OFFICIAL BRANDON INGRAM THREAD
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 905, 906, 907 ... 1883, 1884, 1885  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> General Basketball Discussion Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mookielala
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 29 Jul 2012
Posts: 3026

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 8:31 am    Post subject:

TheBlackMamba wrote:
55 wrote:
pio2u wrote:
Lakers Trade Rumors: Is a Brandon Ingram for Kawhi Leonard flip worth it?

Quote:
Kawhi Leonard may be heading out of San Antonio, which may lead to interesting Lakers trade rumors. This raises the question: do you trade Brandon Ingram?


https://lasportshub.com/2018/01/24/lakers-trade-rumors-ingram-kawhi-leonard/


What makes this make some sense, is that BI is exactly the type of player/person the Spurs like. He fits the Pop mold. Doesn't showboat, puts his head down and does his work.


On the flip side, that coaching staff would also be perfect for him. Pop would get on him for every little mistake, which would be great for him in the long run. And BI + Chip Engelland =


Kawhi is one of very few players off the top of my head I'd consider trading BI for, but Spurs would not give up Kawhi (nor would other teams give up any of those other players). That article is just a fan site trying to get traffic.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lakersfan8
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 27 May 2014
Posts: 2991

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 9:01 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
I still think ultimately, BI will be a high level support player more than a #1 option alpha lead player. That's fine with me (unless we can't find any true #1 options, though I think Kuz may be a better #1 option amongst our current core group if we were unable to upgrade via FA).

I might be the only one here but I don't think Kuz can be a # 1 option. He doesn't have the handling skill or the physicality to create for himself. His playing style is like a bigger version of Klay Thompson who hasn't been the # 1 option for his team. Ball will never be the top scoring option for a good team. The only one who has the potential to be our go-to-guy is Ingram.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lakersfan8
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 27 May 2014
Posts: 2991

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 9:02 am    Post subject:

Vanquish wrote:
pio2u wrote:
Lakers Trade Rumors: Is a Brandon Ingram for Kawhi Leonard flip worth it?

Quote:
Kawhi Leonard may be heading out of San Antonio, which may lead to interesting Lakers trade rumors. This raises the question: do you trade Brandon Ingram?


https://lasportshub.com/2018/01/24/lakers-trade-rumors-ingram-kawhi-leonard/


Provided Kawhi is healthy, I would do that trade everyday and twice on sunday!

I will not do that trade. If Kawhi is healthy, there is no reason why Spurs will trade him.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 9:11 am    Post subject:

lakersfan8 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
I still think ultimately, BI will be a high level support player more than a #1 option alpha lead player. That's fine with me (unless we can't find any true #1 options, though I think Kuz may be a better #1 option amongst our current core group if we were unable to upgrade via FA).

I might be the only one here but I don't think Kuz can be a # 1 option. He doesn't have the handling skill or the physicality to create for himself. His playing style is like a bigger version of Klay Thompson who hasn't been the # 1 option for his team. Ball will never be the top scoring option for a good team. The only one who has the potential to be our go-to-guy is Ingram.


Agree about Kuz's ballhandling, but he can score in so many different ways right now than BI. 3s, post ups, mid range, off the dribble, etc. He has a better toolset scoring wise than BI.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
tox
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Nov 2015
Posts: 17835

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 9:14 am    Post subject:

jjangx27 wrote:
Vanquish wrote:
pio2u wrote:
Lakers Trade Rumors: Is a Brandon Ingram for Kawhi Leonard flip worth it?

Quote:
Kawhi Leonard may be heading out of San Antonio, which may lead to interesting Lakers trade rumors. This raises the question: do you trade Brandon Ingram?


https://lasportshub.com/2018/01/24/lakers-trade-rumors-ingram-kawhi-leonard/


Provided Kawhi is healthy, I would do that trade everyday and twice on sunday!


Yea that's not even up for debate

Kawhi is making $17M. Getting Kawhi would make a legit Big 3 of Kawhi/PG/LeBron possible. Possibly even while stretching Deng. Hard to argue with that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lakersfan8
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 27 May 2014
Posts: 2991

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 9:34 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
lakersfan8 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
I still think ultimately, BI will be a high level support player more than a #1 option alpha lead player. That's fine with me (unless we can't find any true #1 options, though I think Kuz may be a better #1 option amongst our current core group if we were unable to upgrade via FA).

I might be the only one here but I don't think Kuz can be a # 1 option. He doesn't have the handling skill or the physicality to create for himself. His playing style is like a bigger version of Klay Thompson who hasn't been the # 1 option for his team. Ball will never be the top scoring option for a good team. The only one who has the potential to be our go-to-guy is Ingram.


Agree about Kuz's ballhandling, but he can score in so many different ways right now than BI. 3s, post ups, mid range, off the dribble, etc. He has a better toolset scoring wise than BI.

Yes, for now. The lack of isolation play will become a major problem if we don't have that go-to-guy on our team. He can easily be a 20+ ppg scorer if playing alongside a dominant player. If he is the # 1 option, he will be facing Draymond Green or Leonard those kinds of players and I am very skeptical about how he would perform.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
RusselDoeee01
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 28 Apr 2014
Posts: 1072

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 9:45 am    Post subject:

There isnt a single player in the league I would trade Ingram for.

He is going to be a SUPERSTAR..

Does he struggle at times? Yes.. But the kid is 20 years old. Some of the shots he makes are shots 90% of the league cant make. His length and size is going to be a problem down the road for all opposing teams.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
governator
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 24995

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 9:48 am    Post subject:

RusselDoeee01 wrote:
There isnt a single player in the league I would trade Ingram for.

He is going to be a SUPERSTAR..

Does he struggle at times? Yes.. But the kid is 20 years old. Some of the shots he makes are shots 90% of the league cant make. His length and size is going to be a problem down the road for all opposing teams.

I like the enthusiasm but do you foresee BI being better than Kawhi?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
RusselDoeee01
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 28 Apr 2014
Posts: 1072

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 9:54 am    Post subject:

governator wrote:
RusselDoeee01 wrote:
There isnt a single player in the league I would trade Ingram for.

He is going to be a SUPERSTAR..

Does he struggle at times? Yes.. But the kid is 20 years old. Some of the shots he makes are shots 90% of the league cant make. His length and size is going to be a problem down the road for all opposing teams.

I like the enthusiasm but do you foresee BI being better than Kawhi?


Given his age, and skillset already, I think he will be better than Kawhi.. Kawhi is already having injury issues and its hard to gauge just how good Kawhi is when he has been on such a good team his whole career. I think a 20 year old Kawhi would not have produced that well with this current lakers team.

In Basketball players tend to play better with better talent around them. Ingram hasn't had the most talent to his disposal in his young career.

Almost every game there is one move or shot where i just saw "wow." We saw a flash of greatness when he dropped 30 on durant earlier in the season.

With all that being said.. He must increase his confidence. Give him the swagger Clarkson and Randle have, and he would be averaging 20ppg easily.

I think this offseason is when we will really see just how much he can improve.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
AFireInside619
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 11 Dec 2015
Posts: 11447

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 9:59 am    Post subject:

Luminous8 wrote:
MJST wrote:
Something Ingram needs to get over is his selfishness.

That's a constant with young players, they have their selfish moments. But BI should get reprimanded when he takes a bad shot or holds the ball and tries to iso it without moving it.

I know Magic wants to force BI into being "the guy" but not at the expense of what we're trying to do, especially if he's not ready for it. Which he isn't, yet.

Off ball Ingram is the best Ingram, when he starts breaking that he needs to be pulled to the side and told.


Funny you never thought that with Randleeeeeee did it for two straight years and STILL has times where he does it.


Randle still has issues passing to the open man on 2 on 1 fast breaks. It happened twice a few games ago. He'd rather take the charging foul. He's also given up on defense (as well as many others) during our big losing streak. I'm definitely nitpicking because he won plenty of games for us this year, but the "selfish" line could be applied to Randle too, but like with BI, both cases would be highly inappropriate.

BI needs to become the man at some point. And we need to find out if he can become that. I'm upset that he miss that 2 point jumper at the end of the Celtics game, but I would rather see him take that and miss, than have a player inconsequential to our future take that shot (ala KCP). If BI played for San Antonio or Boston I'm sure the narrative would be different on him. People are creaming over JBrown and I'm sure BI would contribute in a similar way. Pop would love to get BI on the Spurs I would imagine. They tried to get Stanley Freakin Johnson last season on the cheap so they could mold him the "Spur's Way" with their shooting guru.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Baron Von Humongous
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 02 Jul 2015
Posts: 32979

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 10:10 am    Post subject:

AFireInside619 wrote:
Luminous8 wrote:
MJST wrote:
Something Ingram needs to get over is his selfishness.

That's a constant with young players, they have their selfish moments. But BI should get reprimanded when he takes a bad shot or holds the ball and tries to iso it without moving it.

I know Magic wants to force BI into being "the guy" but not at the expense of what we're trying to do, especially if he's not ready for it. Which he isn't, yet.

Off ball Ingram is the best Ingram, when he starts breaking that he needs to be pulled to the side and told.


Funny you never thought that with Randleeeeeee did it for two straight years and STILL has times where he does it.


Randle still has issues passing to the open man on 2 on 1 fast breaks. It happened twice a few games ago. He'd rather take the charging foul. He's also given up on defense (as well as many others) during our big losing streak. I'm definitely nitpicking because he won plenty of games for us this year, but the "selfish" line could be applied to Randle too, but like with BI, both cases would be highly inappropriate.

BI needs to become the man at some point. And we need to find out if he can become that. I'm upset that he miss that 2 point jumper at the end of the Celtics game, but I would rather see him take that and miss, than have a player inconsequential to our future take that shot (ala KCP). If BI played for San Antonio or Boston I'm sure the narrative would be different on him. People are creaming over JBrown and I'm sure BI would contribute in a similar way. Pop would love to get BI on the Spurs I would imagine. They tried to get Stanley Freakin Johnson last season on the cheap so they could mold him the "Spur's Way" with their shooting guru.

Bill Simmons isn't people. I see appreciation of Jaylen Brown in the context of how Stevens has gotten the kid's game under control moreso than excitement over Brown the player.

Which brings up the same questions about BI's development on the Lakers: is it better to force a young player to be "the man" early on? If a young player is under team control for up to nine years, does he need to become the man by seasons two or three? Should he be expected to? Does it actually lower a team's ceiling when constructing a roster? Should the "Spurs way" of development be emulated?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
AFireInside619
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 11 Dec 2015
Posts: 11447

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 10:50 am    Post subject:

Baron Von Humongous wrote:
AFireInside619 wrote:
Luminous8 wrote:
MJST wrote:
Something Ingram needs to get over is his selfishness.

That's a constant with young players, they have their selfish moments. But BI should get reprimanded when he takes a bad shot or holds the ball and tries to iso it without moving it.

I know Magic wants to force BI into being "the guy" but not at the expense of what we're trying to do, especially if he's not ready for it. Which he isn't, yet.

Off ball Ingram is the best Ingram, when he starts breaking that he needs to be pulled to the side and told.


Funny you never thought that with Randleeeeeee did it for two straight years and STILL has times where he does it.


Randle still has issues passing to the open man on 2 on 1 fast breaks. It happened twice a few games ago. He'd rather take the charging foul. He's also given up on defense (as well as many others) during our big losing streak. I'm definitely nitpicking because he won plenty of games for us this year, but the "selfish" line could be applied to Randle too, but like with BI, both cases would be highly inappropriate.

BI needs to become the man at some point. And we need to find out if he can become that. I'm upset that he miss that 2 point jumper at the end of the Celtics game, but I would rather see him take that and miss, than have a player inconsequential to our future take that shot (ala KCP). If BI played for San Antonio or Boston I'm sure the narrative would be different on him. People are creaming over JBrown and I'm sure BI would contribute in a similar way. Pop would love to get BI on the Spurs I would imagine. They tried to get Stanley Freakin Johnson last season on the cheap so they could mold him the "Spur's Way" with their shooting guru.

Bill Simmons isn't people. I see appreciation of Jaylen Brown in the context of how Stevens has gotten the kid's game under control moreso than excitement over Brown the player.

Which brings up the same questions about BI's development on the Lakers: is it better to force a young player to be "the man" early on? If a young player is under team control for up to nine years, does he need to become the man by seasons two or three? Should he be expected to? Does it actually lower a team's ceiling when constructing a roster? Should the "Spurs way" of development be emulated?


Good question. If he has an open jump shot at the end of a game, would you rather have him pass the ball out? That's basically my question. We need players like Kuzma, Ingram, Ball, etc to step up and make take those open shots. Miss or make. Unfortunately it was a horrible brick. Why were we all mad when LouWill got the call down the stretch over DLO last season? That's because we wanted our young guys to gain that experience. Randle is never scared of taking a late game shot, granted they are usually 8 feet closer. All the way back to his first Summer League, when JC tipped in the Randle miss in the sudden death OT win. I didn't want to see Scrub McScrubbins take that shot.

I also wonder if Kobe shot those three air balls vs Utah in today's Internet and social media age. How badly would we have skewered him?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
2019
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 03 Dec 2014
Posts: 10786

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 10:56 am    Post subject:

RusselDoeee01 wrote:
governator wrote:
RusselDoeee01 wrote:
There isnt a single player in the league I would trade Ingram for.

He is going to be a SUPERSTAR..

Does he struggle at times? Yes.. But the kid is 20 years old. Some of the shots he makes are shots 90% of the league cant make. His length and size is going to be a problem down the road for all opposing teams.

I like the enthusiasm but do you foresee BI being better than Kawhi?


Given his age, and skillset already, I think he will be better than Kawhi.. Kawhi is already having injury issues and its hard to gauge just how good Kawhi is when he has been on such a good team his whole career. I think a 20 year old Kawhi would not have produced that well with this current lakers team.

In Basketball players tend to play better with better talent around them. Ingram hasn't had the most talent to his disposal in his young career.

Almost every game there is one move or shot where i just saw "wow." We saw a flash of greatness when he dropped 30 on durant earlier in the season.

With all that being said.. He must increase his confidence. Give him the swagger Clarkson and Randle have, and he would be averaging 20ppg easily.

I think this offseason is when we will really see just how much he can improve.


it's impossible to say definitively, but hard to down a top 5 guy today...

assuming a deal like that would be plausible, which it would never be as SA has no reason to trade Kwahi, you have to do it. LeBron would be drolling over the idea of coming to LA as would PG. Kwahi is still young enough to play dominant for 8 more years and we'd still have Kuzma and Lonzo. So the answer is easy yes but SA would never ever even remotely consider that deal.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Vin
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 03 Jan 2013
Posts: 6005
Location: France

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 11:27 am    Post subject:

I love BI and thinks he's going to be good but there is no way I don't instantly trade him for the best two way player in the game. Spurs wouldn't though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epak
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 34147

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 11:35 am    Post subject:

Wow.
BI, Zubac and Corey for KL?

That's such a tough one. For today, you say yes!
But there's that gut feeling that BI and Zubac in a Spurs system would kill in the future.

Let's do it!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Luminous8
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 Apr 2017
Posts: 2192

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 11:38 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
I still think ultimately, BI will be a high level support player more than a #1 option alpha lead player. That's fine with me (unless we can't find any true #1 options, though I think Kuz may be a better #1 option amongst our current core group if we were unable to upgrade via FA).


Care to elaborate on why you think he's more of a support player than a #1 when he's improved leaps and bounds in one season. 20 years old.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 11:38 am    Post subject:

Luminous8 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
I still think ultimately, BI will be a high level support player more than a #1 option alpha lead player. That's fine with me (unless we can't find any true #1 options, though I think Kuz may be a better #1 option amongst our current core group if we were unable to upgrade via FA).


Care to elaborate on why you think he's more of a support player than a #1 when he's improved leaps and bounds in one season. 20 years old.


He has, but I don't see him as #1 option. That's my elaboration.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Vin
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 03 Jan 2013
Posts: 6005
Location: France

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 11:40 am    Post subject:

epak wrote:
Wow.
BI, Zubac and Corey for KL?

That's such a tough one. For today, you say yes!
But there's that gut feeling that BI and Zubac in a Spurs system would kill in the future.

Let's do it!


Zu hasn't shown much has he ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
defense
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Jan 2010
Posts: 39322

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 11:43 am    Post subject:

Ingram is ranked 78th best SF at -2.86
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
danzag
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 28 Apr 2013
Posts: 22244
Location: Brazil

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 12:05 pm    Post subject:

epak wrote:
Wow.
BI, Zubac and Corey for KL?

That's such a tough one. For today, you say yes!
But there's that gut feeling that BI and Zubac in a Spurs system would kill in the future.

Let's do it!


I'd easily pull the trigger on that one RIGHT NOW.

Just add PG13 next year and let's go.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
tox
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Nov 2015
Posts: 17835

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 1:16 pm    Post subject:

epak wrote:
Wow.
BI, Zubac and Corey for KL?

That's such a tough one. For today, you say yes!
But there's that gut feeling that BI and Zubac in a Spurs system would kill in the future.

Let's do it!

BI would be a better Spur than Laker, if that makes sense.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Sentient Meat
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 04 Jul 2014
Posts: 12978

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 1:22 pm    Post subject:

If the Spurs traded Kawhi, it would mean that quad injury is something chronic or not understood. You don't trade Ingram for that unknown quantity.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Sina
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 12 Jul 2015
Posts: 1793

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 1:32 pm    Post subject:

Won’t trade Ingram.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
12
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 03 Sep 2010
Posts: 8617

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 2:19 pm    Post subject:

@ people who wanna trade BI
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
MJST
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 26078

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 2:19 pm    Post subject:

Luminous8 wrote:
MJST wrote:
Something Ingram needs to get over is his selfishness.

That's a constant with young players, they have their selfish moments. But BI should get reprimanded when he takes a bad shot or holds the ball and tries to iso it without moving it.

I know Magic wants to force BI into being "the guy" but not at the expense of what we're trying to do, especially if he's not ready for it. Which he isn't, yet.

Off ball Ingram is the best Ingram, when he starts breaking that he needs to be pulled to the side and told.


Funny you never thought that with Randleeeeeee did it for two straight years and STILL has times where he does it.


Actually I did and have, I just didn't create a hyperbole like other posters did when they wanted to act like that's all he was. I've called out Clarkson, Randle, Kuzma and Ingram out for selfish moments.

I don't however watch Randle survey the floor and when there's no off ball movement have to iso and then go type out "What a selfish player."

So if Ingram did that, I wouldn't say anything. He didn't however.

Also if you divert your eyes just a sentence lower

Quote:
That's a constant with young players, they have their selfish moments.

I know Magic wants to force BI into being "the guy" but not at the expense of what we're trying to do, especially if he's not ready for it. Which he isn't, yet.

Off ball Ingram is the best Ingram, when he starts breaking that he needs to be pulled to the side and told.


Now, if you can, try to disagree with the actual point. But you won't be able to.
_________________
How NBA 2K18 failed the All-Time Lakers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxMBYm3wwxk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> General Basketball Discussion All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 905, 906, 907 ... 1883, 1884, 1885  Next
Page 906 of 1885
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB