WHO WON THE DEBATE
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> Off Topic Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Who won the debate
Hillary Clinton
57%
 57%  [ 44 ]
Donald Trump
15%
 15%  [ 12 ]
Neither
21%
 21%  [ 16 ]
Other
5%
 5%  [ 4 ]
Total Votes : 76

Author Message
jodeke
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 67317
Location: In a world where admitting to not knowing something is considered a great way to learn.

PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 8:42 pm    Post subject: WHO WON THE DEBATE

Here we go again testing the LG waters.

Who do you think won the debate?

Discuss
_________________
Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind.

America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Huey Lewis & The News
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 18 Dec 2015
Posts: 5234
Location: So what's the uh...topic of discussion?

PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 8:53 pm    Post subject:

pubic & anus
_________________
"All wars are civil wars, because all men are brothers."
http://forums.lakersground.net/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&u=13018
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
jodeke
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 67317
Location: In a world where admitting to not knowing something is considered a great way to learn.

PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 8:59 pm    Post subject:

Huey Lewis & The News wrote:
pubic & anus

You are one sick puppy.
_________________
Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind.

America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
the association
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 03 Feb 2015
Posts: 1982

PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 9:18 pm    Post subject:

A lot of people are saying Trump looked like he was on coke tonight, and that his natural intellectual curiosity is roughly equivalent to JaVale McGee in the throes of wave after wave of transient ischemic attack ...

I mean, I'm not saying that, but I'm hearing that from lots of people, so ...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
jodeke
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 67317
Location: In a world where admitting to not knowing something is considered a great way to learn.

PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 9:21 pm    Post subject:

I noticed he'd combed his hair differently and lost the lobster look. He started well then faded. His political base is weak. He looked nervous on the split screen, drank a lot of water. Reminded me of Nixon.
_________________
Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind.

America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Steve007
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 13165

PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 9:32 pm    Post subject:

I wish they would kick Trump off the stage and put Gary Johnson up there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Omar Little
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 90299
Location: Formerly Known As 24

PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 9:33 pm    Post subject:

Steve007 wrote:
I wish they would kick Trump off the stage and put Gary Johnson up there.


Dumb and dumber there...
_________________
“We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.” ― Elie Wiesel
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Omar Little
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 90299
Location: Formerly Known As 24

PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 9:34 pm    Post subject:

Of you want to know who won, it isn't the candidate whose people are currently deleting his tweets...
_________________
“We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.” ― Elie Wiesel
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Steve007
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 13165

PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 9:43 pm    Post subject:

Omar Little wrote:
Steve007 wrote:
I wish they would kick Trump off the stage and put Gary Johnson up there.


Dumb and dumber there...


I think Johnson sounds reasonable compared to Trump. Unlike these two clowns he actually was opposed to the war in Iraq from the beginning.

But of course when he tweets stuff like this people think he is nuts:

Quote:
Criminal justice reform begins with ending the #WarOnDrugs. @HillaryClinton has been on the wrong side of this issue.

http://www.google.com/search?q=gary+johnson&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&client=safari#scso=uid_3:-41,uid_3:1777,uid_0:249


Edit: Yeah there are definitely some major concerns I have with Johnson but at least he acts like an adult. Trump looks like a spoiled, angry child up there.


Last edited by Steve007 on Mon Sep 26, 2016 10:03 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
the association
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 03 Feb 2015
Posts: 1982

PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 9:44 pm    Post subject:

How (bleep) GREAT does Willard / Mittens seem as a candidate right about now for the Republican base? I've commented before how baffling I find our political system (e.g., casting the net far and wide to find the very best candidates to battle it out for the right to lead the free world, uncovering every stone along the way, and these two are seriously the best options we can retrieve from the great depths?), but good (bleep) grief already ... the ascension of these Republican candidates is literally following some warped, inverted Moore's Law of competence over the past few election cycles ... each cycle, it trends further down, down, down into this political abyss.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
YSong
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Posts: 2329

PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 10:01 pm    Post subject:

I think both are waste of time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerSanity
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 33474
Location: Long Beach, California

PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 10:22 pm    Post subject:

I take douche over turd sandwich on this one... or is it the other way around? Never know which one is which.
_________________
LakersGround's Terms of Service

Twitter: @DeleteThisPost
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
jonnybravo
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 21 Sep 2007
Posts: 30621

PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 11:17 pm    Post subject:

the association wrote:
How (bleep) GREAT does Willard / Mittens seem as a candidate right about now for the Republican base? I've commented before how baffling I find our political system (e.g., casting the net far and wide to find the very best candidates to battle it out for the right to lead the free world, uncovering every stone along the way, and these two are seriously the best options we can retrieve from the great depths?), but good (bleep) grief already ... the ascension of these Republican candidates is literally following some warped, inverted Moore's Law of competence over the past few election cycles ... each cycle, it trends further down, down, down into this political abyss.


This is a comeuppance for them. They've been pandering to the far, far right for awhile now. Trump is just a manifestation of it's final form...I hope.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
OregonLakerGuy
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 23 Feb 2005
Posts: 13207
Location: Oregon

PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2016 2:31 am    Post subject:

I doubt very seriously that there were very many changed votes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Aeneas Hunter
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 31763

PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2016 3:52 am    Post subject:

Steve007 wrote:
I think Johnson sounds reasonable compared to Trump.


That's not a very tough standard.

In an election cycle with two of the most unpopular candidates ever, if you run as a "none of the above" option, and if you still cannot average more than 8% in the polls, you've got problems. I get a little tired of the Gary Johnson crowd, because none of you seem to want to come to terms with what a train wreck he is. A whole lot of people have taken a look at him this cycle. Almost all of them have come away saying "Hell no."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
angrypuppy
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 13 Apr 2001
Posts: 32730

PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2016 4:08 am    Post subject:

Hillary won, and it wasn't even close. Why should that be surprising? She's bright and well-informed, even if you dislike her character or politics.

Trump has too many personal quirks, quirks that are the equivalent to self-inflicted gunshot wounds; it would have been even more one-sided if this followed a formal debate format. He suffers from a poor attention span, which is why he kept rambling off-topic. He's thin-skinned, which is why Hillary easily baited him into interruptions and defensive posturing. Hillary blithely painted a picture of Trump as a bigot, a misogynist and even a fraud, particularly when cornered on his taxes, Obama's birth certificate, or the suits by the federal government on his Fair Housing Act violations ("We settled, admitting no guilt").

If you voted that Trump won, then you either missed the debate, or simply share Trump's inability to follow a logical argument.


Last edited by angrypuppy on Tue Sep 27, 2016 4:25 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
angrypuppy
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 13 Apr 2001
Posts: 32730

PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2016 4:20 am    Post subject:

the association wrote:
A lot of people are saying Trump looked like he was on coke tonight, and that his natural intellectual curiosity is roughly equivalent to JaVale McGee in the throes of wave after wave of transient ischemic attack ...

I mean, I'm not saying that, but I'm hearing that from lots of people, so ...



Now that you mention it, I do see the symptoms, but no.

Trump obviously had a cold, which is what made the attack on Hillary's health a bit silly. He kept sniveling into the microphone, which isn't too dissimilar to someone who has been doing lines, and he driftlessly rambled on without staying focused on the question or issue.

The latter symptom is something that I read about him years ago, written by the COO of his casino operations. Trump simply doesn't have an attention span, and the cause isn't necessarily neurological as he also has poor self-discipline.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Fan0Bynum17
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 30 Nov 2005
Posts: 15436

PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2016 5:20 am    Post subject:

What is certain is that we have all lost with both of these losers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
999
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Posts: 20265

PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2016 5:58 am    Post subject:

Clinton won in a landslide but Fox News is blaming Lester for aiding and abetting Clinton???
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
tlim
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 Jun 2002
Posts: 6648

PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2016 7:03 am    Post subject:

But Faux Nus still thought that Trump blew her away eh? You know, much more presidential, yada yada.

How they can claim to be news is beyond me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ringfinger
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 29418

PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2016 7:10 am    Post subject:

999 wrote:
Clinton won in a landslide but Fox News is blaming Lester for aiding and abetting Clinton???


I wouldn't say aiding and abetting, but it was pretty clear Holt helped out Clinton more than he did Trump that's for sure.

Wasn't it Holt that brought up birtherism? Trump's comments about the "presidential look", etc? And he didn't ask Clinton not one question about her super predator comments, Benghazi, email scandal, etc.

I actually like that Holt would ask those types of "tough" questions, but it's only fair if it goes both ways, IMO.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lakersken80
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Aug 2009
Posts: 38751

PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2016 7:25 am    Post subject:

OregonLakerGuy wrote:
I doubt very seriously that there were very many changed votes.


Yep, most people have already made up their minds....I doubt there are much people who are still torn between the two since they are both drastically different in terms of policies and personalities. A lot of people watched to see the trainwreck of a debate.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Thugnomoe
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 19 Jul 2005
Posts: 14660
Location: unfortunately not Los Angeles anymore

PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2016 8:34 am    Post subject:

i can't believe how close the race is..I thought hillary would be dominating.. i think it shows how much Americans distrust politicians.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Reply with quote
DuncanIdaho
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 17197
Location: In a no-ship

PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2016 8:44 am    Post subject:

ringfinger wrote:
999 wrote:
Clinton won in a landslide but Fox News is blaming Lester for aiding and abetting Clinton???


I wouldn't say aiding and abetting, but it was pretty clear Holt helped out Clinton more than he did Trump that's for sure.

Wasn't it Holt that brought up birtherism? Trump's comments about the "presidential look", etc? And he didn't ask Clinton not one question about her super predator comments, Benghazi, email scandal, etc.

I actually like that Holt would ask those types of "tough" questions, but it's only fair if it goes both ways, IMO.


From the autists at /pol/ http://i.imgur.com/rh1IEnl.jpg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Theseus
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 15 Dec 2007
Posts: 13855

PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2016 9:14 am    Post subject:

I think in terms of using false statements Trump has far eclipsed Hillary, and he has been making that the bread and butter of his campaign. It seemed like he was being asked to do that last night in an effort to set the record straight.

Trump even doubled down on falsehoods by saying the fact checking was wrong. Thestar reported 34 false things said by Trump while 4 to Hillary. I'm sure you could give or take a number of those in either direction but Trump's falsehoods far eclipsed Hillary's.


Trump interrupted Hillary a ton, I thought that is where the Moderator was weakest.

If Trump needs to interrupt Hillary so much and talk over her, then he can't complain about getting more exclusive questions. He can't interrupt her 50 times then say, "Why aren't you talking to her more?"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> Off Topic All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB