OFFICIAL LONZO BALL THREAD
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 1317, 1318, 1319 ... 1686, 1687, 1688  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> General Basketball Discussion Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Cutheon
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 10 Jul 2009
Posts: 12111
Location: Bay Area

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 1:20 pm    Post subject:

MJST wrote:
I'm good with Lonzo taking those open jumpers with confidence. That's gonna wind up being more important as his shot continues to come around.

I'd feel worse if he passed up the wide open shots and went 0-2.


yeah there were a couple three's he missed last night that I am not sure he would have even attempted last season. It's definitely progress. His mid-range game gives me hope, too. I really, really think he needs to get some sort of floater/tear drop. I don't know who he needs to work with or what he needs to do, but do whatever Parker/Cp3 did.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
noahp45
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 6572
Location: Oceanside Ca

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 1:25 pm    Post subject:

LandsbergerRules wrote:
“Stay confident,” Ball said when asked about making shots. “Keep shooting open shots. All my shots are pretty much open because everybody goes under [the screen]. So just knock them down.”

Ball was asked how much is scoring a barometer for how well he plays.

“I don’t look at scoring,” Ball said. “I’d rather look at wins and losses. Today we won, so it’s all good.”

https://www.latimes.com/sports/lakers/la-sp-lakers-heat-takeaways-20181119-story.html

Good to hear. I hope he extends the stay confident mantra to open lanes to the basket. Can't pass up open layups and just kick it out cuz he's scared.


And this mentality is the reason I like Ball.

I still find it funny people forgot He shut Lillard down a few games ago.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
BigGameHames
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 May 2015
Posts: 7982

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 1:28 pm    Post subject:

Sentient Meat wrote:
eddiejonze wrote:
Sentient Meat wrote:
BigGameHames wrote:
I caught the beginning of yesterday’s game and thats it for the weekend. Judging by what I saw, the box score, and some highlights, he was horrid on offense while playing hard defensively. Regardless of what happened, some of y’all are ruthless. Attacking a barely 21 year old kid who’s been a dad for a few months about his parenting ability. Are you (bleep) serious? Scumbags man. Criticize the on court play. Lay off the kids personal life, it’s pathetic. You don’t know what’s happening and quite frankly you don’t know if you could handle it as well as him let alone better. It’s disgusting what some of you are doing. This is why Internet forums, comment sections, and the depths of twitter are often seen as places where some of the most vile creatures on the planet reside. Y’all are proving it if you’re criticizing his parenting while knowing next to nothing about what’s happening.

He objectively sucked this weekend. From what I saw, he looks scared to shoot and the holes in his offensive game are becoming more glaring. Talk about that. With Rondos injury he was given an opportunity to seize the job, so far, he’s done the opposite. Talk about that. But stop attacking a kids personal life that you only know about because of reality tv and some he said she said TMZ (bleep). It looks like jealousy and insecurity and is absolutely pathetic.

Sorry mods, suspend me if you must, but this needed to be said.


I agree with your overall sentiments... but once you agree to sell your soul by going on a reality tv for money/attention... the need for civility goes out the window. If it was the Daily Mail digging stuff up by going through people's trash and publishing second hand interviews that's one thing... but the Ball Family agreed to put their life on full display so at that point it becomes fair game.

Personally, I've never watched the show... but if they are putting their lives out there... you can't go off on people for commenting about it.

I think it's pretty obvious Lonzo had no say in the reality show, or even playing basketball for that matter. His Dad makes the decisions, and only time will tell if Zo wants any of it frankly...


Zo is a grown man... he can walk away at any time.

As I said, I don't even watch the show... but if people are getting info from a show that the family is making money from, then you can't really get mad at people for commenting on that.


Yes you can. You think you can understand somebody’s life from 20 min a week? Or whatever it is.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Sentient Meat
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 04 Jul 2014
Posts: 12978

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 1:32 pm    Post subject:

BigGameHames wrote:
Sentient Meat wrote:
eddiejonze wrote:
Sentient Meat wrote:
BigGameHames wrote:
I caught the beginning of yesterday’s game and thats it for the weekend. Judging by what I saw, the box score, and some highlights, he was horrid on offense while playing hard defensively. Regardless of what happened, some of y’all are ruthless. Attacking a barely 21 year old kid who’s been a dad for a few months about his parenting ability. Are you (bleep) serious? Scumbags man. Criticize the on court play. Lay off the kids personal life, it’s pathetic. You don’t know what’s happening and quite frankly you don’t know if you could handle it as well as him let alone better. It’s disgusting what some of you are doing. This is why Internet forums, comment sections, and the depths of twitter are often seen as places where some of the most vile creatures on the planet reside. Y’all are proving it if you’re criticizing his parenting while knowing next to nothing about what’s happening.

He objectively sucked this weekend. From what I saw, he looks scared to shoot and the holes in his offensive game are becoming more glaring. Talk about that. With Rondos injury he was given an opportunity to seize the job, so far, he’s done the opposite. Talk about that. But stop attacking a kids personal life that you only know about because of reality tv and some he said she said TMZ (bleep). It looks like jealousy and insecurity and is absolutely pathetic.

Sorry mods, suspend me if you must, but this needed to be said.


I agree with your overall sentiments... but once you agree to sell your soul by going on a reality tv for money/attention... the need for civility goes out the window. If it was the Daily Mail digging stuff up by going through people's trash and publishing second hand interviews that's one thing... but the Ball Family agreed to put their life on full display so at that point it becomes fair game.

Personally, I've never watched the show... but if they are putting their lives out there... you can't go off on people for commenting about it.

I think it's pretty obvious Lonzo had no say in the reality show, or even playing basketball for that matter. His Dad makes the decisions, and only time will tell if Zo wants any of it frankly...


Zo is a grown man... he can walk away at any time.

As I said, I don't even watch the show... but if people are getting info from a show that the family is making money from, then you can't really get mad at people for commenting on that.


Yes you can. You think you can understand somebody’s life from 20 min a week? Or whatever it is.


Do I think hot takes will be inaccurate? Sure... but if you put your life on display like the Kardashians, you don't have the right to complain if people start talking about it.

You can be offended personally... it's not for anyone to tell you how you feel... but I don't agree in this specific instance that the general public is doing something wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
MJST
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 26085

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 1:36 pm    Post subject:

Lonzo would rather have 6/9/10 and the Lakers win. As opposed to 41/12/8 and the Lakers lose.
_________________
How NBA 2K18 failed the All-Time Lakers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxMBYm3wwxk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Joe Pesci
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 15 Oct 2017
Posts: 3885

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 1:36 pm    Post subject:

Completely agree with everyone calling for Hart to start over Kuzma.

Maybe the Lakers are trying their best to keep Kuzma, Ingram, and Ball’s value at their highest by starting them all.

Maybe they feel like that Hart and Mykhailiuk are the two guys they’d most want to keep if they had to “clean house” for a superstar, so they play the three guys on the team who they would be the quickest to trade the most minutes from the starting spots.
_________________
A creative scorer, a wing defender, and a shooter.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
MJST
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 26085

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 1:41 pm    Post subject:

The ideal starting and bench lineup is this

Starters:
Lonzo Ball
Josh Hart
Brandon Ingram
LeBron James
JaVale McGee

Bench:
Rajon Rondo
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope
Lance Stephenson / Svi
Kyle Kuzma
Tyson Chandler / Zubac

Those should be our current 12/15 when it comes to starting and bench unit. But we all knew what the best starting lineup was last year too, and how long did it take Luke to figure that out?
_________________
How NBA 2K18 failed the All-Time Lakers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxMBYm3wwxk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lakersibleed
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 15 Jul 2009
Posts: 343

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 2:04 pm    Post subject:

MJST wrote:
The ideal starting and bench lineup is this

Starters:
Lonzo Ball
Josh Hart
Brandon Ingram
LeBron James
JaVale McGee

Bench:
Rajon Rondo
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope
Lance Stephenson / Svi
Kyle Kuzma
Tyson Chandler / Zubac

Those should be our current 12/15 when it comes to starting and bench unit. But we all knew what the best starting lineup was last year too, and how long did it take Luke to figure that out?



I agree with you... I wonder how long before Luke figures it out??
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
noahp45
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 6572
Location: Oceanside Ca

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 2:04 pm    Post subject:

MJST wrote:
The ideal starting and bench lineup is this

Starters:
Lonzo Ball
Josh Hart
Brandon Ingram
LeBron James
JaVale McGee

Bench:
Rajon Rondo
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope
Lance Stephenson / Svi
Kyle Kuzma
Tyson Chandler / Zubac

Those should be our current 12/15 when it comes to starting and bench unit. But we all knew what the best starting lineup was last year too, and how long did it take Luke to figure that out?


I like it.... but I would have Tyson start depending on McGee energy level and matchups
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
JerryWest_44
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 22 May 2004
Posts: 25268

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 2:04 pm    Post subject:

MJST wrote:
Lonzo would rather have 6/9/10 and the Lakers win. As opposed to 41/12/8 and the Lakers lose.


Thats an unrealistic choice...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ringfinger
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 29418

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 2:11 pm    Post subject:

MJST wrote:
Lonzo would rather have 6/9/10 and the Lakers win. As opposed to 41/12/8 and the Lakers lose.


Wow. He wouldn’t want 41/12/8 and a win?

When did he say this? Postgame??
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epak
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 34147

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 2:11 pm    Post subject:

JerryWest_44 wrote:
MJST wrote:
Lonzo would rather have 6/9/10 and the Lakers win. As opposed to 41/12/8 and the Lakers lose.


Thats an unrealistic choice...


Lonzo would rather have 2/8/7 and the Lakers win, as opposed to having 28/8/7 and the Lakers lose. The thing is, if Lonzo goes 28/8/7, more than likely the Lakers win.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
greenfrog
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 36081
Location: 502 Bad Gateway

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 2:17 pm    Post subject:

MJST wrote:
The ideal starting and bench lineup is this

Starters:
Lonzo Ball
Josh Hart
Brandon Ingram
LeBron James
JaVale McGee

Bench:
Rajon Rondo
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope
Lance Stephenson / Svi
Kyle Kuzma
Tyson Chandler / Zubac

Those should be our current 12/15 when it comes to starting and bench unit. But we all knew what the best starting lineup was last year too, and how long did it take Luke to figure that out?


No ideal lineup has Ingram, LBJ, and Lonzo on the floor together. One will always be forgotten or minimized because they need prime ball handling duties.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epak
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 34147

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 2:23 pm    Post subject:

greenfrog wrote:
MJST wrote:
The ideal starting and bench lineup is this

Starters:
Lonzo Ball
Josh Hart
Brandon Ingram
LeBron James
JaVale McGee

Bench:
Rajon Rondo
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope
Lance Stephenson / Svi
Kyle Kuzma
Tyson Chandler / Zubac

Those should be our current 12/15 when it comes to starting and bench unit. But we all knew what the best starting lineup was last year too, and how long did it take Luke to figure that out?


No ideal lineup has Ingram, LBJ, and Lonzo on the floor together.


Min: 189, Ortg: 105.8, Drtg: 108.9, Net: -3.0 Lonzo . BI . James
Min: 313, Ortg: 106.3, Drtg: 107.6, Net: -1.3 Lonzo . Kuzma . James
Min: 129, Ortg: 107.0, Drtg: 097.7, Net: +9.3 Lonzo . Hart . James

I don't care which of BI or Kuzma it is. Just replace one of them with Hart.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
bandiger
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 12555

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 2:27 pm    Post subject:

epak wrote:
greenfrog wrote:
MJST wrote:
The ideal starting and bench lineup is this

Starters:
Lonzo Ball
Josh Hart
Brandon Ingram
LeBron James
JaVale McGee

Bench:
Rajon Rondo
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope
Lance Stephenson / Svi
Kyle Kuzma
Tyson Chandler / Zubac

Those should be our current 12/15 when it comes to starting and bench unit. But we all knew what the best starting lineup was last year too, and how long did it take Luke to figure that out?


No ideal lineup has Ingram, LBJ, and Lonzo on the floor together.


Min: 189, Ortg: 105.8, Drtg: 108.9, Net: -3.0 Lonzo . BI . James
Min: 313, Ortg: 106.3, Drtg: 107.6, Net: -1.3 Lonzo . Kuzma . James
Min: 129, Ortg: 107.0, Drtg: 097.7, Net: +9.3 Lonzo . Hart . James

I don't care which of BI or Kuzma it is. Just replace one of them with Hart.


Kuzma-Lebron are too much to overcome unless the opp sucks at shooting that night. The way Lebron is playing I prefer Ingram, propping up the defense. In fact if KCP is playing like last year, he would be best in the starting lineup. Everything would fall in place.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
CRoost
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Posts: 4790

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 2:43 pm    Post subject:

epak wrote:
JerryWest_44 wrote:
MJST wrote:
Lonzo would rather have 6/9/10 and the Lakers win. As opposed to 41/12/8 and the Lakers lose.


Thats an unrealistic choice...


Lonzo would rather have 2/8/7 and the Lakers win, as opposed to having 28/8/7 and the Lakers lose. The thing is, if Lonzo goes 28/8/7, more than likely the Lakers win.


Lonzo game is not predicated with him scoring but if he has that stat line, we would be running everyone like a buzzsaw. Zo should never pass an open layup for a 3 ball. It’s important to not become predictable. He does not need to score but he needs to be a threat. I’m glad he was not passing an open 3 ball even he missed them both.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Bol
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 4045

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 2:51 pm    Post subject:

epak wrote:
greenfrog wrote:
MJST wrote:
The ideal starting and bench lineup is this

Starters:
Lonzo Ball
Josh Hart
Brandon Ingram
LeBron James
JaVale McGee

Bench:
Rajon Rondo
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope
Lance Stephenson / Svi
Kyle Kuzma
Tyson Chandler / Zubac

Those should be our current 12/15 when it comes to starting and bench unit. But we all knew what the best starting lineup was last year too, and how long did it take Luke to figure that out?


No ideal lineup has Ingram, LBJ, and Lonzo on the floor together.


Min: 189, Ortg: 105.8, Drtg: 108.9, Net: -3.0 Lonzo . BI . James
Min: 313, Ortg: 106.3, Drtg: 107.6, Net: -1.3 Lonzo . Kuzma . James
Min: 129, Ortg: 107.0, Drtg: 097.7, Net: +9.3 Lonzo . Hart . James

I don't care which of BI or Kuzma it is. Just replace one of them with Hart.


I agree with this. Hart's shooting is needed, and he's better than the 2 young forwards at most other things as well. Actually, I'm not so sure I wouldn't rather see BOTH Ingram and Kuzma go to the bench, since neither one is hitting 3s and neither one rebounds.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
noahp45
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 6572
Location: Oceanside Ca

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 2:59 pm    Post subject:

bandiger wrote:
epak wrote:
greenfrog wrote:
MJST wrote:
The ideal starting and bench lineup is this

Starters:
Lonzo Ball
Josh Hart
Brandon Ingram
LeBron James
JaVale McGee

Bench:
Rajon Rondo
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope
Lance Stephenson / Svi
Kyle Kuzma
Tyson Chandler / Zubac

Those should be our current 12/15 when it comes to starting and bench unit. But we all knew what the best starting lineup was last year too, and how long did it take Luke to figure that out?


No ideal lineup has Ingram, LBJ, and Lonzo on the floor together.


Min: 189, Ortg: 105.8, Drtg: 108.9, Net: -3.0 Lonzo . BI . James
Min: 313, Ortg: 106.3, Drtg: 107.6, Net: -1.3 Lonzo . Kuzma . James
Min: 129, Ortg: 107.0, Drtg: 097.7, Net: +9.3 Lonzo . Hart . James

I don't care which of BI or Kuzma it is. Just replace one of them with Hart.


Kuzma-Lebron are too much to overcome unless the opp sucks at shooting that night. The way Lebron is playing I prefer Ingram, propping up the defense. In fact if KCP is playing like last year, he would be best in the starting lineup. Everything would fall in place.


I find it funny people haven't noticed Bron has only been playing in 2nd gear so far. Come playoffs he will shift to 4th and 5th.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
DancingBarry
Editor-in-Chief
Editor-in-Chief


Joined: 07 Sep 2001
Posts: 40188
Location: O.C.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 3:04 pm    Post subject:

Been debating losing both Ingram and Kuzma from the closing unit. (Kuzma should never be there if he's so-so offensively).

If Kuzma/Ingram are playing meh, closing with Lonzo, KCP, Hart, LeBron, Chander/McGee is probably our best option for consistent two-way play now that KCP is rounding into form.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
greenfrog
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 36081
Location: 502 Bad Gateway

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 3:07 pm    Post subject:

Bol wrote:
epak wrote:
greenfrog wrote:
MJST wrote:
The ideal starting and bench lineup is this

Starters:
Lonzo Ball
Josh Hart
Brandon Ingram
LeBron James
JaVale McGee

Bench:
Rajon Rondo
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope
Lance Stephenson / Svi
Kyle Kuzma
Tyson Chandler / Zubac

Those should be our current 12/15 when it comes to starting and bench unit. But we all knew what the best starting lineup was last year too, and how long did it take Luke to figure that out?


No ideal lineup has Ingram, LBJ, and Lonzo on the floor together.


Min: 189, Ortg: 105.8, Drtg: 108.9, Net: -3.0 Lonzo . BI . James
Min: 313, Ortg: 106.3, Drtg: 107.6, Net: -1.3 Lonzo . Kuzma . James
Min: 129, Ortg: 107.0, Drtg: 097.7, Net: +9.3 Lonzo . Hart . James

I don't care which of BI or Kuzma it is. Just replace one of them with Hart.


I agree with this. Hart's shooting is needed, and he's better than the 2 young forwards at most other things as well. Actually, I'm not so sure I wouldn't rather see BOTH Ingram and Kuzma go to the bench, since neither one is hitting 3s and neither one rebounds.


I completely agree. KCP in the lineup makes more sense than either of them. The only rub, I'm guessing, is who guards 4's since LBJ apparently doesn't want to start games doing it. Could Hart?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epak
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 34147

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 3:09 pm    Post subject:

^ You know what's crazy? None of us would have been saying KCP 2 weeks ago. The ebb and flow of the NBA baby!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
CRoost
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Posts: 4790

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 3:20 pm    Post subject:

DancingBarry wrote:
Been debating losing both Ingram and Kuzma from the closing unit. (Kuzma should never be there if he's so-so offensively).

If Kuzma/Ingram are playing meh, closing with Lonzo, KCP, Hart, LeBron, Chander/McGee is probably our best option for consistent two-way play now that KCP is rounding into form.


Offensively, you going to put a lot energy for Lebron to come through. Playoffs, you can roll with that but during regular season, you’re overworking Lebron . Kuz bring a lot of unpredictability because he moves and cuts. Ingram have some mismatches that we need to explore and develop.

Defensively, that’s a lot of holes to fill in especially with Lebron playing half speed in defense. KCP is a good on ball defender but lack size for help defense. Hart has trouble with quick guards. Zo and Chandler can’t fill on that holes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kobe8One
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 23 May 2011
Posts: 633

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 4:25 pm    Post subject:

epak wrote:
greenfrog wrote:
MJST wrote:
The ideal starting and bench lineup is this

Starters:
Lonzo Ball
Josh Hart
Brandon Ingram
LeBron James
JaVale McGee

Bench:
Rajon Rondo
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope
Lance Stephenson / Svi
Kyle Kuzma
Tyson Chandler / Zubac

Those should be our current 12/15 when it comes to starting and bench unit. But we all knew what the best starting lineup was last year too, and how long did it take Luke to figure that out?


No ideal lineup has Ingram, LBJ, and Lonzo on the floor together.


Min: 189, Ortg: 105.8, Drtg: 108.9, Net: -3.0 Lonzo . BI . James
Min: 313, Ortg: 106.3, Drtg: 107.6, Net: -1.3 Lonzo . Kuzma . James
Min: 129, Ortg: 107.0, Drtg: 097.7, Net: +9.3 Lonzo . Hart . James

I don't care which of BI or Kuzma it is. Just replace one of them with Hart.


What is the net ratio with Hart, Kuzma, James?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epak
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 34147

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 4:54 pm    Post subject:

kobe8One wrote:
epak wrote:
greenfrog wrote:
MJST wrote:
The ideal starting and bench lineup is this

Starters:
Lonzo Ball
Josh Hart
Brandon Ingram
LeBron James
JaVale McGee

Bench:
Rajon Rondo
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope
Lance Stephenson / Svi
Kyle Kuzma
Tyson Chandler / Zubac

Those should be our current 12/15 when it comes to starting and bench unit. But we all knew what the best starting lineup was last year too, and how long did it take Luke to figure that out?


No ideal lineup has Ingram, LBJ, and Lonzo on the floor together.


Min: 189, Ortg: 105.8, Drtg: 108.9, Net: -3.0 Lonzo . BI . James
Min: 313, Ortg: 106.3, Drtg: 107.6, Net: -1.3 Lonzo . Kuzma . James
Min: 129, Ortg: 107.0, Drtg: 097.7, Net: +9.3 Lonzo . Hart . James

I don't care which of BI or Kuzma it is. Just replace one of them with Hart.


What is the net ratio with Hart, Kuzma, James?


Min: 158, Ortg: 108.0, Drtg: 101.9, Net: +6.1 Kuzma . Hart . James
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
BigGameHames
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 May 2015
Posts: 7982

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2018 4:58 pm    Post subject:

epak wrote:
kobe8One wrote:
epak wrote:
greenfrog wrote:
MJST wrote:
The ideal starting and bench lineup is this

Starters:
Lonzo Ball
Josh Hart
Brandon Ingram
LeBron James
JaVale McGee

Bench:
Rajon Rondo
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope
Lance Stephenson / Svi
Kyle Kuzma
Tyson Chandler / Zubac

Those should be our current 12/15 when it comes to starting and bench unit. But we all knew what the best starting lineup was last year too, and how long did it take Luke to figure that out?


No ideal lineup has Ingram, LBJ, and Lonzo on the floor together.


Min: 189, Ortg: 105.8, Drtg: 108.9, Net: -3.0 Lonzo . BI . James
Min: 313, Ortg: 106.3, Drtg: 107.6, Net: -1.3 Lonzo . Kuzma . James
Min: 129, Ortg: 107.0, Drtg: 097.7, Net: +9.3 Lonzo . Hart . James

I don't care which of BI or Kuzma it is. Just replace one of them with Hart.


What is the net ratio with Hart, Kuzma, James?


Min: 158, Ortg: 108.0, Drtg: 101.9, Net: +6.1 Kuzma . Hart . James


Ball, Hart, Bron, Kuz with a center is our best lineup. Luke you gotta recognize this.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> General Basketball Discussion All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 1317, 1318, 1319 ... 1686, 1687, 1688  Next
Page 1318 of 1688
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB