| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Jim99187
Franchise Player
Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 22138
|
 Posted: Sat Nov 21, 2015 11:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Whats wrong with prople? U want to trade rusell/randle for hot trash ok4?
Jesus christ, the name of thread is rumors/speculation and not fantasy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pjiddy
Retired Number
Joined: 12 Dec 2005
Posts: 29061
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 12:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| With the exception of Pau, the motivation for Laker in-season trades the past few years has been to cut salary, which doesn't seem a priority this season. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
scoobs
Star Player
Joined: 19 Aug 2005
Posts: 4746
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Jim99187 wrote: | Whats wrong with prople? U want to trade rusell/randle for hot trash ok4?
Jesus christ, the name of thread is rumors/speculation and not fantasy |
You are right . Disregard that post. I wouldn't trade Russell for him but, I would gladly trade Randle and JC for Okafor, but Philly wouldn't. We probably would be better off trying to get someone like Cousins or Love. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fontana3d
Star Player
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 3794
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 12:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| scoobs wrote: | | Jim99187 wrote: | Whats wrong with prople? U want to trade rusell/randle for hot trash ok4?
Jesus christ, the name of thread is rumors/speculation and not fantasy |
You are right . Disregard that post. I wouldn't trade Russell for him but, I would gladly trade Randle and JC for Okafor, but Philly wouldn't. We probably would be better off trying to get someone like Cousins or Love. |
Which we will have no shot at either one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
paolomagma
Star Player
Joined: 29 May 2009
Posts: 2395
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 12:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| venturalakersfan wrote: | | silkwilkes wrote: | | Dumping players like Kelly, Young and even Lou will be the priority. Probably for #2 picks and/or expiring contracts. |
Kelly maybe, the other two aren't likely to be traded. |
I don't see any team that would want Kelly though. Not one. not even for picks.
The only way to get rid of him is to package him with Lou, Young or Bass. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Shaber
Star Player
Joined: 12 Mar 2006
Posts: 3732
Location: The other side
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 4:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Could we trade Scott?
_________________
.
Lakers depth chart
PG Johnson / Goodrich
SG Bryant / West / Scott
SF Baylor / Worthy / Cooper
PF Mikkelsen / Hairston / McAdoo / Gasol
C Chamberlain / Abdul-Jabbar / O'Neal / Mikan |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fontana3d
Star Player
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 3794
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| paolomagma wrote: | | venturalakersfan wrote: | | silkwilkes wrote: | | Dumping players like Kelly, Young and even Lou will be the priority. Probably for #2 picks and/or expiring contracts. |
Kelly maybe, the other two aren't likely to be traded. |
I don't see any team that would want Kelly though. Not one. not even for picks.
The only way to get rid of him is to package him with Lou, Young or Bass. |
Which the Lakers tried to do by packaging Young with Kelly thus making the Lou signing make sense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rebirth
Star Player
Joined: 26 Apr 2005
Posts: 3970
Location: Garden Grove
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| venturalakersfan wrote: | | I will speculate that there will be no in season trades. |
co-signed
_________________
“What is 17,505”
“Rest at the end not at the middle” |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kikanga
Retired Number
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 29286
Location: La La Land
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 7:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| rebirth wrote: | | venturalakersfan wrote: | | I will speculate that there will be no in season trades. |
co-signed |
I think you guys are right. I don't see any trades happening.
Not for lack of trying. We just won't get the value we want for our assets.
_________________
"Every hurt is a lesson, and every lesson makes you better” |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Chronicle
Retired Number
Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Posts: 31935
Location: Manhattan
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 7:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Would be nice if Bass got traded though. Possibly Lou as well
_________________
Kobe |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HumanVictoryCigar
Star Player
Joined: 28 Apr 2014
Posts: 7601
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| scoobs wrote: | | Jim99187 wrote: | Whats wrong with prople? U want to trade rusell/randle for hot trash ok4?
Jesus christ, the name of thread is rumors/speculation and not fantasy |
You are right . Disregard that post. I wouldn't trade Russell for him but, I would gladly trade Randle and JC for Okafor, but Philly wouldn't. We probably would be better off trying to get someone like Cousins or Love. |
you bought gold at $1,800, didn't you? Buy high, sell low? 
I have a feeling this thread is going to produce the worst "fan" trades in the history of bad fan trades. That one right there, probably should be marked for the history books...
edit: for historical records: this was his ORIGINAL idea:
"I really, really would hate to trade Russell. I think he is going to be a great nba basketball player. However, I am down to send him and Randle to Philly for Okafor"
-------------
Last edited by HumanVictoryCigar on Sun Nov 22, 2015 8:15 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Big Game James
Star Player
Joined: 14 Jan 2003
Posts: 4004
Location: The official trout slapper of LG.net
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 8:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm 100% for trading Clarkson. I just don't see him as a $22 million dollar player and that is what I think we will have to offer him to stay.
_________________
Don't make me give you a trout slap!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Halflife
Franchise Player
Joined: 15 Aug 2015
Posts: 16704
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| When we are 4- whatever by trade deadline I think guys like Lou/bass/nick will be moved to go full youth movement. I expect the way jc was used last year will be how young guys will be used this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 10:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Big Game James wrote: | | I'm 100% for trading Clarkson. I just don't see him as a $22 million dollar player and that is what I think we will have to offer him to stay. |
He's not getting 22m next year. lakers could go up to 21m for him but unlikely. The most I see from the Lakers is probably 15m ish. If another team makes an offer and we match the most he gets for 2 years is the mid level exception.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ch3cky0selff00
Star Player
Joined: 29 Dec 2009
Posts: 4392
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 10:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| yinoma2001 wrote: | | Big Game James wrote: | | I'm 100% for trading Clarkson. I just don't see him as a $22 million dollar player and that is what I think we will have to offer him to stay. |
He's not getting 22m next year. lakers could go up to 21m for him but unlikely. The most I see from the Lakers is probably 15m ish. If another team makes an offer and we match the most he gets for 2 years is the mid level exception. |
Yeah. I don't see 22 million as his value at all. He might get like an Avery Bradley / Iman Shumpert kind of deal. I see him at like 8 to 12 million. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DrumR
Star Player
Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 1336
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 10:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ch3cky0selff00 wrote: | | yinoma2001 wrote: | | Big Game James wrote: | | I'm 100% for trading Clarkson. I just don't see him as a $22 million dollar player and that is what I think we will have to offer him to stay. |
He's not getting 22m next year. lakers could go up to 21m for him but unlikely. The most I see from the Lakers is probably 15m ish. If another team makes an offer and we match the most he gets for 2 years is the mid level exception. |
Yeah. I don't see 22 million as his value at all. He might get like an Avery Bradley / Iman Shumpert kind of deal. I see him at like 8 to 12 million. |
You all do realize there's very specific limits on the amount of money Clarkson can make and be offered. Right? Jeeze. Best part is if someone tries to poison pill us it would actually be a favor with the cap leaping up. We're in the drivers seat with him and he wants to be a Laker. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jim99187
Franchise Player
Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 22138
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| yinoma2001 wrote: | | Big Game James wrote: | | I'm 100% for trading Clarkson. I just don't see him as a $22 million dollar player and that is what I think we will have to offer him to stay. |
He's not getting 22m next year. lakers could go up to 21m for him but unlikely. The most I see from the Lakers is probably 15m ish. If another team makes an offer and we match the most he gets for 2 years is the mid level exception. |
22m/yr? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
15m next year is the equivalent of 11-12m today. Not an outlandish amount.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jim99187
Franchise Player
Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 22138
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 10:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| yinoma2001 wrote: | | 15m next year is the equivalent of 11-12m today. Not an outlandish amount. |
I was asking whats the max clarkson can earn next yr and after that?
I thought it was MLE money? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gng930
Franchise Player
Joined: 13 Apr 2001
Posts: 11475
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 10:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
While it's theoretically possible for the Lakers to offer him a 4 year-$90 million deal, the most any other team can offer him is about $50-55 (roughly 5+5+20+20) million over those 4 years. He easily worth that so consider that before jumping to deal him.
_________________
Luxury Tax/FA Spreadsheet (Save to your Google Drive to edit) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jim99187
Franchise Player
Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 22138
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 10:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| gng930 wrote: | | While it's theoretically possible for the Lakers to offer him a 4 year-$90 million deal, the most any other team can offer him is about $50-55 (roughly 5+5+20+20) million over those 4 years. He easily worth that so consider that before jumping to deal him. |
Ya 50/4 with avg of 12.5 should be fine. Heck how much did ross get? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SGV-Laker fan
Star Player
Joined: 23 May 2013
Posts: 8860
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 11:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Big Game James wrote: | | I'm 100% for trading Clarkson. I just don't see him as a $22 million dollar player and that is what I think we will have to offer him to stay. |
Oh hell no, I wouldn't give Clarkson 1 penny over 8 mil/year. This guy brings nothing else to the table other than scoring on broken and iso plays. with his kind of athleticism and still being a poor defender tells me the guy only cares about scoring, individual stats than helping team win games
Last edited by SGV-Laker fan on Sun Nov 22, 2015 11:53 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jim99187
Franchise Player
Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 22138
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 11:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| SGV-Laker fan wrote: | | Big Game James wrote: | | I'm 100% for trading Clarkson. I just don't see him as a $22 million dollar player and that is what I think we will have to offer him to stay. |
Oh hell no, I wouldn't give Clarkson 1 penny over 8 mil/year. His guy brings nothing else to the table other than scoring on broken and iso plays. with his kind of athleticism and still being a poor defender tells me the guy only cares about scoring, individual stats than helping team win games |
yupe.
I prefer to see what we can get for him at this deadline tough. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144462
Location: The Gold Coast
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 11:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Big Game James wrote: | | I'm 100% for trading Clarkson. I just don't see him as a $22 million dollar player and that is what I think we will have to offer him to stay. |
No one else can offer him that.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144462
Location: The Gold Coast
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jim99187 wrote: | | SGV-Laker fan wrote: | | Big Game James wrote: | | I'm 100% for trading Clarkson. I just don't see him as a $22 million dollar player and that is what I think we will have to offer him to stay. |
Oh hell no, I wouldn't give Clarkson 1 penny over 8 mil/year. His guy brings nothing else to the table other than scoring on broken and iso plays. with his kind of athleticism and still being a poor defender tells me the guy only cares about scoring, individual stats than helping team win games |
yupe.
I prefer to see what we can get for him at this deadline tough. |
You won't get much with a couple of million in salary coming back. Better to wait until the offseason.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
