lakers can't win without Odom
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
gasb
Rookie
Rookie


Joined: 27 Jun 2005
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 7:49 am    Post subject: lakers can't win without Odom

they lose more games without Odom going back to the end of last seasons free fall. if he were playing last night we would have won.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Prometheus8
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 15 Oct 2002
Posts: 1851

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 8:07 am    Post subject:

After the last 2 games....yeah, we're in real trouble without him.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
CeeJay
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Posts: 175

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:04 am    Post subject:

I don't think Odom is the reason they lost. It's just the lack of a second option. If Lamar was there, they may have still lost. Did you not see the Indy game?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Kazaam
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 04 Aug 2005
Posts: 1909

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:32 am    Post subject:

Seriously, freakin Odumb opologists. Watch the indy game man, the guy was horrible... and 3 games before that. He was a turn-over machine. You guys really sound stupid with a comment like that. We can't win without odom... lol. More like, Losing is the only option with this roster full of WNBA players.

Actually, Im being polite. A player in the WNBA would actually hit shots. This team is pathetic.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Sage_10
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Dec 2005
Posts: 6668

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:52 am    Post subject:

Like most of the losses this season, last nights was the result of bad shooting by the offense and even worse defense. This team has to learn to play together. I swear, after they beat Miami I thought they would have turned the corner, but things have only gotten worse.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Aeneas Hunter
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 31763

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:55 am    Post subject:

Thanks. We really needed another thread on this topic.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kells1220
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 561
Location: Maryland

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 10:17 am    Post subject:

Lamar is not that good. More like, the Lakers cant win with those scrubs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
uberzev
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 25 Jan 2002
Posts: 19120
Location: SDSU

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 10:21 am    Post subject:

You could prevent dehydration by drinking toilet water. The question is, would you want to?
_________________
Lakers Gonna Lake
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lakersdynasty999
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 06 Sep 2005
Posts: 1893

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 11:40 am    Post subject:

hope lamar gets back soon...this team needs to stay over 500
_________________
Lakers in '08.
WWW.AVERYTICKETS.COM
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Reply with quote
Car54
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 10 Aug 2005
Posts: 14424

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 12:21 pm    Post subject:

CeeJay wrote:
I don't think Odom is the reason they lost. It's just the lack of a second option. If Lamar was there, they may have still lost. Did you not see the Indy game?


lets see smush had 19pts Mihm had 15pts it had nothing to do with second option.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
tgf5
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 18 Jun 2005
Posts: 11581
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 12:42 pm    Post subject:

Car54 wrote:
CeeJay wrote:
I don't think Odom is the reason they lost. It's just the lack of a second option. If Lamar was there, they may have still lost. Did you not see the Indy game?


lets see smush had 19pts Mihm had 15pts it had nothing to do with second option.


No, someone has to step up when a guy avg 15 ppg is out. And they did, just wasn't enough. It has everything to do with another scorer. What did you think Charlotte did all night? Send everyone at Kobe. And guess what? No one else is a big threat.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Worthy42
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 03 Aug 2004
Posts: 19952

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 1:18 pm    Post subject:

112 pts allowed to the Charlotte Hornets != we need another scorer people... Christ...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
showtime1308
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 05 Dec 2005
Posts: 283

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 1:27 pm    Post subject:

Kobe is forced to facilitate the offense when Odom is gone and that is why he was missed last night. If Phil trusted Smush or Sasha to facilitate then it wouldn't be as big of a loss. Making Kobe a facilitator is not beneficial for this team because he has to point out where these guys have to be and he is constantly away from the basket, usually 5 feet behind the 3 point line.

He should have been posting up their little guards all night long. And when they brought the double and triple the guys should be running dive cuts for layups ( at least attempted layups, they probably would miss most of those as well)

The point is when Kobe is in the post in triple threat position he can't be contained as we've seen with his scoring average this year. When he's consistently getting the ball 28 feet from the basket we are in trouble.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kobebynum2008
Rookie
Rookie


Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 1:31 pm    Post subject:

The team might win a few more games with Lamar in it, but in the long term we're not gonna be doing much, and why the hell do the Lakers want to be mediocre? No team with Kobe should accept being mediocre. I still say we get rid of Odom ASAP. I know the artest trade is over, but damn, people were jsut too damn scared of him blowing up, but at least with Artest there's the chance of him fitting in with Kobe, with Lamar, you know he's a guy who's just gonna coast throughout the rest of his carreer...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
GameCock-MD
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 4498

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:40 pm    Post subject:

uberzev wrote:
You could prevent dehydration by drinking toilet water. The question is, would you want to?




I don't follow the argument but that was a mighty funny post!
_________________
Build around team players, not ISO players.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Reply with quote
Supa
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 08 Dec 2004
Posts: 2210

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:00 pm    Post subject:

Lamar is the toilet water...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
bounty
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 3946

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 5:59 pm    Post subject: Re: lakers can't win without Odom

gasb wrote:
they lose more games without Odom going back to the end of last seasons free fall. if he were playing last night we would have won.

Cant win with him. No one can actually. No one has either. Unless you count 2 games over .500 with the heat. one year.
_________________
Lakers Tickets
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
40ptmachine
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 13 Jan 2006
Posts: 633

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 6:09 pm    Post subject:

When will fanboys understand that lamar is just a role player ?
_________________
After 7 seasons I am a NON ALL STAR, in fact, I am a ROLE PLAYER making Superstar $$$
plus; I get standing ovations when I reach double digits
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LA Lakers 41790
Sixth Man
Sixth Man


Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 68

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 8:43 pm    Post subject: I Love Lamar Odumb

or maybe now its Lamar O we need u. Hey i im pretty new to chatting wit you guys but ive been going to LG reading the discussions. O and i Live in Michigan so I barely get to see any laker games. So any let me get to my point

Lamar Haters "We need a legit second option" DG had 21 tonight(even if it was in garbage time) and smush had 19 last night arent those second option points? But with Lamar scoring like 9,10 ,11 we won 24-20. But thats just ridiculous how can a team win with their 2nd best player scoring 10 pts a game.

Lamar Haters "Lamar Odom's rebounding can be made up by our other players" Ofcourse it can because there will be another laker in odoms spot. But can they push the ball of the rebound like odom can. How bout Cook with his awesome ball-handling skills or DG or Luke or Kwa nvm. I would also like to say that i heard ppl say that Lamar did make lots of timely rebounds.

Lamar Haters "Trade Lamar for Bibby, Pierce, Artest..." Well im sure that mike bibby can give us the 20 pts instead of DG one day Smush the other day and Mihm the other day. Its gives us a new twist to losing. Pierce is inconsistent i c him scoring 30 then 18 then 18 then 30 and isnt he doing that as their primary scroing option? and didnt Wally outscore him a couple of times. And for Artest i can really see him turing that Sacramento franchise around....

Lamar Haters " Lamar is inconsistent" Then he wouldnt be avg 14 9 and 5
per. It would be like 5 5 5 .

And how can u just trade the facilitator. U all know that the tri takes time to learn. So u gonna say to Phil hey Lamar sucks we want u to take some of ur time that would be spent on improving this team to teaching this guy we traded for Lamar the samething u taught Lamar.

LAMAR ODUMB IS NOT THE PROBLEM!!! ITS BECAUSE WE SPEND OUR TIME MAKING BRICK HOUSES MORE THAN MAKING SHOTS.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
angel
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 31 Jul 2004
Posts: 14226
Location: city of angels

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 8:45 pm    Post subject:

The Lakers haven't won so far.
_________________
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness. Only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate. Only love can do that." ~~Martin Luther King Jr.~~
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144464
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 8:55 pm    Post subject:

Car54 wrote:
CeeJay wrote:
I don't think Odom is the reason they lost. It's just the lack of a second option. If Lamar was there, they may have still lost. Did you not see the Indy game?


lets see smush had 19pts Mihm had 15pts it had nothing to do with second option.


Having a second option isn't necessarily related to scoring totals. A second option is someone who poses a threat to the opposing defense, and someone that they have to concentrate on defending. With the way he has played this season, Mihm could be that player.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Warlord23
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 239

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:06 pm    Post subject:

Got a question for someone who watches most Laker games, rather than make statements by looking at the box score.

Earlier this season, Kobe was out for 2 games vs the Jazz. The first one ws a close game throughout that LA lost by 4. The second one was tied through 3 qtrs (IIRC), and Utah finished strongly.

The last 2 games, Kobe's there but no Odom. Both games LA seemed overwhelmed, and the opponent led almost throughout the game and won comfortably. And Charlotte especially is a cellar-dwellar, no comparison to a physical Jazz team.

On the face of it, it seems LA at least competed with Odom, without Kobe. But without Odom, with Kobe, they seemed overmatched. I know Chris Mihm didn't play vs NO/OKC, but he was there vs Charlotte. One clear difference looking at the box score was that the scoring was a lot more distributed in the Utah losses than the last 2 games.

The box score might be misleading, so can someone who watched these games throw some light on this?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Zhengi
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 06 Sep 2004
Posts: 6445

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:10 pm    Post subject:

Kazaam wrote:
Seriously, freakin Odumb opologists. Watch the indy game man, the guy was horrible... and 3 games before that. He was a turn-over machine. You guys really sound stupid with a comment like that. We can't win without odom... lol. More like, Losing is the only option with this roster full of WNBA players.

Actually, Im being polite. A player in the WNBA would actually hit shots. This team is pathetic.


The question is, did you watch the rest of the Lakers season or did you tune in only during the last 6 games? Lakers were 24-20 with Lamar. That's a better winning percentage than the 0 winning percentage without him right now.
_________________
I'm like a Hadouken, down-right Fierce!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number Reply with quote
gill2k
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 06 Jun 2005
Posts: 7038
Location: Somewhere in Canada

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:15 pm    Post subject:

GuRu at CL said it best. This team is currently: "Kobe and his band of merry scrubs".

Funny at first, but then you wonder, how we ever get to this point... one superstar with his prime being wasted away because management is too stingy to surround him with REAL NBA talent.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144464
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:19 pm    Post subject:

Stingy is such an inaccurate term. The Lakers payroll isn't among the lowest in the league.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB