View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
LakerFan1977 Starting Rotation
Joined: 02 Sep 2005 Posts: 581 Location: Southern California
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 6:56 pm Post subject: Does having the #1 or #2 Pick make any difference? |
|
|
It looks like there is a consensus that Ball and Fultz with go 1, 2 but is there any other player that is even considered going 1 if we get that pick, its always nice to be no. 1 and this is no knock on that at all, but as far as pick uniqueness are they mirror images of each other? Two NBA ready scoring point guards with potential superstar qualities...Is there anything else that draft brings that even comes close? _________________ Hambuger! The cornerstone of any nutritious breakfast |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Halflife Franchise Player
Joined: 15 Aug 2015 Posts: 16703
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 7:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Watched a ton of ball. I'm not a huge fan. But what do I know. If we land 1-3 I package it +Jc |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ringfinger Retired Number
Joined: 08 Oct 2013 Posts: 29418
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
First pick gets to pick a player the second pick doesn't. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ziggy Franchise Player
Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 12712
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ringfinger wrote: | First pick gets to pick a player the second pick doesn't. |
sauce? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BigBallerBrand Star Player
Joined: 23 Dec 2008 Posts: 5790 Location: LA
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Let's see, KAT vs Dlo. Simmons vs Ingram. You decide _________________ Billions Billions Billions |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LakerFan1977 Starting Rotation
Joined: 02 Sep 2005 Posts: 581 Location: Southern California
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
its win, win, btw I wonder if the Lakers have ever traded a No.2 pick ever? _________________ Hambuger! The cornerstone of any nutritious breakfast |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ringfinger Retired Number
Joined: 08 Oct 2013 Posts: 29418
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ziggy wrote: | ringfinger wrote: | First pick gets to pick a player the second pick doesn't. |
sauce? |
No. Saw it on twitter. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
non-player zealot Franchise Player
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Posts: 21365
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
15 wrote: | Let's see, KAT vs Dlo. Simmons vs Ingram. You decide |
Well, we do gotta consider each draft as an individual case, o' displayer of a disturbing, disrobing, probably horny Ron Artest avatar. Example: 1st pick in 89 and 1st pick in 92 is a whole different ballgame on a whole nother planet. Shaq Attaq vs Never Nervous Pervis. Sh, it was a large drop between 1 and 2 in 1992 and Zo was good. In 93, you had a quandary over Penny and Webber, so Orlando traded down to get Penny at #2. In 07, you got Durant vs Oden. Oden at 1 makes Gelo and BI seem like we hit home runs at 2 by comparison.
This one, if we get 1, we're gonna be torturing ourselves about whether we picked the right guy until the answer becomes obvious. In early 82/3, there were some restlessness about whether Worthy was the right choice as Cummings and Nique were instantly playing well in major roles as James was being weaned along. I expect that again. If we get 1, I don't know if they might wanna do the 1993 thing. Take Fultz 1 and trade him for Ball 'n stuff.
This is a deeper draft, but I don't want (bleep) #3 if we keep our pick. That would be a repeat of the last 2 years even though Jax, Tatum and others look good. We're holding out for a HERO, this year. He's gotta be larger than life. _________________ GOAT MAGIC REEL
SEDALE TRIBUTE
EDDIE DONX! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mhan00 Retired Number
Joined: 13 Apr 2001 Posts: 32059
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
15 wrote: | Let's see, KAT vs Dlo. Simmons vs Ingram. You decide |
Jury us out on Simmons, but KAT would have been incredible. He's about the clearest example of a near sure fire star from the last three draft classes. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mike@LG Moderator
Joined: 10 Apr 2001 Posts: 65135 Location: Orange County, CA
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I definitely don't consider Lonzo Ball a scoring PG. _________________ Resident Car Nut.
https://lakersdraft.substack.com/
I am not an economic advisor nor do I advise economic strategies or plans. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
allNet Starting Rotation
Joined: 27 Jun 2005 Posts: 159
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm looking at Josh Jackson, Taytum and Jonathon Isaac as fantastic fits for the Lakers. 1-3 doesn't matter to me this year, I see them all as blue-chip prospects.
Last edited by allNet on Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:12 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WeDidItReddit Star Player
Joined: 10 May 2015 Posts: 1087
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd be happy as long as we keep it to be honest |
|
Back to top |
|
|
noahp45 Star Player
Joined: 23 Apr 2006 Posts: 6572 Location: Oceanside Ca
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Markelle Fultz
Or
Josh Jackson
I'm not a believer in the Ball boy. Maybe the young one if he hits the Gym. Don't know if I want to hear his dad on the radio and or TV cryinglike a damn Kardashian
How about their names
Haha I thought my Family had some hood names. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fiendishoc Star Player
Joined: 23 Jun 2005 Posts: 8488 Location: The (real) short corner
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think Fultz and Jackson have a pretty good shot at becoming stars. I'm lower on Ball than most but a lot knowledgeable guys who watched him more, like GT, have him at #1 currently. So we're probably going to get a pretty good player regardless. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
City_Dawg Retired Number
Joined: 14 Jul 2006 Posts: 46878 Location: Coming soon and striking at your borders.
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No difference. We'll hate them both equally. _________________ *sighs*
!... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lakersfever714 Franchise Player
Joined: 05 Jan 2016 Posts: 11757
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
15 wrote: | Let's see, KAT vs Dlo. Simmons vs Ingram. You decide |
Are you implying that Ingram is a bust? KAT vs DLo is clear but Simmons vs Ingram is still too early to call. _________________ LeGoat! LeMazing! LeGend! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tnell Star Player
Joined: 23 Jun 2011 Posts: 3185 Location: Over the River And Through The Woods
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
City_Dawg wrote: | No difference. We'll hate them both equally. |
Pretty much |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nash Star Player
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 Posts: 8194
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
City_Dawg wrote: | No difference. We'll hate them both equally. |
Not if they help us to win games. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
City_Dawg Retired Number
Joined: 14 Jul 2006 Posts: 46878 Location: Coming soon and striking at your borders.
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nash wrote: | City_Dawg wrote: | No difference. We'll hate them both equally. |
Not if they help us to win games. |
Well thats not going to happen anytime soon so... _________________ *sighs*
!... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nash Star Player
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 Posts: 8194
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 10:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
City_Dawg wrote: | nash wrote: | City_Dawg wrote: | No difference. We'll hate them both equally. |
Not if they help us to win games. |
Well thats not going to happen anytime soon so... |
We have a lot of assets, we can move two or three of them for an all star then go after another in free agency and draft a stud PG or Forward in this deep draft. I don't think it is pipe, but a real possibility (best case scenario).
Worst case scenario is keeping this roster and missing our lottery pick, then a 10 win season would be great. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BynumForThree Star Player
Joined: 27 Feb 2016 Posts: 1254
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 10:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would prefer the 3rd pick over the 2nd pick. Picking second would put too much pressure to pick Ball since Fultz is going 1st most likely, we can end up with Jackson or Smith at 3 and get a higher ceiling player. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
epak Retired Number
Joined: 30 Aug 2005 Posts: 34147
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hakeem vs Sam |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Don Draper Retired Number
Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Posts: 28432 Location: LA --> Bay Area
|
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think it matters in a draft where you have a clear #1. But there are always exceptions to the rule e.g. the Blake Griffin/Curry draft. In this draft I haven't seen anything that puts Fultz or Ball clearly above the other. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LakerFan1977 Starting Rotation
Joined: 02 Sep 2005 Posts: 581 Location: Southern California
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 6:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Don Draper wrote: | I think it matters in a draft where you have a clear #1. But there are always exceptions to the rule e.g. the Blake Griffin/Curry draft. In this draft I haven't seen anything that puts Fultz or Ball clearly above the other. |
That's why I was curious who would be a better fit for this Lakers team _________________ Hambuger! The cornerstone of any nutritious breakfast |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yinoma2001 Retired Number
Joined: 19 Jun 2010 Posts: 119487
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 6:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm sure if we get fultz or ball we will somehow screw them up too _________________ From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|