Joined: 19 Dec 2011 Posts: 20880 Location: Southern California
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 10:25 pm Post subject:
venturalakersfan wrote:
Lakers95 wrote:
We seriously had a chance to get this guy?
When?
I should have said that we might have had a chance to get him. Before he signed that new deal with the Warriors back in October, there was a lot of speculation that we'd go after him if he hit free agency amid all the discussion of whether he was a "max player" or not. Plus, there were those reports on how there was discussion of getting Klay for the 7th pick. Would have been awesome. Hopefully we get a REAL shot at him in 4 years
Last edited by Lakers95 on Fri Jan 23, 2015 10:30 pm; edited 1 time in total
Only chance we might have had was when Dwight considered GS. _________________ "Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
- Michael Jordan
Joined: 15 Sep 2012 Posts: 29150 Location: La La Land
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 10:29 pm Post subject:
Lakers95 wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
Lakers95 wrote:
We seriously had a chance to get this guy?
When?
I should have said that we might have had a chance to get him. Before he signed that new deal with the Warriors back in October, there was a lot of speculation that we'd go after him if he hit free agency amid all the discussion of whether he was a "max player" or not. Would have been awesome. Hopefully we get a REAL shot at him in 4 years
Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Posts: 28422 Location: LA --> Bay Area
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 10:32 pm Post subject:
thegreatest wrote:
Only chance we might have had was when Dwight considered GS.
GSW sure dodged a bullet there. Klay is easily the 1A or 1B best shooting guard in the league, while Dwight is behind both Gasols, Cousins, and perhaps a few more in the center depth chart.
37 points in the 3rd for Klay. NBA record. he has 50 after 3Qs
Klay only played 32 minutes as well.
Kobe played 47 minutes to score 81 points.
If you do the math and quantify points per minute(ppm) for the given 32 minutes klay played...klay would have scored 95 points if he played the same number of minutes(47 minutes total)as kobe when he scored 81 against the raptors.
If Kerr did not take Klay out he would be sitting on 95 points.
Dude go back to school. Ok let me do this for you.
50 pts in 32 minutes. That's 1.5625 ppm (50 divided by 32). Multiply that by 47 minutes and you get 73 pts. Where the hell did you get 95 pts?
He actually ended up with 52 but still that amounts to 76 pts.
He scored 81 points in 42 minutes. Not sure where you got the 47 from. Also you are not quantifying the point spread...going from 2nd to 3rd...and 3rd to fourth. There is an incline in points for each quarter that I calculated...which comes to 95 points. Basically you need to adjust for PG(point gap) rising for each quarter and you assume his point count increases in the 4th.
You said 47 minutes, that wasn't me.
Actually Klay played 2:32 minutes in the 4th and scored only 2 points. So your assumption would have been way off by that ppm. Going by that ppm, 2 points per 2.5 minutes, he may not have gotten to 60. And this is not even taking into consideration fatigue and possible double teams even triple teams. Please, your 95 points were beyond ridiculous.
Joined: 23 Jun 2005 Posts: 2456 Location: Seoul, Korea
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 10:33 pm Post subject:
kikanga wrote:
Lakers95 wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
Lakers95 wrote:
We seriously had a chance to get this guy?
When?
I should have said that we might have had a chance to get him. Before he signed that new deal with the Warriors back in October, there was a lot of speculation that we'd go after him if he hit free agency amid all the discussion of whether he was a "max player" or not. Would have been awesome. Hopefully we get a REAL shot at him in 4 years
Joined: 12 Jan 2008 Posts: 3820 Location: Anaheim, CA
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 10:33 pm Post subject:
Jeggs wrote:
dmorans1 wrote:
Jeggs wrote:
KeepItRealOrElse wrote:
37 points in the 3rd for Klay. NBA record. he has 50 after 3Qs
Klay only played 32 minutes as well.
Kobe played 47 minutes to score 81 points.
If you do the math and quantify points per minute(ppm) for the given 32 minutes klay played...klay would have scored 95 points if he played the same number of minutes(47 minutes total)as kobe when he scored 81 against the raptors.
If Kerr did not take Klay out he would be sitting on 95 points.
Dude go back to school. Ok let me do this for you.
50 pts in 32 minutes. That's 1.5625 ppm (50 divided by 32). Multiply that by 47 minutes and you get 73 pts. Where the hell did you get 95 pts?
He actually ended up with 52 but still that amounts to 76 pts.
He scored 81 points in 42 minutes. Not sure where you got the 47 from. Also you are not quantifying the point spread...going from 2nd to 3rd...and 3rd to fourth. There is an incline in points for each quarter that I calculated...which comes to 95 points. Basically you need to adjust for PG(point gap) rising for each quarter and you assume his point count increases in the 4th.
Why don't you compare Kobe's 62 points vs the mavs in 3 quarters instead of the 81 since everyone thinks the 62 points would have been a higher scoring output if Kobe played in the 4th qtr
Joined: 19 Dec 2011 Posts: 20880 Location: Southern California
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 10:35 pm Post subject:
kikanga wrote:
Lakers95 wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
Lakers95 wrote:
We seriously had a chance to get this guy?
When?
I should have said that we might have had a chance to get him. Before he signed that new deal with the Warriors back in October, there was a lot of speculation that we'd go after him if he hit free agency amid all the discussion of whether he was a "max player" or not. Would have been awesome. Hopefully we get a REAL shot at him in 4 years
Nah, that story was flawed from the beginning, since we didn't even have a 1st rounder in 2010. Of course, we might have been able to get him in the 2nd round that year, but who knows?
Last edited by Lakers95 on Fri Jan 23, 2015 10:36 pm; edited 1 time in total
37 points in the 3rd for Klay. NBA record. he has 50 after 3Qs
Klay only played 32 minutes as well.
Kobe played 47 minutes to score 81 points.
If you do the math and quantify points per minute(ppm) for the given 32 minutes klay played...klay would have scored 95 points if he played the same number of minutes(47 minutes total)as kobe when he scored 81 against the raptors.
If Kerr did not take Klay out he would be sitting on 95 points.
Dude go back to school. Ok let me do this for you.
50 pts in 32 minutes. That's 1.5625 ppm (50 divided by 32). Multiply that by 47 minutes and you get 73 pts. Where the hell did you get 95 pts?
He actually ended up with 52 but still that amounts to 76 pts.
He scored 81 points in 42 minutes. Not sure where you got the 47 from. Also you are not quantifying the point spread...going from 2nd to 3rd...and 3rd to fourth. There is an incline in points for each quarter that I calculated...which comes to 95 points. Basically you need to adjust for PG(point gap) rising for each quarter and you assume his point count increases in the 4th.
Why don't you compare Kobe's 62 points vs the mavs in 3 quarters instead of the 81 since everyone thinks the 62 points would have been a higher scoring output if Kobe played in the 4th qtr
Joined: 14 Apr 2001 Posts: 144432 Location: The Gold Coast
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 10:44 pm Post subject:
Lakers95 wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
Lakers95 wrote:
We seriously had a chance to get this guy?
When?
I should have said that we might have had a chance to get him. Before he signed that new deal with the Warriors back in October, there was a lot of speculation that we'd go after him if he hit free agency amid all the discussion of whether he was a "max player" or not. Plus, there were those reports on how there was discussion of getting Klay for the 7th pick. Would have been awesome. Hopefully we get a REAL shot at him in 4 years
Thanks, I thought maybe there was some trade deal that we missed out on. That would have sucked. _________________ RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Posts: 22734 Location: La Jolla, San Diego
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 11:07 pm Post subject:
Jeggs wrote:
dmorans1 wrote:
Jeggs wrote:
KeepItRealOrElse wrote:
37 points in the 3rd for Klay. NBA record. he has 50 after 3Qs
Klay only played 32 minutes as well.
Kobe played 47 minutes to score 81 points.
If you do the math and quantify points per minute(ppm) for the given 32 minutes klay played...klay would have scored 95 points if he played the same number of minutes(47 minutes total)as kobe when he scored 81 against the raptors.
If Kerr did not take Klay out he would be sitting on 95 points.
Dude go back to school. Ok let me do this for you.
50 pts in 32 minutes. That's 1.5625 ppm (50 divided by 32). Multiply that by 47 minutes and you get 73 pts. Where the hell did you get 95 pts?
He actually ended up with 52 but still that amounts to 76 pts.
He scored 81 points in 42 minutes. Not sure where you got the 47 from. Also you are not quantifying the point spread...going from 2nd to 3rd...and 3rd to fourth. There is an incline in points for each quarter that I calculated...which comes to 95 points. Basically you need to adjust for PG(point gap) rising for each quarter and you assume his point count increases in the 4th.
You're the one who said 47 minutes dude. But regardless, you're telling me that Klay, in one night, would break the NBA single quarter record TWICE? 37 points in the 3rd was a new record. After 3 quarters, he had 50 total. If Kerr plays him in the 4th, you're saying he's sitting on 95 pts, which means he needs to break it again and score 45 points. LOL!
Great performance by Klay tonight. But that's a wild crazy math theory you got there. Are you simply using one example in history? Kobe's 81? I'm curious about all this point gap, incline in points, etc.
Last edited by Runway8 on Fri Jan 23, 2015 11:11 pm; edited 1 time in total
Joined: 24 Dec 2007 Posts: 35750 Location: Santa Clarita, CA (Hell) ->>>>>Ithaca, NY -≥≥≥≥≥Berkeley, CA
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 11:18 pm Post subject:
Runway8 wrote:
Jeggs wrote:
dmorans1 wrote:
Jeggs wrote:
KeepItRealOrElse wrote:
37 points in the 3rd for Klay. NBA record. he has 50 after 3Qs
Klay only played 32 minutes as well.
Kobe played 47 minutes to score 81 points.
If you do the math and quantify points per minute(ppm) for the given 32 minutes klay played...klay would have scored 95 points if he played the same number of minutes(47 minutes total)as kobe when he scored 81 against the raptors.
If Kerr did not take Klay out he would be sitting on 95 points.
Dude go back to school. Ok let me do this for you.
50 pts in 32 minutes. That's 1.5625 ppm (50 divided by 32). Multiply that by 47 minutes and you get 73 pts. Where the hell did you get 95 pts?
He actually ended up with 52 but still that amounts to 76 pts.
He scored 81 points in 42 minutes. Not sure where you got the 47 from. Also you are not quantifying the point spread...going from 2nd to 3rd...and 3rd to fourth. There is an incline in points for each quarter that I calculated...which comes to 95 points. Basically you need to adjust for PG(point gap) rising for each quarter and you assume his point count increases in the 4th.
You're the one who said 47 minutes dude. But regardless, you're telling me that Klay, in one night, would break the NBA single quarter record TWICE? 37 points in the 3rd was a new record. After 3 quarters, he had 50 total. If Kerr plays him in the 4th, you're saying he's sitting on 95 pts, which means he needs to break it again and score 45 points. LOL!
Great performance by Klay tonight. But that's a wild crazy math theory you got there. Are you simply using one example in history? Kobe's 81? I'm curious about all this point gap, incline in points, etc.
You're both wrong. He scored 37 points in one quarter. If you multiply that by four, then you in fact get 148 points. _________________ Damian Lillard shatters Dwight Coward's championship dreams:
37 points in the 3rd for Klay. NBA record. he has 50 after 3Qs
Klay only played 32 minutes as well.
Kobe played 47 minutes to score 81 points.
If you do the math and quantify points per minute(ppm) for the given 32 minutes klay played...klay would have scored 95 points if he played the same number of minutes(47 minutes total)as kobe when he scored 81 against the raptors.
If Kerr did not take Klay out he would be sitting on 95 points.
Dude go back to school. Ok let me do this for you.
50 pts in 32 minutes. That's 1.5625 ppm (50 divided by 32). Multiply that by 47 minutes and you get 73 pts. Where the hell did you get 95 pts?
He actually ended up with 52 but still that amounts to 76 pts.
He scored 81 points in 42 minutes. Not sure where you got the 47 from. Also you are not quantifying the point spread...going from 2nd to 3rd...and 3rd to fourth. There is an incline in points for each quarter that I calculated...which comes to 95 points. Basically you need to adjust for PG(point gap) rising for each quarter and you assume his point count increases in the 4th.
You're the one who said 47 minutes dude. But regardless, you're telling me that Klay, in one night, would break the NBA single quarter record TWICE? 37 points in the 3rd was a new record. After 3 quarters, he had 50 total. If Kerr plays him in the 4th, you're saying he's sitting on 95 pts, which means he needs to break it again and score 45 points. LOL!
Great performance by Klay tonight. But that's a wild crazy math theory you got there. Are you simply using one example in history? Kobe's 81? I'm curious about all this point gap, incline in points, etc.
You're both wrong. He scored 37 points in one quarter. If you multiply that by four, then you in fact get 148 points.
Would've been benched for taking too many 3s under Byron. 9 3s is a terrible display of grit. "Stick to the long 2s off pindown screens Klay or you'll be joining Jeremy over there on the bench."
Unfortunately, I question whether Kobe would allow a teammate to shine like that the way Curry did for Thompson. He couldn't help but interject and try to get his.
@mhan00: in college, was there was much to suggest that Klay would be this good? Might be able to ask the same thing for other players, i.e. Wade imo. But Logo was privy to some inside information due to his friendship with Mychal (not just talent, but work ethic and character). If Klay weren't Mychal's son, would West still have given the green light? Glad it's working out for them, though. _________________ Smrek 2, Nevitt 1, Barkley 0
All times are GMT - 8 Hours Goto page Previous1, 2, 3Next
Page 2 of 3
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum