Historic salary cap increase set for 2016-17 (Update: Adam Silver said it will be about $90M) Pg.3
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
32
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 04 Nov 2009
Posts: 73071

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 2:37 pm    Post subject: Historic salary cap increase set for 2016-17 (Update: Adam Silver said it will be about $90M) Pg.3

Quote:
But this dramatically changes the 2016 summer landscape —everyone is going to have money to spend. A lot of money. Teams like the Lakers and Knicks will be able to take on multiple max salaries if they desire, more than 20 teams will be able to add at least one. Kevin Durant and LeBron James will be among the free agents. From ESPN’s Brian Windhorst here is a description of the impending chaos.

NBC Sports
Quote:
After a meeting this week failed to produce a compromise, the NBA is now preparing itself for the largest salary-cap jump in league history for the 2016-17 season.

It's a move that could have significant implications for potential 2016 free agents such as Kevin Durant and LeBron James as well as teams that have positioned themselves to have cap space, most notably the Los Angeles Lakers and New York Knicks.

Quote:
NBA teams using internal data are projecting the salary cap to jump to between $88 million and $92 million per team, sources told ESPN. To compare, this season the cap is set at $63 million and next season it is projected to land at about $66 million. To put it into perspective, the largest salary-cap jump in history is $7 million in one season. What happens in 2016 could triple that leap.

Quote:
Broadly, this development likely means two things for the short term of league business:

• There may be some free agents this summer who only accept one-year contracts so they can retest the market in 2016, when it will be awash with available cash.

• The likelihood of a lockout in 2017 when both sides can opt out of the current CBA just increased significantly, if not unexpectedly.

ESPN
_________________
Nobody in the NBA can touch the Laker brand, which, like the uniform color, is pure gold.


Last edited by 32 on Thu Jun 04, 2015 5:46 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
22
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 05 Apr 2013
Posts: 17063

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 2:43 pm    Post subject:

Teams with the most cap room in 2016-17 (the number is the committed salary):

Quote:
1 Portland Trail Blazers $3,219,579
2 Los Angeles Lakers $8,711,038
3 Boston Celtics $16,767,757
4 Philadelphia 76ers $20,525,553
5 Orlando Magic $ $21,954,549
6 Memphis Grizzlies $23,556,409
7 Detroit Pistons $25,198,750
8 New Orleans Pelicans $26,594,996
9 Cleveland Cavaliers $27,193,835
10 Atlanta Hawks $27,586,927
11 Milwaukee Bucks $29,730,603
12 Denver Nuggets $29,849,765
13 Dallas Mavericks $29,958,880
14 Charlotte Hornets $30,722,833
15 Toronto Raptors $31,060,960
16 Miami Heat $31,854,061
17 San Antonio Spurs $33,966,341
18 Indiana Pacers $34,403,001
19 Brooklyn Nets $36,996,439
20 New York Knicks $37,126,054
21 Oklahoma City Thunder $45,222,699
22 Washington Wizards $47,297,131
23 Utah Jazz $48,796,125
24 Chicago Bulls $49,657,018
25 Houston Rockets $50,150,130
26 Phoenix Suns $52,701,065
27 Minnesota Timberwolves $53,730,726
28 Sacramento Kings $56,550,248
29 Golden State Warriors $56,715,704
30 Los Angeles Clippers $58,102,296


Mitch is smarter than the average bear

EDIT: This was before the trade palooza at the deadline. We should still be 2nd though. Will fact check and come back


Last edited by 22 on Wed Mar 11, 2015 2:45 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
scoobs
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 19 Aug 2005
Posts: 4746

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 2:44 pm    Post subject:

We just now basically have to look at 10 million per year as MLE money because that's probably what it will end up being. So, if we sign somebody like Robin Lopez to a max contract, it won't be a big deal, it would be as if we signed him to a regular 10 million per year contract that more then serviceable 7 footers go for these days. 10 million per year for somebody like Danny Green don't sound too outlandish now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Omar Little
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 90307
Location: Formerly Known As 24

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 2:45 pm    Post subject:

I dont see smoothing having any effect on a cba opt out. The split to the players is the same in 16 with or without smoothing, and they were going to opt out for more regardless.
_________________
“We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.” ― Elie Wiesel
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
scoobs
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 19 Aug 2005
Posts: 4746

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 2:46 pm    Post subject:

I think we might look in to dealing the Houston pick for somebody on a one year deal, like Hibbert or Brook Lopez. Or even, Nick Young, Ryan Kelly and Houston pick to Brooklyn for Deron Williams or Joe Johnson.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
22
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 05 Apr 2013
Posts: 17063

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 2:47 pm    Post subject:

Checked it again, some other teams have moved around, we're still second
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
Reflexx
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 25 Jun 2005
Posts: 11163

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 2:59 pm    Post subject:

And people say that Mitch doesn't know what he's doing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Troublesome626
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 13 Nov 2012
Posts: 2469

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 3:02 pm    Post subject:

^
I know it's good to have a lot cap space. But you still need players that want to come here.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Reflexx
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 25 Jun 2005
Posts: 11163

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 3:06 pm    Post subject:

Troublesome626 wrote:
^
I know it's good to have a lot cap space. But you still need players that want to come here.


I'm sure that wont be an issue. Mitch has a plan and a timeline. Judging him before that will just make us feel silly after it all comes together.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Omar Little
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 90307
Location: Formerly Known As 24

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 3:10 pm    Post subject:

Troublesome626 wrote:
^
I know it's good to have a lot cap space. But you still need players that want to come here.


Players were willing to come here last year (and dragic put us at the top of his wishlist at the deadline), the front office just declined, knowing the class this year is deeper through all talent ranges.
_________________
“We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.” ― Elie Wiesel
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
iggypop123
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 31 May 2008
Posts: 5402

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 3:18 pm    Post subject:

While the fear is top tier teams will gain advantages again(cba targeted the Lakers) it may not be so amazing for those teams. The established playoff teams will have max money while being contenders. Questions becomes do stars go to those stacked teams or to the Lakers. This will also let teams keep their restricted guys, not that it wasn't tough for them to stay.
_________________
Kobe "I mean Phil's been here, and -- to be honest with you -- we might have, in all the years I've been with Phil, (had) maybe three defensive drills the entire time"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Troublesome626
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 13 Nov 2012
Posts: 2469

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 3:23 pm    Post subject:

Reflexx wrote:
Troublesome626 wrote:
^
I know it's good to have a lot cap space. But you still need players that want to come here.


I'm sure that wont be an issue. Mitch has a plan and a timeline. Judging him before that will just make us feel silly after it all comes together.


I am definitely not misjudging or underestimating Mitch. We all know he has done some incredible things in the past. I am just being objective. There are a lot of other perspectives that need to be looked at. For instance our coaching situation dose not look to attractive also we need to have some sort of winning culture to attract big free agent name. It is really hard to get a super star to come and join a team that has been doing a lot of losing in over the past few seasons.
_________________


Last edited by Troublesome626 on Wed Mar 11, 2015 5:41 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Lakers95
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 19 Dec 2011
Posts: 20880
Location: Southern California

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 4:09 pm    Post subject:

22 wrote:
Teams with the most cap room in 2016-17 (the number is the committed salary):

Quote:
1 Portland Trail Blazers $3,219,579
2 Los Angeles Lakers $8,711,038
3 Boston Celtics $16,767,757
4 Philadelphia 76ers $20,525,553
5 Orlando Magic $ $21,954,549
6 Memphis Grizzlies $23,556,409
7 Detroit Pistons $25,198,750
8 New Orleans Pelicans $26,594,996
9 Cleveland Cavaliers $27,193,835
10 Atlanta Hawks $27,586,927
11 Milwaukee Bucks $29,730,603
12 Denver Nuggets $29,849,765
13 Dallas Mavericks $29,958,880
14 Charlotte Hornets $30,722,833
15 Toronto Raptors $31,060,960
16 Miami Heat $31,854,061
17 San Antonio Spurs $33,966,341
18 Indiana Pacers $34,403,001
19 Brooklyn Nets $36,996,439
20 New York Knicks $37,126,054
21 Oklahoma City Thunder $45,222,699
22 Washington Wizards $47,297,131
23 Utah Jazz $48,796,125
24 Chicago Bulls $49,657,018
25 Houston Rockets $50,150,130
26 Phoenix Suns $52,701,065
27 Minnesota Timberwolves $53,730,726
28 Sacramento Kings $56,550,248
29 Golden State Warriors $56,715,704
30 Los Angeles Clippers $58,102,296


Mitch is smarter than the average bear

EDIT: This was before the trade palooza at the deadline. We should still be 2nd though. Will fact check and come back


It's all but certain that the Blazers are going to be re-signing Aldridge and Lillard by then. We should have the most cap when the time comes.

Maybe Aldridge takes a one year deal this summer to maximize his earnings when the cap rises?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
TooMuchMajicBuss
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 17 Sep 2008
Posts: 21079
Location: In a white room, with black curtains near the station

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 4:16 pm    Post subject:

^Portland will without a doubt be playing a win-now strategy and throwing serious money at Lillard and Aldridge. They might not have to offer as much on Matthews with the Achilles tear factoring in, but no way the Blazers stay on top of this list.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
3peat_pete
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 13 Mar 2009
Posts: 5466

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 4:30 pm    Post subject:

22 wrote:
Teams with the most cap room in 2016-17 (the number is the committed salary):

Quote:
1 Portland Trail Blazers $3,219,579
2 Los Angeles Lakers $8,711,038
3 Boston Celtics $16,767,757
4 Philadelphia 76ers $20,525,553
5 Orlando Magic $ $21,954,549
6 Memphis Grizzlies $23,556,409
7 Detroit Pistons $25,198,750
8 New Orleans Pelicans $26,594,996
9 Cleveland Cavaliers $27,193,835
10 Atlanta Hawks $27,586,927
11 Milwaukee Bucks $29,730,603
12 Denver Nuggets $29,849,765
13 Dallas Mavericks $29,958,880
14 Charlotte Hornets $30,722,833
15 Toronto Raptors $31,060,960
16 Miami Heat $31,854,061
17 San Antonio Spurs $33,966,341
18 Indiana Pacers $34,403,001
19 Brooklyn Nets $36,996,439
20 New York Knicks $37,126,054
21 Oklahoma City Thunder $45,222,699
22 Washington Wizards $47,297,131
23 Utah Jazz $48,796,125
24 Chicago Bulls $49,657,018
25 Houston Rockets $50,150,130
26 Phoenix Suns $52,701,065
27 Minnesota Timberwolves $53,730,726
28 Sacramento Kings $56,550,248
29 Golden State Warriors $56,715,704
30 Los Angeles Clippers $58,102,296


Mitch is smarter than the average bear

EDIT: This was before the trade palooza at the deadline. We should still be 2nd though. Will fact check and come back


just wondering, what good are these numbers right now? I mean, we still have the 2015 offseason. Are we expecting more 1-year contracts this offseason? If not, then showing these figures right now doesn't mean that much for the 2016 offseason, right? or am I missing something?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakersRGolden
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 13 Jan 2002
Posts: 7924
Location: Lake Forest

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 4:36 pm    Post subject:

This sort of makes it all-or-nothing. Everyone will have a max slot, so you either need 2+ Max guys colluding with another starter, or you need to be one star away from serious contention because anyone worth having will have 20+ teams to choose from.

So, this off-season will determine how screwed we are in '16
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Reflexx
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 25 Jun 2005
Posts: 11163

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 4:39 pm    Post subject:

3peat_pete wrote:
22 wrote:
Teams with the most cap room in 2016-17 (the number is the committed salary):

Quote:
1 Portland Trail Blazers $3,219,579
2 Los Angeles Lakers $8,711,038
3 Boston Celtics $16,767,757
4 Philadelphia 76ers $20,525,553
5 Orlando Magic $ $21,954,549
6 Memphis Grizzlies $23,556,409
7 Detroit Pistons $25,198,750
8 New Orleans Pelicans $26,594,996
9 Cleveland Cavaliers $27,193,835
10 Atlanta Hawks $27,586,927
11 Milwaukee Bucks $29,730,603
12 Denver Nuggets $29,849,765
13 Dallas Mavericks $29,958,880
14 Charlotte Hornets $30,722,833
15 Toronto Raptors $31,060,960
16 Miami Heat $31,854,061
17 San Antonio Spurs $33,966,341
18 Indiana Pacers $34,403,001
19 Brooklyn Nets $36,996,439
20 New York Knicks $37,126,054
21 Oklahoma City Thunder $45,222,699
22 Washington Wizards $47,297,131
23 Utah Jazz $48,796,125
24 Chicago Bulls $49,657,018
25 Houston Rockets $50,150,130
26 Phoenix Suns $52,701,065
27 Minnesota Timberwolves $53,730,726
28 Sacramento Kings $56,550,248
29 Golden State Warriors $56,715,704
30 Los Angeles Clippers $58,102,296


Mitch is smarter than the average bear

EDIT: This was before the trade palooza at the deadline. We should still be 2nd though. Will fact check and come back


just wondering, what good are these numbers right now? I mean, we still have the 2015 offseason. Are we expecting more 1-year contracts this offseason? If not, then showing these figures right now doesn't mean that much for the 2016 offseason, right? or am I missing something?


We might have some 1 yr contracts. But many teams will be in the exact same situation.

I think we bring back Wes and Ellington on longer cheap deals.

Davis and Lin on longer medium deals. Maybe even Booz.

We can afford to sign some medium sized contracts because Kobe's huge salary comes off he books.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Omar Little
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 90307
Location: Formerly Known As 24

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 4:39 pm    Post subject:

3peat_pete wrote:
22 wrote:
Teams with the most cap room in 2016-17 (the number is the committed salary):

Quote:
1 Portland Trail Blazers $3,219,579
2 Los Angeles Lakers $8,711,038
3 Boston Celtics $16,767,757
4 Philadelphia 76ers $20,525,553
5 Orlando Magic $ $21,954,549
6 Memphis Grizzlies $23,556,409
7 Detroit Pistons $25,198,750
8 New Orleans Pelicans $26,594,996
9 Cleveland Cavaliers $27,193,835
10 Atlanta Hawks $27,586,927
11 Milwaukee Bucks $29,730,603
12 Denver Nuggets $29,849,765
13 Dallas Mavericks $29,958,880
14 Charlotte Hornets $30,722,833
15 Toronto Raptors $31,060,960
16 Miami Heat $31,854,061
17 San Antonio Spurs $33,966,341
18 Indiana Pacers $34,403,001
19 Brooklyn Nets $36,996,439
20 New York Knicks $37,126,054
21 Oklahoma City Thunder $45,222,699
22 Washington Wizards $47,297,131
23 Utah Jazz $48,796,125
24 Chicago Bulls $49,657,018
25 Houston Rockets $50,150,130
26 Phoenix Suns $52,701,065
27 Minnesota Timberwolves $53,730,726
28 Sacramento Kings $56,550,248
29 Golden State Warriors $56,715,704
30 Los Angeles Clippers $58,102,296


Mitch is smarter than the average bear

EDIT: This was before the trade palooza at the deadline. We should still be 2nd though. Will fact check and come back


just wondering, what good are these numbers right now? I mean, we still have the 2015 offseason. Are we expecting more 1-year contracts this offseason? If not, then showing these figures right now doesn't mean that much for the 2016 offseason, right? or am I missing something?


It more or less just shows their flexibility, and how much combined spending power they can have between now and then.
_________________
“We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.” ― Elie Wiesel
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Reflexx
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 25 Jun 2005
Posts: 11163

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 4:41 pm    Post subject:

LakersRGolden wrote:
This sort of makes it all-or-nothing. Everyone will have a max slot, so you either need 2+ Max guys colluding with another starter, or you need to be one star away from serious contention because anyone worth having will have 20+ teams to choose from.

So, this off-season will determine how screwed we are in '16


Not necessarily. The opportunity to be the franchise player for the Lakers is a big draw.

If there's a star on the Lakers we know that others will come because its just a great place to be. Stars know this too. They don't have to collude with anyone. Just being there will make the Lakers a hot spot for free agents.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Don Draper
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 21 Feb 2008
Posts: 28464
Location: LA --> Bay Area

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 4:55 pm    Post subject:

Reflexx wrote:
LakersRGolden wrote:
This sort of makes it all-or-nothing. Everyone will have a max slot, so you either need 2+ Max guys colluding with another starter, or you need to be one star away from serious contention because anyone worth having will have 20+ teams to choose from.

So, this off-season will determine how screwed we are in '16


Not necessarily. The opportunity to be the franchise player for the Lakers is a big draw.

If there's a star on the Lakers we know that others will come because its just a great place to be. Stars know this too. They don't have to collude with anyone. Just being there will make the Lakers a hot spot for free agents.


It does mean that we REALLY need this year's pick. Sure, we get next year's if we miss out now, but there's no way we can tank next year and appear to be a respectable option for big FAs to go to.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
AY2043
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Posts: 10621

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 5:46 pm    Post subject:

3peat_pete wrote:
22 wrote:
Teams with the most cap room in 2016-17 (the number is the committed salary):

Quote:
1 Portland Trail Blazers $3,219,579
2 Los Angeles Lakers $8,711,038
3 Boston Celtics $16,767,757
4 Philadelphia 76ers $20,525,553
5 Orlando Magic $ $21,954,549
6 Memphis Grizzlies $23,556,409
7 Detroit Pistons $25,198,750
8 New Orleans Pelicans $26,594,996
9 Cleveland Cavaliers $27,193,835
10 Atlanta Hawks $27,586,927
11 Milwaukee Bucks $29,730,603
12 Denver Nuggets $29,849,765
13 Dallas Mavericks $29,958,880
14 Charlotte Hornets $30,722,833
15 Toronto Raptors $31,060,960
16 Miami Heat $31,854,061
17 San Antonio Spurs $33,966,341
18 Indiana Pacers $34,403,001
19 Brooklyn Nets $36,996,439
20 New York Knicks $37,126,054
21 Oklahoma City Thunder $45,222,699
22 Washington Wizards $47,297,131
23 Utah Jazz $48,796,125
24 Chicago Bulls $49,657,018
25 Houston Rockets $50,150,130
26 Phoenix Suns $52,701,065
27 Minnesota Timberwolves $53,730,726
28 Sacramento Kings $56,550,248
29 Golden State Warriors $56,715,704
30 Los Angeles Clippers $58,102,296


Mitch is smarter than the average bear

EDIT: This was before the trade palooza at the deadline. We should still be 2nd though. Will fact check and come back


just wondering, what good are these numbers right now? I mean, we still have the 2015 offseason. Are we expecting more 1-year contracts this offseason? If not, then showing these figures right now doesn't mean that much for the 2016 offseason, right? or am I missing something?

Well, yeah. But we'll still have minimum 2 max slots available in 2016, one coming from the cap increase and another coming from Kobe's contract expiring.

If we were to lose this year's pick, trade Young, and sign a bunch of 1 year deals again this off-season, we could have as many as 4 max slots. If that's the worst case scenario, it's not all that terrible I guess.. Correct me if I'm wrong...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Reflexx
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 25 Jun 2005
Posts: 11163

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 6:01 pm    Post subject:

Don Draper wrote:
Reflexx wrote:
LakersRGolden wrote:
This sort of makes it all-or-nothing. Everyone will have a max slot, so you either need 2+ Max guys colluding with another starter, or you need to be one star away from serious contention because anyone worth having will have 20+ teams to choose from.

So, this off-season will determine how screwed we are in '16


Not necessarily. The opportunity to be the franchise player for the Lakers is a big draw.

If there's a star on the Lakers we know that others will come because its just a great place to be. Stars know this too. They don't have to collude with anyone. Just being there will make the Lakers a hot spot for free agents.


It does mean that we REALLY need this year's pick. Sure, we get next year's if we miss out now, but there's no way we can tank next year and appear to be a respectable option for big FAs to go to.


If we have Randle, Clarkson, Davis, and Lin I think that's more than a decent supporting cast for someone like Durant to play with.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kobe_luver
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 08 Feb 2008
Posts: 11644
Location: LA

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 6:19 pm    Post subject:

Reflexx wrote:
Don Draper wrote:
Reflexx wrote:
LakersRGolden wrote:
This sort of makes it all-or-nothing. Everyone will have a max slot, so you either need 2+ Max guys colluding with another starter, or you need to be one star away from serious contention because anyone worth having will have 20+ teams to choose from.

So, this off-season will determine how screwed we are in '16


Not necessarily. The opportunity to be the franchise player for the Lakers is a big draw.

If there's a star on the Lakers we know that others will come because its just a great place to be. Stars know this too. They don't have to collude with anyone. Just being there will make the Lakers a hot spot for free agents.


It does mean that we REALLY need this year's pick. Sure, we get next year's if we miss out now, but there's no way we can tank next year and appear to be a respectable option for big FAs to go to.


If we have Randle, Clarkson, Davis, and Lin I think that's more than a decent supporting cast for someone like Durant to play with.


Also Black and probably Brown.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
danzag
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 28 Apr 2013
Posts: 22378
Location: Brazil

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 6:54 pm    Post subject:

The Lakers are in great position. Specially if we keep our top 5 pick this year.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144469
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 6:56 pm    Post subject:

So using the number that 22 provided, and assuming we get all our picks this offseason and use all our cap space, we would be looking at $50-54 mil in cap space.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 1 of 5
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB