IndyStar: "Because if next season is not different, Paul George is probably gone to his hometown Los Angeles Lakers."
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 11, 12, 13 ... 16, 17, 18  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Chronicle
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Posts: 31935
Location: Manhattan

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 3:26 am    Post subject:

Thinking about it some more though it seems really weird to me, because ultimately a player has no control over whether he gets traded (no-trade clauses aren't until after the 8th seasons)

which means that they have no control over whether they can earn that significant amount of extra money. Because if they get traded in their 5th-8th season, they lose all that money.

How did the player association agree to this?
_________________
Kobe


Last edited by Chronicle on Sat Apr 29, 2017 3:29 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Palin
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 Feb 2008
Posts: 1808

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 3:28 am    Post subject:

Deng and top3 pick for PG
Ingram, Randle, Brewer and 28th pick for Butler

Sign Ibaka for 20 mil and sign Bogdanovic for 10 mil

DLO/Clarkson
Butler/Nwaba
PG/Bogdanovic
Ibaka/Nance
Mozgov/Zubac


Butler and PG can fill the 1st and 2nd option roles in offense and will be best defensive wing duo in Nba

Ibaka would be our shooting big whe can play both sides of the game

DLO, PG and Butler provides enough ball handiling.

Would have a nice bench and with Clarkson/Bogdanovic/Nance coming for Mozgov we can have flexibility when we go small with different alternative lineups.

Bogdanovic helps our much needed shooting
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
richmorgan12
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 13 Feb 2017
Posts: 595

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 5:22 am    Post subject:

Chronicle wrote:
Thinking about it some more though it seems really weird to me, because ultimately a player has no control over whether he gets traded (no-trade clauses aren't until after the 8th seasons)

which means that they have no control over whether they can earn that significant amount of extra money. Because if they get traded in their 5th-8th season, they lose all that money.

How did the player association agree to this?


Probably because it affects a very, very, very, very small number of players and those very, very, very, very few players want the possibility to earn even more, to the point where they're willing to take that risk. And blocking it might have meant a work stoppage. So it boils down to "Do you want to make no money to support something that is 99.99% likely NOT to affect you or do you want to make millions instead?"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
MJST
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 26309

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 8:09 am    Post subject:

Should the Lakers trade for Paul George?




Agree 100% with Max's points here.
_________________
How NBA 2K18 failed the All-Time Lakers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxMBYm3wwxk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Chronicle
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Posts: 31935
Location: Manhattan

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 8:23 am    Post subject:

richmorgan12 wrote:
Probably because it affects a very, very, very, very small number of players and those very, very, very, very few players want the possibility to earn even more, to the point where they're willing to take that risk. And blocking it might have meant a work stoppage. So it boils down to "Do you want to make no money to support something that is 99.99% likely NOT to affect you or do you want to make millions instead?"


Yeah okay you're right

but still, let's take a look at the players who will be ineligible because of that caveat

Kevin Durant
Lamarcus Aldridge
Carmelo Anthony
Kyle Lowry
Kevin Love

That's kinda stupid no?

Meanwhile Lebron james is eligible because he returned to his home team. Which no other player has ever done. so they added that exception specifically for lebron james?
_________________
Kobe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
VicXLakers
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 11823

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 8:32 am    Post subject:

Chronicle wrote:
richmorgan12 wrote:
Probably because it affects a very, very, very, very small number of players and those very, very, very, very few players want the possibility to earn even more, to the point where they're willing to take that risk. And blocking it might have meant a work stoppage. So it boils down to "Do you want to make no money to support something that is 99.99% likely NOT to affect you or do you want to make millions instead?"


Yeah okay you're right

but still, let's take a look at the players who will be ineligible because of that caveat

Kevin Durant
Lamarcus Aldridge
Carmelo Anthony
Kyle Lowry
Kevin Love

That's kinda stupid no?

Meanwhile Lebron james is eligible because he returned to his home team. Which no other player has ever done. so they added that exception specifically for lebron james?


it’s pretty darned interesting that Chris Paul stands to be one of the biggest individual beneficiaries of a subtle rule change on deck for the new collective bargaining agreement.
Who else wins here?
The two other players who immediately jump out as beneficiaries of this rule change happen to be close CP3 friends and fellow union leaders LeBron James and Carmelo Anthony. Both can become free agents in 2018. Both will be able to sign longer max salary deals than would previously have been possible.


http://www.sbnation.com/nba/2016/12/15/13966058/chris-paul-nba-labor-deal-win-money-clippers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Chronicle
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Posts: 31935
Location: Manhattan

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 8:40 am    Post subject:

How is carmelo eligible for it since he was traded well after his rookie contract?

edit; nvm that article is about a change to the over36 rule. but yeah the union leaders definitely managed to make a good deal for themselves
_________________
Kobe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
sonic the laker
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 06 Oct 2013
Posts: 2063

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 8:54 am    Post subject:

MJST wrote:
Should the Lakers trade for Paul George?




Agree 100% with Max's points here.



Yep. Max is dead-on with all his points, and articulated them in an easily understandable way. Been saying this myself, since the beginning of the entire trade debate, whether it was for PG or Butler. Not trading for those dudes, just to have a depleted team get their arses handed to them by the GSW super-squad.

Read the winds, be patient, accumulate/cultivate young talent, and strike the FA market when it's hot.


ZOOM!!!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Chronicle
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Posts: 31935
Location: Manhattan

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 9:08 am    Post subject:

Supersquads don't always win the championship.

Injuries are a real concern for every team, and they can happen at any moment

so if a supersquad gets hurt, there's gonna be some other team that happens to be there to take their place

Would you rather be that team, or once more the worst team in the league ?
_________________
Kobe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
richmorgan12
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 13 Feb 2017
Posts: 595

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 10:44 am    Post subject:

Chronicle wrote:
richmorgan12 wrote:
Probably because it affects a very, very, very, very small number of players and those very, very, very, very few players want the possibility to earn even more, to the point where they're willing to take that risk. And blocking it might have meant a work stoppage. So it boils down to "Do you want to make no money to support something that is 99.99% likely NOT to affect you or do you want to make millions instead?"


Yeah okay you're right

but still, let's take a look at the players who will be ineligible because of that caveat

Kevin Durant
Lamarcus Aldridge
Carmelo Anthony
Kyle Lowry
Kevin Love

That's kinda stupid no?

Meanwhile Lebron james is eligible because he returned to his home team. Which no other player has ever done. so they added that exception specifically for lebron james?


Well, the only guy who deserves a $30 million salary in that group is Durant. That's one guy. Anthony is lucky he doesn't play in the NFL, because he would have been cut long ago.

Regarding LeBron, LeBron makes the rules, so yeah that exception and the age exception were added because of him and a few of his older, near top player buddies.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144461
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 11:58 am    Post subject:

vdogg11 wrote:
MJST wrote:
If he's so hell bent on coming to the Lakers, let him in free agency.

I have no freaking clue what the rush is for. If you're afraid he's gonna go elsewhere if we don't trade for him, then I don't get why you think he still WOULDN'T go elsewhere with our depleted core when Houston and Boston are better options.

Everyone seems to be super confident or convinced he really wants to go to the Lakers EXCEPT Lakers fans.


agreed. and we need to stop talking about paul George like he's kawhi leonard or something. he's not.


He is a hell of a lot closer than anyone we have.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144461
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:02 pm    Post subject:

socalsp3 wrote:
MJST wrote:
vdogg11 wrote:
MJST wrote:
If he's so hell bent on coming to the Lakers, let him in free agency.

I have no freaking clue what the rush is for. If you're afraid he's gonna go elsewhere if we don't trade for him, then I don't get why you think he still WOULDN'T go elsewhere with our depleted core when Houston and Boston are better options.

Everyone seems to be super confident or convinced he really wants to go to the Lakers EXCEPT Lakers fans.


agreed. and we need to stop talking about paul George like he's kawhi leonard or something. he's not.


No, he's not.

You ask the question "Whose better, Paul George or Jimmy Butler" you wouldn't likely find someone that would out and out say "George without a doubt".


George gets overrated cause he's "there" and wants to be a Laker, and after years of getting burned by FAs they need someone to latch on to and he's that guy, BUT he's also at best a Robin on a championship team and we ARE NOT getting "Batman" during the season we'd trade our youth for him and he'll waltz away to Houston or Boston while we watch whichever of the core we traded for him rule it up in Indiana and feel stupid like the Knicks felt when they unloaded all their depth for a Carmelo they could have gotten in free agency had they waited a few months.

And George isn't even on a prime Melo's level so there's that too. Better defender, but better player? No.


Great point. lakers would be heading down the path of the current NY Knicks if they gut the core for PG13


No one is suggesting they gut the core for PG, stop making crap up. And that "core" can't win 30 games. God I hate tanking, it turns everyone into losers.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144461
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:03 pm    Post subject:

22 wrote:
I'd give up the pick before I gave up Julius or DLO or Ingram *zips up flame suit*


The pick would be the first thing I offered.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerLogic
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 27 Mar 2005
Posts: 17886

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:04 pm    Post subject:

venturalakersfan wrote:
22 wrote:
I'd give up the pick before I gave up Julius or DLO or Ingram *zips up flame suit*


The pick would be the first thing I offered.


Fultz is a better prospect than anyone we have.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144461
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:05 pm    Post subject:

MJST wrote:
Chronicle wrote:
If he gets traded to some other team the chances of him signing with us in 2018 are next to nothing imo



If the chances of him signing with us are next to nothing if he was traded to another team. Then our chances would be worse to retain him, with a depleted version of the team we have now to get him...


Not really, he will likely sign with whoever has his Bird Rights.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Chronicle
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Posts: 31935
Location: Manhattan

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:05 pm    Post subject:

LakerLogic wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
22 wrote:
I'd give up the pick before I gave up Julius or DLO or Ingram *zips up flame suit*


The pick would be the first thing I offered.


Fultz is a better prospect than anyone we have.


For the record, same thing was said about our pick last year, and the pick the year before that, and the pick the year before that
_________________
Kobe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144461
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:07 pm    Post subject:

MJST wrote:
Chronicle wrote:
MJST wrote:
Chronicle wrote:
If he gets traded to some other team the chances of him signing with us in 2018 are next to nothing imo



If the chances of him signing with us are next to nothing if he was traded to another team. Then our chances would be worse to retain him, with a depleted version of the team we have now to get him...


No, the reason I say that is because of the extra 100 million he will get for sticking with whatever team has him, because of the new cba that starts next season


Than if it's all about money, he'll stay in Indiana and they don't need to trade him anyway.


I am sure that is his thinking, stay in Indy and get the super max.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Villain6Activated
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 22 Dec 2011
Posts: 6697

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:09 pm    Post subject:

sonic the laker wrote:
MJST wrote:
Should the Lakers trade for Paul George?




Agree 100% with Max's points here.



Yep. Max is dead-on with all his points, and articulated them in an easily understandable way. Been saying this myself, since the beginning of the entire trade debate, whether it was for PG or Butler. Not trading for those dudes, just to have a depleted team get their arses handed to them by the GSW super-squad.

Read the winds, be patient, accumulate/cultivate young talent, and strike the FA market when it's hot.


ZOOM!!!!!


I also 100% agree with Max Kellerman.
_________________
“Life is too short. You have to keep it moving.” - Kobe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144461
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:13 pm    Post subject:

LakerLogic wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
22 wrote:
I'd give up the pick before I gave up Julius or DLO or Ingram *zips up flame suit*


The pick would be the first thing I offered.


Fultz is a better prospect than anyone we have.


No, it is a weak draft. In strong draft he wouldn't be top 8.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
greenfrog
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 36081
Location: 502 Bad Gateway

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:21 pm    Post subject:

lol

http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/244356/GMs-Calling-2017-NBA-Draft-Strongest-In-A-Decade

https://twitter.com/DraftExpress/status/806352951430316032


Last edited by greenfrog on Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:23 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Chronicle
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Posts: 31935
Location: Manhattan

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:22 pm    Post subject:

And once more for the record, the same thing was said about the previous 3 drafts
_________________
Kobe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
greenfrog
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 36081
Location: 502 Bad Gateway

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:24 pm    Post subject:

Chronicle wrote:
And once more for the record, the same thing was said about the previous 3 drafts


Who the hell said that about last season's draft?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerLogic
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 27 Mar 2005
Posts: 17886

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:49 pm    Post subject:

Chronicle wrote:
LakerLogic wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
22 wrote:
I'd give up the pick before I gave up Julius or DLO or Ingram *zips up flame suit*


The pick would be the first thing I offered.


Fultz is a better prospect than anyone we have.


For the record, same thing was said about our pick last year, and the pick the year before that, and the pick the year before that


Yeah because we started with nothing. Not all drafts are the same.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerLogic
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 27 Mar 2005
Posts: 17886

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:55 pm    Post subject:

venturalakersfan wrote:
LakerLogic wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
22 wrote:
I'd give up the pick before I gave up Julius or DLO or Ingram *zips up flame suit*


The pick would be the first thing I offered.


Fultz is a better prospect than anyone we have.


No, it is a weak draft. In strong draft he wouldn't be top 8.


Which strong draft is that? I'd really like to see it.

He is top 3 in most drafts easily.

Let's look at LeBron's draft. That one is obviously strong.

I'd take him over Darko, Carmelo, possibly Wade.

At minimum top 4.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerLogic
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 27 Mar 2005
Posts: 17886

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:56 pm    Post subject:

greenfrog wrote:
lol

http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/244356/GMs-Calling-2017-NBA-Draft-Strongest-In-A-Decade

https://twitter.com/DraftExpress/status/806352951430316032


Where are these strong drafts that people speak of?

In the past decade, he would go top 2 or top 3 in all of them.

This is a strong draft.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 11, 12, 13 ... 16, 17, 18  Next
Page 12 of 18
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB