OFFICIAL 2017 FREE AGENCY (Lakers sign Bogut)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 1686, 1687, 1688 ... 1811, 1812, 1813  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Inspector Gadget
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Posts: 46684

PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 10:50 am    Post subject:

I wonder if Trey Burke is a option?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
rogers49
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 02 Jul 2015
Posts: 1182

PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 10:59 am    Post subject:

venturalakersfan wrote:
Dr. Funkbot wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
If there was a way to get PG13 here without a 2nd star, i'd be open to it.

Would be PG13 + 2 out of Jules/Brook/KCP.

But it seems PG13 doesn't want to come here without a 2nd current star.


I think this is the most likely outcome unless we want to do something drastic with Deng's contract.

IMO between Ingram, Ball and KFC and or Lopez there should be enough star power here in LA to lure PG. Plus you get to play for Luke who is a good players coach.

IMO Ball is going to change the atmosphere of the team and make it a desirable destination again.

Some of it will depend on how well PG gets along with the MVP. If Westrbook hogs the bill like he did with KD, I think PG will look to leave. But they might hit it off. Who knows at this point!


Westbrook hogged the ball with KD? He will get George some incredible looks.


Yes he did, and Durant went away from him.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
True Lakers Fan
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 28 Oct 2011
Posts: 917
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 11:00 am    Post subject:

Nah, I think we are done. Unless they have a trade brewing.
_________________
I can accept failure, but I can't accept not trying.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Reply with quote
eagles nut
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 06 Jul 2001
Posts: 6240
Location: Baltimore, MD

PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 11:02 am    Post subject:

Inspector Gadget wrote:
I wonder if Trey Burke is a option?


I think whoever they sign will be to non-guaranteed contracts so eventually the guaranteed contracts won't be available and players, including Burke, will have to sign to non-guaranteed contracts.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
rogers49
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 02 Jul 2015
Posts: 1182

PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 11:03 am    Post subject:

Inspector Gadget wrote:
I wonder if Trey Burke is a option?


Team is done, no more signings.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Chase.button07
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 19 Feb 2017
Posts: 4996

PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 11:07 am    Post subject:

rogers49 wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
I wonder if Trey Burke is a option?


Team is done, no more signings.



_________________
Now Playing: The Zo Show @Staples
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerDYnasty72
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 4574

PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 11:15 am    Post subject:

Sentient Meat wrote:
When I look up Nance and Randle's numbers... it backs up what most of you are saying... that LNJ's better as a backup... not sure if he's a starter.

But I think if Ball is the real thing, Nance's athleticism and defense might better complement Ball. We won't know this until pre season... but I have a feeling Nance might flourish the most, provided he's given adequate minutes.
I know Julius is strong and fast... but it just seems like Nance is better suited to be a Worthy type finisher on the break. Also, I think Nance in general just lacks confidence and swagger... if he played with the same mentality that Julius did, I think he'd be an even better player.


It's funny because, though I agree that Nance might be a better player if he played with the same mentality; aggressive, physical, seeks to impose his will on his opponent, as JR, it's also evident that Julius would be a better complement for Ball, and the rest, if he had the same mentality; unselfish to a fault, defensively sharp, practices the fundamentals like setting solid screens, as Nance.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 11:47 am    Post subject:

Briante Weber waived by Charlotte. Worth a training camp invite?
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Fortysixn2
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 22 Jun 2016
Posts: 2849

PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 11:54 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
Briante Weber waived by Charlotte. Worth a training camp invite?


I've never seen him play admittedly, but just looked up his bio...he's 24, 1-15 lifetime from 3 point range. Is he a defensive beast? What would lead you to think he'd be worthy of an invite?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
greenfrog
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 36081
Location: 502 Bad Gateway

PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 11:54 am    Post subject:

Dr. Funkbot wrote:
adkindo wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
True Lakers Fan wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
True Lakers Fan wrote:
Hypothetically, if we can attach Randle to Deng, is Nance capable starting?


Not if you want to win.


Yeah, that's what I thought too. I just wanted to throw it out there.


Great as a backup though


probably the most overrated Laker player on LG....not saying he is bad, but at his best, he is getting rotation minutes on a mediocre team.


Nance and Kuz can hold down the PF spot. Defense would be much improved.

Plus if we are getting either or Lebron and PG, they can both man the 4 spot.



Lebron is destined to move there. The league gets smaller every year.

"Double digit" rebounding is an overrated attribute, anyway. I can't believe people still clamor over it in 2017.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
adkindo
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 40345
Location: Dirty South

PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 11:58 am    Post subject:

Fortysixn2 wrote:
Is he a defensive beast?


not sure if he is a beast, but he is pretty good on defense
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
pio2u
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 26 Dec 2012
Posts: 54624

PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 12:00 pm    Post subject:

Quote:
Ramon Sessions, Knicks Reportedly Finalizing 1-Year Contract
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 12:08 pm    Post subject:

Fortysixn2 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
Briante Weber waived by Charlotte. Worth a training camp invite?


I've never seen him play admittedly, but just looked up his bio...he's 24, 1-15 lifetime from 3 point range. Is he a defensive beast? What would lead you to think he'd be worthy of an invite?


Had a rep as a good defender. A bit light weight-wise.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Bard207
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 08 Jan 2013
Posts: 7713

PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 12:21 pm    Post subject:

Chase.button07 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
Chase.button07 wrote:
22 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:


I think guys who will be cheap surrounding pieces around 2 max/LonzoGram are Nance/Hart/Bryant/Zub/Kuz.

JC and Jules are or will get expensive. My bet is that Jules will make a case to stay on the team more than JC this year. Chances are both may be gone regardless.


Precisely why these will be the pieces other teams ask for if we're trying to dump Deng, as opposed to Julius or Clarkson.

Something I frequently see neglected in all of these future move predictions. Deng likely gets stretched me thinks...carry on


not really. D Carroll was traded for a protected 1st and a 2nd. Thats what Deng's value will be. add chicago's 2nd round pick and its good


Doesn't Carroll have 1 less year?


30m for 2 years @15m each
Deng's case: 36m for 2 years @18m each



Maybe things will be the same for a Deng trade and perhaps they will be different.

This spring, the Nets had:

* Lopez as an expiring contract ($22,642,350)

* Nicholson with three years ($6,362,998 | $6,637,002 | $6,911,007)


After their trades in June and July:

* Mozgov for three seasons ($15,280,000 | $16,000,000 | $16,720,000)

* DMC with two seasons ($14,800,000 | $15,400,000)

* Crabbe with three seasons ($19,332,500 | $18,500,000 | $18,500,000 - Player Option)



The first and second that was included with DMC could be a general guideline, but don't use it as a definite price/cost going forward because things in 2018 aren't going to be exactly the same as they were in summer 2017.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Dr. Funkbot
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Sep 2001
Posts: 8188
Location: Eagle Rock

PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 12:29 pm    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
Per SHAMWOW, Ramon Sessions, 1 year deal at minimum to the Knicks.

Pretty slim pickings and a huge difference from 2016. Almost wish we never had 2 max slots for 2016.


Me too!
_________________
R.I.P. Doc Buss
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 12:35 pm    Post subject:

Dr. Funkbot wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
Per SHAMWOW, Ramon Sessions, 1 year deal at minimum to the Knicks.

Pretty slim pickings and a huge difference from 2016. Almost wish we never had 2 max slots for 2016.


Me too!


In 2016 Sessions probably gets 2 years, 8m/year.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
giordan0
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 05 Jan 2016
Posts: 1017

PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 12:45 pm    Post subject:

Fortysixn2 wrote:

I've never seen him play admittedly, but just looked up his bio...he's 24, 1-15 lifetime from 3 point range. Is he a defensive beast? What would lead you to think he'd be worthy of an invite?




    All-NBA D-League Second Team (2017)
    NBA D-League All-Defensive Team (2017)
    NBA D-League All-Star (2017)
    3× Atlantic 10 Defensive Player of the Year (2013–2015)
    3× Atlantic 10 All-Defensive Team (2013–2015)
    CAA All-Defensive Team (2012)

_________________

_____________________________________
#MPLStheoriginallakeshow
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 12:47 pm    Post subject:

Yup. Warriors briefly had him. His calling card is defense though he's not a shooter.

Quinn Cook/Demetrius Jackson i would also consider for a camp invite.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Sentient Meat
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 04 Jul 2014
Posts: 12978

PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 12:52 pm    Post subject:

LakerDYnasty72 wrote:
Sentient Meat wrote:
When I look up Nance and Randle's numbers... it backs up what most of you are saying... that LNJ's better as a backup... not sure if he's a starter.

But I think if Ball is the real thing, Nance's athleticism and defense might better complement Ball. We won't know this until pre season... but I have a feeling Nance might flourish the most, provided he's given adequate minutes.
I know Julius is strong and fast... but it just seems like Nance is better suited to be a Worthy type finisher on the break. Also, I think Nance in general just lacks confidence and swagger... if he played with the same mentality that Julius did, I think he'd be an even better player.


It's funny because, though I agree that Nance might be a better player if he played with the same mentality; aggressive, physical, seeks to impose his will on his opponent, as JR, it's also evident that Julius would be a better complement for Ball, and the rest, if he had the same mentality; unselfish to a fault, defensively sharp, practices the fundamentals like setting solid screens, as Nance.


Yes, I agree with that... the blend of the two would be a perfect player.

The question is, would it be easier to turn Nance into Randle or vice versa? Personally, I believe Larry can learn confidence more easily than Julius can learn discipline... but I guess time will answer this for us... barring a trade.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Nash Vegas
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 01 Sep 2012
Posts: 7239

PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 12:56 pm    Post subject:

Sentient Meat wrote:
LakerDYnasty72 wrote:
Sentient Meat wrote:
When I look up Nance and Randle's numbers... it backs up what most of you are saying... that LNJ's better as a backup... not sure if he's a starter.

But I think if Ball is the real thing, Nance's athleticism and defense might better complement Ball. We won't know this until pre season... but I have a feeling Nance might flourish the most, provided he's given adequate minutes.
I know Julius is strong and fast... but it just seems like Nance is better suited to be a Worthy type finisher on the break. Also, I think Nance in general just lacks confidence and swagger... if he played with the same mentality that Julius did, I think he'd be an even better player.


It's funny because, though I agree that Nance might be a better player if he played with the same mentality; aggressive, physical, seeks to impose his will on his opponent, as JR, it's also evident that Julius would be a better complement for Ball, and the rest, if he had the same mentality; unselfish to a fault, defensively sharp, practices the fundamentals like setting solid screens, as Nance.


Yes, I agree with that... the blend of the two would be a perfect player.

The question is, would it be easier to turn Nance into Randle or vice versa? Personally, I believe Larry can learn confidence more easily than Julius can learn discipline... but I guess time will answer this for us... barring a trade.


Neither we already have Kuzma who is basically the best compliment player alongside Ball. He runs, he shoots, he defends.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144474
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 1:10 pm    Post subject:

rogers49 wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
Dr. Funkbot wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
If there was a way to get PG13 here without a 2nd star, i'd be open to it.

Would be PG13 + 2 out of Jules/Brook/KCP.

But it seems PG13 doesn't want to come here without a 2nd current star.


I think this is the most likely outcome unless we want to do something drastic with Deng's contract.

IMO between Ingram, Ball and KFC and or Lopez there should be enough star power here in LA to lure PG. Plus you get to play for Luke who is a good players coach.

IMO Ball is going to change the atmosphere of the team and make it a desirable destination again.

Some of it will depend on how well PG gets along with the MVP. If Westrbook hogs the bill like he did with KD, I think PG will look to leave. But they might hit it off. Who knows at this point!


Westbrook hogged the ball with KD? He will get George some incredible looks.


Yes he did, and Durant went away from him.


Durant went to a title team, he has said so repeatedly.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144474
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 1:21 pm    Post subject:

greenfrog wrote:
Dr. Funkbot wrote:
adkindo wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
True Lakers Fan wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
True Lakers Fan wrote:
Hypothetically, if we can attach Randle to Deng, is Nance capable starting?


Not if you want to win.


Yeah, that's what I thought too. I just wanted to throw it out there.


Great as a backup though


probably the most overrated Laker player on LG....not saying he is bad, but at his best, he is getting rotation minutes on a mediocre team.


Nance and Kuz can hold down the PF spot. Defense would be much improved.

Plus if we are getting either or Lebron and PG, they can both man the 4 spot.



Lebron is destined to move there. The league gets smaller every year.

"Double digit" rebounding is an overrated attribute, anyway. I can't believe people still clamor over it in 2017.


That is because it is important, every rebound you don't get is a TO. You don't think possessions matter?
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Sentient Meat
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 04 Jul 2014
Posts: 12978

PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 1:36 pm    Post subject:

Nash Vegas wrote:
Sentient Meat wrote:
LakerDYnasty72 wrote:
Sentient Meat wrote:
When I look up Nance and Randle's numbers... it backs up what most of you are saying... that LNJ's better as a backup... not sure if he's a starter.

But I think if Ball is the real thing, Nance's athleticism and defense might better complement Ball. We won't know this until pre season... but I have a feeling Nance might flourish the most, provided he's given adequate minutes.
I know Julius is strong and fast... but it just seems like Nance is better suited to be a Worthy type finisher on the break. Also, I think Nance in general just lacks confidence and swagger... if he played with the same mentality that Julius did, I think he'd be an even better player.


It's funny because, though I agree that Nance might be a better player if he played with the same mentality; aggressive, physical, seeks to impose his will on his opponent, as JR, it's also evident that Julius would be a better complement for Ball, and the rest, if he had the same mentality; unselfish to a fault, defensively sharp, practices the fundamentals like setting solid screens, as Nance.


Yes, I agree with that... the blend of the two would be a perfect player.

The question is, would it be easier to turn Nance into Randle or vice versa? Personally, I believe Larry can learn confidence more easily than Julius can learn discipline... but I guess time will answer this for us... barring a trade.


Neither we already have Kuzma who is basically the best compliment player alongside Ball. He runs, he shoots, he defends.


He's definitely a promising player. We'll soon find out exactly what we have.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
darkside4730
Sixth Man
Sixth Man


Joined: 02 Jul 2015
Posts: 30

PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 1:49 pm    Post subject:

Archie Goodwin got waived by the Nets.

Would he be a good pick up?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Dr. Funkbot
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Sep 2001
Posts: 8188
Location: Eagle Rock

PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 1:59 pm    Post subject:

venturalakersfan wrote:
greenfrog wrote:
Dr. Funkbot wrote:
adkindo wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
True Lakers Fan wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
True Lakers Fan wrote:
Hypothetically, if we can attach Randle to Deng, is Nance capable starting?


Not if you want to win.


Yeah, that's what I thought too. I just wanted to throw it out there.


Great as a backup though


probably the most overrated Laker player on LG....not saying he is bad, but at his best, he is getting rotation minutes on a mediocre team.


Nance and Kuz can hold down the PF spot. Defense would be much improved.

Plus if we are getting either or Lebron and PG, they can both man the 4 spot.



Lebron is destined to move there. The league gets smaller every year.

"Double digit" rebounding is an overrated attribute, anyway. I can't believe people still clamor over it in 2017.


That is because it is important, every rebound you don't get is a TO. You don't think possessions matter?


For sure rebounding is important. But to me Jules is a Kevin Love type player without the spacing. Jules gets boards just like Love, but his tissue soft effort at D to me erases the rebounding numbers.
_________________
R.I.P. Doc Buss
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 1686, 1687, 1688 ... 1811, 1812, 1813  Next
Page 1687 of 1813
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB