Reggie Miller :“Michael Jordan on his worst day is 10 times better than Kobe Bryant on his best day.”
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 14, 15, 16  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mixtim
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 965

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:00 am    Post subject:

troy wrote:
There is no comparison.

Kobe is and has been a great player. But he is not as good as Michael Jordan. Very few players will ever be as good as Jordan. Jordan was a pure shooter; Kobe is a good volume shooter.

Although Reggie Miller's statement was silly, the intent was accurate and appreciated. Michael was a much better player than Kobe Bryant.




You're not in Reggie Miller's mind so you can't know what his intent was,you can appreciate what he said,that's your prerogative and your own business.
Miller's statement was not accurate but asinine.
Correction,utterly asinine.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
tyusedney1
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 20 Jul 2014
Posts: 408

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:09 am    Post subject:

Reflexx wrote:
He meant in bed.


that doesn't make Kobe feel any better
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ringfinger
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 29418

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 8:38 am    Post subject:

55 wrote:
ringfinger wrote:
I think another factor which plays a role in why MJ will be considered "better" is because he accomplished so much yet, leaves room for reasonable speculation that he could have done even more.

Meanwhile, with Kobe, he's played every season essentially, so there is no room for speculation and so his story has clear bounds.


6 games played coming back from severe injury is not "essentially".
Why the constant need to twist the truth to make your point about the guy?


The sensitivity is real and clouding your judgment on this one. Twist the truth? You clearly misunderstood my post. I'm speculating as to why Kobe falls short relative to Jordan for many people. That's why I put the word better in quotes. I'm not saying WHY he falls short.

And Kobe's played I think, a season's worth of games in 17 out of 18 seasons which is over 94%.

My point is that people can look at what Jordan actually accomplished and it still feels a little incomplete given his absence in some years. But with Kobe, he didn't really miss any time, and even the one season he did, we were clearly not a contender so there's little to wonder in that regard.

And so I'm speculating, that one reason that some people might give Jordan the edge, is because they're thinking at worst he accomplished the same, at best he accomplished more, and yet, had he not been hurt in 1986, missed time in 1993-1994 and didn't retire at the young age of 34, he could have done even more. It's more challenging to think that way with Kobe because he's played in essentially every season where he'd have had a reasonable chance to further this legacy.

FWIW, this isn't the reason I give Jordan the edge, I was just trying to think of other explanations as to why others might.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
55
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 12092

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 9:25 am    Post subject:

ringfinger wrote:
55 wrote:
ringfinger wrote:
I think another factor which plays a role in why MJ will be considered "better" is because he accomplished so much yet, leaves room for reasonable speculation that he could have done even more.

Meanwhile, with Kobe, he's played every season essentially, so there is no room for speculation and so his story has clear bounds.


6 games played coming back from severe injury is not "essentially".
Why the constant need to twist the truth to make your point about the guy?


The sensitivity is real and clouding your judgment on this one. Twist the truth? You clearly misunderstood my post. I'm speculating as to why Kobe falls short relative to Jordan for many people. That's why I put the word better in quotes. I'm not saying WHY he falls short.

And Kobe's played I think, a season's worth of games in 17 out of 18 seasons which is over 94%.

My point is that people can look at what Jordan actually accomplished and it still feels a little incomplete given his absence in some years. But with Kobe, he didn't really miss any time, and even the one season he did, we were clearly not a contender so there's little to wonder in that regard.

And so I'm speculating, that one reason that some people might give Jordan the edge, is because they're thinking at worst he accomplished the same, at best he accomplished more, and yet, had he not been hurt in 1986, missed time in 1993-1994 and didn't retire at the young age of 34, he could have done even more. It's more challenging to think that way with Kobe because he's played in essentially every season where he'd have had a reasonable chance to further this legacy.

FWIW, this isn't the reason I give Jordan the edge, I was just trying to think of other explanations as to why others might.


This reminds me of those old arguments with the "what if" Bynum crowd.
You're using speculation to make your case but you aren't considering the other end of the stick. He could've also played in 93-94 and had a career ending injury and never been the Jordan he is today.

There's nothing wrong with using the 6 rings, multiple MVP's, DPOY, etc to make a case for Jordan without it hurting Kobe's legacy. But at least those are facts, and not some "what-if" theories.
Now give us reasons why you think some consider Kobe to be "better"...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ringfinger
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 29418

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 9:39 am    Post subject:

55 wrote:
ringfinger wrote:
55 wrote:
ringfinger wrote:
I think another factor which plays a role in why MJ will be considered "better" is because he accomplished so much yet, leaves room for reasonable speculation that he could have done even more.

Meanwhile, with Kobe, he's played every season essentially, so there is no room for speculation and so his story has clear bounds.


6 games played coming back from severe injury is not "essentially".
Why the constant need to twist the truth to make your point about the guy?


The sensitivity is real and clouding your judgment on this one. Twist the truth? You clearly misunderstood my post. I'm speculating as to why Kobe falls short relative to Jordan for many people. That's why I put the word better in quotes. I'm not saying WHY he falls short.

And Kobe's played I think, a season's worth of games in 17 out of 18 seasons which is over 94%.

My point is that people can look at what Jordan actually accomplished and it still feels a little incomplete given his absence in some years. But with Kobe, he didn't really miss any time, and even the one season he did, we were clearly not a contender so there's little to wonder in that regard.

And so I'm speculating, that one reason that some people might give Jordan the edge, is because they're thinking at worst he accomplished the same, at best he accomplished more, and yet, had he not been hurt in 1986, missed time in 1993-1994 and didn't retire at the young age of 34, he could have done even more. It's more challenging to think that way with Kobe because he's played in essentially every season where he'd have had a reasonable chance to further this legacy.

FWIW, this isn't the reason I give Jordan the edge, I was just trying to think of other explanations as to why others might.


This reminds me of those old arguments with the "what if" Bynum crowd.
You're using speculation to make your case but you aren't considering the other end of the stick. He could've also played in 93-94 and had a career ending injury and never been the Jordan he is today.

There's nothing wrong with using the 6 rings, multiple MVP's, DPOY, etc to make a case for Jordan without it hurting Kobe's legacy. But at least those are facts, and not some "what-if" theories.
Now give us reasons why you think some consider Kobe to be "better"...


Speculation to make my case? I'm not making a case either way in that post. I've speculated on why most pundits are steadfast on crowning MJ over Kobe including guys like Carlos Boozer who said as much in the post-game interview. And I think there are factors which might (correctly or incorrectly) sway people in MJ's favor. One being he did it first. And whenever the first, you get a much longer leash. Is it fair? Debatable. The other is, he has gaps which allows someone to say if filled, it COULD have been more but even if he did get an injury like you said and you discount those gaps, he'd still have his 6 rings and DPOY and 10 scoring titles in his 13 seasons as a Chicago Bull. Is it fair? Debatable.

As for why some people think Kobe is better? When you say people, are you saying non-Laker fans? Because I think the majority of people who think Kobe is better than MJ, are Laker fans. I mean, even current Laker players think MJ is better. But outside of those? I think media exposure has some to do with it (though, I agree with the point that can go both ways but MJ did not have 21 million people subscribing to receive regular brand updates). I think the arguments about whether Kobe was better offensively have some merit (I believe even Steve Kerr said this once). Some people point to the 81 and 62 and incorrectly use that as the basis for their argument. (One game shouldn't be worth more than 1 season, and Jordan has the best season(s) by far).

But most people don't put Kobe > MJ. Laker fans do, but no one else does really. So it's not that interesting to look at reasons why they do. I'm trying to find reasons beyond rings/stats/accolades/etc that people might put Jordan unfairly ahead of Kobe.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
george w kush
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 1167

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 9:58 am    Post subject:

Do some homers here actually think Kobe is better than Michael Jordan?


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ringfinger
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 29418

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 10:02 am    Post subject:

Even his own teammates think MJ > Kobe.



Carlos Boozer on Kobe passing MJ in scoring:

"Most of us in our era think Michael is the greatest player of all-time and right behind him is Kob, so, for him to pass Mike tonight, I'm honored to be a part of that and honored to be a part of this team."

In any event, I don't see why it is a slight, for a person to think Kobe is right behind Michael Jordan of all players.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakesGnrLake
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 07 Apr 2011
Posts: 1292

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 10:14 am    Post subject:

If to you want to see the true differences between these players you have to look at their psychological approach to the game. It's actually quite simple. Jordan probably has the edge but it's slight. People who are saying Jordan is infinity better than kobe are just as blinded as those who say the opposite.it comes down to this.

Jordan: Ultimate competitor. Will do anything to win, and will do what gives his team best chance to win. At the end of the day he is playing and game and wants to kick everyone's ass

Kobe: sociopath. His goal in life has been to be one of the best players to play the game. Puts so much pressure on himself to accomplish that goal. If his teammates aren't working ad hard as him they are just getting in his way. Will do anything to accomplish that goal. Kobe doesn't want to beat you, he wants to humiliate you. His way or the high way.

I personally think Kobe is more fundamentally sound than Jordan but Jordan is just the smarter player. Kobe's ego gets in the way of his own goals sometime. Jordan had an ego too, but Kobe's life is defined by basketball Jordan's is by competition.

If you put them against each other in their primes on equal teams, flip a coin, that's who will end up winning the game. One on one I think Kobe might have the edge.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
troy
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 30 Jan 2013
Posts: 4973

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 10:22 am    Post subject:

mixtim wrote:
troy wrote:
There is no comparison.

Kobe is and has been a great player. But he is not as good as Michael Jordan. Very few players will ever be as good as Jordan. Jordan was a pure shooter; Kobe is a good volume shooter.

Although Reggie Miller's statement was silly, the intent was accurate and appreciated. Michael was a much better player than Kobe Bryant.




You're not in Reggie Miller's mind so you can't know what his intent was,you can appreciate what he said,that's your prerogative and your own business.
Miller's statement was not accurate but asinine.
Correction,utterly asinine.


I may not be in his head, but you didn't play against Kobe and MJ. Reggie Miller did. I'll take his opinion over yours because he has actual experience.

I repeat...MJ was a better player than Kobe.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
JP_Lakerfan
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 21 Mar 2002
Posts: 1408
Location: Long Beach, CA

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 11:15 am    Post subject:

troy wrote:
mixtim wrote:
troy wrote:
There is no comparison.

Kobe is and has been a great player. But he is not as good as Michael Jordan. Very few players will ever be as good as Jordan. Jordan was a pure shooter; Kobe is a good volume shooter.

Although Reggie Miller's statement was silly, the intent was accurate and appreciated. Michael was a much better player than Kobe Bryant.




You're not in Reggie Miller's mind so you can't know what his intent was,you can appreciate what he said,that's your prerogative and your own business.
Miller's statement was not accurate but asinine.
Correction,utterly asinine.


I may not be in his head, but you didn't play against Kobe and MJ. Reggie Miller did. I'll take his opinion over yours because he has actual experience.

I repeat...MJ was a better player than Kobe.


Just because Miller played against both does not make him right. I'm pretty sure if you polled all players who played against both, they would not agree that "MJ on his worst day was 10 times better than Kobe on his best day."

That's an exaggeration and anyone with half a brain knows it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
THE_TWELFTH
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 30 Oct 2007
Posts: 733
Location: Los Angeles, CA.

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 11:49 am    Post subject:

P.K. wrote:
Cancun Van Exel wrote:
MJ was in college at the same age that Kobe was coming off the bench. Kobe had way more points and experience by the age of 21. That's a wash in my book in terms of either having an advantage based on those set of circumstances.

Also, lets not forget MJ didn't play for a year or two in his prime or he would've scored another 3-6,000 points.

and 1 or 2 more rings


And yet, you don't see anyone adding M.J.'s college years to how long it took him to reach his career point total. It's not a wash.
_________________
Blood, sweat, tears,
We dripped all three just to get here.
No longer will I wake up and my dreams just vanished.
It’s staring right at me, I must take advantage.

Juelz Santana - "The Second Coming"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
PhoenixForce
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 07 Oct 2014
Posts: 1780

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 12:03 pm    Post subject:

MJ himself said Kobe would beat him 1 on 1. Kobe is the clearly more skilled player that has played in a more competitive era than Jordan did.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ringfinger
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 29418

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 12:13 pm    Post subject:

PhoenixForce wrote:
MJ himself said Kobe would beat him 1 on 1. Kobe is the clearly more skilled player that has played in a more competitive era than Jordan did.


Haha. I do love how people say things like "clearly" as if that actually means it is clearly to anyone other than the person saying it.

A Chinese kid beat Kobe in 1-on-1.

That doesn't make the kid better than Kobe.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jeggs
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 14 Oct 2013
Posts: 1659

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 12:27 pm    Post subject:

george w kush wrote:
Do some homers here actually think Kobe is better than Michael Jordan?




John Wooden said Kobe was the greatest ball player of all time. There are more Jordan homers than Kobe homers and that is due to Nike, wheaties, and the constant media hype. Many people in the media are Jordan homers.

Kobe is a better player than Jordan...more skilled, Better shooter, more dominant offensively, better durability and longevity...what helped Jordan boost his stats and accolades was playing in a very watered down era.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144432
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 12:35 pm    Post subject:

george w kush wrote:
Do some homers here actually think Kobe is better than Michael Jordan?




Know would be the correct word, not think.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144432
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 12:38 pm    Post subject:

ringfinger wrote:
Even his own teammates think MJ > Kobe.



Carlos Boozer on Kobe passing MJ in scoring:

"Most of us in our era think Michael is the greatest player of all-time and right behind him is Kob, so, for him to pass Mike tonight, I'm honored to be a part of that and honored to be a part of this team."

In any event, I don't see why it is a slight, for a person to think Kobe is right behind Michael Jordan of all players.


No slight, just disagreement. Jordan was Jordan, Kobe has been Jordan and Pippen. Still, neither's career holds a candle to Caps.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
PhoenixForce
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 07 Oct 2014
Posts: 1780

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 12:54 pm    Post subject:

ringfinger wrote:
PhoenixForce wrote:
MJ himself said Kobe would beat him 1 on 1. Kobe is the clearly more skilled player that has played in a more competitive era than Jordan did.


Haha. I do love how people say things like "clearly" as if that actually means it is clearly to anyone other than the person saying it.

A Chinese kid beat Kobe in 1-on-1.

That doesn't make the kid better than Kobe.


We get it you hate Kobe. In every damn thread.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
P.K.
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 10 Jul 2003
Posts: 29641

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 1:07 pm    Post subject:

PhoenixForce wrote:
MJ himself said Kobe would beat him 1 on 1. Kobe is the clearly more skilled player that has played in a more competitive era than Jordan did.

You've taken that quote completely out of context.
Attached is a link to that video interview.
1. Jordan clearly says "I am the greatest player ever"
2. he's talking about playing 1-1 against OJ Mayo when Mayo was the #1 high school player, and beating him multiple times. repeat the multiple times
3. he's immediately asked after that if he could pllay anyone in his prime, and says he that he'd beat them all. Then he jokingly says, well except Kobe because he stole all my moves. and he smiles and chuckles

3A: he was obviously kidding
3B: he's talking about it right after talking about playing 1-1 against Mayo in the context of multiple games - ie. Kobe might beat me once out of multiple games...and again, he's chuckling about it

MJ quite obviously thinks he's still the greatest that ever played

If you guys are going to keep throwing soundbites out there, at least make sure you're using it in the context that the person quoted meant it

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1933537-kobe-bryant-once-told-michael-jordan-i-could-kick-your-a-says-phil-jackson
_________________
LBJ + AD = More rings
Never argue with a fool - listeners can't tell you apart
Wilt's unstoppable fadeaway: www.youtube.com/watch?v=8O9MgNfcGJA
NPZ's Magic Johnson mix: www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8Qbo0WqvOI
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jeggs
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 14 Oct 2013
Posts: 1659

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 1:15 pm    Post subject:

troy wrote:
mixtim wrote:
troy wrote:
There is no comparison.

Kobe is and has been a great player. But he is not as good as Michael Jordan. Very few players will ever be as good as Jordan. Jordan was a pure shooter; Kobe is a good volume shooter.

Although Reggie Miller's statement was silly, the intent was accurate and appreciated. Michael was a much better player than Kobe Bryant.




You're not in Reggie Miller's mind so you can't know what his intent was,you can appreciate what he said,that's your prerogative and your own business.
Miller's statement was not accurate but asinine.
Correction,utterly asinine.


I may not be in his head, but you didn't play against Kobe and MJ. Reggie Miller did. I'll take his opinion over yours because he has actual experience.

I repeat...MJ was a better player than Kobe.


And I will take John Wooden's opinion over both you and Reggie Miller as Kobe as the greatest of all time over Jordan.

And it isn't by any means a slight for Jordan to be behind Kobe...were talking about a guy that scored 81 points in a game here...something no other guard has done in the nba. It's not an insult for Jordan to be behind Kobe if you look at what Kobe has accomplished.

And now I can add longevity, 32k 6k 6k club, and 3rd all time points over Jordan to my argument.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Oliver Reed
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 28 Sep 2014
Posts: 2626
Location: Globo Gym

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 1:20 pm    Post subject:

Who cares who's better. It means nothing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144432
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 1:25 pm    Post subject:

P.K. wrote:
PhoenixForce wrote:
MJ himself said Kobe would beat him 1 on 1. Kobe is the clearly more skilled player that has played in a more competitive era than Jordan did.

You've taken that quote completely out of context.
Attached is a link to that video interview.
1. Jordan clearly says "I am the greatest player ever"
2. he's talking about playing 1-1 against OJ Mayo when Mayo was the #1 high school player, and beating him multiple times. repeat the multiple times
3. he's immediately asked after that if he could pllay anyone in his prime, and says he that he'd beat them all. Then he jokingly says, well except Kobe because he stole all my moves. and he smiles and chuckles

3A: he was obviously kidding
3B: he's talking about it right after talking about playing 1-1 against Mayo in the context of multiple games - ie. Kobe might beat me once out of multiple games...and again, he's chuckling about it

MJ quite obviously thinks he's still the greatest that ever played

If you guys are going to keep throwing soundbites out there, at least make sure you're using it in the context that the person quoted meant it

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1933537-kobe-bryant-once-told-michael-jordan-i-could-kick-your-a-says-phil-jackson


If you have to try to convince people you are the greatest ever, you probably don't really believe it.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ringfinger
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 29418

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 1:27 pm    Post subject:

Jeggs wrote:
troy wrote:
mixtim wrote:
troy wrote:
There is no comparison.

Kobe is and has been a great player. But he is not as good as Michael Jordan. Very few players will ever be as good as Jordan. Jordan was a pure shooter; Kobe is a good volume shooter.

Although Reggie Miller's statement was silly, the intent was accurate and appreciated. Michael was a much better player than Kobe Bryant.




You're not in Reggie Miller's mind so you can't know what his intent was,you can appreciate what he said,that's your prerogative and your own business.
Miller's statement was not accurate but asinine.
Correction,utterly asinine.


I may not be in his head, but you didn't play against Kobe and MJ. Reggie Miller did. I'll take his opinion over yours because he has actual experience.

I repeat...MJ was a better player than Kobe.


And I will take John Wooden's opinion over both you and Reggie Miller as Kobe as the greatest of all time over Jordan.

And it isn't by any means a slight for Jordan to be behind Kobe...were talking about a guy that scored 81 points in a game here...something no other guard has done in the nba. It's not an insult for Jordan to be behind Kobe if you look at what Kobe has accomplished.

And now I can add longevity, 32k 6k 6k club, and 3rd all time points over Jordan to my argument.


That quote was never substantiated. It may have been misheard or misinterpreted by the comedian who claimed it to have been said.

Also, the quote is being misrepresented. I thought the actual quote, which only 1 person has ever actually heard and that person was some comedian, was that he thought Kobe was the best to play the game from a physical point of view.

Wooden also said he'd take Lebron over Kobe in 2009 before Kobe had won rings 4 and 5. Do you agree with that? Or just the other part?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jeggs
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 14 Oct 2013
Posts: 1659

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 1:29 pm    Post subject:

It's between magic and Kobe for me right now for goat. Kobe still has a chance though. But if he completes another season after this....20 seasons on one team...I will have no choice but to give Kobe the nod over magic.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
bryants2hot2handle
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 09 Jan 2007
Posts: 5372

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 1:38 pm    Post subject:

The legend of michael jordan continues to grow. Even 16 years after his retirement, he continues to break NBA records
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Cancun Van Exel
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 15 Oct 2014
Posts: 203

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 1:52 pm    Post subject:

george w kush wrote:
Do some homers here actually think Kobe is better than Michael Jordan?




Jeggs wrote:
It's between magic and Kobe for me right now for goat. Kobe still has a chance though. But if he completes another season after this....20 seasons on one team...I will have no choice but to give Kobe the nod over magic.



_________________
Championships since NBA/ABA merger in '76: Lakers 10 - Celtics 5 - Clippers 0 --- Phil Jackson 10 - Doc Rivers 1
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 14, 15, 16  Next
Page 15 of 16
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB