OFFICIAL BRANDON INGRAM THREAD
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 1663, 1664, 1665 ... 1883, 1884, 1885  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> General Basketball Discussion Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
adkindo
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 40345
Location: Dirty South

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2019 10:04 pm    Post subject:

1ngr4m wrote:
Lakesh0wtime wrote:
Lazlow wrote:
Strange. Ingram has a decent game going but doesn't take the game over and carry? Isn't he supposed to be a "scorer" and "Lebron's Pippen"? Why couldn't he carry us tonight? Is there a reason why he only has 1 total 30+ point game in his career?


Dude stfu lol


If Big Bol is currently banned or suspended, then Lazlow has to be next in line right?

He's made an account for the sole purpose of bashing one player, 90% of his posts are about Ingram.


I am not sure why you guys continue to respond to him....he is clearly desperate for attention, and spewing stupidity is apparently the only way he feels he can get it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Thee Black Mamba
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 08 Feb 2011
Posts: 488

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2019 10:05 pm    Post subject:

Plus Minus
Ingram -10
Kuzma 0
Zu -10
KCP -1
Rondo -1
Mcgee -1
Beas -9
Hart -17
Lance -15
Svi -9
Mo -2

and Tyson didnt play a single minute.
_________________
I was horribly wrong about Brandon Ingram.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Sentient Meat
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 04 Jul 2014
Posts: 12978

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2019 10:06 pm    Post subject:

adkindo wrote:
1ngr4m wrote:
Lakesh0wtime wrote:
Lazlow wrote:
Strange. Ingram has a decent game going but doesn't take the game over and carry? Isn't he supposed to be a "scorer" and "Lebron's Pippen"? Why couldn't he carry us tonight? Is there a reason why he only has 1 total 30+ point game in his career?


Dude stfu lol


If Big Bol is currently banned or suspended, then Lazlow has to be next in line right?

He's made an account for the sole purpose of bashing one player, 90% of his posts are about Ingram.


I am not sure why you guys continue to respond to him....he is clearly desperate for attention, and spewing stupidity is apparently the only way he feels he can get it.


The reason you post against trolls... is because lurkers and newcomers will come and see it like someone who visits a neighborhood and sees poop all over the lawns.

It's easy to do it... they get no rise out of me, and it kills time while waiting for some interesting news or comment to come by.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Lazlow
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 06 Jan 2019
Posts: 345
Location: Cypress, California

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2019 10:07 pm    Post subject:

Thee Black Mamba wrote:
Plus Minus
Ingram -10
Kuzma 0
Zu -10
KCP -1
Rondo -1
Mcgee -1
Beas -9
Hart -17
Lance -15
Svi -9
Mo -2

and Tyson didnt play a single minute.

He really should've played. Might've put some fear into Towns and cause him to fold as usual.

But yeah we already knew Ingram is an empty stat player that does nothing well. Just an average, fringe nba starter.
_________________
https://www.landofbasketball.com/player_comparison/brandon_ingram_vs_tim_thomas.htm
Brandon "Fool's Gold" Ingram
https://www.landofbasketball.com/player_comparison/brandon_ingram_vs_darius_miles.htm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epak
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 34147

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2019 10:09 pm    Post subject:

You know someone is a troll when they have Kobe's mug shot as his avi.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
adkindo
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 40345
Location: Dirty South

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2019 10:09 pm    Post subject:

Thee Black Mamba wrote:
Plus Minus
Ingram -10
Kuzma 0
Zu -10
KCP -1
Rondo -1
Mcgee -1
Beas -9
Hart -17
Lance -15
Svi -9
Mo -2

and Tyson didnt play a single minute.


perfect example how +/- from a single game means nothing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Lazlow
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 06 Jan 2019
Posts: 345
Location: Cypress, California

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2019 10:10 pm    Post subject:

epak wrote:
You know someone is a troll when they have Kobe's mug shot as his avi.

I legit can't change it. What do you want me to do?
_________________
https://www.landofbasketball.com/player_comparison/brandon_ingram_vs_tim_thomas.htm
Brandon "Fool's Gold" Ingram
https://www.landofbasketball.com/player_comparison/brandon_ingram_vs_darius_miles.htm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Lakesh0wtime
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 28 Mar 2016
Posts: 5351

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2019 10:20 pm    Post subject:

At this point I hope he gets traded soon for his sake.

We are horrible at developing players.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
statyin
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 05 Jul 2013
Posts: 440

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2019 10:53 pm    Post subject:

Lakesh0wtime wrote:
At this point I hope he gets traded soon for his sake.

We are horrible at developing players.


If BI can shoot 3, he will look much much better. I am not sure if we failed to develop him on this aspect, or he just sucks in shooting long range shot.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
tox
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Nov 2015
Posts: 17876

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2019 10:55 pm    Post subject:

adkindo wrote:
Thee Black Mamba wrote:
Plus Minus
Ingram -10
Kuzma 0
Zu -10
KCP -1
Rondo -1
Mcgee -1
Beas -9
Hart -17
Lance -15
Svi -9
Mo -2

and Tyson didnt play a single minute.


perfect example how +/- from a single game means nothing

Pretty much, feel like you can basically explain +/- by whether they played with Rondo or not
Which makes sense since he's the only point guard available.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerLogic
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 27 Mar 2005
Posts: 17886

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2019 11:35 pm    Post subject:

statyin wrote:
Lakesh0wtime wrote:
At this point I hope he gets traded soon for his sake.

We are horrible at developing players.


If BI can shoot 3, he will look much much better. I am not sure if we failed to develop him on this aspect, or he just sucks in shooting long range shot.


His jumper is broke.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KeepItRealOrElse
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 11 Oct 2012
Posts: 32767

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2019 11:37 pm    Post subject:

LakerLogic wrote:
statyin wrote:
Lakesh0wtime wrote:
At this point I hope he gets traded soon for his sake.

We are horrible at developing players.


If BI can shoot 3, he will look much much better. I am not sure if we failed to develop him on this aspect, or he just sucks in shooting long range shot.


His jumper is broke.


But 39%!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
GoldenThroat
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 37474

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2019 12:27 am    Post subject:

I suspended Lazlow and told him to tone it down when he comes back.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
SocalDevin
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 May 2016
Posts: 7825
Location: Long Beach

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2019 12:28 am    Post subject:

Last 10 games..

17.1 47.8%
5.9 Boards
4.1 Assists

He's almost at a point where he's consistently solid.. Yet the same cast of characters in here are still negative.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KeepItRealOrElse
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 11 Oct 2012
Posts: 32767

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2019 1:43 am    Post subject:

SocalDevin wrote:
Last 10 games..

17.1 47.8%
5.9 Boards
4.1 Assists

He's almost at a point where he's consistently solid.. Yet the same cast of characters in here are still negative.


IMO - most of those games have had both good stretches and bad stretches within them. Idk if any of those games have been like “wow, that was legit great for him”... He’s had some damn solid stat lines, but again, within those games there have been bad stretches or huge lulls... Halfs where he’s disappeared or played ISO ball and hurt us.. I wouldn’t call it a legit good stretch, solid with very solid numbers on a talent deprived team - sure

Not a good enough stretch to be above critique or the general saltiness when you don’t help a plummeting team win
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
SocalDevin
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 May 2016
Posts: 7825
Location: Long Beach

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2019 2:21 am    Post subject:

KeepItRealOrElse wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
Last 10 games..

17.1 47.8%
5.9 Boards
4.1 Assists

He's almost at a point where he's consistently solid.. Yet the same cast of characters in here are still negative.


IMO - most of those games have had both good stretches and bad stretches within them. Idk if any of those games have been like “wow, that was legit great for him”... He’s had some damn solid stat lines, but again, within those games there have been bad stretches or huge lulls... Halfs where he’s disappeared or played ISO ball and hurt us.. I wouldn’t call it a legit good stretch, solid with very solid numbers on a talent deprived team - sure

Not a good enough stretch to be above critique or the general saltiness when you don’t help a plummeting team win


You see anywhere in the context I provided after the numbers, that would indicate that I was communicating we should be wowed by his play? I didn't, nor did I communicate that he's had a good stretch either. Read it again.

He's not good enough to will a plummeting team into a win, very few players are. It's a criticism unworthy of even being noted.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KeepItRealOrElse
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 11 Oct 2012
Posts: 32767

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2019 2:36 am    Post subject:

SocalDevin wrote:
KeepItRealOrElse wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
Last 10 games..

17.1 47.8%
5.9 Boards
4.1 Assists

He's almost at a point where he's consistently solid.. Yet the same cast of characters in here are still negative.


IMO - most of those games have had both good stretches and bad stretches within them. Idk if any of those games have been like “wow, that was legit great for him”... He’s had some damn solid stat lines, but again, within those games there have been bad stretches or huge lulls... Halfs where he’s disappeared or played ISO ball and hurt us.. I wouldn’t call it a legit good stretch, solid with very solid numbers on a talent deprived team - sure

Not a good enough stretch to be above critique or the general saltiness when you don’t help a plummeting team win


You see anywhere in the context I provided after the numbers, that would indicate that I was communicating we should be wowed by his play? I didn't, nor did I communicate that he's had a good stretch either. Read it again.

He's not good enough to will a plummeting team into a win, very few players are. It's a criticism unworthy of even being noted.


There is a large gap between ‘willing/carrying’, and just a great consistent 4Qs for him.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
hype
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 4373
Location: Lake Nacimiento

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2019 2:37 am    Post subject:

SocalDevin wrote:
KeepItRealOrElse wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
Last 10 games..

17.1 47.8%
5.9 Boards
4.1 Assists

He's almost at a point where he's consistently solid.. Yet the same cast of characters in here are still negative.


IMO - most of those games have had both good stretches and bad stretches within them. Idk if any of those games have been like “wow, that was legit great for him”... He’s had some damn solid stat lines, but again, within those games there have been bad stretches or huge lulls... Halfs where he’s disappeared or played ISO ball and hurt us.. I wouldn’t call it a legit good stretch, solid with very solid numbers on a talent deprived team - sure

Not a good enough stretch to be above critique or the general saltiness when you don’t help a plummeting team win


You see anywhere in the context I provided after the numbers, that would indicate that I was communicating we should be wowed by his play? I didn't, nor did I communicate that he's had a good stretch either. Read it again.

He's not good enough to will a plummeting team into a win, very few players are. It's a criticism unworthy of even being noted.


Exactly how I feel, he clearly is still growing.. It is as blatantly obvious as can be.. You can either take the logical view and see that he has grown consistently since he entered the league and still is not even close to done growing or you can ignore he is one of the youngest players on the roster still and be upset he isn't a superstar.. Lebron is the only player on this roster that can do that consistently, nobody else really comes close at this point. I still see a damn good prospect in Ingram personally and think he will grow into a very solid player and wouldn't be surprised if he ends up being the best prospect we have but he could also take the longest to get there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
SocalDevin
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 May 2016
Posts: 7825
Location: Long Beach

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2019 2:46 am    Post subject:

hype wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
KeepItRealOrElse wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
Last 10 games..

17.1 47.8%
5.9 Boards
4.1 Assists

He's almost at a point where he's consistently solid.. Yet the same cast of characters in here are still negative.


IMO - most of those games have had both good stretches and bad stretches within them. Idk if any of those games have been like “wow, that was legit great for him”... He’s had some damn solid stat lines, but again, within those games there have been bad stretches or huge lulls... Halfs where he’s disappeared or played ISO ball and hurt us.. I wouldn’t call it a legit good stretch, solid with very solid numbers on a talent deprived team - sure

Not a good enough stretch to be above critique or the general saltiness when you don’t help a plummeting team win


You see anywhere in the context I provided after the numbers, that would indicate that I was communicating we should be wowed by his play? I didn't, nor did I communicate that he's had a good stretch either. Read it again.

He's not good enough to will a plummeting team into a win, very few players are. It's a criticism unworthy of even being noted.


Exactly how I feel, he clearly is still growing.. It is as blatantly obvious as can be.. You can either take the logical view and see that he has grown consistently since he entered the league and still is not even close to done growing or you can ignore he is one of the youngest players on the roster still and be upset he isn't a superstar.. Lebron is the only player on this roster that can do that consistently, nobody else really comes close at this point. I still see a damn good prospect in Ingram personally and think he will grow into a very solid player and wouldn't be surprised if he ends up being the best prospect we have but he could also take the longest to get there.


Yep.. and that longest to get there part is probably what we'll see play out. Most fans aren't interested in waiting and that's fine I guess considering our window with Bron. I'm personally okay with waiting it out, so long as I'm seeing progression.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
SocalDevin
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 May 2016
Posts: 7825
Location: Long Beach

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2019 2:49 am    Post subject:

KeepItRealOrElse wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
KeepItRealOrElse wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
Last 10 games..

17.1 47.8%
5.9 Boards
4.1 Assists

He's almost at a point where he's consistently solid.. Yet the same cast of characters in here are still negative.


IMO - most of those games have had both good stretches and bad stretches within them. Idk if any of those games have been like “wow, that was legit great for him”... He’s had some damn solid stat lines, but again, within those games there have been bad stretches or huge lulls... Halfs where he’s disappeared or played ISO ball and hurt us.. I wouldn’t call it a legit good stretch, solid with very solid numbers on a talent deprived team - sure

Not a good enough stretch to be above critique or the general saltiness when you don’t help a plummeting team win


You see anywhere in the context I provided after the numbers, that would indicate that I was communicating we should be wowed by his play? I didn't, nor did I communicate that he's had a good stretch either. Read it again.

He's not good enough to will a plummeting team into a win, very few players are. It's a criticism unworthy of even being noted.


There is a large gap between ‘willing/carrying’, and just a great consistent 4Qs for him.


Has nothing to do with my post. You're attempting to take it into left field to manufacture criticism.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KeepItRealOrElse
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 11 Oct 2012
Posts: 32767

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2019 2:54 am    Post subject:

You a have a gift. You are the ultimate denier. You gotta take this persona to entertainment
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
bum2
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 31 Aug 2005
Posts: 809

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2019 3:01 am    Post subject:

SocalDevin wrote:
Last 10 games..

17.1 47.8%
5.9 Boards
4.1 Assists

He's almost at a point where he's consistently solid.. Yet the same cast of characters in here are still negative.
25% from 3 and 67% from the Harden. In January.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
SocalDevin
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 May 2016
Posts: 7825
Location: Long Beach

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2019 3:06 am    Post subject:

bum2 wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
Last 10 games..

17.1 47.8%
5.9 Boards
4.1 Assists

He's almost at a point where he's consistently solid.. Yet the same cast of characters in here are still negative.
25% from 3 and 67% from the Harden. In January.


Uh huh.. Which is why I said.. "He's almost at a point where he's consistently solid" Not great.. Not good.. Solid..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
SocalDevin
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 May 2016
Posts: 7825
Location: Long Beach

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2019 3:08 am    Post subject:

KeepItRealOrElse wrote:
You a have a gift. You are the ultimate denier. You gotta take this persona to entertainment


This is your third post in which you haven't addressed anything related to my post. Nor did I deny anything. You're rambling. Hit me back when it's related to my post, or don't bother.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Wildchild027
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 17 Jul 2002
Posts: 3846
Location: A-T-L-A-N-T-A

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2019 3:37 am    Post subject:

SocalDevin wrote:
bum2 wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
Last 10 games..

17.1 47.8%
5.9 Boards
4.1 Assists

He's almost at a point where he's consistently solid.. Yet the same cast of characters in here are still negative.
25% from 3 and 67% from the Harden. In January.


Uh huh.. Which is why I said.. "He's almost at a point where he's consistently solid" Not great.. Not good.. Solid..


He's in his third season, and the best term you can use for him is he's solid? Ok.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> General Basketball Discussion All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 1663, 1664, 1665 ... 1883, 1884, 1885  Next
Page 1664 of 1885
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB