|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487
|
 Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2015 7:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
The fact we have a greater number of core rotation players who aren't 1 year mercenaries will help. Look at our core rotation last year (expiring deals):
Lin-1 year
Ellington-1 year
Price-1 year
Hill-1 year
Boozer-1 year
Ed-1 year
Wes-1 year
I can't tell you how unenjoyable that team was due to the fact that so many of these guys would not be back.
This year:
DLO-rookie deal
Randle-rookie deal
Clarkson-we can match any deal in 2016
Nance-rookie deal
Brown-rookie deal
Lou-multi-year
Hibbert-1 year
Kobe-1 year
Bass-1 + 1 (2nd year player option)
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
greenfrog
Retired Number
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 36081
Location: 502 Bad Gateway
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2015 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| lukewaltonsdad wrote: | | We also have some other creators/shot makers to ease the burden off of Kobe. My hope is that we use Kobe in more off ball action this year; I do like the instances in when he facilitated last year... |
I've been on this soapbox for 4 years and have finally come to accept it's never happening, certainly not in his farewell season. He's either a ball dominant pseudo PG, which messes with Russell's development, or a high volume inefficient shooter. Personally, I would prefer the latter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lukewaltonsdad
Star Player
Joined: 09 Jul 2014
Posts: 2983
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2015 7:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| greenfrog wrote: | | lukewaltonsdad wrote: | | We also have some other creators/shot makers to ease the burden off of Kobe. My hope is that we use Kobe in more off ball action this year; I do like the instances in when he facilitated last year... |
I've been on this soapbox for 4 years and have finally come to accept it's never happening, certainly not in his farewell season. He's either a ball dominant pseudo PG, which messes with Russell's development, or a high volume inefficient shooter. Personally, I would prefer the latter. |
Gotcha. We'll just have to see how it goes, man. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
