View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ChickenStu Retired Number
Joined: 25 Apr 2015 Posts: 31912 Location: Anaheim, CA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Moses wrote: | Snapped a 5 game losing streak this week. Le'Veon Bell rounding nicely into form at the moment, and Brady continuing to do well.
Question - do I keep the Pats D against Jets this week? I have waiver claim in for Chargers at moment, so if I get them do I roll with Pats or Bolts? |
With turnover machine Fitzpatrick starting for the Jets, I would roll with New England. And with the way that the refs so clearly screwed Houston last night, I'm expecting them to magically get a few calls and control that game vs. the Chargers.
Last edited by ChickenStu on Mon Nov 28, 2016 12:12 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vanexelent Retired Number
Joined: 17 May 2005 Posts: 30081
|
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pick 2 RB's to start this week:
Theo Riddick
Thomas Rawls
Lagarrete Blount
Rob Kelley |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LakersChamps04 Star Player
Joined: 06 Oct 2003 Posts: 3737
|
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vanexelent wrote: | Pick 2 RB's to start this week:
Theo Riddick
Thomas Rawls
Lagarrete Blount
Rob Kelley |
Kelley and Rawls |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vanexelent Retired Number
Joined: 17 May 2005 Posts: 30081
|
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 9:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
LakersChamps04 wrote: | vanexelent wrote: | Pick 2 RB's to start this week:
Theo Riddick
Thomas Rawls
Lagarrete Blount
Rob Kelley |
Kelley and Rawls |
My thoughts were Riddick and Rawls. Why Kelley? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ringfinger Retired Number
Joined: 08 Oct 2013 Posts: 29418
|
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
vanexelent wrote: | Pick 2 RB's to start this week:
Theo Riddick
Thomas Rawls
Lagarrete Blount
Rob Kelley |
Kelley and Rawls. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vanexelent Retired Number
Joined: 17 May 2005 Posts: 30081
|
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I rolled with Riddick over Kelley. Neither produced much, but Riddick more. Of course now Blount will go off on Sunday. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
USCandLakers Franchise Player
Joined: 13 Mar 2008 Posts: 19955
|
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vanexelent wrote: | I rolled with Riddick over Kelley. Neither produced much, but Riddick more. Of course now Blount will go off on Sunday. |
Don't worry. Rawls will carry you. _________________ A banana is killed every time a terrible thread or post is made. Save the bananas. Stop creating terrible posts! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
USCandLakers Franchise Player
Joined: 13 Mar 2008 Posts: 19955
|
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2016 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
One last (bleep) you from Russell Wilson and I'm knocked out of the playoffs. If I weren't a Seahawks fan I'd hate him. How many games without a TD, Russell? HOW MANY? Second straight season I've had a very good team held back by my second QB. I don't think I'm made for this 2QB stuff.
Welp, onto the LG league where I'm likely to get steamrolled by PLATNUM. _________________ A banana is killed every time a terrible thread or post is made. Save the bananas. Stop creating terrible posts! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PLATNUM Star Player
Joined: 17 Dec 2002 Posts: 7124 Location: L.A.
|
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2016 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
USCandLakers wrote: | One last (bleep) you from Russell Wilson and I'm knocked out of the playoffs. If I weren't a Seahawks fan I'd hate him. How many games without a TD, Russell? HOW MANY? Second straight season I've had a very good team held back by my second QB. I don't think I'm made for this 2QB stuff.
Welp, onto the LG league where I'm likely to get steamrolled by PLATNUM. |
I lost today, man. Like I said I've had it way too easy. My biggest fear is that I peaked too early. It's better to get hot right at the END of the season. But, any given Sunday someone can have a few players go off and you never know. I had a pretty high scoring week and STILL lost. _________________ "Dread it, run from it... destiny arrives all the same." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
venturalakersfan Retired Number
Joined: 14 Apr 2001 Posts: 144462 Location: The Gold Coast
|
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2016 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Glad I picked up Tyreek Hill _________________ RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ChickenStu Retired Number
Joined: 25 Apr 2015 Posts: 31912 Location: Anaheim, CA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
ChickenStu wrote: | Moses wrote: | Snapped a 5 game losing streak this week. Le'Veon Bell rounding nicely into form at the moment, and Brady continuing to do well.
Question - do I keep the Pats D against Jets this week? I have waiver claim in for Chargers at moment, so if I get them do I roll with Pats or Bolts? |
With turnover machine Fitzpatrick starting for the Jets, I would roll with New England. And with the way that the refs so clearly screwed Houston last night, I'm expecting them to magically get a few calls and control that game vs. the Chargers. |
Well, that didn't happen! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
USCandLakers Franchise Player
Joined: 13 Mar 2008 Posts: 19955
|
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
PLATNUM wrote: | USCandLakers wrote: | One last (bleep) you from Russell Wilson and I'm knocked out of the playoffs. If I weren't a Seahawks fan I'd hate him. How many games without a TD, Russell? HOW MANY? Second straight season I've had a very good team held back by my second QB. I don't think I'm made for this 2QB stuff.
Welp, onto the LG league where I'm likely to get steamrolled by PLATNUM. |
I lost today, man. Like I said I've had it way too easy. My biggest fear is that I peaked too early. It's better to get hot right at the END of the season. But, any given Sunday someone can have a few players go off and you never know. I had a pretty high scoring week and STILL lost. |
True. True.
But I'm still hoping I get the #2 seed so I don't have to potentially play you until the championship. Also that first round bye would be nice. _________________ A banana is killed every time a terrible thread or post is made. Save the bananas. Stop creating terrible posts! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Moses Star Player
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 8270 Location: London
|
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
ChickenStu wrote: | ChickenStu wrote: | Moses wrote: | Snapped a 5 game losing streak this week. Le'Veon Bell rounding nicely into form at the moment, and Brady continuing to do well.
Question - do I keep the Pats D against Jets this week? I have waiver claim in for Chargers at moment, so if I get them do I roll with Pats or Bolts? |
With turnover machine Fitzpatrick starting for the Jets, I would roll with New England. And with the way that the refs so clearly screwed Houston last night, I'm expecting them to magically get a few calls and control that game vs. the Chargers. |
Well, that didn't happen! |
Went with your advice too
Fortunately I won comfortably so wouldn't have mattered, could've had no defense at all and still won. And most importantly, my Bolts got a W _________________ Lakers, Chargers, Dodgers, Arsenal FC.
Mamba Forever
The Marathon Continues
Still I Rise |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Aussiesuede Franchise Player
Joined: 27 Jul 2005 Posts: 10964
|
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 11:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
USCandLakers wrote: | One last (bleep) you from Russell Wilson and I'm knocked out of the playoffs. If I weren't a Seahawks fan I'd hate him. How many games without a TD, Russell? HOW MANY? Second straight season I've had a very good team held back by my second QB. I don't think I'm made for this 2QB stuff.
Welp, onto the LG league where I'm likely to get steamrolled by PLATNUM. |
I feel ya bruddah. I always suggest everyone play in at least one 2QB league at least once. It changes your whole perspective on Fantasy. Definitely not for the feint of heart. If either one of your 2 QB's has an off day like Russell did, then you're pretty much sunk for that week. If it's any consolation, just be glad you didn't trot out Jimmy Graham, Rawls, & Lockett alongside Russell yesterday. The offense had been rolling, so I rolled the dice and came up gooses. I was in a tied for 1st with a team far superior to mine and even though he had his worse day of the season, I couldn't take advantage of it due to going all in on that joke of a Seahawk offense. It was an UGGLY Day! lol _________________ I'm On point, On task, On message, and Off drugs. A Streetwise Smart Bomb, Out of rehab and In denial. Over the Top, On the edge, Under the Radar, and In Control. Behind the 8 ball, Ahead of the Curve and I've got a Love Child who sends me Hate mail. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DuncanIdaho Franchise Player
Joined: 26 Apr 2004 Posts: 17248 Location: In a no-ship
|
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aussiesuede wrote: | USCandLakers wrote: | One last (bleep) you from Russell Wilson and I'm knocked out of the playoffs. If I weren't a Seahawks fan I'd hate him. How many games without a TD, Russell? HOW MANY? Second straight season I've had a very good team held back by my second QB. I don't think I'm made for this 2QB stuff.
Welp, onto the LG league where I'm likely to get steamrolled by PLATNUM. |
I feel ya bruddah. I always suggest everyone play in at least one 2QB league at least once. It changes your whole perspective on Fantasy. Definitely not for the feint of heart. If either one of your 2 QB's has an off day like Russell did, then you're pretty much sunk for that week. If it's any consolation, just be glad you didn't trot out Jimmy Graham, Rawls, & Lockett alongside Russell yesterday. The offense had been rolling, so I rolled the dice and came up gooses. I was in a tied for 1st with a team far superior to mine and even though he had his worse day of the season, I couldn't take advantage of it due to going all in on that joke of a Seahawk offense. It was an UGGLY Day! lol |
I ran out Rawls and Graham in my work league. Graham actually got 2 more points than Olsen though, who I benched for Graham. What a crappy week for high-end TE's.
I thought Rawls was going to feast being the only active RB. Uggggggh. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
USCandLakers Franchise Player
Joined: 13 Mar 2008 Posts: 19955
|
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aussiesuede wrote: | USCandLakers wrote: | One last (bleep) you from Russell Wilson and I'm knocked out of the playoffs. If I weren't a Seahawks fan I'd hate him. How many games without a TD, Russell? HOW MANY? Second straight season I've had a very good team held back by my second QB. I don't think I'm made for this 2QB stuff.
Welp, onto the LG league where I'm likely to get steamrolled by PLATNUM. |
I feel ya bruddah. I always suggest everyone play in at least one 2QB league at least once. It changes your whole perspective on Fantasy. Definitely not for the feint of heart. If either one of your 2 QB's has an off day like Russell did, then you're pretty much sunk for that week. If it's any consolation, just be glad you didn't trot out Jimmy Graham, Rawls, & Lockett alongside Russell yesterday. The offense had been rolling, so I rolled the dice and came up gooses. I was in a tied for 1st with a team far superior to mine and even though he had his worse day of the season, I couldn't take advantage of it due to going all in on that joke of a Seahawk offense. It was an UGGLY Day! lol |
Oh I had Rawls too. The week started out so good with Reed, Bell, Big Ben and Crowder. Evans tried his best to save me.
Tell me about it with the 2QB part. Last year I had Peyton. This year Russell. I think these have been the highest ADP QB duds of the past two seasons in all of fantasy. And I just happened to draft both. I think the problem is not that I drafted them, it's been my unwillingness to let them go. "He'll perform next week. If I drop him someone else is just going to pick him up." Just have to avoid that mentality next time. Despite there being only 4 starting QBs on the waivers in any given week in my league, I would have been fine streaming those QBs after what Petyon and Russell have done with the past two seasons.
At least I wised up in the LG league and benched Cam for Kap.
Russell's 0 TD games have left me traumatized. How many, Russell? HOW MANY IS ENOUGH? _________________ A banana is killed every time a terrible thread or post is made. Save the bananas. Stop creating terrible posts! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LakersChamps04 Star Player
Joined: 06 Oct 2003 Posts: 3737
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2016 6:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
would you play the packer D vs Hou or the Chargers D vs Tampa? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ChickenStu Retired Number
Joined: 25 Apr 2015 Posts: 31912 Location: Anaheim, CA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2016 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LakersChamps04 wrote: | would you play the packer D vs Hou or the Chargers D vs Tampa? |
I'm asking myself this same question, as I have a league where both are available and I won't be playing the Bills D against the Raiders. GB's D was annihilated over a 4-game stretch, before looking decent last night. But I think a lot of that may have been due to the conservative nature of the Eagles' offense, and that they don't have the WR talent to make GB pay. But Houston has Osweiler at QB, so can he even effectively get the ball to his WR's? As for SD, they just had a nice game against the aforementioned Osweiler, but Winston's been playing fairly well. I suppose I'd go with GB just because of the sinking ship that is Osweiler. But I think it's pretty close.
EDIT: After thinking about it, I went back to SD over GB for my waiver picks. I'll find out soon what I got. Bosa is wreaking havoc, and Clay Matthews might be out, so I guess that tipped it for SD for me. But it is probably close. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LakersChamps04 Star Player
Joined: 06 Oct 2003 Posts: 3737
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
ChickenStu wrote: | LakersChamps04 wrote: | would you play the packer D vs Hou or the Chargers D vs Tampa? |
I'm asking myself this same question, as I have a league where both are available and I won't be playing the Bills D against the Raiders. GB's D was annihilated over a 4-game stretch, before looking decent last night. But I think a lot of that may have been due to the conservative nature of the Eagles' offense, and that they don't have the WR talent to make GB pay. But Houston has Osweiler at QB, so can he even effectively get the ball to his WR's? As for SD, they just had a nice game against the aforementioned Osweiler, but Winston's been playing fairly well. I suppose I'd go with GB just because of the sinking ship that is Osweiler. But I think it's pretty close.
EDIT: After thinking about it, I went back to SD over GB for my waiver picks. I'll find out soon what I got. Bosa is wreaking havoc, and Clay Matthews might be out, so I guess that tipped it for SD for me. But it is probably close. | my thoughts too. GB may not be as good defensively but houston is bad offensively. I think brock might be the worst QB in the league. Hes thrown more picks than TDs. and i think tampa is feeling pretty good right now so i expect them to put up points against SD. we'll see though..like you said, it's pretty close |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ringfinger Retired Number
Joined: 08 Oct 2013 Posts: 29418
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
LakersChamps04 wrote: | would you play the packer D vs Hou or the Chargers D vs Tampa? |
Chargers.
Also, Chargers play CLE in Week 16, so if you can ride two defenses and find one to play for you in Week 14/15, even better. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vanexelent Retired Number
Joined: 17 May 2005 Posts: 30081
|
Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
USCandLakers wrote: | vanexelent wrote: | I rolled with Riddick over Kelley. Neither produced much, but Riddick more. Of course now Blount will go off on Sunday. |
Don't worry. Rawls will carry you. |
Same choices this week; start one:
Blount, Kelley or Rawls? Blount has the easiest matchup and is overdue for a TD and may see more touches with Gronk out. I'm leaning Blount, with Rawls a near 2nd. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ChickenStu Retired Number
Joined: 25 Apr 2015 Posts: 31912 Location: Anaheim, CA
|
Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 3:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vanexelent wrote: | USCandLakers wrote: | vanexelent wrote: | I rolled with Riddick over Kelley. Neither produced much, but Riddick more. Of course now Blount will go off on Sunday. |
Don't worry. Rawls will carry you. |
Same choices this week; start one:
Blount, Kelley or Rawls? Blount has the easiest matchup and is overdue for a TD and may see more touches with Gronk out. I'm leaning Blount, with Rawls a near 2nd. |
For me Blount is the easy call here. They are 14 point favorites and it figures that the Pats might be a little more balanced offensively without Gronk. I do like Rawls to rebound this week, even in a tough matchup, but to me, Blount offers the combination of almost certain positive game script/TD upside/matchup that the others just don't have. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
USCandLakers Franchise Player
Joined: 13 Mar 2008 Posts: 19955
|
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2016 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thomas (bleep) Rawls. _________________ A banana is killed every time a terrible thread or post is made. Save the bananas. Stop creating terrible posts! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ChickenStu Retired Number
Joined: 25 Apr 2015 Posts: 31912 Location: Anaheim, CA
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 1:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
USCandLakers wrote: | Thomas (bleep) Rawls. |
I had him in one of my leagues, at least. Seattle is just so much better at home, and I felt that they essentially took a mental week off last week, so I did think Rawls would do well tonight. (Not as well as he did, of course.)
I'm upset that I got SD D instead of GB because once I knew it was going to be snowy there, it totally tipped the scales in favor of GB. I still ended up winning in that league, at least. I won even though I had SD D (4 points), Brees, and Santos; David Johnson, Jordan Howard, Zach Ertz, and Dez Bryant basically carried the day for me.
David Johnson is basically like a bigger version of Marshall Faulk. Perhaps not quite as elusive, but pretty damn close, and he has more power. Man, he's great. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vanexelent Retired Number
Joined: 17 May 2005 Posts: 30081
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 6:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
ChickenStu wrote: | USCandLakers wrote: | Thomas (bleep) Rawls. |
I had him in one of my leagues, at least. Seattle is just so much better at home, and I felt that they essentially took a mental week off last week, so I did think Rawls would do well tonight. (Not as well as he did, of course.)
I'm upset that I got SD D instead of GB because once I knew it was going to be snowy there, it totally tipped the scales in favor of GB. I still ended up winning in that league, at least. I won even though I had SD D (4 points), Brees, and Santos; David Johnson, Jordan Howard, Zach Ertz, and Dez Bryant basically carried the day for me.
David Johnson is basically like a bigger version of Marshall Faulk. Perhaps not quite as elusive, but pretty damn close, and he has more power. Man, he's great. |
I sat him for Blount. He outscored him by 10 points in my league. If TY Hilton gets 20 points tonight, those 10 points will haunt me. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|