Hyundai/KIA nabs BMW M chief of Engineering
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> Off Topic Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Splash1
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 18 Aug 2011
Posts: 482

PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 10:18 pm    Post subject: Hyundai/KIA nabs BMW M chief of Engineering

LINK

Hyundai/KIA getting serious about performance.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lakersken80
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Aug 2009
Posts: 38751

PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 10:26 pm    Post subject:

Don't think its gonna change much from a German automakers perspective, but it should scare the Japanese automakers....since they now have a rival from South Korea that is serious about making performance cars. If you look at the lineup from the Japanese automakers they are sorely lacking in affordable performance cars. Honda and Toyota have abandoned the performance segment to make family cars and people movers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Reflexx
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 25 Jun 2005
Posts: 11163

PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 10:46 pm    Post subject:

If Honda and Toyota abandons performance cars, why would they be scared if Kia was serious about it?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lakersken80
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Aug 2009
Posts: 38751

PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 10:59 pm    Post subject:

Reflexx wrote:
If Honda and Toyota abandons performance cars, why would they be scared if Kia was serious about it?


Its a small market, but they would cede it to the Korean automakers.
Honda and Toyota have gone for profits as they should be, but they have left the enthusiasts with very little to be excited about with their lineup.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Vancouver Fan
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 17 Apr 2006
Posts: 17740

PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 11:41 pm    Post subject:

lakersken80 wrote:
Reflexx wrote:
If Honda and Toyota abandons performance cars, why would they be scared if Kia was serious about it?


Its a small market, but they would cede it to the Korean automakers.
Honda and Toyota have gone for profits as they should be, but they have left the enthusiasts with very little to be excited about with their lineup.
nsx has mad potential regardless of it being assembled in the USA
_________________
Music is my medicine
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lakersken80
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Aug 2009
Posts: 38751

PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2014 9:00 am    Post subject:

Vancouver Fan wrote:
lakersken80 wrote:
Reflexx wrote:
If Honda and Toyota abandons performance cars, why would they be scared if Kia was serious about it?


Its a small market, but they would cede it to the Korean automakers.
Honda and Toyota have gone for profits as they should be, but they have left the enthusiasts with very little to be excited about with their lineup.
nsx has mad potential regardless of it being assembled in the USA


NSX isn't affordable for the majority of people.
Sure Toyota and Honda will still make halo cars like the LF-A and NSX, but unless you make 6 figures, good luck trying to buy one.
I'm talking about cars that were somewhat affordable to most people that they used to make like the S2000, Supra, Integra, RSX, etc.....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
marga86
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Posts: 3442

PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2014 10:14 am    Post subject:

Kia has really stepped it up.

the optima is a nice looking car and the interior isnt bad at all.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Reflexx
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 25 Jun 2005
Posts: 11163

PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2014 10:30 am    Post subject:

The S2000 was a sweet car.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
DeeAgeaux
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 11 Apr 2009
Posts: 1652

PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2014 1:09 pm    Post subject:

Sports cars and "sporty" cars don't account for many sales.

But they sell to influence makers.

Not only in the media but in the general population.

The guy that bought a Prelude in the past or a Toyota Scion FR-S is the kinda guy that is the "car guy" in his circle of friends and family.

And may influence another 12 purchases. If he buys an FR-S he is more likely to recommend Camry over Accord or Fusion.

Vice versa if he gets a Mustang.

If you cut sports/sporty cars out of your portfolio for budgetary reasons you feel the effects immediately. But a decade later you will.


Mazda has really built the brand around Miata's Zoom Zoom.


Without Miata Mazda would have gone the way of Isuzu.


When Toyota brought out the Lexus LS400 most thought BMW and MB did not have much to worry about either.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
marga86
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Posts: 3442

PostPosted: Sun Dec 28, 2014 10:08 am    Post subject:

not gonna lie, anytime i see an S2k on the road im like... :0!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
jodeke
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 67317
Location: In a world where admitting to not knowing something is considered a great way to learn.

PostPosted: Sun Dec 28, 2014 4:43 pm    Post subject:

If they want to get real serious they should try to get Wolfgang Schreiber. He was the chief designer of the Bugatti Veyron.

The way that car performed in the video Mike posted was unblievable.. How could they go wrong?
_________________
Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind.

America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Grammer
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 25 Jun 2013
Posts: 1273

PostPosted: Sun Dec 28, 2014 5:49 pm    Post subject:

Does this mean BGriffen is going to be appearing in some nicer car commercials while still wearing sweats?
_________________
Lakers Cardinals Rams
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lakersken80
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Aug 2009
Posts: 38751

PostPosted: Sun Dec 28, 2014 6:26 pm    Post subject:

DeeAgeaux wrote:
Sports cars and "sporty" cars don't account for many sales.

But they sell to influence makers.

Not only in the media but in the general population.

The guy that bought a Prelude in the past or a Toyota Scion FR-S is the kinda guy that is the "car guy" in his circle of friends and family.

And may influence another 12 purchases. If he buys an FR-S he is more likely to recommend Camry over Accord or Fusion.

Vice versa if he gets a Mustang.

If you cut sports/sporty cars out of your portfolio for budgetary reasons you feel the effects immediately. But a decade later you will.


Mazda has really built the brand around Miata's Zoom Zoom.


Without Miata Mazda would have gone the way of Isuzu.


When Toyota brought out the Lexus LS400 most thought BMW and MB did not have much to worry about either.


Not to mention Hyundai still has this image of low rate junk in the eyes of many consumers. So if they can change this image to match the quality and performance of Japanese and German cars it will definitely increase sales across their entire lineup of cars.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
cisternachyli
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 08 Jul 2012
Posts: 2274

PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2015 12:43 pm    Post subject:

marga86 wrote:
Kia has really stepped it up.

the optima is a nice looking car and the interior isnt bad at all.


It is nice, but from what I hear, it doesn't drive that great. I drove a 2013 model at the LA auto show a couple of years ago...it didn't feel terribly fast, at least as fast as its hp rating would belie.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
mporter
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 628

PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2015 1:26 pm    Post subject:

marga86 wrote:
Kia has really stepped it up.

the optima is a nice looking car and the interior isnt bad at all.


A lot kia's improvement, particularly with the optima's design, is credited to them snatching up the VW/Audi design chief maybe 6 or 7 years ago.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KobeBryantCliffordBrown
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 6429

PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2015 1:49 pm    Post subject:

I've had
1. 77 Toyota Corolla
2. Motorcycle
3. 89 Hyundai
4. 93 Passat
5. 95 300 ZY
6. 97 Mercedes SLK
7. 2004 Lexus 300SC
8. 2007 Chrysler 300C
9. 2008 Ford Expedition.

The Z car was the most fun and probably my most cherished. But after the 300SC was demolished by a drunk driver who slammed into me at 55 MPH, I think I'll stick to large SUV's the rest of the way on out, especially while my children have to be in the back seat. My SUV is paid for, but I'd consider the large Mercedes SUV because of safety reasons. But that's the only reason I'd take on another car payment.
_________________
“It took many years of vomiting up all the filth I’d been taught about myself, and half-believed, before I was able to walk on the earth as though I had a right to be here.”
― James Baldwin, Collected Essays
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
999
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Posts: 20265

PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 9:58 am    Post subject:

KobeBryantCliffordBrown wrote:
I've had
1. 77 Toyota Corolla
2. Motorcycle
3. 89 Hyundai
4. 93 Passat
5. 95 300 ZY
6. 97 Mercedes SLK
7. 2004 Lexus 300SC
8. 2007 Chrysler 300C
9. 2008 Ford Expedition.

The Z car was the most fun and probably my most cherished. But after the 300SC was demolished by a drunk driver who slammed into me at 55 MPH, I think I'll stick to large SUV's the rest of the way on out, especially while my children have to be in the back seat. My SUV is paid for, but I'd consider the large Mercedes SUV because of safety reasons. But that's the only reason I'd take on another car payment.



you had a 95 Nissan 300zx? tt or 2+2?

also you said 04 lexus 300SC??? did you mean 94 SC 300 and not 04?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KobeBryantCliffordBrown
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 6429

PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 10:06 am    Post subject:

LAKERSCMXCIX wrote:
KobeBryantCliffordBrown wrote:
I've had
1. 77 Toyota Corolla
2. Motorcycle
3. 89 Hyundai
4. 93 Passat
5. 95 300 ZY
6. 97 Mercedes SLK
7. 2004 Lexus 300SC
8. 2007 Chrysler 300C
9. 2008 Ford Expedition.

The Z car was the most fun and probably my most cherished. But after the 300SC was demolished by a drunk driver who slammed into me at 55 MPH, I think I'll stick to large SUV's the rest of the way on out, especially while my children have to be in the back seat. My SUV is paid for, but I'd consider the large Mercedes SUV because of safety reasons. But that's the only reason I'd take on another car payment.



you had a 95 Nissan 300zx? tt or 2+2?

also you said 04 lexus 300SC??? did you mean 94 SC 300 and not 04?



OK, looked it up. 1996 300 ZX convertible. 2004 SC 540 convertible hard top.
_________________
“It took many years of vomiting up all the filth I’d been taught about myself, and half-believed, before I was able to walk on the earth as though I had a right to be here.”
― James Baldwin, Collected Essays
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
999
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Posts: 20265

PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 10:56 am    Post subject:

KobeBryantCliffordBrown wrote:
LAKERSCMXCIX wrote:
KobeBryantCliffordBrown wrote:
I've had
1. 77 Toyota Corolla
2. Motorcycle
3. 89 Hyundai
4. 93 Passat
5. 95 300 ZY
6. 97 Mercedes SLK
7. 2004 Lexus 300SC
8. 2007 Chrysler 300C
9. 2008 Ford Expedition.

The Z car was the most fun and probably my most cherished. But after the 300SC was demolished by a drunk driver who slammed into me at 55 MPH, I think I'll stick to large SUV's the rest of the way on out, especially while my children have to be in the back seat. My SUV is paid for, but I'd consider the large Mercedes SUV because of safety reasons. But that's the only reason I'd take on another car payment.



you had a 95 Nissan 300zx? tt or 2+2?

also you said 04 lexus 300SC??? did you mean 94 SC 300 and not 04?



OK, looked it up. 1996 300 ZX convertible. 2004 SC 540 convertible hard top.



I think you mean the SC 430 for the lexus. and I find it hard to believe that you had your hands on a 96 commemorative edition Nissan 300zx tt Conv and than let it go.... those bad boys are super rare
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KobeBryantCliffordBrown
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 6429

PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 11:50 am    Post subject:

LAKERSCMXCIX wrote:
KobeBryantCliffordBrown wrote:
LAKERSCMXCIX wrote:
KobeBryantCliffordBrown wrote:
I've had
1. 77 Toyota Corolla
2. Motorcycle
3. 89 Hyundai
4. 93 Passat
5. 95 300 ZY
6. 97 Mercedes SLK
7. 2004 Lexus 300SC
8. 2007 Chrysler 300C
9. 2008 Ford Expedition.

The Z car was the most fun and probably my most cherished. But after the 300SC was demolished by a drunk driver who slammed into me at 55 MPH, I think I'll stick to large SUV's the rest of the way on out, especially while my children have to be in the back seat. My SUV is paid for, but I'd consider the large Mercedes SUV because of safety reasons. But that's the only reason I'd take on another car payment.



you had a 95 Nissan 300zx? tt or 2+2?

also you said 04 lexus 300SC??? did you mean 94 SC 300 and not 04?



OK, looked it up. 1996 300 ZX convertible. 2004 SC 540 convertible hard top.



I think you mean the SC 430 for the lexus. and I find it hard to believe that you had your hands on a 96 commemorative edition Nissan 300zx tt Conv and than let it go.... those bad boys are super rare



Yes, it was the SC430 and they didn't sale the ZX 300 twin turbo convertible in the US. If you wanted the TT, you had to have the T-Top. Something about chassis stability mixing with turbo engines back then. So I had the standard 300ZX, not the twin turbo. I think they did sale the TT in convertible in other countries.
_________________
“It took many years of vomiting up all the filth I’d been taught about myself, and half-believed, before I was able to walk on the earth as though I had a right to be here.”
― James Baldwin, Collected Essays
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
999
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Posts: 20265

PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 12:41 pm    Post subject:

KobeBryantCliffordBrown wrote:
LAKERSCMXCIX wrote:
KobeBryantCliffordBrown wrote:
LAKERSCMXCIX wrote:
KobeBryantCliffordBrown wrote:
I've had
1. 77 Toyota Corolla
2. Motorcycle
3. 89 Hyundai
4. 93 Passat
5. 95 300 ZY
6. 97 Mercedes SLK
7. 2004 Lexus 300SC
8. 2007 Chrysler 300C
9. 2008 Ford Expedition.

The Z car was the most fun and probably my most cherished. But after the 300SC was demolished by a drunk driver who slammed into me at 55 MPH, I think I'll stick to large SUV's the rest of the way on out, especially while my children have to be in the back seat. My SUV is paid for, but I'd consider the large Mercedes SUV because of safety reasons. But that's the only reason I'd take on another car payment.



you had a 95 Nissan 300zx? tt or 2+2?

also you said 04 lexus 300SC??? did you mean 94 SC 300 and not 04?



OK, looked it up. 1996 300 ZX convertible. 2004 SC 540 convertible hard top.



I think you mean the SC 430 for the lexus. and I find it hard to believe that you had your hands on a 96 commemorative edition Nissan 300zx tt Conv and than let it go.... those bad boys are super rare



Yes, it was the SC430 and they didn't sale the ZX 300 twin turbo convertible in the US. If you wanted the TT, you had to have the T-Top. Something about chassis stability mixing with turbo engines back then. So I had the standard 300ZX, not the twin turbo. I think they did sale the TT in convertible in other countries.


no they sold them here

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KobeBryantCliffordBrown
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 6429

PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 4:11 pm    Post subject:

LAKERSCMXCIX wrote:
KobeBryantCliffordBrown wrote:
LAKERSCMXCIX wrote:
KobeBryantCliffordBrown wrote:
LAKERSCMXCIX wrote:
KobeBryantCliffordBrown wrote:
I've had
1. 77 Toyota Corolla
2. Motorcycle
3. 89 Hyundai
4. 93 Passat
5. 95 300 ZY
6. 97 Mercedes SLK
7. 2004 Lexus 300SC
8. 2007 Chrysler 300C
9. 2008 Ford Expedition.

The Z car was the most fun and probably my most cherished. But after the 300SC was demolished by a drunk driver who slammed into me at 55 MPH, I think I'll stick to large SUV's the rest of the way on out, especially while my children have to be in the back seat. My SUV is paid for, but I'd consider the large Mercedes SUV because of safety reasons. But that's the only reason I'd take on another car payment.



you had a 95 Nissan 300zx? tt or 2+2?

also you said 04 lexus 300SC??? did you mean 94 SC 300 and not 04?



OK, looked it up. 1996 300 ZX convertible. 2004 SC 540 convertible hard top.



I think you mean the SC 430 for the lexus. and I find it hard to believe that you had your hands on a 96 commemorative edition Nissan 300zx tt Conv and than let it go.... those bad boys are super rare



Yes, it was the SC430 and they didn't sale the ZX 300 twin turbo convertible in the US. If you wanted the TT, you had to have the T-Top. Something about chassis stability mixing with turbo engines back then. So I had the standard 300ZX, not the twin turbo. I think they did sale the TT in convertible in other countries.


no they sold them here




Dealership lied to me then. Doesn't surprise me come to think of it. When my lease was up, they tried to stick me with an overage mileage charge. I had kept the contract and when I had them send me what they had, they had changed it after I signed it. My GF at the time was a lawyer so, she sent them a letter and the charge went away and they had to pay me some money to avoid taking them to court for fraud. Shady (bleep).
_________________
“It took many years of vomiting up all the filth I’d been taught about myself, and half-believed, before I was able to walk on the earth as though I had a right to be here.”
― James Baldwin, Collected Essays
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
22
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 05 Apr 2013
Posts: 17063

PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 4:20 pm    Post subject:

DeeAgeaux wrote:
.

The guy that bought a Prelude in the past or a Toyota Scion FR-S is the kinda guy that is the "car guy" in his circle of friends and family.

And may influence another 12 purchases. If he buys an FR-S he is more likely to recommend Camry over Accord or Fusion.

Vice versa if he gets a Mustang.


This is me and I encourage people to get a fusion lol
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
999
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Posts: 20265

PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 6:25 pm    Post subject:

KobeBryantCliffordBrown wrote:
LAKERSCMXCIX wrote:
KobeBryantCliffordBrown wrote:
LAKERSCMXCIX wrote:
KobeBryantCliffordBrown wrote:
LAKERSCMXCIX wrote:
KobeBryantCliffordBrown wrote:
I've had
1. 77 Toyota Corolla
2. Motorcycle
3. 89 Hyundai
4. 93 Passat
5. 95 300 ZY
6. 97 Mercedes SLK
7. 2004 Lexus 300SC
8. 2007 Chrysler 300C
9. 2008 Ford Expedition.

The Z car was the most fun and probably my most cherished. But after the 300SC was demolished by a drunk driver who slammed into me at 55 MPH, I think I'll stick to large SUV's the rest of the way on out, especially while my children have to be in the back seat. My SUV is paid for, but I'd consider the large Mercedes SUV because of safety reasons. But that's the only reason I'd take on another car payment.



you had a 95 Nissan 300zx? tt or 2+2?

also you said 04 lexus 300SC??? did you mean 94 SC 300 and not 04?



OK, looked it up. 1996 300 ZX convertible. 2004 SC 540 convertible hard top.



I think you mean the SC 430 for the lexus. and I find it hard to believe that you had your hands on a 96 commemorative edition Nissan 300zx tt Conv and than let it go.... those bad boys are super rare



Yes, it was the SC430 and they didn't sale the ZX 300 twin turbo convertible in the US. If you wanted the TT, you had to have the T-Top. Something about chassis stability mixing with turbo engines back then. So I had the standard 300ZX, not the twin turbo. I think they did sale the TT in convertible in other countries.


no they sold them here




Dealership lied to me then. Doesn't surprise me come to think of it. When my lease was up, they tried to stick me with an overage mileage charge. I had kept the contract and when I had them send me what they had, they had changed it after I signed it. My GF at the time was a lawyer so, she sent them a letter and the charge went away and they had to pay me some money to avoid taking them to court for fraud. Shady (bleep).



over mileage charge is cut and dry no? either your over or your not? not sure why they try to screw you if you were over the mileage. if you were under the mileage I get.....

also... Mike @ LG chime in please... wasn't the 96 z32 comm edition only sold in twin turbo models?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KobeBryantCliffordBrown
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 6429

PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 6:54 pm    Post subject:

LAKERSCMXCIX wrote:
KobeBryantCliffordBrown wrote:
LAKERSCMXCIX wrote:
KobeBryantCliffordBrown wrote:
LAKERSCMXCIX wrote:
KobeBryantCliffordBrown wrote:
LAKERSCMXCIX wrote:
KobeBryantCliffordBrown wrote:
I've had
1. 77 Toyota Corolla
2. Motorcycle
3. 89 Hyundai
4. 93 Passat
5. 95 300 ZY
6. 97 Mercedes SLK
7. 2004 Lexus 300SC
8. 2007 Chrysler 300C
9. 2008 Ford Expedition.

The Z car was the most fun and probably my most cherished. But after the 300SC was demolished by a drunk driver who slammed into me at 55 MPH, I think I'll stick to large SUV's the rest of the way on out, especially while my children have to be in the back seat. My SUV is paid for, but I'd consider the large Mercedes SUV because of safety reasons. But that's the only reason I'd take on another car payment.



you had a 95 Nissan 300zx? tt or 2+2?

also you said 04 lexus 300SC??? did you mean 94 SC 300 and not 04?



OK, looked it up. 1996 300 ZX convertible. 2004 SC 540 convertible hard top.



I think you mean the SC 430 for the lexus. and I find it hard to believe that you had your hands on a 96 commemorative edition Nissan 300zx tt Conv and than let it go.... those bad boys are super rare



Yes, it was the SC430 and they didn't sale the ZX 300 twin turbo convertible in the US. If you wanted the TT, you had to have the T-Top. Something about chassis stability mixing with turbo engines back then. So I had the standard 300ZX, not the twin turbo. I think they did sale the TT in convertible in other countries.


no they sold them here




Dealership lied to me then. Doesn't surprise me come to think of it. When my lease was up, they tried to stick me with an overage mileage charge. I had kept the contract and when I had them send me what they had, they had changed it after I signed it. My GF at the time was a lawyer so, she sent them a letter and the charge went away and they had to pay me some money to avoid taking them to court for fraud. Shady (bleep).



over mileage charge is cut and dry no? either your over or your not? not sure why they try to screw you if you were over the mileage. if you were under the mileage I get.....

also... Mike -at- LG chime in please... wasn't the 96 z32 comm edition only sold in twin turbo models?



We agreed to and I signed to 15k Miles per year. And I kept that contract. And I was under that. But when I turned the car in, there was an overage charge. Nissan said that I had agreed to 12K/yr. I asked them to show me the contract. They did so and it was obvious that the dudes at the dealership had literally changed the mileage after I signed the contract. I assume that was their standard technique because most individuals don't save the contract. If I hadn't, I would have had no recourse.
_________________
“It took many years of vomiting up all the filth I’d been taught about myself, and half-believed, before I was able to walk on the earth as though I had a right to be here.”
― James Baldwin, Collected Essays
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> Off Topic All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB