OFFICIAL 2017 FREE AGENCY (Lakers sign Bogut)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 1731, 1732, 1733 ... 1811, 1812, 1813  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 10:41 am    Post subject:

Dallas can't have 2 non-shooting bigs in Noel/Jules. That's a non-starter for them, and if Dirk is around in 2018, they're going to pay 18-20m for Jules to be a bench big?
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kevin61
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 1332

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 10:51 am    Post subject:

venturalakersfan wrote:
kevin61 wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
textbook wrote:
Randle signing the qualifying offer with a wink wink deal in place the following year is the way to go. I don't get why they author thinks this is "shady" for the lakers. It will get Randle to 5mil. It would give us a lot more room. Those are the rules, and you have to work around them as best you can. Was Durant and Golden State Shady for him taking less?

I think the more likely scenario is Randle/Deng/First rounder get traded to clear up room. I think Lebron would play the 4...Ball/George/Ingram/Lebron/?


It wouldn't need to be a wink wink deal. If Randle doesn't get a big RFA offer (from the Mavs?) then sign the QO and if he has a great 2018-2019 season, the Lakers bid on him with Bird Rights.

And who is willing to pay $40 mil for Randle? By including Deng that is what you are asking a team to do. Again, can't we have a little realism?


Exactly right. If someone was willing to pay the $40mil, we wouldn't want to trade him. Deng will be stretched or traded for low cost players and/or picks. I'm in favor of stretching before the team is permanently capped by signing Max FA's. More assets are better. You have Bird Rights and therefore can exceed the cap to resign them. Once your capped, it's more difficult to add players.


We won't trade Deng with nothing coming back. We had to take $22 mil Lopez to dump Mozgov, and I would argue he brings more on the court than Deng does. Stretching is likely the only way.

That's correct
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
nash
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Oct 2001
Posts: 8194

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 11:52 am    Post subject:

venturalakersfan wrote:

We won't trade Deng with nothing coming back. We had to take $22 mil Lopez to dump Mozgov, and I would argue he brings more on the court than Deng does. Stretching is likely the only way.


Not next offseason, it has to be for an expiring contract at the trade deadline, after that we sign him or we let him go for nothing.

I'm confident we can move his contract for a late first or maybe a second round pick, so we are not losing a high lottery pick for nothing.

Considering the gems we are drafting late in the draft we may end up with the best player in the long run.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144461
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 11:59 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
kevin61 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
It's a big gamble but if Jules wants to stay here, and be a part of a championship core, that may be the ultimate price (i.e. taking QO and letting the Lakers sign him over the cap in 2019). Then again, he would also be a UFA in 2019 so he could leave too.


Im the eternal optimist, but I'd be shocked if he took that route. Once you get to that point, you have to take "money for life", it's just too big a risk not to. If I was advising him, I'd tell him that, especially considering his injury history.


Sure. But if no team is willing to pay him the amount he wants (i.e. 18-20m/year), isn't he going to go that route anyways (unless the Lakers renounce him)?


JR checks many of the boxes that Dallas needs, I would be surprised if there is no interest. If Matthews opts out or signs a smaller deal they can have $40-50 mil in cap space. Cuban will be active.


So kind of like how they haven't signed their own RFA Noel?


I don't know what Noel has to do with anything. Cuban will be looking at a potential post-Dirk rebuild with cap space.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.


Last edited by venturalakersfan on Wed Aug 16, 2017 12:04 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144461
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 12:00 pm    Post subject:

nash wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:

We won't trade Deng with nothing coming back. We had to take $22 mil Lopez to dump Mozgov, and I would argue he brings more on the court than Deng does. Stretching is likely the only way.


Not next offseason, it has to be for an expiring contract at the trade deadline, after that we sign him or we let him go for nothing.

I'm confident we can move his contract for a late first or maybe a second round pick, so we are not losing a high lottery pick for nothing.

Considering the gems we are drafting late in the draft we may end up with the best player in the long run.


We can't let Deng go for nothing
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
greenfrog
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 36081
Location: 502 Bad Gateway

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 12:17 pm    Post subject:

nash wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:

We won't trade Deng with nothing coming back. We had to take $22 mil Lopez to dump Mozgov, and I would argue he brings more on the court than Deng does. Stretching is likely the only way.


Not next offseason, it has to be for an expiring contract at the trade deadline, after that we sign him or we let him go for nothing.

I'm confident we can move his contract for a late first or maybe a second round pick, so we are not losing a high lottery pick for nothing.

Considering the gems we are drafting late in the draft we may end up with the best player in the long run.


A second round pick? Are you kidding. The Celtics had to throw in a second round pick just to move Avery Bradley.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
nash
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Oct 2001
Posts: 8194

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 12:19 pm    Post subject:

venturalakersfan wrote:
nash wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:

We won't trade Deng with nothing coming back. We had to take $22 mil Lopez to dump Mozgov, and I would argue he brings more on the court than Deng does. Stretching is likely the only way.


Not next offseason, it has to be for an expiring contract at the trade deadline, after that we sign him or we let him go for nothing.

I'm confident we can move his contract for a late first or maybe a second round pick, so we are not losing a high lottery pick for nothing.

Considering the gems we are drafting late in the draft we may end up with the best player in the long run.


We can't let Deng go for nothing


I was talking about Julius.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Chase.button07
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 19 Feb 2017
Posts: 4996

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 12:34 pm    Post subject:

Randle is garbage or pure trash of defense. low defensive iq i have seen.
_________________
Now Playing: The Zo Show @Staples
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
pio2u
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 26 Dec 2012
Posts: 54570

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 12:49 pm    Post subject:

Bulls/buy-out Wade imminent:

https://twitter.com/search?q=wade+bulls+buyout&ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Esearch


Last edited by pio2u on Wed Aug 16, 2017 12:50 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kevin61
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 1332

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 12:50 pm    Post subject:

nash wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
nash wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:

We won't trade Deng with nothing coming back. We had to take $22 mil Lopez to dump Mozgov, and I would argue he brings more on the court than Deng does. Stretching is likely the only way.


Not next offseason, it has to be for an expiring contract at the trade deadline, after that we sign him or we let him go for nothing.

I'm confident we can move his contract for a late first or maybe a second round pick, so we are not losing a high lottery pick for nothing.

Considering the gems we are drafting late in the draft we may end up with the best player in the long run.


We can't let Deng go for nothing


I was talking about Julius.


Deng has a negative value, something more must be given by the Lakers to get a team to take him.

As for Randle, if he plays well enough to warrant other team's interest, no one will want him traded him at the deadline or any time. If he doesn't, the point is moot and he'll be gone. You'd be trading his Bird Rights, that's only valuable if there are other teams bidding against you and your willing to outbid them at any cost.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 12:51 pm    Post subject:

venturalakersfan wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
kevin61 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
It's a big gamble but if Jules wants to stay here, and be a part of a championship core, that may be the ultimate price (i.e. taking QO and letting the Lakers sign him over the cap in 2019). Then again, he would also be a UFA in 2019 so he could leave too.


Im the eternal optimist, but I'd be shocked if he took that route. Once you get to that point, you have to take "money for life", it's just too big a risk not to. If I was advising him, I'd tell him that, especially considering his injury history.


Sure. But if no team is willing to pay him the amount he wants (i.e. 18-20m/year), isn't he going to go that route anyways (unless the Lakers renounce him)?


JR checks many of the boxes that Dallas needs, I would be surprised if there is no interest. If Matthews opts out or signs a smaller deal they can have $40-50 mil in cap space. Cuban will be active.


So kind of like how they haven't signed their own RFA Noel?


I don't know what Noel has to do with anything. Cuban will be looking at a potential post-Dirk rebuild with cap space.


He has everything to do with it. If they keep him, a Jules/Noel pairing is antithetical to what the Mavs like at PF. Plus, Barnes is functionally their PF at many times.

I would say Noel's value is greater or equal to Jules, and the Mavs aren't paying him 20m/year. What makes you think they would do that for Jules?
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kevin61
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 1332

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 12:52 pm    Post subject:

pio2u wrote:
Bulls/buy-out Wade imminent:

https://twitter.com/search?q=wade+bulls+buyout&ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Esearch


That interesting, off to Cleveland I bet, I'm a bit surprised.
Don't really get the "next few months" part, why not now?


Last edited by kevin61 on Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:42 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
2019
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 03 Dec 2014
Posts: 10801

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 12:54 pm    Post subject:

pio2u wrote:
Bulls/buy-out Wade imminent:

https://twitter.com/search?q=wade+bulls+buyout&ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Esearch


Things just got interesting... can't help but wonder if we saved the exception for D Wade.

Obviously we'll have competition... SAS, Cleveland, MIA, Houston, Clippers, etc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 12:58 pm    Post subject:

kevin61 wrote:
pio2u wrote:
Bulls/buy-out Wade imminent:

https://twitter.com/search?q=wade+bulls+buyout&ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Esearch


That interesting, off to Cleveland I bet, I'm a bit surprised.
Don't really the "next few months" part, why not now?


Isn't he making 24m? It'll be a lot of negotiations b/c the Bulls are stingy and won't want to give him anything near that; and the cap space has dried out so I would think Wade wants at least 18m guaranteed.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Inspector Gadget
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Posts: 46631

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 12:59 pm    Post subject:

Wade has been talking positively regarding the Lakers in the past few months and recently he praised the Lakers for signing Vander Blue.

Last edited by Inspector Gadget on Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:00 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epak
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 34147

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 12:59 pm    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
kevin61 wrote:
pio2u wrote:
Bulls/buy-out Wade imminent:

https://twitter.com/search?q=wade+bulls+buyout&ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Esearch


That interesting, off to Cleveland I bet, I'm a bit surprised.
Don't really the "next few months" part, why not now?


Isn't he making 24m? It'll be a lot of negotiations b/c the Bulls are stingy and won't want to give him anything near that; and the cap space has dried out so I would think Wade wants at least 18m guaranteed.



I wonder which team can use a non-3pt shooting SG.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epak
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 34147

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 12:59 pm    Post subject:

Inspector Gadget wrote:
Wade has been harping positively with the Lakers in the past few months and recently he was praised the Lakers for signing Vander Blue.


Then he takes Blue's spot?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:00 pm    Post subject:

epak wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
kevin61 wrote:
pio2u wrote:
Bulls/buy-out Wade imminent:

https://twitter.com/search?q=wade+bulls+buyout&ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Esearch


That interesting, off to Cleveland I bet, I'm a bit surprised.
Don't really the "next few months" part, why not now?


Isn't he making 24m? It'll be a lot of negotiations b/c the Bulls are stingy and won't want to give him anything near that; and the cap space has dried out so I would think Wade wants at least 18m guaranteed.



I wonder which team can use a non-3pt shooting SG.


Some room exceptions, teams that he would never go to may have some cap space. Maybe some full MLE room. But there's no way i see Wade walking away from 24m.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144461
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:07 pm    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
kevin61 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
It's a big gamble but if Jules wants to stay here, and be a part of a championship core, that may be the ultimate price (i.e. taking QO and letting the Lakers sign him over the cap in 2019). Then again, he would also be a UFA in 2019 so he could leave too.


Im the eternal optimist, but I'd be shocked if he took that route. Once you get to that point, you have to take "money for life", it's just too big a risk not to. If I was advising him, I'd tell him that, especially considering his injury history.


Sure. But if no team is willing to pay him the amount he wants (i.e. 18-20m/year), isn't he going to go that route anyways (unless the Lakers renounce him)?


JR checks many of the boxes that Dallas needs, I would be surprised if there is no interest. If Matthews opts out or signs a smaller deal they can have $40-50 mil in cap space. Cuban will be active.


So kind of like how they haven't signed their own RFA Noel?


I don't know what Noel has to do with anything. Cuban will be looking at a potential post-Dirk rebuild with cap space.


He has everything to do with it. If they keep him, a Jules/Noel pairing is antithetical to what the Mavs like at PF. Plus, Barnes is functionally their PF at many times.

I would say Noel's value is greater or equal to Jules, and the Mavs aren't paying him 20m/year. What makes you think they would do that for Jules?


Randle fits what it has been reported they are looking for, a scoring big who can help their anemic rebounding. I think they are treating Noel correctly, $8-10 mil should be his max.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:16 pm    Post subject:

venturalakersfan wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
kevin61 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
It's a big gamble but if Jules wants to stay here, and be a part of a championship core, that may be the ultimate price (i.e. taking QO and letting the Lakers sign him over the cap in 2019). Then again, he would also be a UFA in 2019 so he could leave too.


Im the eternal optimist, but I'd be shocked if he took that route. Once you get to that point, you have to take "money for life", it's just too big a risk not to. If I was advising him, I'd tell him that, especially considering his injury history.


Sure. But if no team is willing to pay him the amount he wants (i.e. 18-20m/year), isn't he going to go that route anyways (unless the Lakers renounce him)?


JR checks many of the boxes that Dallas needs, I would be surprised if there is no interest. If Matthews opts out or signs a smaller deal they can have $40-50 mil in cap space. Cuban will be active.


So kind of like how they haven't signed their own RFA Noel?


I don't know what Noel has to do with anything. Cuban will be looking at a potential post-Dirk rebuild with cap space.


He has everything to do with it. If they keep him, a Jules/Noel pairing is antithetical to what the Mavs like at PF. Plus, Barnes is functionally their PF at many times.

I would say Noel's value is greater or equal to Jules, and the Mavs aren't paying him 20m/year. What makes you think they would do that for Jules?


Randle fits what it has been reported they are looking for, a scoring big who can help their anemic rebounding. I think they are treating Noel correctly, $8-10 mil should be his max.


Disagree. If they think Noel is 8-10m, they will value Jules the same or less. And Jules isn't taking that little.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
22
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 05 Apr 2013
Posts: 17063

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:24 pm    Post subject:

interesting! I assumed he was playing out the year there.

He'll try to get as close to the $24m as he can and then go to a contender.

If he comes here I'll laugh my butt off. Would be so out of left field lol
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
True Lakers Fan
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 28 Oct 2011
Posts: 917
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:03 pm    Post subject:

Interesting about Wade. We'll see.
_________________
I can accept failure, but I can't accept not trying.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144461
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:14 pm    Post subject:

22 wrote:
interesting! I assumed he was playing out the year there.

He'll try to get as close to the $24m as he can and then go to a contender.

If he comes here I'll laugh my butt off. Would be so out of left field lol


I don't see any reason he would want to come here.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kevin61
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 1332

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:41 pm    Post subject:

venturalakersfan wrote:
22 wrote:
interesting! I assumed he was playing out the year there.

He'll try to get as close to the $24m as he can and then go to a contender.

If he comes here I'll laugh my butt off. Would be so out of left field lol


I don't see any reason he would want to come here.


I agree, absolutely will not happen.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
22
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 05 Apr 2013
Posts: 17063

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:42 pm    Post subject:

venturalakersfan wrote:
22 wrote:
interesting! I assumed he was playing out the year there.

He'll try to get as close to the $24m as he can and then go to a contender.

If he comes here I'll laugh my butt off. Would be so out of left field lol


I don't see any reason he would want to come here.

agreed VLF
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 1731, 1732, 1733 ... 1811, 1812, 1813  Next
Page 1732 of 1813
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB