OFFICIAL LONZO BALL THREAD
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 1059, 1060, 1061 ... 1686, 1687, 1688  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> General Basketball Discussion Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ringfinger
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 29418

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 8:09 pm    Post subject:

MJST wrote:
lol wow. I'd really hope the Lakers wouldn't be stupid enough to giftwrap a back court of Lonzo and Booker, along with Josh Jackson and Deandre Ayton as part of that core, JUST to rid of Deng's contract X_X


I was never a fan of the 2 max plan, precisely for these reasons. I doubt we do it, but, when you acquire LBJ and another star, everything is on the table.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
1hu2ren3dui4
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 19 Jul 2002
Posts: 15403
Location: Oak Park

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 8:17 pm    Post subject:

Why do the lakers need to move deng? Can’t they just extend and stretch and keep ball for something better?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Freddie Buckets
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 08 Oct 2007
Posts: 9131

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 8:19 pm    Post subject:

1hu2ren3dui4 wrote:
Why do the lakers need to move deng? Can’t they just extend and stretch and keep ball for something better?


if we sign PG and LeBron and wanna keep Randle, we need to trade Deng's contract, per Larry Coon.

Can't stretch him and keep Randle if we give PG and LeBron max deals.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
PRLakeShow
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 07 Oct 2016
Posts: 10460

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 8:20 pm    Post subject:

Of course Phoenix would do it. It would be dumb not to. They are not signing FAs so taking on Deng doesn't matter. Basically get a transcendent PG for free.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
chantruong
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 15 Jun 2009
Posts: 8894
Location: SGV

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 8:20 pm    Post subject:

1hu2ren3dui4 wrote:
Why do the lakers need to move deng? Can’t they just extend and stretch and keep ball for something better?


A lot of us believe that the extend and stretch strategy would not work as it may be a blatant circumvention of the CBA and Silver will veto it.

I would be very hesistant to use BI or Lonzo to move Deng but I would not be opposed to it if we got the right deal.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
scoobs
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 19 Aug 2005
Posts: 4746

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 8:20 pm    Post subject:

chantruong wrote:
Mitch better hook us up with Kemba and the 11th pick if they want Ball
What would you offer Charlotte for that?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Judah
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jun 2015
Posts: 4759

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 8:21 pm    Post subject:

Lonzo-Lite wrote:
Mozgov cost us Dlo

Deng may cost us Zo


No, it won't. For one thing, the Lakers value Lonzo so much more than they valued Russell (which they should). Secondly, these weird trade ideas involving Lonzo are directly related to Haynes’ speculation and ESPN's misrepresentation of what he said. The Lakers will probably get a flurry of calls about him from various teams leading up to the draft, all because of that comment by Haynes. The diss track certainly didn't help matters either, but either way it goes, the FO is not going to use him as a sweetener just to dump Deng. He's way too valuable for that. Same goes for BI, Kuz, and even Hart IMO. I'd much rather attach the two firsts to Deng. And if that can't get it done, stretch him.
_________________
“Christ did not die to forgive sinners who go on treasuring anything above seeing and savoring God. And people who would be happy in heaven if Christ were not there, will not be there."
- John Piper


Last edited by Judah on Sun Jun 17, 2018 8:33 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Freddie Buckets
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 08 Oct 2007
Posts: 9131

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 8:21 pm    Post subject:

chantruong wrote:
1hu2ren3dui4 wrote:
Why do the lakers need to move deng? Can’t they just extend and stretch and keep ball for something better?


A lot of us believe that the extend and stretch strategy would not work as it may be a blatant circumvention of the CBA and Silver will veto it.

I would be very hesistant to use BI or Lonzo to move Deng but I would not be opposed to it if we got the right deal.


i haven't heard that.

don't think the nba can stop it since it's perfectly legal under the cba.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
chantruong
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 15 Jun 2009
Posts: 8894
Location: SGV

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 8:37 pm    Post subject:

scoobs wrote:
chantruong wrote:
Mitch better hook us up with Kemba and the 11th pick if they want Ball
What would you offer Charlotte for that?


Lonzo
Deng

For

Kemba
11th pick
Monk or Kaminsky
Bums to make salary work

Yes it would be a highway robbery but Mitch owes us
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
scoobs
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 19 Aug 2005
Posts: 4746

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 8:38 pm    Post subject:

Freddie Buckets wrote:
chantruong wrote:
1hu2ren3dui4 wrote:
Why do the lakers need to move deng? Can’t they just extend and stretch and keep ball for something better?


A lot of us believe that the extend and stretch strategy would not work as it may be a blatant circumvention of the CBA and Silver will veto it.

I would be very hesistant to use BI or Lonzo to move Deng but I would not be opposed to it if we got the right deal.


i haven't heard that.

don't think the nba can stop it since it's perfectly legal under the cba.
What ever the case may be, its not likely, so lets just leave it at that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Chronicle
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Posts: 31935
Location: Manhattan

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 8:40 pm    Post subject:

Screw phoenix.

I am okay with trading one of our young players if it's for an all star, but not if it's for a salary dump.

Phoenix is not getting ball
_________________
Kobe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Endless3D
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 03 Mar 2018
Posts: 794

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 8:41 pm    Post subject:

Giving up Lonzo just to get rid of Deng would be stupid as hell.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
waterman40
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 17 Jun 2003
Posts: 6285
Location: Central Coast

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 8:47 pm    Post subject:

If LBJ is coming (and possibly PG13 too) then the rational in trading Deng and Lonzo, would be to keep Randle, and not have to give away our first round picks, which might be nice to have if we have to retool the roster with cheap younger players, while we ride the new "superteam."

To me, if Deng HAS to be dealt (not stretched), would you rather have Lonzo (and his Dad) or the 2 first round picks.

For the record, I like Lonzo, he has a lot of skills for a first year player, other than shooting - which seems to be a Laker fetish, lottery draft picks who cant shoot the first couple of years. Although DLO and Kuzma are the exceptions. Probably this upcoming year BI will move out of the "cant shoot" catergory.
_________________
LAKERS 2019-2020: NBA World Champions!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Freddie Buckets
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 08 Oct 2007
Posts: 9131

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 8:53 pm    Post subject:

waterman40 wrote:
If LBJ is coming (and possibly PG13 too) then the rational in trading Deng and Lonzo, would be to keep Randle, and not have to give away our first round picks, which might be nice to have if we have to retool the roster with cheap younger players, while we ride the new "superteam."

To me, if Deng HAS to be dealt (not stretched), would you rather have Lonzo (and his Dad) or the 2 first round picks.

For the record, I like Lonzo, he has a lot of skills for a first year player, other than shooting - which seems to be a Laker fetish, lottery draft picks who cant shoot the first couple of years. Although DLO and Kuzma are the exceptions. Probably this upcoming year BI will move out of the "cant shoot" catergory.


Lonzo because if LeBron and PG come here, those picks would be in 20's (hopefully #30)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kobe_luver
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 08 Feb 2008
Posts: 11644
Location: LA

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 8:55 pm    Post subject:

waterman40 wrote:
If LBJ is coming (and possibly PG13 too) then the rational in trading Deng and Lonzo, would be to keep Randle, and not have to give away our first round picks, which might be nice to have if we have to retool the roster with cheap younger players, while we ride the new "superteam."

To me, if Deng HAS to be dealt (not stretched), would you rather have Lonzo (and his Dad) or the 2 first round picks.

For the record, I like Lonzo, he has a lot of skills for a first year player, other than shooting - which seems to be a Laker fetish, lottery draft picks who cant shoot the first couple of years. Although DLO and Kuzma are the exceptions. Probably this upcoming year BI will move out of the "cant shoot" catergory.


The 2 first round picks will be at the end of the 1st round because we'll be one of if not the top NBA team. Much rather have #2 pick Lonzo than 2 of the 28, 29 or 30th picks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Big Game James
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 14 Jan 2003
Posts: 4004
Location: The official trout slapper of LG.net

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 8:56 pm    Post subject:

To many people in this thread are so blinded by Lonzo's jumper and think he sucks. They just don't understand how good Lonzo was this season.

Shooting isn't everything.
_________________
Don't make me give you a trout slap!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
justsomelakerfan
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Jul 2016
Posts: 10939

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 9:12 pm    Post subject:

Bro I would be irate if we give Lonzo to Phoenix
_________________
Austin Reaves
Tweeter: @sarah_dotbiz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
MJST
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 26313

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2018 9:24 pm    Post subject:

Lonzo Ball was one of the best defensive guards in the league his rookie year; Let's talk about it
Lonzo Ball’s lockdown defense saved his rookie season; Lonzo Ball was one of the best defensive guards in the NBA this season and we need to talk about it.

Using ESPN’s defensive real plus-minus, Ball finished the season ranked No. 3 overall among point guards with a positive score of plus-2.25, ahead of acclaimed defensive stalwarts like Jrue Holiday, Ricky Rubio and Marcus Smart. Granted, Ball played in only 52 games this season, but when he was on the floor he showed all the ways he could impact a game on the defensive end.

Ball finished his rookie season with averages of 10.2 points, 6.9 rebounds, 7.2 assists and 1.7 steals per game. According to basketball-reference.com, only three rookies in NBA history have averaged at least 5 assists, 5 defensive rebounds, and 1.5 steals per game: Ball, Ben Simmons and Magic Johnson.

While Ball and Simmons are just getting their NBA careers started, they could do worse than being historically tied to arguably the greatest point guard to ever lace them up.

However, unlike Ball and Simmons, Ball was not physically imposing his rookie season. Even though he has nice length for the point guard position (6-6 with a 6-9 wingspan), no one was going to struggle to push through Ball’s 190-lb. frame and he found that out right away.

So instead of trying to bang bodies with guys that were much more physically mature than him at this stage of his career, Ball used every inch of his lanky frame to his advantage and made life hard on opposing guards, bigs, and sometimes both.


https://www.silverscreenandroll.com/2018/4/17/17236218/la-lakers-news-lonzo-ball-all-nba-defense-in-rookie-season
_________________
How NBA 2K18 failed the All-Time Lakers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxMBYm3wwxk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
splashmtn
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 30 Aug 2016
Posts: 3961

PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 8:52 am    Post subject:

waterman40 wrote:
If LBJ is coming (and possibly PG13 too) then the rational in trading Deng and Lonzo, would be to keep Randle, and not have to give away our first round picks, which might be nice to have if we have to retool the roster with cheap younger players, while we ride the new "superteam."

To me, if Deng HAS to be dealt (not stretched), would you rather have Lonzo (and his Dad) or the 2 first round picks.

For the record, I like Lonzo, he has a lot of skills for a first year player, other than shooting - which seems to be a Laker fetish, lottery draft picks who cant shoot the first couple of years. Although DLO and Kuzma are the exceptions. Probably this upcoming year BI will move out of the "cant shoot" catergory.
stop saying lonzo and his dad. lavar doesnt play in the nba. there is no real basketball mind thats trying to win a ring even remotely caring about lavar. only you guys do. he has nothing to do with how the team plays and who they pick or play.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
AllorNothing
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 08 Oct 2001
Posts: 18448

PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 9:36 am    Post subject:

This is the dumbest speculation so far this off-season
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
al242
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 28 Sep 2012
Posts: 3120

PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:32 am    Post subject:

MJST wrote:
Lonzo Ball was one of the best defensive guards in the league his rookie year; Let's talk about it
Lonzo Ball’s lockdown defense saved his rookie season; Lonzo Ball was one of the best defensive guards in the NBA this season and we need to talk about it.

Using ESPN’s defensive real plus-minus, Ball finished the season ranked No. 3 overall among point guards with a positive score of plus-2.25, ahead of acclaimed defensive stalwarts like Jrue Holiday, Ricky Rubio and Marcus Smart. Granted, Ball played in only 52 games this season, but when he was on the floor he showed all the ways he could impact a game on the defensive end.

Ball finished his rookie season with averages of 10.2 points, 6.9 rebounds, 7.2 assists and 1.7 steals per game. According to basketball-reference.com, only three rookies in NBA history have averaged at least 5 assists, 5 defensive rebounds, and 1.5 steals per game: Ball, Ben Simmons and Magic Johnson.

While Ball and Simmons are just getting their NBA careers started, they could do worse than being historically tied to arguably the greatest point guard to ever lace them up.

However, unlike Ball and Simmons, Ball was not physically imposing his rookie season. Even though he has nice length for the point guard position (6-6 with a 6-9 wingspan), no one was going to struggle to push through Ball’s 190-lb. frame and he found that out right away.

So instead of trying to bang bodies with guys that were much more physically mature than him at this stage of his career, Ball used every inch of his lanky frame to his advantage and made life hard on opposing guards, bigs, and sometimes both.


https://www.silverscreenandroll.com/2018/4/17/17236218/la-lakers-news-lonzo-ball-all-nba-defense-in-rookie-season


He was also the worst offensive guard in the NBA, a positive plus a negative equal a negative #quickmaths
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
socalsp3
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 07 Jul 2016
Posts: 3502

PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:49 am    Post subject:

MJST wrote:
Lonzo Ball was one of the best defensive guards in the league his rookie year; Let's talk about it
Lonzo Ball’s lockdown defense saved his rookie season; Lonzo Ball was one of the best defensive guards in the NBA this season and we need to talk about it.

Using ESPN’s defensive real plus-minus, Ball finished the season ranked No. 3 overall among point guards with a positive score of plus-2.25, ahead of acclaimed defensive stalwarts like Jrue Holiday, Ricky Rubio and Marcus Smart. Granted, Ball played in only 52 games this season, but when he was on the floor he showed all the ways he could impact a game on the defensive end.

Ball finished his rookie season with averages of 10.2 points, 6.9 rebounds, 7.2 assists and 1.7 steals per game. According to basketball-reference.com, only three rookies in NBA history have averaged at least 5 assists, 5 defensive rebounds, and 1.5 steals per game: Ball, Ben Simmons and Magic Johnson.

While Ball and Simmons are just getting their NBA careers started, they could do worse than being historically tied to arguably the greatest point guard to ever lace them up.

However, unlike Ball and Simmons, Ball was not physically imposing his rookie season. Even though he has nice length for the point guard position (6-6 with a 6-9 wingspan), no one was going to struggle to push through Ball’s 190-lb. frame and he found that out right away.

So instead of trying to bang bodies with guys that were much more physically mature than him at this stage of his career, Ball used every inch of his lanky frame to his advantage and made life hard on opposing guards, bigs, and sometimes both.


https://www.silverscreenandroll.com/2018/4/17/17236218/la-lakers-news-lonzo-ball-all-nba-defense-in-rookie-season


very kidd-like. if he can shoot as well as a young kidd (who was a bad shooter) that would be better than what he is now
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144462
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 12:44 pm    Post subject:

waterman40 wrote:
If LBJ is coming (and possibly PG13 too) then the rational in trading Deng and Lonzo, would be to keep Randle, and not have to give away our first round picks, which might be nice to have if we have to retool the roster with cheap younger players, while we ride the new "superteam."

To me, if Deng HAS to be dealt (not stretched), would you rather have Lonzo (and his Dad) or the 2 first round picks.

For the record, I like Lonzo, he has a lot of skills for a first year player, other than shooting - which seems to be a Laker fetish, lottery draft picks who cant shoot the first couple of years. Although DLO and Kuzma are the exceptions. Probably this upcoming year BI will move out of the "cant shoot" catergory.


Lonzo easily
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epak
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 34147

PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:43 pm    Post subject:



Remember the pop interview after Lavar said Luke lost the team?
Ironic that it may have saved Lonzo from being traded there.
Like some have said, it'll probably take a 3rd team.

But hopefully he stays, improves his shot and opens eyes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
leor_77
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 23 Mar 2012
Posts: 21920

PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 2:06 pm    Post subject:

It's pretty unbelievable - His dad is looking like a genius. Because of the circus he created, no one will take/trade for his son.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> General Basketball Discussion All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 1059, 1060, 1061 ... 1686, 1687, 1688  Next
Page 1060 of 1688
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB