Official Goodbye LUKE WALTON Thread (Luke/Lakers Part Ways, p. 792, Signs Deal with Kings p. 809)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 177, 178, 179 ... 816, 817, 818  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dcarter4kobe
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Posts: 17687

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 10:12 am    Post subject:

To be fair Deng hasnt been available for much of the preseason and he is suppose to be a major addition to our team although I do question the fit up front with Mozgov/Randle/Deng
_________________
"He's a Zen master, so he can speak to you, and he doesn't need a microphone; you can hear him in your head, 'Ron, don't shoot, don't shoot.' Whatever, pow, three. I love the Zen, though."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
GoldenThroat
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 37474

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 10:47 am    Post subject:

dcarter4kobe wrote:
To be fair Deng hasnt been available for much of the preseason and he is suppose to be a major addition to our team although I do question the fit up front with Mozgov/Randle/Deng


Deng is a PF in 2016.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
pio2u
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 26 Dec 2012
Posts: 54647

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 10:50 am    Post subject:

Luke has a bright and progressive mind. I am still thrilled that he is our coach.
I trust that he will figure it out and do what's best for the future development of the team.
I back him 110% and won't try to second guess him at this point. I'm confident that he knows this team better than anyone else.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
pio2u
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 26 Dec 2012
Posts: 54647

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 10:51 am    Post subject:

GoldenThroat wrote:
dcarter4kobe wrote:
To be fair Deng hasnt been available for much of the preseason and he is suppose to be a major addition to our team although I do question the fit up front with Mozgov/Randle/Deng


Deng is a PF in 2016.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Chronicle
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Posts: 31935
Location: Manhattan

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 10:55 am    Post subject:

GoldenThroat wrote:
dcarter4kobe wrote:
To be fair Deng hasnt been available for much of the preseason and he is suppose to be a major addition to our team although I do question the fit up front with Mozgov/Randle/Deng


Deng is a PF in 2016.


I thought you didnt believe in positions in 2016
_________________
Kobe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yuurin98
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 28 Aug 2015
Posts: 1164

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 11:09 am    Post subject:

BigGameHames wrote:
yuurin98 wrote:
Dave20 wrote:
His rotations are terrible. I'm at a loss of words.

To be honest, this is what the Warriors fans were unhappy about when Luke takes over as interim head coach. His rotations are weird.

Regardless, lets see how he does in the real season. Preseason rotations are nothing since some of the players won't be in the team anymore.


The Warriors were at their best when Luke was in charge so if there was fans complaining, they shouldn't have been.

Dave expected JC to be treated as the best player. Since that isn't happening he is whining about anything he can think of. It's the preseason, let's not worry about the rotations until we play games that actually count.

I've been following the Warriors for a while since the start of last season and stopped because how much I hate their arrogance, and indeed, this is what I've seen from their fans, they don't like how Luke is doing with their rotations despite they win alot of games, I don't remember the details but I do remember that during the 24-0 streak the Warriors were mostly the trailing one during the 1st-3rd quarter, and then Walton puts the starting lineup back in the 4th to let Steph & co. bail them out like crazy.
If you could check it out I'm sure you'll find out that the last few wins were not dominant as you think. That's why the Warriors were exhausted during the playoff run. They don't have energy to keep it up with the Cavaliers who sleepwalk through the season and the playoffs.
_________________
I was an atheist, until I knew Kobe.

I love basketball. *Metta voice*
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KindCrippler2000
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 02 May 2003
Posts: 15821

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 11:23 am    Post subject:

pio2u wrote:
Luke has a bright and progressive mind. I am still thrilled that he is our coach.
I trust that he will figure it out and do what's best for the future development of the team.
I back him 110% and won't try to second guess him at this point. I'm confident that he knows this team better than anyone else.


Well, there's been a clear and consistent pattern in these preseason games, and whether it's against the lottery caliber Suns or the contending Warriors, the fast starts by the opposition have almost entirely to do with the defensive woes of the Lakers starting unit. Almost every recent analytical development supports the viewpoint that the rotations need to change if they even want a chance at winning 25-30 games this season. They can't rely on the bench to bring them back every game. And I'm not going to lie - last night felt like a carbon copy of Byron-ball.

I know Luke's a good coach, but his preseason rotations (minus the 2nd unit) have been quite bad. I'm aware some of it is experimentation, and I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt the first 5-10 games and see where it goes. Otherwise, continuing to play Lou and Randle heavy minutes while ignoring their defensive woes means he's as stubborn as Byron.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
P.K.
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 10 Jul 2003
Posts: 29726

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 11:28 am    Post subject:

justsomelakerfan wrote:
Also, another theory about why the starting lineup isn't working is that Luke kept changing it around game-to-game without letting them really play themselves into being more comfortable. But it's clear as day the construct isn't working either way, so, eh.

venturalakersfan wrote:
Dave20 wrote:
Halflife wrote:
Dlo
Jc
Deng
Nanca
Moz

IMO this has to be our starting 5. Does Luke have strength to bring jr off bench
If he wants to win he's going to have to.


I guess you somehow missed his comments regarding winning. He is interested in developing the players that will lead this team going forward.


Yep. As I've said, personally I'd prefer Nance to start any day of the week. But Luke is stressing development and prioritizing Randle is high on his list. We got our development coach, so I can't argue here.

Randle can develop on the 2nd team just as good as he can on the 1st team. Believing he can only develop with the 1st team is fallacy.
_________________
LBJ + AD = More rings
Never argue with a fool - listeners can't tell you apart
Wilt's unstoppable fadeaway: www.youtube.com/watch?v=8O9MgNfcGJA
NPZ's Magic Johnson mix: www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8Qbo0WqvOI
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yuurin98
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 28 Aug 2015
Posts: 1164

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 11:35 am    Post subject:

KindCrippler2000 wrote:
pio2u wrote:
Luke has a bright and progressive mind. I am still thrilled that he is our coach.
I trust that he will figure it out and do what's best for the future development of the team.
I back him 110% and won't try to second guess him at this point. I'm confident that he knows this team better than anyone else.


Well, there's been a clear and consistent pattern in these preseason games, and whether it's against the lottery caliber Suns or the contending Warriors, the fast starts by the opposition have almost entirely to do with the defensive woes of the Lakers starting unit. Almost every recent analytical development supports the viewpoint that the rotations need to change if they even want a chance at winning 25-30 games this season. They can't rely on the bench to bring them back every game. And I'm not going to lie - last night felt like a carbon copy of Byron-ball.

I know Luke's a good coach, but his preseason rotations (minus the 2nd unit) have been quite bad. I'm aware some of it is experimentation, and I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt the first 5-10 games and see where it goes. Otherwise, continuing to play Lou and Randle heavy minutes while ignoring their defensive woes means he's as stubborn as Byron.

I know someone has mentioned it, but your avatar is funny as hell.

What Luke seems focus on is to build a solid second unit. To me I feel like his approach is a mistake. He should be focusing on making the best starting lineup by starting the players that plays the most effective first, and then build the second unit with the remaining pieces.
_________________
I was an atheist, until I knew Kobe.

I love basketball. *Metta voice*
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
dcarter4kobe
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Posts: 17687

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 11:38 am    Post subject:

GoldenThroat wrote:
dcarter4kobe wrote:
To be fair Deng hasnt been available for much of the preseason and he is suppose to be a major addition to our team although I do question the fit up front with Mozgov/Randle/Deng


Deng is a PF in 2016.


That's clear. But how does that fit in with Randle/Nance at the 4?
_________________
"He's a Zen master, so he can speak to you, and he doesn't need a microphone; you can hear him in your head, 'Ron, don't shoot, don't shoot.' Whatever, pow, three. I love the Zen, though."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
justsomelakerfan
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Jul 2016
Posts: 10939

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 12:02 pm    Post subject:

yuurin98 wrote:
KindCrippler2000 wrote:
pio2u wrote:
Luke has a bright and progressive mind. I am still thrilled that he is our coach.
I trust that he will figure it out and do what's best for the future development of the team.
I back him 110% and won't try to second guess him at this point. I'm confident that he knows this team better than anyone else.


Well, there's been a clear and consistent pattern in these preseason games, and whether it's against the lottery caliber Suns or the contending Warriors, the fast starts by the opposition have almost entirely to do with the defensive woes of the Lakers starting unit. Almost every recent analytical development supports the viewpoint that the rotations need to change if they even want a chance at winning 25-30 games this season. They can't rely on the bench to bring them back every game. And I'm not going to lie - last night felt like a carbon copy of Byron-ball.

I know Luke's a good coach, but his preseason rotations (minus the 2nd unit) have been quite bad. I'm aware some of it is experimentation, and I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt the first 5-10 games and see where it goes. Otherwise, continuing to play Lou and Randle heavy minutes while ignoring their defensive woes means he's as stubborn as Byron.

I know someone has mentioned it, but your avatar is funny as hell.

What Luke seems focus on is to build a solid second unit. To me I feel like his approach is a mistake. He should be focusing on making the best starting lineup by starting the players that plays the most effective first, and then build the second unit with the remaining pieces.


1000% agree. I think the second unit is also so attractive because every player in it has a ROLE and they have great synergy. Luke's so locked in and encouraged by that. The reality is that, for the best lineup, he might need to bring some of the bench into the starting lineup and find another way to create a similar energy bench unit.

Also, great points brought up about being able to give Randle his minutes off the bench. I do think it's fair to say that giving Randle time with Russell, as a starter or bench player, is important if the team believes he's a starter for the franchise in the future. They need to improve their chemistry on the court.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
GoldenThroat
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 37474

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 12:03 pm    Post subject:

Chronicle wrote:
GoldenThroat wrote:
dcarter4kobe wrote:
To be fair Deng hasnt been available for much of the preseason and he is suppose to be a major addition to our team although I do question the fit up front with Mozgov/Randle/Deng


Deng is a PF in 2016.


I thought you didnt believe in positions in 2016


I believe that you need to have particular skill sets on the floor. So sure, he can play SF if you have a big who can run in transition, handle the ball, defend the perimeter, & stretch the floor on offense. We don't have that guy, so those skills would be coming from a smaller player.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
GoldenThroat
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 37474

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 12:06 pm    Post subject:

dcarter4kobe wrote:
GoldenThroat wrote:
dcarter4kobe wrote:
To be fair Deng hasnt been available for much of the preseason and he is suppose to be a major addition to our team although I do question the fit up front with Mozgov/Randle/Deng


Deng is a PF in 2016.


That's clear. But how does that fit in with Randle/Nance at the 4?


I think Deng should be getting about 20mpg at PF, and Randle/Nance can battle Mozgov & Black for the remaining 76mpg at PF & C. My distribution would be more Nance/Mozgov heavy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Laker's Fan
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 27 Jun 2002
Posts: 12888

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 12:39 pm    Post subject:

GoldenThroat wrote:
dcarter4kobe wrote:
GoldenThroat wrote:
dcarter4kobe wrote:
To be fair Deng hasnt been available for much of the preseason and he is suppose to be a major addition to our team although I do question the fit up front with Mozgov/Randle/Deng


Deng is a PF in 2016.


That's clear. But how does that fit in with Randle/Nance at the 4?


I think Deng should be getting about 20mpg at PF, and Randle/Nance can battle Mozgov & Black for the remaining 76mpg at PF & C. My distribution would be more Nance/Mozgov heavy.


We need Randle's rebounding and longer term to know if he can develop into a cornerstone piece. He's also the next guy up for serious contract discussions and management needs input for that decision (I'm actually a little worried there's a disconnect in how Randle sees himself and the reality of his performance. Could be a difficult negotiation that leads to a rFA play).

But if you're looking in the immediate, I agree Deng/Moz/Nance are more well rounded and thus make things run smoother. This season we are starting our ascent from the base of the mountain.
_________________
Austin Reaves keeps his game tight, like Kobe Bryant on game night.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
BigGameHames
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 May 2015
Posts: 7982

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 3:38 pm    Post subject:

yuurin98 wrote:
BigGameHames wrote:
yuurin98 wrote:
Dave20 wrote:
His rotations are terrible. I'm at a loss of words.

To be honest, this is what the Warriors fans were unhappy about when Luke takes over as interim head coach. His rotations are weird.

Regardless, lets see how he does in the real season. Preseason rotations are nothing since some of the players won't be in the team anymore.


The Warriors were at their best when Luke was in charge so if there was fans complaining, they shouldn't have been.

Dave expected JC to be treated as the best player. Since that isn't happening he is whining about anything he can think of. It's the preseason, let's not worry about the rotations until we play games that actually count.

I've been following the Warriors for a while since the start of last season and stopped because how much I hate their arrogance, and indeed, this is what I've seen from their fans, they don't like how Luke is doing with their rotations despite they win alot of games, I don't remember the details but I do remember that during the 24-0 streak the Warriors were mostly the trailing one during the 1st-3rd quarter, and then Walton puts the starting lineup back in the 4th to let Steph & co. bail them out like crazy.
If you could check it out I'm sure you'll find out that the last few wins were not dominant as you think. That's why the Warriors were exhausted during the playoff run. They don't have energy to keep it up with the Cavaliers who sleepwalk through the season and the playoffs.


The Warriors had what is probably the greatest 1st half of the season in NBA history while Luke was the coach. You can't complain about what a coach is doing if they are having that much success no matter how good his team is.

Blaming a finals loss on the rotations of an interim coach in the first half of the year is an example of why Warriors fans are so hated. They lost because they were outplayed(and Curry was hurt).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Outspoken
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 11 Feb 2015
Posts: 8457

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 4:14 pm    Post subject:

Dave20 wrote:
His rotations are terrible. I'm at a loss of words.


I agree. I don't ever wanna see a lou/young starting lineup. I mean what have preseason really established from a starting standpoint? he doesn't even have a idea of the starting line up. lou is not a starter nor is young.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KBH
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 13 Sep 2008
Posts: 12171

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 4:36 pm    Post subject:

yuurin98 wrote:
BigGameHames wrote:
yuurin98 wrote:
Dave20 wrote:
His rotations are terrible. I'm at a loss of words.

To be honest, this is what the Warriors fans were unhappy about when Luke takes over as interim head coach. His rotations are weird.

Regardless, lets see how he does in the real season. Preseason rotations are nothing since some of the players won't be in the team anymore.


The Warriors were at their best when Luke was in charge so if there was fans complaining, they shouldn't have been.

Dave expected JC to be treated as the best player. Since that isn't happening he is whining about anything he can think of. It's the preseason, let's not worry about the rotations until we play games that actually count.

I've been following the Warriors for a while since the start of last season and stopped because how much I hate their arrogance, and indeed, this is what I've seen from their fans, they don't like how Luke is doing with their rotations despite they win alot of games, I don't remember the details but I do remember that during the 24-0 streak the Warriors were mostly the trailing one during the 1st-3rd quarter, and then Walton puts the starting lineup back in the 4th to let Steph & co. bail them out like crazy.
If you could check it out I'm sure you'll find out that the last few wins were not dominant as you think. That's why the Warriors were exhausted during the playoff run. They don't have energy to keep it up with the Cavaliers who sleepwalk through the season and the playoffs.


The biggest reasons the Warriors "didn't have energy" was because Dray was suspended for Game 5, Bogut got hurt game 6 and Igoudala hirt his back in either game 5 or 6.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Halflife
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 15 Aug 2015
Posts: 16799

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 5:47 pm    Post subject:

I love Luke but if our starters are struggling why not start super sub clarkson instead of super sub Lou/nick.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
The Logo
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 25 Jul 2013
Posts: 9577
Location: Salem, OR

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 5:49 pm    Post subject:

Outspoken wrote:
Dave20 wrote:
His rotations are terrible. I'm at a loss of words.


I agree. I don't ever wanna see a lou/young starting lineup. I mean what have preseason really established from a starting standpoint? he doesn't even have a idea of the starting line up. lou is not a starter nor is young.

And Young won't be once Deng starts on opening night. The only times when Nick started was because Deng was resting
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Dave20
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 15 Jun 2013
Posts: 11333

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 5:51 pm    Post subject:

Outspoken wrote:
Dave20 wrote:
His rotations are terrible. I'm at a loss of words.


I agree. I don't ever wanna see a lou/young starting lineup. I mean what have preseason really established from a starting standpoint? he doesn't even have a idea of the starting line up. lou is not a starter nor is young.
There has to be something else going on that we don't know about because there's no way Lou should ever start over Clarkson.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Halflife
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 15 Aug 2015
Posts: 16799

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 5:57 pm    Post subject:

Dave20 wrote:
Outspoken wrote:
Dave20 wrote:
His rotations are terrible. I'm at a loss of words.


I agree. I don't ever wanna see a lou/young starting lineup. I mean what have preseason really established from a starting standpoint? he doesn't even have a idea of the starting line up. lou is not a starter nor is young.
There has to be something else going on that we don't know about because there's no way Lou should ever start over Clarkson.

We have 3 sixth men. Jc/Lou/nick. Jc is better at that roll than others.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
AllorNothing
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 08 Oct 2001
Posts: 18448

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 6:05 pm    Post subject:

Halflife wrote:
Dave20 wrote:
Outspoken wrote:
Dave20 wrote:
His rotations are terrible. I'm at a loss of words.


I agree. I don't ever wanna see a lou/young starting lineup. I mean what have preseason really established from a starting standpoint? he doesn't even have a idea of the starting line up. lou is not a starter nor is young.
There has to be something else going on that we don't know about because there's no way Lou should ever start over Clarkson.

We have 3 sixth men. Jc/Lou/nick. Jc is better at that roll than others.

Don't forget Julius as sixth man also.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
greenfrog
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 36081
Location: 502 Bad Gateway

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 6:07 pm    Post subject:

Halflife wrote:
Dave20 wrote:
Outspoken wrote:
Dave20 wrote:
His rotations are terrible. I'm at a loss of words.


I agree. I don't ever wanna see a lou/young starting lineup. I mean what have preseason really established from a starting standpoint? he doesn't even have a idea of the starting line up. lou is not a starter nor is young.
There has to be something else going on that we don't know about because there's no way Lou should ever start over Clarkson.

We have 3 sixth men. Jc/Lou/nick. Jc is better at that roll than others.


JC has more room to grow than the others, but I wouldn't say he's better. We really don't have a starting caliber 2 on the team, and that's a huge problem.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Halflife
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 15 Aug 2015
Posts: 16799

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 6:08 pm    Post subject:

AllorNothing wrote:
Halflife wrote:
Dave20 wrote:
Outspoken wrote:
Dave20 wrote:
His rotations are terrible. I'm at a loss of words.


I agree. I don't ever wanna see a lou/young starting lineup. I mean what have preseason really established from a starting standpoint? he doesn't even have a idea of the starting line up. lou is not a starter nor is young.
There has to be something else going on that we don't know about because there's no way Lou should ever start over Clarkson.

We have 3 sixth men. Jc/Lou/nick. Jc is better at that roll than others.

Don't forget Julius as sixth man also.

Maybe but he gets rbs at a good rate. I think deng will open 1st unit up but if we aren't going to slug Calderon at 2 I would prefer Jc for now even though he is better suited or bench
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jim99187
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 22138

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 6:12 pm    Post subject:

pretty disappointed in Luke with his decision to Start Lou Williams
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 177, 178, 179 ... 816, 817, 818  Next
Page 178 of 818
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB