today do you still take DLO and ingram #2 in their respective drafts?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
crazylakerfan001
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 14 Feb 2011
Posts: 1006

PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2017 3:18 pm    Post subject:

anpherknee wrote:
zingis and ingram out there with nobody to pass them the ball would be so lit breh


We got Lonzo Ball to pass them the ball brah
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Yong
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 08 Oct 2009
Posts: 9024

PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2017 3:52 pm    Post subject:

Ingram was indubitably the right pick.
DLO/Porzingod/B70ker is the debate.

Looking at the team is constructed now, the revisionist's perfect world would be to trade down for Booker + additional asset. We don't exactly need Porinzgis anymore due to Zubac's emergence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2017 5:27 pm    Post subject:

I wonder if we didn't have Jules already whether we would have picked Porky. I think they thought he was a PF.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144474
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2017 5:30 pm    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
I wonder if we didn't have Jules already whether we would have picked Porky. I think they thought he was a PF.


Maybe if they were lying about the reason they passed on Porky. If not, the potential injury concerns would still be there.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2017 5:33 pm    Post subject:

venturalakersfan wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
I wonder if we didn't have Jules already whether we would have picked Porky. I think they thought he was a PF.


Maybe if they were lying about the reason they passed on Porky. If not, the potential injury concerns would still be there.


The irony was that Jules was coming off a season ending injury, and his stock might have fallen bc of his previous foot injuries.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
44TheLogo
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 21 Feb 2009
Posts: 6364

PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2017 5:38 pm    Post subject:

Porzingis is so overrated, unfairly to him.

Ultimately he is only a finisher. Cannot be relied upon to create offense at all. That limits his value. Whereas dlo can create for himself and others. Far more valuable skill imo.
_________________
substance over style
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144474
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2017 5:41 pm    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
I wonder if we didn't have Jules already whether we would have picked Porky. I think they thought he was a PF.


Maybe if they were lying about the reason they passed on Porky. If not, the potential injury concerns would still be there.


The irony was that Jules was coming off a season ending injury, and his stock might have fallen bc of his previous foot injuries.


Yes, that timely release regarding the screws in his foot was a good move by the Lakers.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Interesting
Sixth Man
Sixth Man


Joined: 18 Jul 2014
Posts: 45

PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2017 8:27 pm    Post subject:

I'm one of the biggest laker homers there is but some of the stuff I'm reading here "don't need to draft porzingis now that we have Zubac"

"Porzingis can't create for others" (Who Cares?! He's 7'3 and can shoot threes, defend on the weak-side and pick & rolls while playing above the rim.

DLo is slow, has weak handles. no resemblance of quickness, and no defense. He has to play like a wiley ageing vet to get off his shots due to his lack of quickness/athleticism. It's sad really -- his offense game is like old Sam Cassell (minus the clutch-ness) Only way he can score is through pick & rolls by hitting the mid range or shooting a wide open 3 for a mediocre 35% clip.

I don't for a second believe that if we know what we know now, you guys would take Porzingis or Booker in front of him. We'd be battling for the playoffs if we had switched Porzingis for Dlo this past season.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
akk7
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 15 Oct 2005
Posts: 3013

PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2017 8:36 pm    Post subject:

Interesting wrote:
I'm one of the biggest laker homers there is but some of the stuff I'm reading here "don't need to draft porzingis now that we have Zubac"

"Porzingis can't create for others" (Who Cares?! He's 7'3 and can shoot threes, defend on the weak-side and pick & rolls while playing above the rim.

DLo is slow, has weak handles. no resemblance of quickness, and no defense. He has to play like a wiley ageing vet to get off his shots due to his lack of quickness/athleticism. It's sad really -- his offense game is like old Sam Cassell (minus the clutch-ness) Only way he can score is through pick & rolls by hitting the mid range or shooting a wide open 3 for a mediocre 35% clip.

I don't for a second believe that if we know what we know now, you guys would take Porzingis or Booker in front of him. We'd be battling for the playoffs if we had switched Porzingis for Dlo this past season.


So why weren't the Knicks battling for the playoffs in a weaker conference?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
44TheLogo
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 21 Feb 2009
Posts: 6364

PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2017 8:37 pm    Post subject:

Interesting wrote:
shooting a wide open 3 for a mediocre 35% clip.


devin booker 3pt%: .363
kristaps porzingis 3pt%: .357


_________________
substance over style
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
tox
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Nov 2015
Posts: 17880

PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2017 8:52 pm    Post subject:

44TheLogo wrote:
Interesting wrote:
shooting a wide open 3 for a mediocre 35% clip.


devin booker 3pt%: .363
kristaps porzingis 3pt%: .357


Russell shoots 38.3% on wide open 3s anyways. His 35% on 3s is decidedly not just on wide open 3s.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Gellollo
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 17 Jul 2008
Posts: 1561

PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2017 8:57 pm    Post subject:

Isn't it even possible that if we had taken Porzingis, we might not had even been in a position to draft Ingram? We might have been slightly better or slightly worse in 2015 that we could've drafted Simmons or Jaylen Brown instead. Who really knows?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
44TheLogo
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 21 Feb 2009
Posts: 6364

PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2017 8:59 pm    Post subject:

tox wrote:
44TheLogo wrote:
Interesting wrote:
shooting a wide open 3 for a mediocre 35% clip.


devin booker 3pt%: .363
kristaps porzingis 3pt%: .357


Russell shoots 38.3% on wide open 3s anyways. His 35% on 3s is decidedly not just on wide open 3s.


yea obviously an overall 35% 3pt% is not solely on wide open 3s.

Interesting...anything but
_________________
substance over style
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Mamba Mentality
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 04 May 2017
Posts: 3078
Location: The Left Coast

PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2017 10:01 pm    Post subject:

With all the hindsight in the world... I still take DLo and Ingram.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144474
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2017 9:09 am    Post subject:

crazylakerfan001 wrote:
anpherknee wrote:
zingis and ingram out there with nobody to pass them the ball would be so lit breh


We got Lonzo Ball to pass them the ball brah


No we don't.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ingle
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 17 Mar 2017
Posts: 960

PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2017 9:31 am    Post subject:

In hindsight, Ingram and Porzingis

DLo will be good, but Porzingis is on another level of impact. And for one, he makes up for Randle's weaknesses
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
crazylakerfan001
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 14 Feb 2011
Posts: 1006

PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2017 12:43 pm    Post subject:

venturalakersfan wrote:
crazylakerfan001 wrote:
anpherknee wrote:
zingis and ingram out there with nobody to pass them the ball would be so lit breh


We got Lonzo Ball to pass them the ball brah


No we don't.


we will have him in a couple of weeks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
nash
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Oct 2001
Posts: 8194

PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2017 1:12 pm    Post subject:

ingle wrote:
In hindsight, Ingram and Porzingis

DLo will be good, but Porzingis is on another level of impact. And for one, he makes up for Randle's weaknesses


At this point I'd call Dlo and Porzingis a close call with Porzingis a tad above.

Now stop a minute and think about that, Jokic was a late pick from Julius class, which one do you like best:

1 - Jokic / Dlo

2 - Julius / Porzingis

I'd take Jokic and Dlo every day of week, twice on sundays.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
crazylakerfan001
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 14 Feb 2011
Posts: 1006

PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2017 1:31 pm    Post subject:

nash wrote:
ingle wrote:
In hindsight, Ingram and Porzingis

DLo will be good, but Porzingis is on another level of impact. And for one, he makes up for Randle's weaknesses


At this point I'd call Dlo and Porzingis a close call with Porzingis a tad above.

Now stop a minute and think about that, Jokic was a late pick from Julius class, which one do you like best:

1 - Jokic / Dlo

2 - Julius / Porzingis

I'd take Jokic and Dlo every day of week, twice on sundays.


so we could have had jokic, porzingis, ingram, and ball? where do i sign?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144474
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2017 1:46 pm    Post subject:

crazylakerfan001 wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
crazylakerfan001 wrote:
anpherknee wrote:
zingis and ingram out there with nobody to pass them the ball would be so lit breh


We got Lonzo Ball to pass them the ball brah


No we don't.


we will have him in a couple of weeks.


Maybe
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Wilkes52
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 02 Jun 2009
Posts: 2415
Location: Far from home

PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2017 1:52 pm    Post subject:

I have no idea how to evaluate that. We knew at the time of each's draft that time would be required for each guy to develop. It's still too early to know if the Lakers picked well.
_________________
“These GOAT discussions are fun distractions while sitting around waiting for the pizza to be served.”

Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Page 7 of 7
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB