Projecting 2017 Cap Space, Pre-Lottery
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
emplay
Site Staff
Site Staff


Joined: 15 Apr 2001
Posts: 25549

PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2017 10:34 am    Post subject: Projecting 2017 Cap Space, Pre-Lottery

Hey all,

Here's a look at the summer - Lakers are hard to peg because of the lottery, Swaggy & Tarik contracts, etc.

At @BBallInsiders Projecting 2017 Cap Space, Pre-Lottery - all 30 teams, their FAs, the max they can spend
http://www.basketballinsiders.com/projecting-2017-cap-space-pre-lottery/

Cheers,

Eric
_________________
Salary Cap Strategist and Columnist at Bleacher Report and on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/EricPincus
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
nash
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Oct 2001
Posts: 8194

PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2017 12:08 pm    Post subject:

Good stuff emplay, thanks for sharing.

It's clear that our former front office didn't let us in a good situation. We have a couple of veterans that aren't producing and are eating our cap space, we don't have a single young piece that a casual fan would choose to build a contender around and our chance to keep our own lottery pick is < 50%.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
CaliRyderX
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 13 May 2009
Posts: 404

PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2017 1:01 pm    Post subject:

nash wrote:
Good stuff emplay, thanks for sharing.

It's clear that our former front office didn't let us in a good situation. We have a couple of veterans that aren't producing and are eating our cap space, we don't have a single young piece that a casual fan would choose to build a contender around and our chance to keep our own lottery pick is < 50%.


All valid points, and along similar lines that I brought up before being lambasted in this forum by Kupchak/Jim Buss supporters...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Dr. Funkbot
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Sep 2001
Posts: 8188
Location: Eagle Rock

PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2017 1:48 pm    Post subject:

CaliRyderX wrote:
nash wrote:
Good stuff emplay, thanks for sharing.

It's clear that our former front office didn't let us in a good situation. We have a couple of veterans that aren't producing and are eating our cap space, we don't have a single young piece that a casual fan would choose to build a contender around and our chance to keep our own lottery pick is < 50%.


All valid points, and along similar lines that I brought up before being lambasted in this forum by Kupchak/Jim Buss supporters...


Casual fans are stupid. IMO Ingram is going to be a monster.

But the rest of the post about a 2 really really really bad veteran signings is on point.
_________________
R.I.P. Doc Buss
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Inspector Gadget
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Posts: 46681

PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2017 1:49 pm    Post subject:

Thanks emplay, I would expect the FO to clear cap space, i don't think there is much to work with without getting rid of contracts especially since we might need to potentially entice PG13 by bringing in star FAs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
JH from Hemet
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 25 Jun 2016
Posts: 518

PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2017 8:10 am    Post subject:

nash wrote:
Good stuff emplay, thanks for sharing.

It's clear that our former front office didn't let us in a good situation. We have a couple of veterans that aren't producing and are eating our cap space, we don't have a single young piece that a casual fan would choose to build a contender around and our chance to keep our own lottery pick is < 50%.


waaaait a minute....what exactly is BI if not a young piece to biuld around?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Chase.button07
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 19 Feb 2017
Posts: 4996

PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2017 8:28 am    Post subject:

28.3 without the pick.

Emplay, what does this mean? Nick Young ($10.3 or $5.7 PO)

whats the 10.3?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
january
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 01 Nov 2016
Posts: 106

PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2017 8:36 am    Post subject:

cap hold i guess.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
emplay
Site Staff
Site Staff


Joined: 15 Apr 2001
Posts: 25549

PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2017 12:24 pm    Post subject:

$10.3 mil cap hold if he opts out - Lakers can renounce that amount
_________________
Salary Cap Strategist and Columnist at Bleacher Report and on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/EricPincus
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
CandyCanes
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 24 Dec 2007
Posts: 35854
Location: Santa Clarita, CA (Hell) ->>>>>Ithaca, NY -≥≥≥≥≥Berkeley, CA

PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2017 12:27 pm    Post subject:

So effectively we have roughly one max slot if we keep the pick, and an additional ten million if we don't keep Nick Young?
_________________
Damian Lillard shatters Dwight Coward's championship dreams:

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
Dr. Funkbot
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Sep 2001
Posts: 8188
Location: Eagle Rock

PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2017 12:30 pm    Post subject:

CandyCanes wrote:
So effectively we have roughly one max slot if we keep the pick, and an additional ten million if we don't keep Nick Young?


To get one max slot we would have to get rid of both Black and Young and we would have no money left over.
_________________
R.I.P. Doc Buss
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
emplay
Site Staff
Site Staff


Joined: 15 Apr 2001
Posts: 25549

PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2017 12:35 pm    Post subject:

Lakers can't get to a mid-tier max slot w/o trading or buying out a player - they can get close but not quite there for a Hayward, Griffin type
_________________
Salary Cap Strategist and Columnist at Bleacher Report and on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/EricPincus
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
CandyCanes
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 24 Dec 2007
Posts: 35854
Location: Santa Clarita, CA (Hell) ->>>>>Ithaca, NY -≥≥≥≥≥Berkeley, CA

PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2017 12:36 pm    Post subject:

Dr. Funkbot wrote:
CandyCanes wrote:
So effectively we have roughly one max slot if we keep the pick, and an additional ten million if we don't keep Nick Young?


To get one max slot we would have to get rid of both Black and Young and we would have no money left over.


I'm fairly ignorant of how the cap works... Is even 28.3 million not enough for a max slot now?
_________________
Damian Lillard shatters Dwight Coward's championship dreams:

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
emplay
Site Staff
Site Staff


Joined: 15 Apr 2001
Posts: 25549

PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2017 12:37 pm    Post subject:

not for the middle tier
_________________
Salary Cap Strategist and Columnist at Bleacher Report and on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/EricPincus
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
rogers49
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 02 Jul 2015
Posts: 1182

PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2017 2:20 pm    Post subject:

CandyCanes wrote:
Dr. Funkbot wrote:
CandyCanes wrote:
So effectively we have roughly one max slot if we keep the pick, and an additional ten million if we don't keep Nick Young?


To get one max slot we would have to get rid of both Black and Young and we would have no money left over.


I'm fairly ignorant of how the cap works... Is even 28.3 million not enough for a max slot now?


36 or 30 depending on nba years
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Inspector Gadget
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Posts: 46681

PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2017 3:01 pm    Post subject:

emplay wrote:
Lakers can't get to a mid-tier max slot w/o trading or buying out a player - they can get close but not quite there for a Hayward, Griffin type


It's obvious we need significant cap to make a run at them, hopefully there is a plan.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
emplay
Site Staff
Site Staff


Joined: 15 Apr 2001
Posts: 25549

PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2017 3:26 pm    Post subject:

Not sure Lakers make a run at them - but if they got a yes, then they can clear cap to make room
_________________
Salary Cap Strategist and Columnist at Bleacher Report and on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/EricPincus
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Inspector Gadget
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Posts: 46681

PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2017 3:30 pm    Post subject:

emplay wrote:
Not sure Lakers make a run at them - but if they got a yes, then they can clear cap to make room


At lot of rumors of the laker's going after Hayward or Griffin and I'm assuming the Lakers won't mind getting multiple stars in FA so I'm sure there is motivation to make more cap room.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
emplay
Site Staff
Site Staff


Joined: 15 Apr 2001
Posts: 25549

PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2017 3:31 pm    Post subject:

there aren't any real rumors - that's nothing but complete and utter speculation, simply because they will be FA this summer
_________________
Salary Cap Strategist and Columnist at Bleacher Report and on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/EricPincus
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Inspector Gadget
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Posts: 46681

PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2017 3:34 pm    Post subject:

But it's obvious that the Lakers want them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
emplay
Site Staff
Site Staff


Joined: 15 Apr 2001
Posts: 25549

PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2017 3:53 pm    Post subject:

Lakers want good, available players? well yah.
_________________
Salary Cap Strategist and Columnist at Bleacher Report and on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/EricPincus
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
cthroatgtr
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 21 Aug 2005
Posts: 1375

PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2017 6:30 pm    Post subject:

Wow do the Deng/Mozgov deals really hurt. Was Jim/Mitch intentionally sabotaging the teams future?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
emplay
Site Staff
Site Staff


Joined: 15 Apr 2001
Posts: 25549

PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2017 6:31 pm    Post subject:

no
_________________
Salary Cap Strategist and Columnist at Bleacher Report and on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/EricPincus
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
rock0100
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 Mar 2005
Posts: 5399

PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2017 7:35 pm    Post subject:

emplay wrote:
no


Were those signings due to Jim? I cannot see Mitch signing players like that on his own. Am I wrong?

We would have been better served not signing anyone.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
emplay
Site Staff
Site Staff


Joined: 15 Apr 2001
Posts: 25549

PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2017 8:14 pm    Post subject:

No. It's fantasy to blame Jim and absolve Mitch
_________________
Salary Cap Strategist and Columnist at Bleacher Report and on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/EricPincus
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB