2017 Dodgers Thread
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10 ... 340, 341, 342  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> Off Topic Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
rwongega
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 20510
Location: UCLA -> NY

PostPosted: Thu Dec 08, 2016 5:30 pm    Post subject:

DuncanIdaho wrote:
LAkers 4 Life wrote:
DuncanIdaho wrote:
LAkers 4 Life wrote:
rwongega wrote:
LAkers 4 Life wrote:
lakersken80 wrote:
Aroldis Chapman back to the Yankees, 86 million/5 years.


Chapman is the deal that keeps on giving for the Yankees. Trade him for little, then trade him away for a lot, then just re-sign him without having to worry about compensation. All in one year. The smart sabermetric GMs salivate at that scenario.


It seems everyone won in the Chapman roundabout. Yanks got prospects, Reds got prospects, Cubs got a WS, Chapman gets a ring and gets paid. Dodgers sabermorons got hosed.


Yep. In hindsight they really crapped the bed in so many ways. I expected a lot better when this front office staff was built, but so far practically all of their deals have been at best meh... Toles may be the only deal that actually has worked out fantastic for them so far. OK, the only great deal they made was signing Roberts as manager.


That was actually Stan Kasten, too. The regular FO wanted Kapler.


I hear that from you guys, but are there any articles that really confirms it? Because from what I remember reading, Kapler was the front-runner until the Roberts interview and then the FO eventually decided to choose him. I would've expected at least one article leaking the true back story but I never heard of it except here. I don't hate this front office, but all of their moves have been uninspiring.


I'll see if I can find where I read that specifically, but here's an article that kind of hints at that:

Quote:
LOS ANGELES -- Dodgers CEO Stan Kasten, speaking publicly for the first time about the hiring of Dave Roberts as manager, said the person whose decision "mattered the most" was president of baseball operations Andrew Friedman.

Kasten told MLB Network Radio that ownership was involved when the field was trimmed to the final two, Roberts and Gabe Kapler, after a "collaborative" search driven by Friedman and top lieutenants Farhan Zaidi and Josh Byrnes.

http://m.dodgers.mlb.com/news/article/158079926/stan-kasten-happy-with-dave-roberts-hiring/


I think I had it elsewhere, might've been an LA Times column as well. Regardless, while the official statements attempt to save face for the pocket protectors, Kasten played a crucial role in getting them to not put a yes man at the helm.
_________________
http://media.giphy.com/media/zNyBPu5hEFpu/giphy.gif
http://bartsblackboard.com/files/2009/11/The-Simpsons-05x18-Burns-Heir.jpg

RIP Jonathan Tang
RIP Alex Gruenberg

Free KBCB
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
jonnybravo
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 21 Sep 2007
Posts: 30621

PostPosted: Thu Dec 08, 2016 6:30 pm    Post subject:

^^

I don't think there is going to be a definitive answer as to who the final call was. The press release after the fact is, of course, going to be PR spin, Kasten isn't going to publically neuter his own front office by saying it was his decision. We can read the tea leaves though... Kapler was a front office disciple and largely into the bean counting methodology they use. Roberts may not be 180 degrees from that but he's far different philosophically.

Regardless, even giving them credit for the Roberts hire is really digging deep for a hit. I feel like I keep saying it but this winter is huge year for the front office.
_________________
KOBE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Gatekeeper
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 11 Jan 2012
Posts: 5103
Location: Southland Native

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 10:42 am    Post subject:

More than likely, we'll lose Jansen to the Marlins or the Nationals. Blame the front office to wasting $$ on oft-injured starting pitching (Kazmir, Anderson, McCarthy).

http://www.dodgersnation.com/dodgers-credits-la-unlikey-to-re-sign-kenley-jansen-twins-interested-in-brock-stewart-and-more/2016/12/08/
_________________
Character
Manchester United | Greatest European Moments
Fabric of United - Our Belief
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
jonnybravo
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 21 Sep 2007
Posts: 30621

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 11:12 am    Post subject:

Gatekeeper wrote:
More than likely, we'll lose Jansen to the Marlins or the Nationals. Blame the front office to wasting $$ on oft-injured starting pitching (Kazmir, Anderson, McCarthy).

http://www.dodgersnation.com/dodgers-credits-la-unlikey-to-re-sign-kenley-jansen-twins-interested-in-brock-stewart-and-more/2016/12/08/


We'll see how many bargain bin closers we rotate in and out of the lineup to replace Jansen. You know, to be "fiscally responsible".
_________________
KOBE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LAkers 4 Life
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 12 Apr 2001
Posts: 14629

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 11:38 am    Post subject:

jonnybravo wrote:
Gatekeeper wrote:
More than likely, we'll lose Jansen to the Marlins or the Nationals. Blame the front office to wasting $$ on oft-injured starting pitching (Kazmir, Anderson, McCarthy).

http://www.dodgersnation.com/dodgers-credits-la-unlikey-to-re-sign-kenley-jansen-twins-interested-in-brock-stewart-and-more/2016/12/08/


We'll see how many bargain bin closers we rotate in and out of the lineup to replace Jansen. You know, to be "fiscally responsible".


And that's the irony of the whole thing about it. The front office's job right now is to trim down the money spent from their blockbuster deals years ago to get in line with the luxury tax threshold while still remaining competitive with a deep farm system. Yet there have been a lot of moves made that have done the exact opposite of being fiscally responsible.

All 3 of the pitchers mentioned being prime examples. Not to mention they could've approached Jansen last offseason for a contract extension but decided to risk just the one year. Then there's the big money spent on prospects that were just a huge drain in Guerrero, Arruebarrena, Olivera, etc. None of these guys from what I remember were considered creme of the crop Cuban prospects. Sucks even more since the entire scenario that happened with Chapman was what I thought would happen with the Dodgers: bought low, sold high, re-sign.

At some point, the Dodgers need to stop gambling money on players with known injury histories and just pay premium dollars for premium players. Hill is gonna be the fourth straight huge money injury-risk free-agent to be signed by the Dodgers.


Last edited by LAkers 4 Life on Fri Dec 09, 2016 12:48 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Nissan
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 30 Dec 2006
Posts: 1031

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 12:17 pm    Post subject:

jonnybravo wrote:
Gatekeeper wrote:
More than likely, we'll lose Jansen to the Marlins or the Nationals. Blame the front office to wasting $$ on oft-injured starting pitching (Kazmir, Anderson, McCarthy).

http://www.dodgersnation.com/dodgers-credits-la-unlikey-to-re-sign-kenley-jansen-twins-interested-in-brock-stewart-and-more/2016/12/08/


We'll see how many bargain bin closers we rotate in and out of the lineup to replace Jansen. You know, to be "fiscally responsible".


Blame the front office? Blame Jansen for being greedy because a closer is not worth what he is asking for.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
rwongega
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 20510
Location: UCLA -> NY

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 12:23 pm    Post subject:

Nissan wrote:
jonnybravo wrote:
Gatekeeper wrote:
More than likely, we'll lose Jansen to the Marlins or the Nationals. Blame the front office to wasting $$ on oft-injured starting pitching (Kazmir, Anderson, McCarthy).

http://www.dodgersnation.com/dodgers-credits-la-unlikey-to-re-sign-kenley-jansen-twins-interested-in-brock-stewart-and-more/2016/12/08/


We'll see how many bargain bin closers we rotate in and out of the lineup to replace Jansen. You know, to be "fiscally responsible".


Blame the front office? Blame Jansen for being greedy because a closer is not worth what he is asking for.


Why blame someone for trying to make more money? The Giants gave premium cash for the #3 guy. They're the one with 3 WS's of late.
_________________
http://media.giphy.com/media/zNyBPu5hEFpu/giphy.gif
http://bartsblackboard.com/files/2009/11/The-Simpsons-05x18-Burns-Heir.jpg

RIP Jonathan Tang
RIP Alex Gruenberg

Free KBCB
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Moses
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Aug 2008
Posts: 8262
Location: London

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 12:31 pm    Post subject:

rwongega wrote:
Nissan wrote:
jonnybravo wrote:
Gatekeeper wrote:
More than likely, we'll lose Jansen to the Marlins or the Nationals. Blame the front office to wasting $$ on oft-injured starting pitching (Kazmir, Anderson, McCarthy).

http://www.dodgersnation.com/dodgers-credits-la-unlikey-to-re-sign-kenley-jansen-twins-interested-in-brock-stewart-and-more/2016/12/08/


We'll see how many bargain bin closers we rotate in and out of the lineup to replace Jansen. You know, to be "fiscally responsible".


Blame the front office? Blame Jansen for being greedy because a closer is not worth what he is asking for.


Why blame someone for trying to make more money? The Giants gave premium cash for the #3 guy. They're the one with 3 WS's of late.


Exactly. Never blame someone for taking the money. If another similar company offered you a chance to do the same job for significantly more money, and your current employer knew and wouldn't match, you'd bounce, he we all would. Loyalty cuts both ways man, if they have a chance to match and won't, then it's the Dodgers not committing to Kenley and not the other way around. Kenley honored his contract, earned the right to be a free agent, now he's getting his.
_________________
Lakers, Chargers, Dodgers, Arsenal FC.

Mamba Forever
The Marathon Continues
Still I Rise
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Nissan
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 30 Dec 2006
Posts: 1031

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 12:58 pm    Post subject:

rwongega wrote:
Nissan wrote:
jonnybravo wrote:
Gatekeeper wrote:
More than likely, we'll lose Jansen to the Marlins or the Nationals. Blame the front office to wasting $$ on oft-injured starting pitching (Kazmir, Anderson, McCarthy).

http://www.dodgersnation.com/dodgers-credits-la-unlikey-to-re-sign-kenley-jansen-twins-interested-in-brock-stewart-and-more/2016/12/08/


We'll see how many bargain bin closers we rotate in and out of the lineup to replace Jansen. You know, to be "fiscally responsible".


Blame the front office? Blame Jansen for being greedy because a closer is not worth what he is asking for.


Why blame someone for trying to make more money? The Giants gave premium cash for the #3 guy. They're the one with 3 WS's of late.


He can ask for any amount he wants, but it doesn't mean he is worth it. The Giants had no choice and the team was going to overpay for a closer.

Jansen is not worth $80+ million.

So it's okay for Jansen to ask for 8 years, $150 million?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
jonnybravo
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 21 Sep 2007
Posts: 30621

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 2:29 pm    Post subject:

Nissan wrote:
rwongega wrote:
Nissan wrote:
jonnybravo wrote:
Gatekeeper wrote:
More than likely, we'll lose Jansen to the Marlins or the Nationals. Blame the front office to wasting $$ on oft-injured starting pitching (Kazmir, Anderson, McCarthy).

http://www.dodgersnation.com/dodgers-credits-la-unlikey-to-re-sign-kenley-jansen-twins-interested-in-brock-stewart-and-more/2016/12/08/


We'll see how many bargain bin closers we rotate in and out of the lineup to replace Jansen. You know, to be "fiscally responsible".


Blame the front office? Blame Jansen for being greedy because a closer is not worth what he is asking for.


Why blame someone for trying to make more money? The Giants gave premium cash for the #3 guy. They're the one with 3 WS's of late.


He can ask for any amount he wants, but it doesn't mean he is worth it. The Giants had no choice and the team was going to overpay for a closer.

Jansen is not worth $80+ million.

So it's okay for Jansen to ask for 8 years, $150 million?


What an awful leap.
_________________
KOBE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
frijolero01
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 10 May 2005
Posts: 13324

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 2:38 pm    Post subject:

In baseball, loyalty and being on a team with a chance to win a WS means nothing. They go where the money is.

Complete opposite in bball.
_________________
Thank you, Kobe. We love you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
DuncanIdaho
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 17197
Location: In a no-ship

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 2:51 pm    Post subject:

jonnybravo wrote:
Nissan wrote:
rwongega wrote:
Nissan wrote:
jonnybravo wrote:
Gatekeeper wrote:
More than likely, we'll lose Jansen to the Marlins or the Nationals. Blame the front office to wasting $$ on oft-injured starting pitching (Kazmir, Anderson, McCarthy).

http://www.dodgersnation.com/dodgers-credits-la-unlikey-to-re-sign-kenley-jansen-twins-interested-in-brock-stewart-and-more/2016/12/08/


We'll see how many bargain bin closers we rotate in and out of the lineup to replace Jansen. You know, to be "fiscally responsible".


Blame the front office? Blame Jansen for being greedy because a closer is not worth what he is asking for.


Why blame someone for trying to make more money? The Giants gave premium cash for the #3 guy. They're the one with 3 WS's of late.


He can ask for any amount he wants, but it doesn't mean he is worth it. The Giants had no choice and the team was going to overpay for a closer.

Jansen is not worth $80+ million.

So it's okay for Jansen to ask for 8 years, $150 million?


What an awful leap.


That's what he did ask for though, but I bet it was just his agent throwing back something ridiculous because the Dodgers' initial offer wasn't close to Melancon or Chapman.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Nissan
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 30 Dec 2006
Posts: 1031

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 3:16 pm    Post subject:

DuncanIdaho wrote:
jonnybravo wrote:
Nissan wrote:
rwongega wrote:
Nissan wrote:
jonnybravo wrote:
Gatekeeper wrote:
More than likely, we'll lose Jansen to the Marlins or the Nationals. Blame the front office to wasting $$ on oft-injured starting pitching (Kazmir, Anderson, McCarthy).

http://www.dodgersnation.com/dodgers-credits-la-unlikey-to-re-sign-kenley-jansen-twins-interested-in-brock-stewart-and-more/2016/12/08/


We'll see how many bargain bin closers we rotate in and out of the lineup to replace Jansen. You know, to be "fiscally responsible".


Blame the front office? Blame Jansen for being greedy because a closer is not worth what he is asking for.


Why blame someone for trying to make more money? The Giants gave premium cash for the #3 guy. They're the one with 3 WS's of late.


He can ask for any amount he wants, but it doesn't mean he is worth it. The Giants had no choice and the team was going to overpay for a closer.

Jansen is not worth $80+ million.

So it's okay for Jansen to ask for 8 years, $150 million?


What an awful leap.


That's what he did ask for though, but I bet it was just his agent throwing back something ridiculous because the Dodgers' initial offer wasn't close to Melancon or Chapman.


Make a legit counter offer instead of a BS counter offer, or use the Marlins offer as leverage against the Dodgers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
jonnybravo
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 21 Sep 2007
Posts: 30621

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 3:22 pm    Post subject:

^^ I stand corrected, I wasn't aware of that. Um, yeah Kenley, we need you back but (bleep) that 150 noise.
_________________
KOBE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
rwongega
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 20510
Location: UCLA -> NY

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 4:56 pm    Post subject:

frijolero01 wrote:
In baseball, loyalty and being on a team with a chance to win a WS means nothing. They go where the money is.

Complete opposite in bball.


Different circumstances. No hard salary cap for baseball plus with so many factors and so few playoff opportunities, a WS contender is not as surehanded as an NBA Finals contender. Not to mention, basketball players also seek money out themselves.
_________________
http://media.giphy.com/media/zNyBPu5hEFpu/giphy.gif
http://bartsblackboard.com/files/2009/11/The-Simpsons-05x18-Burns-Heir.jpg

RIP Jonathan Tang
RIP Alex Gruenberg

Free KBCB
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
rwongega
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 20510
Location: UCLA -> NY

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 4:57 pm    Post subject:

Nissan wrote:
rwongega wrote:
Nissan wrote:
jonnybravo wrote:
Gatekeeper wrote:
More than likely, we'll lose Jansen to the Marlins or the Nationals. Blame the front office to wasting $$ on oft-injured starting pitching (Kazmir, Anderson, McCarthy).

http://www.dodgersnation.com/dodgers-credits-la-unlikey-to-re-sign-kenley-jansen-twins-interested-in-brock-stewart-and-more/2016/12/08/


We'll see how many bargain bin closers we rotate in and out of the lineup to replace Jansen. You know, to be "fiscally responsible".


Blame the front office? Blame Jansen for being greedy because a closer is not worth what he is asking for.


Why blame someone for trying to make more money? The Giants gave premium cash for the #3 guy. They're the one with 3 WS's of late.


He can ask for any amount he wants, but it doesn't mean he is worth it. The Giants had no choice and the team was going to overpay for a closer.

Jansen is not worth $80+ million.

So it's okay for Jansen to ask for 8 years, $150 million?


He can ask for whatever he wants. If the market will oblige, he'll get that money. If not, that's what negotiating is about.
_________________
http://media.giphy.com/media/zNyBPu5hEFpu/giphy.gif
http://bartsblackboard.com/files/2009/11/The-Simpsons-05x18-Burns-Heir.jpg

RIP Jonathan Tang
RIP Alex Gruenberg

Free KBCB
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Moses
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Aug 2008
Posts: 8262
Location: London

PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2016 10:39 am    Post subject:

Welcome back Kenley! 5 years and 80m per ESPN

Apparently we also have a 4 year offer on the table for JT too.
_________________
Lakers, Chargers, Dodgers, Arsenal FC.

Mamba Forever
The Marathon Continues
Still I Rise
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Gatekeeper
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 11 Jan 2012
Posts: 5103
Location: Southland Native

PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2016 10:46 am    Post subject:

Moses wrote:
Welcome back Kenley! 5 years and 80m per ESPN

Apparently we also have a 4 year offer on the table for JT too.


Some good news. Take that Mattingly!
_________________
Character
Manchester United | Greatest European Moments
Fabric of United - Our Belief
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
frijolero01
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 10 May 2005
Posts: 13324

PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2016 11:12 am    Post subject:

Yessss!!!! It's been reported that JT is close to resigning too. Good job pocket protectors!
_________________
Thank you, Kobe. We love you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
rwongega
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 20510
Location: UCLA -> NY

PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2016 11:42 am    Post subject:

Moses wrote:
Welcome back Kenley! 5 years and 80m per ESPN

Apparently we also have a 4 year offer on the table for JT too.


Chapman got 6 mil more so I guess that's fine. Re-signing him and JT is just getting back to par. We still have immense holes at SP once Hill/McCarthy/Ryu get injured again, 2B unless Utley comes back for a year, and bringing Ellis back to appease Kershaw.
_________________
http://media.giphy.com/media/zNyBPu5hEFpu/giphy.gif
http://bartsblackboard.com/files/2009/11/The-Simpsons-05x18-Burns-Heir.jpg

RIP Jonathan Tang
RIP Alex Gruenberg

Free KBCB
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
DuncanIdaho
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 17197
Location: In a no-ship

PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2016 11:47 am    Post subject:

rwongega wrote:
Moses wrote:
Welcome back Kenley! 5 years and 80m per ESPN

Apparently we also have a 4 year offer on the table for JT too.


Chapman got 6 mil more so I guess that's fine. Re-signing him and JT is just getting back to par. We still have immense holes at SP once Hill/McCarthy/Ryu get injured again, 2B unless Utley comes back for a year, and bringing Ellis back to appease Kershaw.


I've been seeing rumors that we have a trade for Dozier we're working on.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
rwongega
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 20510
Location: UCLA -> NY

PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2016 12:06 pm    Post subject:

DuncanIdaho wrote:
rwongega wrote:
Moses wrote:
Welcome back Kenley! 5 years and 80m per ESPN

Apparently we also have a 4 year offer on the table for JT too.


Chapman got 6 mil more so I guess that's fine. Re-signing him and JT is just getting back to par. We still have immense holes at SP once Hill/McCarthy/Ryu get injured again, 2B unless Utley comes back for a year, and bringing Ellis back to appease Kershaw.


I've been seeing rumors that we have a trade for Dozier we're working on.


I have as well but he'll come at significant cost. You're talking a 2B who hits 42 home runs in not so friendly Target Park (though they did move in the field of late) albeit not a great for average hitter.
_________________
http://media.giphy.com/media/zNyBPu5hEFpu/giphy.gif
http://bartsblackboard.com/files/2009/11/The-Simpsons-05x18-Burns-Heir.jpg

RIP Jonathan Tang
RIP Alex Gruenberg

Free KBCB
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ChickenStu
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 25 Apr 2015
Posts: 31789
Location: Anaheim, CA

PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2016 12:41 pm    Post subject:

Ellis signed with the Marlins.

I don't think we're going to make a significant move for a starting pitcher. I do think you may see a deal for a second baseman, because we need an upgrade over Utley, and the other internal options (Hernandez, etc.) aren't exactly overwhelming me.

You could also see a move for a significant reliever via trade. I also am not ruling out a trade for Braun via trade.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ChickenStu
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 25 Apr 2015
Posts: 31789
Location: Anaheim, CA

PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2016 1:07 pm    Post subject:

Turner is about to re-sign for 4 years and $64MM.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
jonnybravo
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 21 Sep 2007
Posts: 30621

PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2016 3:20 pm    Post subject:

ChickenStu wrote:
Turner is about to re-sign for 4 years and $64MM.




Hell yeah. That + Kenley + Fisher getting fired = Great day in LA!
_________________
KOBE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> Off Topic All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10 ... 340, 341, 342  Next
Page 9 of 342
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB