keeping and have no value in a trade either Yinomes. You know that.

You might not agree with our strategy but it isn't ridiculous to expect to get a future 2nd for Kelly. Completely plausible
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 12:31 pm    Post subject:

I just can't remember a recent and comparable scenario where it went down like that. Usually it would be just a TPE (at best) or the team needing to trade away the player surrendering a pick. That's all I was reflecting. Anyways a moot point imo. I think the team likes him and keeps him.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Gimme_the_rock
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 13 Apr 2001
Posts: 11882
Location: Looking outta the window, watching the asphalt grow ...

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 12:39 pm    Post subject:

22 wrote:

You might not agree with our strategy but it isn't ridiculous to expect to get a future 2nd for Kelly. Completely plausible


Then again, the 2nd round pick used on Kelly was pretty golden considering the crap of a draft that 2013 has shaped up to be so far.

In other words, Lakers got pretty lucky with that pick as, if the draft were revisited, Ryan might be a 1st rounder. Yeah, I'm speaking hypothetically but he's essentially 1st round talent and, barring health issues, he's got potential to be a really solid player on such a cheap deal.

That's why I wouldn't be in a rush to move the man.

IMO, Butler's going nowhere.
_________________
We back.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
22
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 05 Apr 2013
Posts: 17063

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 12:55 pm    Post subject:

Gimme_the_rock wrote:
22 wrote:

You might not agree with our strategy but it isn't ridiculous to expect to get a future 2nd for Kelly. Completely plausible


Then again, the 2nd round pick used on Kelly was pretty golden considering the crap of a draft that 2013 has shaped up to be so far.

In other words, Lakers got pretty lucky with that pick as, if the draft were revisited, Ryan might be a 1st rounder. Yeah, I'm speaking hypothetically but he's essentially 1st round talent and, barring health issues, he's got potential to be a really solid player on such a cheap deal.

That's why I wouldn't be in a rush to move the man.

IMO, Butler's going nowhere.


I agree. He is 1st round talent. It was a good pick. However, I think he will be injury prone. I'd like to get something for him while we can.

My pipe is to package him for Gobert. I'd even consider him + Hou 1st for Gobert if we don't get a top 5 pick
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 1:00 pm    Post subject:

22 wrote:
Gimme_the_rock wrote:
22 wrote:

You might not agree with our strategy but it isn't ridiculous to expect to get a future 2nd for Kelly. Completely plausible


Then again, the 2nd round pick used on Kelly was pretty golden considering the crap of a draft that 2013 has shaped up to be so far.

In other words, Lakers got pretty lucky with that pick as, if the draft were revisited, Ryan might be a 1st rounder. Yeah, I'm speaking hypothetically but he's essentially 1st round talent and, barring health issues, he's got potential to be a really solid player on such a cheap deal.

That's why I wouldn't be in a rush to move the man.

IMO, Butler's going nowhere.


I agree. He is 1st round talent. It was a good pick. However, I think he will be injury prone. I'd like to get something for him while we can.

My pipe is to package him for Gobert. I'd even consider him + Hou 1st for Gobert if we don't get a top 5 pick


Now that's interesting! Not sure if Jazz would give up Gobert though.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
22
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 05 Apr 2013
Posts: 17063

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 1:02 pm    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
22 wrote:
Gimme_the_rock wrote:
22 wrote:

You might not agree with our strategy but it isn't ridiculous to expect to get a future 2nd for Kelly. Completely plausible


Then again, the 2nd round pick used on Kelly was pretty golden considering the crap of a draft that 2013 has shaped up to be so far.

In other words, Lakers got pretty lucky with that pick as, if the draft were revisited, Ryan might be a 1st rounder. Yeah, I'm speaking hypothetically but he's essentially 1st round talent and, barring health issues, he's got potential to be a really solid player on such a cheap deal.

That's why I wouldn't be in a rush to move the man.

IMO, Butler's going nowhere.


I agree. He is 1st round talent. It was a good pick. However, I think he will be injury prone. I'd like to get something for him while we can.

My pipe is to package him for Gobert. I'd even consider him + Hou 1st for Gobert if we don't get a top 5 pick


Now that's interesting! Not sure if Jazz would give up Gobert though.


Me either. I think they will likely move Kanter because Gobert has a higher ceiling and is cheap for a long time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
Bard207
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 08 Jan 2013
Posts: 7713

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 1:02 pm    Post subject:

There are several things working against Kelly having much trade value at the deadline in February.

1. Currently injured and might not play until January.

2. He needs to stay healthy because getting injured again is likely to kill whatever trade interest there would be for him.

3. He needs to get enough minutes, shots and shoot fairly well to prove that he can stay on the court and contribute.


A possible obstacle to Kelly getting enough shots is that Kobe and Nick are sometimes prone to playing Iso ball and freezing out their teammates.

An edict from the FO for Kobe and Nick to defer some to Kelly on offense because he is being showcased might be ignored.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
TheElectronica
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 30 Jan 2010
Posts: 1392

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 1:35 pm    Post subject:

Ehh....I don't see too much value in trading Kelly. If a team wants a stretch four, they are better off just signing or drafting someone that won't cost them anything. Kelly hasn't proved enough to justify any value in trade, but he's valuable enough given his contract and his age to keep around.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LAKERMIKE2
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 Oct 2005
Posts: 2076
Location: Jack's Crib

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 1:36 pm    Post subject:

One of the reasons such players are getting a chance to play or join this team is because we are snake bitten by the dreaded "built like leggo players syndrone", but what's Wes Johnson's excuse?

It's become a bit ridiculous!

Can we go a month with a healthy roster?

Welcome to season "rent a player"...
_________________
My Laker squad.
Mr. Clutch, Nixon, Eddie, Nick, Magic, Kareem,
Silk, Cooper, AC, Worthy, Horry, Shaq, Kobe.
HC: Riley
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jim99187
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 22138

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 1:42 pm    Post subject:

22 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
Jim99187 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
If you want Butler,

1. you're going to have to offer the max. Chicago will keep him for offers below that. They have other contracts that are moveable (Taj, Pau, even McBuckets).

2. if Butler is the target, then the FO will make the offer first and the other FAs will be adjusted, not the other way around. Your scenario presupposes that Butler is the last move in free agency.


when u wait that long and the world know u have to give a 2nd pick and not get it.

fyi: butler was an example.


I don't even understand what's going on here.


that's because you convoluted the hell out of something that was incredibly simple.

It's just differing opinions.

Kelly has some value to trade and thereby some value to keep as well.

But he can't both be worth keeping and have no value in a trade either Yinomes. You know that.

You might not agree with our strategy but it isn't ridiculous to expect to get a future 2nd for Kelly. Completely plausible


This. This is what the guy goes. In summer he kept going in circles about sessions and even admitted at 1 point that he doesnt like him personally.

He will keep on chewing the topic till u just stop responding
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 1:50 pm    Post subject:

Oh I love you guys. I have no idea what you're talking about with Sessions, but who the heck cares.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
K0BEE 2.0
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 17 May 2013
Posts: 10949
Location: I wish I knew

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 2:16 pm    Post subject:

I simply do not understand the Roscoe Smith work out... this must be some sort of sick joke that the Lakers are trying to throw at the media/fans.... we already have a D-League big-man on our FC rotation and don't need to add another one.....

if this isn't a smokescreen... then the Lakers are trying to tank games.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 13, 14, 15, 16  Next
Page 14 of 16
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB