Sub-plots for the 2016 season
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
waterman40
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 17 Jun 2003
Posts: 6287
Location: Central Coast

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 7:51 am    Post subject: Sub-plots for the 2016 season

1. How well does Randle adjust to the new system? Will Ingram in affect, outplay Him, earn the SF spot and then Deng slides over to become the starting PF? I think Ingram can do it and makes us more balanced on the floor.

2. By mid-season, who will be the better Laker power forward Nance or Randle? Which of these two will have the better mid-range game and be the better defender? Randle can rebound, can he do enough else to hold off Nance? Nance is closing the gap.

3. When will the Nick Young nightmare be over? Hopefully right after September 1st.

4. Will Black play well enough to earn the 2nd year of his deal? It seems like we overpaid for Him, and if his offensive game doesn't improve, I could see Him being like the last Jordan Hill deal. My guess is he's gone in 2017.

5. How long in the season until we pass last years 17 wins? I'll say mid-January.
_________________
LAKERS 2019-2020: NBA World Champions!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 7:56 am    Post subject:

Other "subplots"

1. Is DLO really a "point guard?"
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Purp&Gold
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 22 Nov 2012
Posts: 1641
Location: Long Beach, Ca

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 8:01 am    Post subject:

By mid-season,

1. Is Zubac our best player?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
NYCLaker
Sixth Man
Sixth Man


Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 94

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 8:04 am    Post subject:

Pending our record in at allstar break, will the FO pressure Luke to tank....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
waterman40
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 17 Jun 2003
Posts: 6287
Location: Central Coast

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 10:25 am    Post subject:

Purp&Gold wrote:
By mid-season,

1. Is Zubac our best player?


Zubac looks to be a great player, but he is a 19 year old big-man, so I think he gets brought along very slowly this year and probably won't get heavy starter minutes until his 3rd year.
_________________
LAKERS 2019-2020: NBA World Champions!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 10:28 am    Post subject:

NYCLaker wrote:
Pending our record in at allstar break, will the FO pressure Luke to tank....


Highly doubt it. You don't promote a growing culture of competition and competence, then tell your rookie Coach to tank.

They may lose games but it won't be because they intentionally decided to.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
governator
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 25092

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 10:34 am    Post subject:

How many more draft picks can Calderon get us
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
NYCLaker
Sixth Man
Sixth Man


Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 94

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 11:19 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
NYCLaker wrote:
Pending our record in at allstar break, will the FO pressure Luke to tank....


Highly doubt it. You don't promote a growing culture of competition and competence, then tell your rookie Coach to tank.

They may lose games but it won't be because they intentionally decided to.


They can. For example. they could pressure Luke to start players a, c and c, even though they suck together to raise trade value or to tank. Not like they didn't with Scott
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 11:26 am    Post subject:

NYCLaker wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
NYCLaker wrote:
Pending our record in at allstar break, will the FO pressure Luke to tank....


Highly doubt it. You don't promote a growing culture of competition and competence, then tell your rookie Coach to tank.

They may lose games but it won't be because they intentionally decided to.


They can. For example. they could pressure Luke to start players a, c and c, even though they suck together to raise trade value or to tank. Not like they didn't with Scott


You mean like start DLO/JC/Deng/Randle/Moz?
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
NYCLaker
Sixth Man
Sixth Man


Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 94

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 11:30 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
NYCLaker wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
NYCLaker wrote:
Pending our record in at allstar break, will the FO pressure Luke to tank....


Highly doubt it. You don't promote a growing culture of competition and competence, then tell your rookie Coach to tank.

They may lose games but it won't be because they intentionally decided to.


They can. For example. they could pressure Luke to start players a, c and c, even though they suck together to raise trade value or to tank. Not like they didn't with Scott


You mean like start DLO/JC/Deng/Randle/Moz?


Players that don't fit the mold of Luke's vision.

Also, if our record is bad, they might collectively agree to tank to obtain the 2017 draft pick.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 11:35 am    Post subject:

NYCLaker wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
NYCLaker wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
NYCLaker wrote:
Pending our record in at allstar break, will the FO pressure Luke to tank....


Highly doubt it. You don't promote a growing culture of competition and competence, then tell your rookie Coach to tank.

They may lose games but it won't be because they intentionally decided to.


They can. For example. they could pressure Luke to start players a, c and c, even though they suck together to raise trade value or to tank. Not like they didn't with Scott


You mean like start DLO/JC/Deng/Randle/Moz?


Players that don't fit the mold of Luke's vision.

Also, if our record is bad, they might collectively agree to tank to obtain the 2017 draft pick.


I really doubt it, especially given our miniscule chances of keeping a top 3 pick.

I'm satisfied with 2 #2 picks. Time to grow instead of tank.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Yumyumcha
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 751

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 11:37 am    Post subject:

NYCLaker wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
NYCLaker wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
NYCLaker wrote:
Pending our record in at allstar break, will the FO pressure Luke to tank....


Highly doubt it. You don't promote a growing culture of competition and competence, then tell your rookie Coach to tank.

They may lose games but it won't be because they intentionally decided to.


They can. For example. they could pressure Luke to start players a, c and c, even though they suck together to raise trade value or to tank. Not like they didn't with Scott


You mean like start DLO/JC/Deng/Randle/Moz?


Players that don't fit the mold of Luke's vision.

Also, if our record is bad, they might collectively agree to tank to obtain the 2017 draft pick.


You're giving Byron Scott too much credit. He didn't tank the last 2 years because Jim and Mitch told him to, the Lakers were horrible because he's a horrible coach.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
NYCLaker
Sixth Man
Sixth Man


Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 94

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 11:40 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
NYCLaker wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
NYCLaker wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
NYCLaker wrote:
Pending our record in at allstar break, will the FO pressure Luke to tank....


Highly doubt it. You don't promote a growing culture of competition and competence, then tell your rookie Coach to tank.

They may lose games but it won't be because they intentionally decided to.


They can. For example. they could pressure Luke to start players a, c and c, even though they suck together to raise trade value or to tank. Not like they didn't with Scott


You mean like start DLO/JC/Deng/Randle/Moz?


Players that don't fit the mold of Luke's vision.

Also, if our record is bad, they might collectively agree to tank to obtain the 2017 draft pick.


I really doubt it, especially given our miniscule chances of keeping a top 3 pick.

I'm satisfied with 2 #2 picks. Time to grow instead of tank.


Almost everyone around the league has us pegged for worst or second worst in the west and bottom 3 overall. Getting the top 3 pick will be luck/ nba rigging, however, the players coming out next summer will be huge for us immediately.

Buss and kupchak definitely knows this and will be tempted. Also, we might not directly even have to tank, since as many others stated, we will be in the bottom 3 regardless
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 11:41 am    Post subject:

Quote:
Almost everyone around the league has us pegged for worst or second worst in the west and bottom 3 overall. Getting the top 3 pick will be luck/ nba rigging, however, the players coming out next summer will be huge for us immediately.

Buss and kupchak definitely knows this and will be tempted. Also, we might not directly even have to tank, since as many others stated, we will be in the bottom 3 regardless


So if we're the bottom 3 with our slated starting lineup, how do you intend to get worse? Starting Zubac at SF?
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
NYCLaker
Sixth Man
Sixth Man


Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 94

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 11:43 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
Quote:
Almost everyone around the league has us pegged for worst or second worst in the west and bottom 3 overall. Getting the top 3 pick will be luck/ nba rigging, however, the players coming out next summer will be huge for us immediately.

Buss and kupchak definitely knows this and will be tempted. Also, we might not directly even have to tank, since as many others stated, we will be in the bottom 3 regardless


So if we're the bottom 3 with our slated starting lineup, how do you intend to get worse? Starting Zubac at SF?


For example, benching Mozgov and starting Zubac. Shutting down players with slight injuries. ETc. Many ways to indirectly tank with player personnel.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 11:44 am    Post subject:

NYCLaker wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
Quote:
Almost everyone around the league has us pegged for worst or second worst in the west and bottom 3 overall. Getting the top 3 pick will be luck/ nba rigging, however, the players coming out next summer will be huge for us immediately.

Buss and kupchak definitely knows this and will be tempted. Also, we might not directly even have to tank, since as many others stated, we will be in the bottom 3 regardless


So if we're the bottom 3 with our slated starting lineup, how do you intend to get worse? Starting Zubac at SF?


For example, benching Mozgov and starting Zubac. Shutting down players with slight injuries. ETc. Many ways to indirectly tank with player personnel.


God I hate talking about tanking. I'm over it. I think the Lakers are too.

But of course you don't have to be.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
NYCLaker
Sixth Man
Sixth Man


Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 94

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 11:51 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
NYCLaker wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
Quote:
Almost everyone around the league has us pegged for worst or second worst in the west and bottom 3 overall. Getting the top 3 pick will be luck/ nba rigging, however, the players coming out next summer will be huge for us immediately.

Buss and kupchak definitely knows this and will be tempted. Also, we might not directly even have to tank, since as many others stated, we will be in the bottom 3 regardless


So if we're the bottom 3 with our slated starting lineup, how do you intend to get worse? Starting Zubac at SF?


For example, benching Mozgov and starting Zubac. Shutting down players with slight injuries. ETc. Many ways to indirectly tank with player personnel.


God I hate talking about tanking. I'm over it. I think the Lakers are too.

But of course you don't have to be.


Well, if the two options are tanking/getting top 3 pick or finishing right above the threshold and missing out on the pick, than I would choose choice A.

Obvious, if we just miss the playoffs and get a top 3 pick, that would be the most ideal situation...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 11:54 am    Post subject:

NYCLaker wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
NYCLaker wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
Quote:
Almost everyone around the league has us pegged for worst or second worst in the west and bottom 3 overall. Getting the top 3 pick will be luck/ nba rigging, however, the players coming out next summer will be huge for us immediately.

Buss and kupchak definitely knows this and will be tempted. Also, we might not directly even have to tank, since as many others stated, we will be in the bottom 3 regardless


So if we're the bottom 3 with our slated starting lineup, how do you intend to get worse? Starting Zubac at SF?


For example, benching Mozgov and starting Zubac. Shutting down players with slight injuries. ETc. Many ways to indirectly tank with player personnel.


God I hate talking about tanking. I'm over it. I think the Lakers are too.

But of course you don't have to be.


Well, if the two options are tanking/getting top 3 pick or finishing right above the threshold and missing out on the pick, than I would choose choice A.

Obvious, if we just miss the playoffs and get a top 3 pick, that would be the most ideal situation...


I don't see being the worst team in the NBA as a goal for the Lakers, especially if there's only a small chance we get a top 3 pick.

To me the goal is to begin a positive culture and system. Tanking does not help that and leaves another terrible impression on prospective FAs. Why not tank in 2018 too while you're at it?

What did KD say? We're just not even "there" yet. Tanking and aiming to be one of the worst puts us right back into that territory.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kikanga
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 29354
Location: La La Land

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 11:57 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
NYCLaker wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
NYCLaker wrote:
Pending our record in at allstar break, will the FO pressure Luke to tank....


Highly doubt it. You don't promote a growing culture of competition and competence, then tell your rookie Coach to tank.

They may lose games but it won't be because they intentionally decided to.


They can. For example. they could pressure Luke to start players a, c and c, even though they suck together to raise trade value or to tank. Not like they didn't with Scott


You mean like start DLO/JC/Deng/Randle/Moz?

IF we're nowhere near .500 at all star break. Luke should just play DLo, JC, Ingram, Randle, Nance 30+ MPG. THey all don't have to play in a lineup together, just give those young guys as many minutes as possible.
The more reps for the young guys, the faster the rebuild pushes forward.
If giving those guys as many minutes as possible = losing games. So be it. Our young guys combined for an average of 27 MPG under Scott last year. So 30+ MPG is a good benchmark IMO.
_________________
"Every hurt is a lesson, and every lesson makes you better”
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 12:00 pm    Post subject:

kikanga wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
NYCLaker wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
NYCLaker wrote:
Pending our record in at allstar break, will the FO pressure Luke to tank....


Highly doubt it. You don't promote a growing culture of competition and competence, then tell your rookie Coach to tank.

They may lose games but it won't be because they intentionally decided to.


They can. For example. they could pressure Luke to start players a, c and c, even though they suck together to raise trade value or to tank. Not like they didn't with Scott


You mean like start DLO/JC/Deng/Randle/Moz?

IF we're nowhere near .500 at all star break. Luke should just play DLo, JC, Ingram, Randle, Nance 30+ MPG. THey all don't have to play in a lineup together, just give those young guys as many minutes as possible.
The more reps for the young guys, the faster the rebuild pushes forward.
If giving those guys as many minutes as possible = losing games. So be it. Our young guys combined for an average of 27 MPG under Scott last year. So 30+ MPG is a good benchmark IMO.


And that's not tanking. Again, I see a major stigma attached to that philosophy. We've gathered the fruits of our dis-labor...let's build on it.

I'm ALL for the notion of playing a DLO/JC/Ingram/Randle/Nance/Zubac heavier minutes at the end of the year. I don't consider that tanking.

Tanking would be to start Huertas/Brown/Young/Black/Auguste (if he made the team) and just totally try to lose games on purpose.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
NYCLaker
Sixth Man
Sixth Man


Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 94

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 12:02 pm    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
NYCLaker wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
NYCLaker wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
Quote:
Almost everyone around the league has us pegged for worst or second worst in the west and bottom 3 overall. Getting the top 3 pick will be luck/ nba rigging, however, the players coming out next summer will be huge for us immediately.

Buss and kupchak definitely knows this and will be tempted. Also, we might not directly even have to tank, since as many others stated, we will be in the bottom 3 regardless


So if we're the bottom 3 with our slated starting lineup, how do you intend to get worse? Starting Zubac at SF?


For example, benching Mozgov and starting Zubac. Shutting down players with slight injuries. ETc. Many ways to indirectly tank with player personnel.


God I hate talking about tanking. I'm over it. I think the Lakers are too.

But of course you don't have to be.


Well, if the two options are tanking/getting top 3 pick or finishing right above the threshold and missing out on the pick, than I would choose choice A.

Obvious, if we just miss the playoffs and get a top 3 pick, that would be the most ideal situation...


I don't see being the worst team in the NBA as a goal for the Lakers, especially if there's only a small chance we get a top 3 pick.

To me the goal is to begin a positive culture and system. Tanking does not help that and leaves another terrible impression on prospective FAs. Why not tank in 2018 too while you're at it?

What did KD say? We're just not even "there" yet. Tanking and aiming to be one of the worst puts us right back into that territory.


In 2018, we lose our pick regardless of where we finish... This is Luke's first season, so I don't really expect many wins with the current team. No one probably predicted 17 last season, but thats where we were.

If we went from pick #1-3 to #6, for improving the culture that would be the worse scenario for us.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
NYCLaker
Sixth Man
Sixth Man


Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 94

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 12:05 pm    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
kikanga wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
NYCLaker wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
NYCLaker wrote:
Pending our record in at allstar break, will the FO pressure Luke to tank....


Highly doubt it. You don't promote a growing culture of competition and competence, then tell your rookie Coach to tank.

They may lose games but it won't be because they intentionally decided to.


They can. For example. they could pressure Luke to start players a, c and c, even though they suck together to raise trade value or to tank. Not like they didn't with Scott


You mean like start DLO/JC/Deng/Randle/Moz?

IF we're nowhere near .500 at all star break. Luke should just play DLo, JC, Ingram, Randle, Nance 30+ MPG. THey all don't have to play in a lineup together, just give those young guys as many minutes as possible.
The more reps for the young guys, the faster the rebuild pushes forward.
If giving those guys as many minutes as possible = losing games. So be it. Our young guys combined for an average of 27 MPG under Scott last year. So 30+ MPG is a good benchmark IMO.


And that's not tanking. Again, I see a major stigma attached to that philosophy. We've gathered the fruits of our dis-labor...let's build on it.

I'm ALL for the notion of playing a DLO/JC/Ingram/Randle/Nance/Zubac heavier minutes at the end of the year. I don't consider that tanking.

Tanking would be to start Huertas/Brown/Young/Black/Auguste (if he made the team) and just totally try to lose games on purpose.


WEll, if you start all the young guys like

Russ-JC-Ingram-Randle-Zubac, that is tanking.. Since, we have better options available to win games now. Hence, "indirect tanking."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
RJBaca
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 2050
Location: Costa Rica

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 1:31 pm    Post subject:

1. Will Deangelo Russel quickly climb to the ranks of best NBA point guard only to be trapped by the fast life, becoming addicted to partying and prescription drugs, alienating his teammates and eventually hitting rock bottom the day he shows up to the all star game drunk and disorderly. But then he is supported and encouraged by the young core and eventually makes a triumphant return at the Staples Center???

2. Will Larry Nance, in a strange twist of fate be wrongfully accused of rape during a road game in Denver only to be rescued by no other than Kobe Bryant, who completed law school, passed the bar and became one of the most skilled defense attorneys over the summer??

3. Will Brandon Ingram, who was reported to still be growing, grow???

4. Will Nick Young and Lou Williams finally be voted off the island???

These questions and more to be answered this season in Total Drama Lakers!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
waterman40
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 17 Jun 2003
Posts: 6287
Location: Central Coast

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 2:14 pm    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
NYCLaker wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
NYCLaker wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
NYCLaker wrote:
Pending our record in at allstar break, will the FO pressure Luke to tank....


Highly doubt it. You don't promote a growing culture of competition and competence, then tell your rookie Coach to tank.

They may lose games but it won't be because they intentionally decided to.


They can. For example. they could pressure Luke to start players a, c and c, even though they suck together to raise trade value or to tank. Not like they didn't with Scott


You mean like start DLO/JC/Deng/Randle/Moz?


Players that don't fit the mold of Luke's vision.

Also, if our record is bad, they might collectively agree to tank to obtain the 2017 draft pick.


I really doubt it, especially given our miniscule chances of keeping a top 3 pick.

I'm satisfied with 2 #2 picks. Time to grow instead of tank.


Time to move forward and build to the future. If we just wanted to tank, we would have kept Scott and kept playing Groundhog Day.
_________________
LAKERS 2019-2020: NBA World Champions!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 2:15 pm    Post subject:

^ Bingo. If the primary goal was the #1 pick for 2017, our head coach would be Byron and Kobe would have gotten a 1 year 35m deal.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB