Lakers Rebuild: Case Study of OKC/Warriors Core and Why We Likely Won't Make Playoffs Until 2017 (Update, p.6, comparing Lakers's core stats and OKC/GSW)
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 10:53 am    Post subject: Lakers Rebuild: Case Study of OKC/Warriors Core and Why We Likely Won't Make Playoffs Until 2017 (Update, p.6, comparing Lakers's core stats and OKC/GSW)

I thought it would be interesting to examine 2 other teams that went from broke to contenders/champs (Warriors/OKC). Warriors went from 26-56 in 2009-10 to NBA champs in 2014-15. It took them 6 years to get there. While they had some astute free agent signings (Iggy for example), the core of their success was great drafting. In that time period, they drafted 1 likely HOFer (Curry), all-NBA player (Klay), all-NBA defender (Green) and a solid starter (Barnes).

Looking at OKC, from 20-62 in 2007-08 (in Seattle), they reached the NBA Finals in 2011-12 and a peak record of 60-22 in 2012-13. Their team was built mostly via draft picks which includes 3 likely HOFers (Durant, Westbrook, Harden) and an all NBA defender (Ibaka).

Some observations:

1.I think DLO can mirror some of Westbrook’s 3 year stats (which are listed below). If I told you that Westbrook only averaged 15/5/5 his rookie year, folks may say that he was not a likely HOFer based on that trajectory. But look at him now.

2.I think Randle has a chance to be a great #3 guy akin to Ibaka/D.Green/H.Barnes. Of course he doesn’t play defense like them, but I see him being a very versatile player.

3.Clarkson is the wildcard. Can he continue his trajectory from his great rookie year, maybe matching Klay Thompson’s trajectory to be a solid #2 option?

4. What is glaringly missing IMO is the Kevin Durant/Steph Curry transcendent player. I’m high on DLO, and I think he may ultimately get to Curry’s level of impact. I don’t see a Kevin Durant level player in our core.

5. Due to Randle’s injury last season, I have a hard time paralleling the Lakers with the OKC/Warriors trajectory. Is it the 2008-09 OKC team we are currently seeing (23-59)? Or the 2010-11 Warriors (36-46)? This much is certain, I don’t think we are anywhere near the jumps that OKC (23 to 50 wins in 2009-10) and Warriors (from 28 wins (projected) to 47 in 2012-13) had to propel them from young cores to playoff regulars.

6. OKC took 3 seasons to become a playoff regular; Warriors took 4 seasons.

7. Conclusion:

a. Patience with young core: We have to patient with our young core. Looking at Durant/Westbrook/Harden/Ibaka, even these great players had modest beginnings (aside from Durant). Westbrook showed incremental gains and by his 3rd season was putting up 22/5/8. The Warriors young core put up less spectacular numbers, and I do remember echoes of people saying Curry was done due to ankle problems. Look at him now.

b. Coaching: Warriors needed multiple coaching changes to get them to the promised land. (Don Nelson, Keith Smart, Mark Jax, Steve Kerr). OKC has had relative stability going from PJ Carlesimo to Brooks, most recently Donovan. Lakers will likely have gone through Brown, D’Antoni, Scott, before we get “the Coach.”

c. Free agency: Unlike these OKC/GSW, we hopefully have the power of grabbing multiple top free agents in 2016-18. OKC has not been active in free agency and the Warriors have been resourceful in their pursuits.
These powerhouse programs weren’t built in 1 season. I think we are frankly in year 1 of a multi-year rebuild (b/c we now have Clarkson, DLo, Randle all playing together). Based on the OKC/Warriors model, and assuming we don’t get rich via free agency, it may take until 2017 before we are back as playoff regulars. The clock’s ticking as we do not have an unlimited time to take advantage of rookie contracts (we lost 1 year on Randle, Clarkson is up in 2016).

OKC
2007-08 (Seattle): 20-62
2008-09: 23-59
2009-10: 50-32
2010-11: 55-27
2011-12: 47-19 (Lockout, 56-26 projection)
2012-13: 60-22
2013-14: 59-23
2014-15: 45-37

Durant (First 3 seasons)
2007-08: 20/4/2 (ppg/rpg/apg)
2008-09: 25/7/3
2009-10: 30/8/3 (PLAYOFFS)

Westbrook
2008-09: 15/5/5
2009-10: 16/5/8
2010-11: 22/5/8

Harden
2009-10: 10/3/2
2010-11: 12/3/2
2011-12: 17/4/4

Ibaka
2009-10: 6/5
2010-11: 10/8
2011-12: 9/8


Warriors
2009-10: 26-56
2010-11: 36-46
2011-12: 23-43 (lockout, projected 28-54 team)
2012-13: 47-35
2013-14: 51-31
2014-15: 67-15 (CHAMPS)

Curry
2009-10: 18/5/6
2010-11: 19/4/6
2011-12: 15/3/5
2012-13: 23/4/7
2013-14: 24/4/9
2014-15: 24/4/8

Klay
2011-12: 13/2/2
2012-13: 17/4/2
2013-14: 18/3/2
2014-15: 22/3/3

Barnes
2012-13: 9/4/1
2013-14: 10/4/2
2014-15: 10/6/1

Green
2012-13: 3/3/1
2013-14: 6/5/2
2014-15: 12/8/4


Lakers
2013-14: 27-55
2014-15: 21-61

Randle
2014-15: INC

Clarkson:
2014-15: 12/3/4

Russell:
2015-16: INC
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals


Last edited by yinoma2001 on Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:35 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 10:54 am    Post subject:

Wrapped up a hearing early ergo some time on my hand today. Enjoy.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144462
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 11:07 am    Post subject:

I think the Lakers next playoff appearance being in the 2017 playoffs is something I can agree with.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ocho
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 24 May 2005
Posts: 53796

PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 11:08 am    Post subject:

venturalakersfan wrote:
I think the Lakers next playoff appearance being in the 2017 playoffs is something I can agree with.


Yeah 2017/2018 sounds about right.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144462
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 11:12 am    Post subject:

I am thinking 2016/2017
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 11:20 am    Post subject:

venturalakersfan wrote:
I am thinking 2016/2017


Maybe if:

1. we snag multiple top tier FAs (which includes the spectrum from Durant to something like Batum) AND

2. our young core develop like Westbrook did.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 11:22 am    Post subject:

ocho wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
I think the Lakers next playoff appearance being in the 2017 playoffs is something I can agree with.


Yeah 2017/2018 sounds about right.


The nice thing is that we will have a 1st round pick in the next season's draft. If we don't make the playoffs in 2016-17, we can hopefully get an impact FA since Clarkson will no longer be on a cheap deal, and Randle will be up for an extension soon thereafter.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kikanga
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 29286
Location: La La Land

PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 11:29 am    Post subject:

I'm surprised yinoma didn't bash Scott.

I haven't seen enough of Russell or Randle to know if they have curry, Westbrook, ibaka, or D. Green upside.
So it's tough to agree or disagree with Yinoma.

But I will say curry, Klay, Westbrook, and Durant are the exception to the rule and not the standard.
Drafting future all-NBA first and second team players is far from a given.
_________________
"Every hurt is a lesson, and every lesson makes you better”
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 11:30 am    Post subject:

kikanga wrote:
I'm surprised yinoma didn't bash Scott.

I haven't seen enough of Russell or Randle to know if they have curry, Westbrook, ibaka, or D. Green upside.
So it's tough to agree or disagree with Yinoma.

But I will say curry, Klay, Westbrook, and Durant are the exception to the rule and not the standard.
Drafting all-NBA first and second team players is far from a given.


You must have missed the section about how we will need a real "coach" to move forward.

I did make the point that unlike OKC/Warriors, we will also have significant cap space to pair with the development of our young guys.

And we can also try to get that Durant and/or Westbrook guy too.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kikanga
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 29286
Location: La La Land

PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 11:42 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
kikanga wrote:
I'm surprised yinoma didn't bash Scott.

I haven't seen enough of Russell or Randle to know if they have curry, Westbrook, ibaka, or D. Green upside.
So it's tough to agree or disagree with Yinoma.

But I will say curry, Klay, Westbrook, and Durant are the exception to the rule and not the standard.
Drafting all-NBA first and second team players is far from a given.


You must have missed the section about how we will need a real "coach" to move forward.

I did make the point that unlike OKC/Warriors, we will also have significant cap space to pair with the development of our young guys.

And we can also try to get that Durant and/or Westbrook guy too.


You're right. I missed that part.

The cap space will determine our fate to a large degree.
If we fill it with top tier talent. Playoffs won't be a problem.
But if the story goes the same way as it has the past few free agencies (gulp).

Clarkson is the only guy who has shown he has all star player level upside.

If Russell and Randle do the same this year, and we keep the young core together. We could hit a .500 record by the 2016/2017 season without landing a big fish FA.
_________________
"Every hurt is a lesson, and every lesson makes you better”
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 11:44 am    Post subject:

But the surprising info was just how humble Westbrook/Harden/Ibaka/Klay/Barnes/Green's beginnings were. Pretty eye opening. This tells me that we need to have patience with someone like Randle, even DLO.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
wolfpaclaker
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 29 May 2002
Posts: 58336

PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 11:45 am    Post subject:

Nice writeup, Yin.

My only concern and I've said this elsewhere when the comparison is made. The draftees from OKC/GST showed within 2 years they were going to be all-stars. Lakers have yet to show a single draftee that has shown he will make an all-star team anytime soon. Now I'm judging based on Randle's little PT in SPL and preseason last year, and Russ this SPL. They could be closer than I think, but IMO it's a long shot that we have 2 all-stars drafted. Maybe 1. I hope I'm wrong.

In which case, in case I'm right, Lakers will need to rely heavily on other avenues to get better, such as FA and trades, something GST/OKC didn't have to rely on as much to get into the playoffs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 11:46 am    Post subject:

wolfpaclaker wrote:
Nice writeup, Yin.

My only concern and I've said this elsewhere when the comparison is made. The draftees from OKC/GST showed within 2 years they were going to be all-stars. Lakers have yet to show a single draftee that has shown he will make an all-star team anytime soon. Now I'm judging based on Randle's little PT in SPL and preseason last year, and Russ this SPL. They could be closer than I think, but IMO it's a long shot that we have 2 all-stars drafted. Maybe 1. I hope I'm wrong.

In which case, in case I'm right, Lakers will need to rely heavily on other avenues to get better, such as FA and trades, something GST/OKC didn't have to rely on as much to get into the playoffs.


Agreed that Durant showed he was a star in the making. Steph, I don't recall him doing that notwithstanding his good stats. Westbrook/Harden sure didn't scream HOFer.

The Durant piece is missing, and DLO doesn't strike me as that kind of player (though I think he will be really good).
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
wolfpaclaker
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 29 May 2002
Posts: 58336

PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 11:51 am    Post subject:

Perhaps this will come across as being dishonest, but when I saw rookie/sophmore versions of their top 2 drafted guys, I immediately sensed an all-star in all of them, minus Klay. Klay is the one that really surprised me. Curry I didn't expect to be a MVP, but it was clear the ankle injuries were the only thing holding him back from being a franchise point guard/consistent all-star.

Now Randle, Russ and Clarkson have promise as well, but I think they are further away from being there vs rookie/sophmore Durant/Westbrook. IMO, of course.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 11:53 am    Post subject:

wolfpaclaker wrote:
Perhaps this will come across as being dishonest, but when I saw rookie/sophmore versions of their top 2 drafted guys, I immediately sensed an all-star in all of them, minus Klay. Klay is the one that really surprised me. Curry I didn't expect to be an all-star, but it was clear the ankle injuries were the only thing holding him back from being a franchise point guard.

Now Randle, Russ and Clarkson have promise as well, but I think they are further away from being there vs rookie/sophmore Durant/Westbrook. IMO, of course.


Yeah, I certainly missed that. I thought only Durant at the time showed a surefire star quality. I really didn't know much about Westbrook/Harden at the time and their stats (and team's poor record) was probably the reason why.

Klay wasn't an all-star guy in my mind too.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kikanga
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 29286
Location: La La Land

PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 11:58 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
But the surprising info was just how humble Westbrook/Harden/Ibaka/Klay/Barnes/Green's beginnings were. Pretty eye opening. This tells me that we need to have patience with someone like Randle, even DLO.


So true. The key will be improvement.
We don't want DLO and Randle making the same mistakes at the end of this season that they were making in the beginning of the season.

In terms of areas for improvement. The biggest area I see for DLO is quickness and aggressiveness with the ball in his hands. If opposing teams put SGs on him defensively, he'll need to make them pay. Also he'll need to utilize his competitive nature (which is well documented) when going head to head with the brutal PGs across the league.

Randle should develop his catch and shoot game and his defensive consistency/awareness. From the midrange, and eventually the 3PT line he should work on his catch and shoot (in game). I LOVE his isolation step back jumper. But it would be better if he can get jumpers in the rhythm of the offense as opposed to eyeing down his man and stopping the ball for multiple seconds in the shot clock before going to his step back. Also his defensive deficiencies are well documented. He won't magically gain 6 inches of wingspan to match ZBo's wingspan. But if he pays attention to his defensive positioning, he could be a great pick and roll defender eventually. His lateral quickness is solid. So thats a good foundation to work from.
_________________
"Every hurt is a lesson, and every lesson makes you better”
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 12:00 pm    Post subject:

Since it doesn't look like we will have a top 3 draft pick next year, and I'm projecting that we will be at worst a borderline playoff team in 2016-17, the "Durant" slot will be via free agency, aka Durant in 2016, Westbrook in 2017, or Paul George/Cousins in 2018. OKC/Warriors never lured a max level star so in a sense we still have that theoretical advantage.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Voices
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 07 Jul 2006
Posts: 8287
Location: Oxnard, Ca.

PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 12:10 pm    Post subject:

kikanga wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
kikanga wrote:
I'm surprised yinoma didn't bash Scott.

I haven't seen enough of Russell or Randle to know if they have curry, Westbrook, ibaka, or D. Green upside.
So it's tough to agree or disagree with Yinoma.

But I will say curry, Klay, Westbrook, and Durant are the exception to the rule and not the standard.
Drafting all-NBA first and second team players is far from a given.


You must have missed the section about how we will need a real "coach" to move forward.

I did make the point that unlike OKC/Warriors, we will also have significant cap space to pair with the development of our young guys.

And we can also try to get that Durant and/or Westbrook guy too.


You're right. I missed that part.

The cap space will determine our fate to a large degree.
If we fill it with top tier talent. Playoffs won't be a problem.
But if the story goes the same way as it has the past few free agencies (gulp).

Clarkson is the only guy who has shown he has all star player level upside.

If Russell and Randle do the same this year, and we keep the young core together. We could hit a .500 record by the 2016/2017 season without landing a big fish FA.


Why do you think the Lakers cannot attract blue chip FA's....
_________________
.....
.....
ALTHOUGH HE STANDS 6 FEET 2 INCHES, JIM BUSS ATTENDED JOCKEY SCHOOL WHEN HE WAS 20.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
oldschool32
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 20032

PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 12:44 pm    Post subject:

Thanks for posting this!

Biggest problem we're facing right now is finding a Durant/Curry/Westbrook. All 3 our elite go to guys who can give you 24+ppg on any given night. Finding the Thompson's and Ibaka's is slightly easier. I don't see a big turn around for another 2 seasons. Getting anywhere near .500 this year would be huge. The Lakers need Russell to look like a future star player, Clarkson to continue on his curve, and Randle to look like a legit big man(double double machine), and develop a consistent jump shot. I'm hoping that Russell or Clarkson look like a closer. They need a player that can finish games with the ball in his hands, as I don't know if they are going to be able to get that player through free agency (KD/Russ).
_________________
"It's just a job. Grass grows, birds fly, waves pound the sand. I beat people up."-The Greatest
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 12:45 pm    Post subject:

What's imperative is the ticking rookie contract time clock. Clarkson is up for an extension in 2016, and then Randle/DLO will come sooner than later. When these guys are getting relative FMV contracts, then the means to get a superstar (assuming they don't turn out to be ones themselves) get tougher and tougher.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Rivershow
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 09 Dec 2011
Posts: 6731

PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 12:58 pm    Post subject:

I will just say I disagree. As I said, I don't think making the playoffs is impossible this year. Now actually competing for a championship realistically, is where I can agree with your title.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jim99187
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 22138

PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 1:00 pm    Post subject:

1 thing i would say is neither OKC nor GSW had any vet presence like us next yr nor did they had any burning desire to go get FA's with max

if not this yr then i can see them making playoffs next yr with all the vet additions
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Rivershow
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 09 Dec 2011
Posts: 6731

PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 1:02 pm    Post subject:

Jim99187 wrote:
1 thing i would say is neither OKC nor GSW had any vet presence like us next yr nor did they had any burning desire to go get FA's with max

if not this yr then i can see them making playoffs next yr with all the vet additions


Yup. It's not like we're playing just our rookies and some scrubs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Omar Little
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 90306
Location: Formerly Known As 24

PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 1:06 pm    Post subject:

It is worth noting that OKC had to go through 4 miserable seasons to put their core together, missing the playoffs 4 straight years, and bottoming out in years 3 and 4 with 20 and 23 wins (and the latter year was WITH Durant AND Westbrook).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jim99187
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 22138

PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 1:15 pm    Post subject:

24 wrote:
It is worth noting that OKC had to go through 4 miserable seasons to put their core together, missing the playoffs 4 straight years, and bottoming out in years 3 and 4 with 20 and 23 wins (and the latter year was WITH Durant AND Westbrook).


their gm never wanted to add any vet players to those teams. they were in asset collection modes.

with 60mil cap space we will be looking to add solid vets this young core next yr

I expect them to make playoffs next yr
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 1 of 7
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB