Official 2015: In Season trade Rumor/speculation thread (Lakers related only please)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 122, 123, 124 ... 214, 215, 216  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
The Logo
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 25 Jul 2013
Posts: 9577
Location: Salem, OR

PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:20 am    Post subject:

So the Bucks give up two duds that won't be able to survive in today's NBA and get back Julius? Yeah I call (bleep) on that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
BigGameHames
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 May 2015
Posts: 7982

PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:21 am    Post subject:

((COMMENT REMOVED- JMK))

You know bards tendencies on here but it's only your first post?

Smells like a troll people. Somebody with multiple usernames
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Robster8989
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 30 Dec 2014
Posts: 1025
Location: San Diego

PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:21 am    Post subject:

((COMMENT REMOVED- JMK))

Ah Ha!
So you have made more than 3 posts on this sight.
Is that you 2.0?
_________________
"Rangers lead the way!"

West Point '88
UCLA '92
75th Ranger Regiment '88-'04
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:22 am    Post subject:

AY2043 wrote:
If a first time poster

A) Posts a ridiculous trade rumor
B) Uses the phrase "something is brewing"
C) Excessively uses ellipsis ("...")
D) Exhibits a terrible understanding of proper comma usage

Don't respond. It's a certain poltergeist back from the dead


It's the underwear brand that gives it away.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:22 am    Post subject:

Don't feed the troll.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Palin
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 Feb 2008
Posts: 1808

PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:29 am    Post subject:

only legitimate insider in this forum was Gumby who was David Lee who was agent of Ariza and Bynum.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
JerryMagicKobe
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 28 Jul 2005
Posts: 15100

PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:30 am    Post subject:

PLEASE REPORT THE TROLL SO WE CAN MAKE HIM DISAPPEAR.

Last edited by JerryMagicKobe on Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:32 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kikanga
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 29332
Location: La La Land

PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:31 am    Post subject:

I was just thinking yesterday, I miss 2.0's crazy trade/FA speculation.

Classic example of, "be careful what you wish for".

The best think CKs trade rumor has going for it is, nobody would expect it. Seems completely out of the blue, which is Mitch's MO.

But CK could make up a Lebron trade, and I could say the same thing.
Long story short, don't hold your breath.
_________________
"Every hurt is a lesson, and every lesson makes you better”
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:35 am    Post subject:

Doubt the Clips would trade Blake in-city to the Lakers, but including salary fillers, would anyone consider Randle/JC for Blake?

I'm on the fence about that, even though I'm not a fan of Blake, I recognize his game is legit.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Bard207
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 08 Jan 2013
Posts: 7713

PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:37 am    Post subject:

The trade would have worked from the salaries involved POV by very simply dropping Nick from the trade.

It wouldn't have required a Larry Coon level CBA expert to have figured that out.

Thus it was very sketchy that the Front Offices involved would still be trying to iron out the details.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
dmorans1
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 11 Sep 2012
Posts: 11669

PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:40 am    Post subject:

Why are you guys discussing a trade from a troll? Move on, Clippers won't trade Blake to us.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
USCandLakers
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 19955

PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:40 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
Doubt the Clips would trade Blake in-city to the Lakers, but including salary fillers, would anyone consider Randle/JC for Blake?

I'm on the fence about that, even though I'm not a fan of Blake, I recognize his game is legit.


Why the hell would you be on the fence?
_________________
A banana is killed every time a terrible thread or post is made. Save the bananas. Stop creating terrible posts!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Thugnomoe
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 19 Jul 2005
Posts: 14660
Location: unfortunately not Los Angeles anymore

PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:41 am    Post subject:

I'd do JC randle for Blake in a heartbeat..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:41 am    Post subject:

USCandLakers wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
Doubt the Clips would trade Blake in-city to the Lakers, but including salary fillers, would anyone consider Randle/JC for Blake?

I'm on the fence about that, even though I'm not a fan of Blake, I recognize his game is legit.


Why the hell would you be on the fence?


Not an issue of talent b/c I do think Blake's talent is greater than that package. Just from a chemistry/leadership standpoint.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jim99187
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 22138

PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:44 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
USCandLakers wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
Doubt the Clips would trade Blake in-city to the Lakers, but including salary fillers, would anyone consider Randle/JC for Blake?

I'm on the fence about that, even though I'm not a fan of Blake, I recognize his game is legit.


Why the hell would you be on the fence?


Not an issue of talent b/c I do think Blake's talent is greater than that package. Just from a chemistry/leadership standpoint.


we would have 2 other max spot for leadership role
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:46 am    Post subject:

Jim99187 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
USCandLakers wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
Doubt the Clips would trade Blake in-city to the Lakers, but including salary fillers, would anyone consider Randle/JC for Blake?

I'm on the fence about that, even though I'm not a fan of Blake, I recognize his game is legit.


Why the hell would you be on the fence?


Not an issue of talent b/c I do think Blake's talent is greater than that package. Just from a chemistry/leadership standpoint.


we would have 2 other max spot for leadership role


We'd need to have an endless line of assistant equipment managers after they're punched out by him.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jim99187
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 22138

PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:50 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
Jim99187 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
USCandLakers wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
Doubt the Clips would trade Blake in-city to the Lakers, but including salary fillers, would anyone consider Randle/JC for Blake?

I'm on the fence about that, even though I'm not a fan of Blake, I recognize his game is legit.


Why the hell would you be on the fence?


Not an issue of talent b/c I do think Blake's talent is greater than that package. Just from a chemistry/leadership standpoint.


we would have 2 other max spot for leadership role


We'd need to have an endless line of assistant equipment managers after they're punched out by him.


dude u know what, sometimes it ok to let go off things.

these are basketball player and not saints.

in life, everybody makes mistakes, u move on.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:55 am    Post subject:

This is not his first time getting involved in altercations.

The fact he broke his hand while coming off an injury is a big red flag, given the fact the Clippers are a playoff team.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Bard207
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 08 Jan 2013
Posts: 7713

PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:56 am    Post subject:

dmorans1 wrote:
Why are you guys discussing a trade from a troll? Move on, Clippers won't trade Blake to us.



It is just a momentary diversion and it will pass soon enough.

At the moment, there is a dearth of trade news and thus the Blake talk is just killing some time until something concrete comes along.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Lakers#1fan
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 25 Sep 2007
Posts: 184

PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2016 12:08 pm    Post subject:

Thugnomoe wrote:
I'd do JC randle for Blake in a heartbeat..


Really?...Really?? In a heartbeat.

I don't think this trade makes us any better at all. We have a mini Griffin in Randle. Clarkson is a keeper (valuable role player).

This is Randles first season and we are giving up on him? How many seasons has Griffin played before he's playing consistent basketball like this? Answer that question for me.

I say we don't break up this young core of Russell, Randle, and Clarkson. They deserve a chance by themselves next year.

Hopefully we can get Simmons. I like the position this team is in currently.







Before you google that. Griffin was drafted in 2009. Do the math, and give these kids a chance. You don't want to be kicking yourself 2 years down the line when Griffin's explosiveness is gone.


Last edited by Lakers#1fan on Fri Feb 05, 2016 12:11 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
nolookpass
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 21 May 2012
Posts: 124

PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2016 12:11 pm    Post subject:

Was reading an article on the five trades the Lakers should consider earlier today two of which I would do plus one with Detroit that was not included.

The ones I would proceed with are Hibbert for Noah and Kelly for a pick from Philly. The one I would not do or treat as a back plan is Lou and Bass for Oubre, Humphries ans Blair.

Instead of the latter I would call Detroit and offer Bass and Lou plus our second rounder for Jennings, Anthony and their first rounder. Would then involve Portland with their huge cap space and give them Jennings and Anthony for two second rounders (similar to the Peeler/Lynch trade, remember). I would let them give us Kaman too with whom I would negotiate a buyout right away.

Now, we'd have:

Russell Huertas
Clarkson Young
Bryant Brown MWP
Nance Randle
Black Sacre

Would then sign Upshaw and see how he carries himself as an NBA player and mybe consider picking up Wroten.

And, I would insist on The Chicago deal in order to make the Bulls strong enough to beat the Cavs, as I do not want that wannabe GOAT LeBron to ever sniff a title again.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2016 12:11 pm    Post subject:

Lakers#1fan wrote:
Thugnomoe wrote:
I'd do JC randle for Blake in a heartbeat..


Really?...Really?? In a heartbeat.

I don't think this trade makes us any better at all. We have a mini Griffin in Randle. Clarkson is a keeper (valuable role player).

This is Randles first season and we are giving up on him? How many seasons has Griffin played before he's playing consistent basketball like this? Answer that question for me.

I say we don't break up this young core of Russell, Randle, and Clarkson. They deserve a chance by themselves next year.

Hopefully we can get Simmons. I like the position this team is in currently.


Blake is more talented than them, but I do have questions about his character and whether he's someone we can rely on down the road.

It's a shame b/c he was really a beast last season.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Lakers#1fan
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 25 Sep 2007
Posts: 184

PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2016 12:16 pm    Post subject:

nolookpass wrote:
Was reading an article on the five trades the Lakers should consider earlier today two of which I would do plus one with Detroit that was not included.

The ones I would proceed with are Hibbert for Noah and Kelly for a pick from Philly. The one I would not do or treat as a back plan is Lou and Bass for Oubre, Humphries ans Blair.

Instead of the latter I would call Detroit and offer Bass and Lou plus our second rounder for Jennings, Anthony and their first rounder. Would then involve Portland with their huge cap space and give them Jennings and Anthony for two second rounders (similar to the Peeler/Lynch trade, remember). I would let them give us Kaman too with whom I would negotiate a buyout right away.

Now, we'd have:

Russell Huertas
Clarkson Young
Bryant Brown MWP
Nance Randle
Black Sacre

Would then sign Upshaw and see how he carries himself as an NBA player and mybe consider picking up Wroten.

And, I would insist on The Chicago deal in order to make the Bulls strong enough to beat the Cavs, as I do not want that wannabe GOAT LeBron to ever sniff a title again.


I'm glad you then proposed flipping Jennings and Anthony for picks. The Lakers are a class organization and we need to stop getting players like nick Young, Lou, and Sacre. Jennings is one of those guys also. Lou and Nick can shoot lights out, but they are not winners.

I'm sure you know, there are guys who just put up points and then there are those who win games.

* I like Upshaw as well. I say we go Upshaw/Randle/Simmons or Ingram/Clarkson/Russell starting lineup next year with Nance/Black/Brown off the bench.


Last edited by Lakers#1fan on Fri Feb 05, 2016 12:19 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
adkindo
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 40345
Location: Dirty South

PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2016 12:19 pm    Post subject:

nolookpass wrote:
The ones I would proceed with are Hibbert for Noah and Kelly for a pick from Philly. The one I would not do or treat as a back plan is Lou and Bass for Oubre, Humphries ans Blair.


I think I would stick with Oubre. Was not big on him at Kansas, but have been impressed the few times I have seen him this year. How old is he, 19? I don't think they give him up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Lakers#1fan
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 25 Sep 2007
Posts: 184

PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2016 12:24 pm    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
Lakers#1fan wrote:
Thugnomoe wrote:
I'd do JC randle for Blake in a heartbeat..


Really?...Really?? In a heartbeat.

I don't think this trade makes us any better at all. We have a mini Griffin in Randle. Clarkson is a keeper (valuable role player).

This is Randles first season and we are giving up on him? How many seasons has Griffin played before he's playing consistent basketball like this? Answer that question for me.

I say we don't break up this young core of Russell, Randle, and Clarkson. They deserve a chance by themselves next year.

Hopefully we can get Simmons. I like the position this team is in currently.


Blake is more talented than them, but I do have questions about his character and whether he's someone we can rely on down the road.

It's a shame b/c he was really a beast last season.


No doubt we get better instantly. But its for the short term. Griffin relies on athleticism and that'll be gone 2 years down the line.

If you think we can win in the next two years with him then sure go all out for him. The thing is I don't think he is a winner.

Do you risk breaking our young core up for this big question mark that is Blake Griffin?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 122, 123, 124 ... 214, 215, 216  Next
Page 123 of 216
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB