gsw picks vs. lal picks
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
nomoreshaq
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 5141

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 10:07 am    Post subject: gsw picks vs. lal picks

if you had to quantify a player's draft pick "worth", how would you do so? *LAL picks have incomplete ratings but if you had to reasonably project.

curry (10/10)
klay (9/10)
barnes (8/10)
ezeli (7/10)
green (9/10)

randle (8/10)
clarkson (8/10)
nance (7/10)
dlo (9/10)
ingraham/simmons (9/10) --> totally a guess
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KobeRe-Loaded
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 09 Dec 2003
Posts: 14944

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 10:09 am    Post subject:

Are we really going there? A team with players that just won a championship relative to a team that just finished next to last?
_________________
#11/08/16 America became GREAT again
#Avatar-gate
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Gatekeeper
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 11 Jan 2012
Posts: 5103
Location: Southland Native

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 10:12 am    Post subject:

Come back in three years to see if:

A) We still have our young core intact.
B) We're a playoff contender.
C) Our players have improved significantly.
_________________
Character
Manchester United | Greatest European Moments
Fabric of United - Our Belief
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 10:12 am    Post subject:

KobeRe-Loaded wrote:
Are we really going there? A team with players that just won a championship relative to a team that just finished next to last?


Seriously.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Wino
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 07 Jun 2002
Posts: 9674
Location: San Diego

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 10:14 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
KobeRe-Loaded wrote:
Are we really going there? A team with players that just won a championship relative to a team that just finished next to last?


Seriously.


Double that and
_________________
Never argue with stupid people! They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!! - Twain
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
DangeRuss
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 10 Feb 2016
Posts: 1418

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 10:20 am    Post subject:

A perfect 5/7
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
22
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 05 Apr 2013
Posts: 17063

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 10:27 am    Post subject:

Way too early lol
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
activeverb
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 37470

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 10:29 am    Post subject: Re: gsw picks vs. lal picks

nomoreshaq wrote:
if you had to quantify a player's draft pick "worth", how would you do so? *LAL picks have incomplete ratings but if you had to reasonably project.

curry (10/10)
klay (9/10)
barnes (8/10)
ezeli (7/10)
green (9/10)

randle (8/10)
clarkson (8/10)
nance (7/10)
dlo (9/10)
ingraham/simmons (9/10) --> totally a guess


You are not making "reasonable projections." You're just arbitrarily giving your guys high marks because they're your guys. If they were on other teams, you would rank them lower, because your rankings are based on nothing except what you hope will happen.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KBH
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 13 Sep 2008
Posts: 12171

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 10:55 am    Post subject: Re: gsw picks vs. lal picks

activeverb wrote:
nomoreshaq wrote:
if you had to quantify a player's draft pick "worth", how would you do so? *LAL picks have incomplete ratings but if you had to reasonably project.

curry (10/10)
klay (9/10)
barnes (8/10)
ezeli (7/10)
green (9/10)

randle (8/10)
clarkson (8/10)
nance (7/10)
dlo (9/10)
ingraham/simmons (9/10) --> totally a guess


You are not making "reasonable projections." You're just arbitrarily giving your guys high marks because they're your guys. If they were on other teams, you would rank them lower, because your rankings are based on nothing except what you hope will happen.


The best part is how only Ingram/Simmons is considered total guesses. Get ready, boys. We're winning the 2020 NBA title.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ningchi
Rookie
Rookie


Joined: 19 May 2016
Posts: 8

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 10:57 am    Post subject:

Clarkson should be 10/10 not sure who else you would take at that position in the draft where we got him.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KindCrippler2000
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 02 May 2003
Posts: 15821

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 11:01 am    Post subject:

Ask again in 2 years.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
PHILosophize
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 10758

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 11:19 am    Post subject:

How are Klay Thompson and Draymond Green not a 10/10?? And DLO should be lower just for the Nick Young video alone.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
activeverb
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 37470

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 11:33 am    Post subject: Re: gsw picks vs. lal picks

KBH wrote:
activeverb wrote:
nomoreshaq wrote:
if you had to quantify a player's draft pick "worth", how would you do so? *LAL picks have incomplete ratings but if you had to reasonably project.

curry (10/10)
klay (9/10)
barnes (8/10)
ezeli (7/10)
green (9/10)

randle (8/10)
clarkson (8/10)
nance (7/10)
dlo (9/10)
ingraham/simmons (9/10) --> totally a guess


You are not making "reasonable projections." You're just arbitrarily giving your guys high marks because they're your guys. If they were on other teams, you would rank them lower, because your rankings are based on nothing except what you hope will happen.


The best part is how only Ingram/Simmons is considered total guesses. Get ready, boys. We're winning the 2020 NBA title.


Well, not only are they "total guesses," but that guess is predictably a 9.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
SuperboyReformed
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 07 Oct 2012
Posts: 4083

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 11:51 am    Post subject:

i love how you guys criticize/mock the OP even though he/she states it's "totally a guess". typical. good stuff usual.

i like the OP's idea btw, and it doesn't seem too far off. yes, it's not crazy to go from the worst team to playoff contender in one season...when you are TANKING! what is it that people don't understand about tanking?

remember the spurs? had drob? mvp candidate? tanked. got duncan. won immediately? hello? continued winning for the nest 20 years? that's like the warriors deciding to tank after an injury to curry, post a terrible record, get ben simmons, then carry right along business as usual.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kikanga
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 29279
Location: La La Land

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 11:52 am    Post subject:

KobeRe-Loaded wrote:
Are we really going there? A team with players that just won a championship relative to a team that just finished next to last?



Whenever I talk basketball with my obnoxious cousin who lives in The Bay. I jokingly say Rookie DLO > Prime Curry. And then text him this LINK
Drives him nuts.
_________________
"Every hurt is a lesson, and every lesson makes you better”
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Chronicle
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Posts: 31935
Location: Manhattan

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 11:59 am    Post subject:

kikanga wrote:
KobeRe-Loaded wrote:
Are we really going there? A team with players that just won a championship relative to a team that just finished next to last?



Whenever I talk basketball with my obnoxious cousin who lives in The Bay. I jokingly say Rookie DLO > Prime Curry. And then text him this LINK
Drives him nuts.

Quote:
D'Angelo Russell doing some... unidentified dance

_________________
Kobe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Lucky_Shot
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 10 Jan 2016
Posts: 5140

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 12:14 pm    Post subject:

PHILosophize wrote:
How are Klay Thompson and Draymond Green not a 10/10?? And DLO should be lower just for the Nick Young video alone.


Do people still care about the nick young video?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
nomoreshaq
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 5141

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 12:16 pm    Post subject:

arbitrary ranking criteria

10-mvp
9-all-star
8-solid starter
7-solid rotation player (6th man type)
6-rotation player (7th-8th man)
5-bench depth (9th-10th man)
4-end of the bench (11th man)
3-bottom of the bench (12th man)
2-only there in case someone gets injured
1-NBDL talent

i think ingraham/simmons can reasonably project to be an all-star (based on nothing but speculation) and same with dlo. i think randle and clarkson could become reasonable starters and nance a solid rotation player.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Car54
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 10 Aug 2005
Posts: 14424

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 12:26 pm    Post subject:

KobeRe-Loaded wrote:
Are we really going there? A team with players that just won a championship relative to a team that just finished next to last?


He said projection
_________________
Coach Vogel, Kidd, Hollins
Max slot : Kawhi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
activeverb
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 37470

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 12:35 pm    Post subject:

SuperboyReformed wrote:
i love how you guys criticize/mock the OP even though he/she states it's "totally a guess". typical. good stuff usual.

i like the OP's idea btw, and it doesn't seem too far off. yes, it's not crazy to go from the worst team to playoff contender in one season...when you are TANKING! what is it that people don't understand about tanking?

remember the spurs? had drob? mvp candidate? tanked. got duncan. won immediately? hello? continued winning for the nest 20 years? that's like the warriors deciding to tank after an injury to curry, post a terrible record, get ben simmons, then carry right along business as usual.


The Spurs were a 59 win team with an MVP level guy in Robinson, a 20 ppg all-star in Sean Elliot, and other key pieces. Robinson got hurt; they sunk artificially, and they lucked into a GOAT level guy in Duncan.

That's not our situation. We had a crappy team with no foundation. We've added some promising rookies who may or may not pan out, but none of them are no-brainer, #1 picks in any era like Duncan or Robinson.

So, yeah, at this point it's silly to compare us to the Warriors and the Spurs simply because we dream of being as successful as the Warriors and Spurs.

When a poster declares that DLO is equal to Draymond Green or Klay Thompson right now he's being delusional.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
nomoreshaq
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 5141

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 12:42 pm    Post subject:

activeverb wrote:
SuperboyReformed wrote:
i love how you guys criticize/mock the OP even though he/she states it's "totally a guess". typical. good stuff usual.

i like the OP's idea btw, and it doesn't seem too far off. yes, it's not crazy to go from the worst team to playoff contender in one season...when you are TANKING! what is it that people don't understand about tanking?

remember the spurs? had drob? mvp candidate? tanked. got duncan. won immediately? hello? continued winning for the nest 20 years? that's like the warriors deciding to tank after an injury to curry, post a terrible record, get ben simmons, then carry right along business as usual.


The Spurs were a 59 win team with an MVP level guy in Robinson. He got hurt; they sunk artificially, and they lucked into a GOAT level guy in Duncan.

That's not our situation. We had a crappy team with no foundation. We've added some promising rookies who may or may not pan out, but none of them are no-brainer, #1 picks in any era like Duncan or Robinson.

So, yeah, at this point it's silly to compare us to the Warriors and the Spurs simply because we dream of being as successful as the Warriors and Spurs.

When a poster declares that DLO is equal to Draymond Green or Klay Thompson right now he's being delusional.


i'm not saying equal. sheesh. i'm just saying can we reasonably project. no one is saying sacre projects out to shaq, but dlo a multiple all-star? eh, that's not a total pipe crack reach. can dlo be a max player and maybe top 5-7 in his position in a few years? i, and seemingly many others, think that's reasonable.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
activeverb
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 37470

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 12:44 pm    Post subject:

nomoreshaq wrote:
arbitrary ranking criteria

10-mvp
9-all-star
8-solid starter
7-solid rotation player (6th man type)
6-rotation player (7th-8th man)
5-bench depth (9th-10th man)
4-end of the bench (11th man)
3-bottom of the bench (12th man)
2-only there in case someone gets injured
1-NBDL talent

i think ingraham/simmons can reasonably project to be an all-star (based on nothing but speculation) and same with dlo. i think randle and clarkson could become reasonable starters and nance a solid rotation player.


I don't see how a "reasonable projection" can be based on "nothing but speculation." Seems like you're just pulling numbers out of thin air.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
PHILosophize
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 10758

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 1:00 pm    Post subject:

Lucky_Shot wrote:
PHILosophize wrote:
How are Klay Thompson and Draymond Green not a 10/10?? And DLO should be lower just for the Nick Young video alone.


Do people still care about the nick young video?


Idk dude but if I was on the team I could never trust him again, at least for like a year or so when he's hopefully more mature.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KobeRe-Loaded
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 09 Dec 2003
Posts: 14944

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 1:00 pm    Post subject:

Car54 wrote:
KobeRe-Loaded wrote:
Are we really going there? A team with players that just won a championship relative to a team that just finished next to last?


He said projection


No he said "reasonably project".
_________________
#11/08/16 America became GREAT again
#Avatar-gate
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
activeverb
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 37470

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 1:01 pm    Post subject:

nomoreshaq wrote:
i'm not saying equal. sheesh. i'm just saying can we reasonably project. no one is saying sacre projects out to shaq, but dlo a multiple all-star? eh, that's not a total pipe crack reach. can dlo be a max player and maybe top 5-7 in his position in a few years? i, and seemingly many others, think that's reasonable.


I'm not sure if I'd consider your projections "reasonable" -- I'd say they are the upper end possibility, but there are many more modest outcomes that are just as likely.

So what you call "reasonable projections," I'd call "optimistic projections."

And there is a big difference between "reasonable" and "optimistic."

All I'm saying is it's way too early to start penciling all-star appearances for these guys and dynasties for the Lakers. Wouldn't surprise me if some of these guys aren't even here anymore by the time we are a contender again.

But it's cool. People are excited we kept the draft pick, so they are going overboard on their excitement.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB